Introduction
In Mexico, sheep production is important due to the high demand for and insufficient domestic production of meat1. In warm-humid regions, local forage production is favorable, and sheep meat production could be improved year-round to meet domestic demand. In local sheep production systems, including those in warm-humid regions, meat production can be improved by the use of specific technologies and management strategies2. One of these strategies is the crossing of local breeds such as the Pelibuey breed of sheep with large wool breeds to produce crossbred lambs, since the animals resulting from these crosses present greater daily weight gain3.
The Pelibuey is a medium-sized hair breed and is distributed throughout a large portion of the Mexican territory4. It is a breed that is used for meat production because it possesses hardiness characteristics that allow it to adapt to different climates5,6. It has low reproductive seasonality, high prolificacy, and resistance to parasites, although fattening animals have lower growth rates than the traditional wool breeds7. Due to their specific characteristics and under the conditions of the production systems in use in Mexico, Pelibuey sheep can be used as a maternal breed for crossing with other breeds specialized for meat production6 to obtain lambs that develop carcasses with better meat conformation. However, the productive performance and carcass characteristics of the Pelibuey breed have been less satisfactory than those of other breeds with better meat conformation4, and sometimes these carcass characteristics are not improved by crossing with certain specialized wool breeds5. Due to the recent introduction into Mexico of new breeds of sheep with greater specialization for meat production (for example, the Charollais and Dorper breeds) and the possibility that these breeds may be of potential use in crossing with the Pelibuey breed, it is necessary to evaluate the productive performance (birth weight, weaning weight, daily weight gain, and fattening days) and the carcass meat characteristics of lambs that result from crossing with the Pelibuey breed.
Standards for the evaluation of the quality of sheep carcass meat vary worldwide. To guide and strengthen the chain of production, processing, marketing, and consumption of sheep meat and to define the quality characteristics of sheep carcasses for national commercialization in Mexico, the Mexican standard for the classification of sheep carcass meat, NMX-FF-106-SCFI-2006, was used. However, there are few reports of its application in the evaluation of sheep carcass meat. Likewise, there is little information on the growth and characteristics of either purebred Pelibuey lambs or lambs obtained by crossing this breed with breeds such as Dorper and Charollais. To meet the current and future demand of the domestic market, it is important to determine the effect of breed on the growth of lambs, their age at slaughter, and the quality of the carcass meat for breeds currently in use in Mexico and thereby to generate information that contributes to the commercialization of quality carcass meat. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of breed on the growth, characteristics, and carcass classification of purebred Pelibuey lambs and lambs obtained by crossing the Pelibuey breed with the Dorper and Charollais breeds.
Material and methods
The research was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at the facilities of the Ovine Experimental Area of the Córdoba Campus Colegio de Postgraduados, located on the Córdoba-Veracruz federal highway at km 348, Amatlán de los Reyes, Veracruz, Mexico. The geographic location is 18° 51' 20" N and 96° 51' 37" W, at an altitude of 650 m asl. The climate is warm-humid with abundant rains in summer, the average annual temperature is 22 °C, and the annual rainfall is 2,000 mm8. The experiment was conducted according to the criteria set forth in the Official Mexican Standard on technical specifications for the production and sanitary meat processing (NOM-009-ZOO-1994), technical specifications for the production and humane treatment in the mobilization of animals (NOM-051-ZOO-1995), use of laboratory animals (NOM-062-ZOO-1999), and methods for killing domestic and wild animals (NOM-033-SAG/ZOO-2014), in accordance with the Regulations for the Use and Care of Animals Intended for Research of the Colegio de Postgraduados.
Experimental animals and diet
Thirty-nine (39) male lambs from an experimental herd: Charollais x Pelibuey (n= 11), Dorper x Pelibuey (n= 10), and Pelibuey (n= 18), were reared by their mothers. In the first week of lactation, the lambs stayed with their mothers; after this period, the ewes went out to pasture from 1000 to 1400 h, returning to nurse their young and to stay all night. The lambs were provided with a commercial diet (Agribrands Purina Mexico® creep feeding) from birth to weaning in feeders with restricted access for mothers. After weaning, the lambs were fed a diet of mechanically minced sugarcane forage with an approximate particle size of 3.0 cm and a commercial feed concentrate (Agribrands Purina Mexico®) containing 15% crude protein (CP) and consisting mainly of ground cereals, a combination of oilseed pastes, cereal by-products, molasses, coconut paste, and vegetable oil. This food was offered freely to the lambs only once daily (0700 to 0800 h). Water was available ad libitum in cup drinkers. In the central region of Veracruz, Mexico, where the present study was developed, sheep producers manage the diet tested in this research during the fattening period. In this sense, the management conditions that sheep producers currently apply are being evaluated, so the diet of the sheep studied was not modified, in order to adopt and transfer the results of this research to the producer’s local sheep.
Lamb growth performance
The weight of the lambs was measured at birth (within the first 24 h of life, BW) and every 15 d thereafter until they reached slaughter weight (approximately 45 kg). The lambs’ weaning weights (WW) were also recorded (approximately 75 d). The fattening days (FD) were determined as the number of days between weaning and slaughter. The daily weight gain (DWG) was determined from the difference in the slaughter weight and the WW divided by the FD. The lambs were slaughtered at similar average live weights.
Lamb carcass yield
The slaughter of the animals was conducted in the municipal slaughterhouse of Orizaba, Veracruz, Mexico, at 18 km from the facilities of the Colegio de Postgraduados under the specifications established in standard NOM-033-SAG/ZOO-2014. Each lamb was individually carried, and the animals were transported at a population density of 0.2 m2/lamb to minimize the likelihood of injury. Prior to slaughter (1200 h), food availability to the lambs was reduced, and they were fasted for 4 h and transported to the slaughterhouse on the day of the slaughter. The live weight (LW) of the lambs was recorded at the slaughterhouse. They were then stunned using a captive bolt pistol, and exsanguination was performed through a cut in the carotid artery and the jugular vein. The animals were then skinned and eviscerated. Non-carcass components such as the head and hooves were removed and weighed separately. The weights of the blood, skin, full and empty green viscera, red viscera, and bile were also recorded. The hot carcass weight (HCW) was recorded immediately to determine the hot carcass yield (HCW/LW*100).
When the carcasses reached room temperature, they were stored in a cold room at 4 °C for 24 h, where they were hung by both Achilles tendons. Subsequently, the following measurements were made: cold carcass weight (CCW) for determining the cold carcass yield (CCW/LW), weight loss (HCW−CCW), dorsal fat thickness, and rib eye perimeter. To determine the fat thickness and the area of the rib eye of the longissimus dorsi, a cut was made between the 12th and 13th ribs, the thickness of the dorsal fat was measured with a digital caliper, and the perimeter of the rib eye was drawn on acetate paper. The rib eye area was estimated from the perimeter using an LI 3100 leaf area meter (LICOR®, Lincoln, NE, USA).
Lamb carcass conformation-classification and commercial meat cuts
The carcasses were evaluated by five trained evaluators. The training of the evaluators consisted of several training sessions in ovine carcass quality. The photographic standards used for the evaluation of the carcasses obtained in this experiment are shown in Figure 1. The evaluation of the carcasses was based on the criteria of the Mexican standard for the classification of lamb carcasses (NMX-FF-106-SCFI-2006)9. This standard describes three carcass conformation categories (excellent, good, and deficient) and four quality grade categories for the complete carcass; in order of decreasing quality, the better are Mexico Extra (MEX EXT), Mexico 1 (MEX 1), Mexico 2 (MEX 2), and Out of Classification (O/C). The criteria for classification include age of the animal, slaughter weight, carcass conformation, and dorsal fat thickness in the longissimus dorsi muscle at the height of the 12th rib (fat/conformation ratio).
(A) Charollais x Pelibuey (Good conformation, MEX 1 quality grade); (B) Dorper x Pelibuey (Good conformation, MEX 1 quality grade); and (C) Pelibuey (Deficient conformation, MEX 2 quality grade).
The carcasses were divided longitudinally along the dorsal spine. The right half was divided into six commercial sections in a modification of the procedure described: cuello (neck, 1st to 5th cervical vertebrae); hombro (shoulder, bone base: scapula and humerus including the first 5 ribs in a perpendicular section located under this); brazuelo (foreshank and breast, including the radius, from the 2nd to the 11th rib in a perpendicular section with the flank); costillar (ribs, 5th to 12th thoracic vertebrae); lomo (loin, longissimus lumborum from the 13th thoracic vertebra to the 7th lumbar vertebra); and pierna (leg, the section between the last lumbar vertebra and the first sacral vertebra)10. The sections were weighed individually, and the yield (%) was determined with respect to the weight of the right half of the carcass11.
Measurements of carcass color, temperature, and pH
Instrumental color, temperature, and pH of the carcasses were measured at 30 min and 24 h after slaughter. The instrumental color was measured according to the CIE L*a*b* scale. For the color30min of the carcass, the reading was made of the rectus abdominis muscle11; for the color24h, the reading was made of the longissimus dorsi, and for the fat color, the reading was made of the fat coverage of the leg. A portable colorimeter was used to measure this variable (Mod CR-300/410, Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). Illuminant D65 was used as an observation standard at a visual angle of 10º and an 8 mm of aperture. The temperature of the hot carcass (HC) and that of the cold carcass (CC) were measured by inserting a food-grade punch thermometer into the muscle mass (leg). The pH30min was measured using a potentiometer equipped with a puncture electrode (pH meter Mod HI 99163, Hanna, TX, USA) after calibration of the equipment using buffer solutions at pH 4.0 and 7.0, choosing the same point for all the carcasses. The pH24h of the meat (longissimus dorsi) was measured according using a potentiometer (Mod pH 1100, Oaklon, Eutech Instruments, Singapore) previously calibrated with pH 4.0, 7.0, and 10.0 buffer solutions. All measurements were performed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The type of breed was considered as the main effect in the model. For the DWG and FD variables, the following covariance model was used:
Where
To analyze the variables of productive development, carcass characteristics, commercial cuts, and carcass and meat quality, the following mixed model was used:
Where
Fisher's LSD method and Satterthwaite's degrees of freedom correction method were used to compare means. The cumulative logit model was used to compare the carcass conformation and the quality grade of the genotypes. The linear predictor is
Results and discussion
Lamb growth performance
The productive performance of the lambs according to genotype is shown in Table 1. The analysis of variance showed that there is a highly significant effect (
Variable | ChP (n= 11) |
DP (n= 10) |
P (n= 18) |
---|---|---|---|
Birth weight, kg | 3.93 ± 0.24a | 3.46 ± 0.24ab | 3.24 ± 0.16b |
Weaning weight, kg | 19.39 ± 0.91a | 16.45 ± 0.92b | 15.34 ± 0.60b |
FD (weaning to slaughter) | 106.87 ± 7.07b | 118.01 ± 6.76b | 141.35 ± 5.36a |
DWG, kg/d (weaning to slaughter) | 0.278 ± 0.01a | 0.235 ± 0.01b | 0.207 ± 0.01c |
FD= fattening days; DWG= daily weight gain; The data are reported as the mean ± the standard error.
abc Means within the same row marked with different letters are significantly different (
The present study showed that crossing of Pelibuey ewes with Charollais rams results in better productive development (BW, WW, FD and DWG) of lambs raised in conditions of high temperature and humidity, that is, in the study area where the present investigation was developed, the temperature varies from 12 to 32 °C (minimum of 9 °C and maximum of 37 °C) and it rains 25.1 d on a month with at least 1 mm of precipitation. The lambs from ewes with meat suitability (Katahdin) and rams of four breeds (Charollais, Dorper, Suffolk, and Textel) under better environmental conditions for the production of sheep (dry temperate climate at 1,962 m asl), were that the best productive behavior was found in lambs from the Katahdin x Charollais crossing12. The production values cited in that study are similar to the values found in the present study. The BW values found in this study are superior to those reported in other studies13 in lambs from Black Belly x Pelibuey ewes and rams of three different breeds (Dorset, Hampshire, and Suffolk) and lambs from Pelibuey ewes and hair breed rams (Pelibuey, Katahdin, and Dorper), with average reported values of 3.18 ± 0.34 and 2.9 ± 0.09 kg, respectively.
The DWG (kg/d) in the present study for the three genotypes was higher than the values in P (0.181 ± 0.02), Pelibuey x Suffolk (0.206 ± 0.03), DP (0.222 ± 0.03), F1 x Dorset (0.217 ± 0.05), F1 x Hampshire (0.219 ± 0.05), and F1 x Suffolk (0.222 ± 0.04) lambs4,13. These differences may be due to the breeds used in the crossbreeding and to the management of the lambs during fattening. It is important to mention that no BW, WW, FD, or DWG values have previously been reported for the Charollais x Pelibuey (ChP) crossing. For the first time, this study showed that the performance of ChP lambs with respect to the variables is better than that of other crosses, even under stressful climatic conditions of high temperature and humidity of study area. Thus, this crossing is a good alternative to produce sheep in the tropics.
Figure 2 shows the change in live weight from birth to 5.5 mo according to genotype. The graph shows that at the age of 5.5 mo, lambs of the ChP and DP genotypes showed a higher growth rate, with average monthly weight gains of 6.71 and 5.42 kg, respectively, than lambs of the P genotype (5.02 kg), despite the fact that the initial weights of the lambs of the three genotypes were very similar. ChP lambs reached the commercial weight for slaughter 35 and 12 d before lambs of the P and DP genotypes, respectively. The Dorper breed has been recommended for the production of lambs with meat suitability in crossbreeding14. However, the results obtained in this investigation show that crossing of Charollais rams with Pelibuey ewes results in lambs that are more suitable to produce meat due to their better growth rate.
Lamb carcass yield
The analysis of variance showed a highly significant effect of genotype on carcass weight loss (
Variable | ChP (n = 11) |
DP (n = 10) |
P (n = 18) |
---|---|---|---|
Empty live weight, kg | 44.85 ± 0.85 | 42.96 ± 0.89 | 43.17 ± 0.66 |
Hot carcass weight, kg | 22.21 ± 0.47 | 21.45 ± 0.49 | 21.40 ± 0.36 |
Cold carcass weight, kg | 21.86 ± 0.46 | 21.03 ± 0.49 | 20.91 ± 0.36 |
Hot carcass yield, % | 49.53 ± 0.44 | 49.89 ± 0.46 | 49.53 ± 0.34 |
Cold carcass yield, % | 48.74 ± 0.43 | 48.90 ± 0.45 | 48.46 ± 0.33 |
Loss of weight, kg | 0.35 ± 0.03b | 0.42 ± 0.03ab | 0.50 ± 0.02a |
Dorsal fat thickness, mm | 1.51 ± 0.17 | 1.63 ± 0.18 | 1.56 ± 0.13 |
Area of the rib, cm2 | 14.66 ± 0.69 | 15.43 ± 0.81 | 15.83 ± 1.33 |
Red viscera, kg | 1.98 ± 0.39 | 1.98 ± 0.41 | 2.39 ± 0.30 |
Empty green viscera, kg | 3.84 ± 0.13c | 4.31 ± 0.13b | 4.87 ± 0.10a |
The data are reported as the mean ± the standard error (SE).
abc Means within a row marked with different letters are significantly different (
In this study, genotype was not found to affect the CCY and lambs with standardized weights at slaughter and from hair sheep ewes and rams of the Dorset, Hampshire, Suffolk, Pelibuey, and Rambouillet breeds5,13. Those authors showed that there were no significant differences in CCY among the genotypes studied, but the values reported for CCY were lower than those obtained in this investigation. Carcass yield can be affected by factors such as the age of the lamb, wool growth, nutrition, and breed15. Results in this research showed no effect of breed on the CCY. In this sense, state that with the standardization of the weight at slaughter, the carcass yield is not affected5. In this study, ChP lamb carcasses lost less weight at 24 h after slaughter (0.15 kg) than P and DP carcasses. In contrast, in the crossing of Pelibuey with Rambouillet and Suffolk breeds, no differences were found in this variable5.
Another important characteristic of the carcass is dorsal fat thickness. Low values of this parameter are an indicator of lean meat, which is preferred in the Mexican market5. The average dorsal fat thickness values in this study were very low (ChP= 1.51 ± 0.17 mm, DP= 1.63 ± 0.18 mm, P= 1.56 ± 0.13 mm) despite the high slaughter weight of the animals. Similar values have been reported for Pelibuey (1.2), Pelibuey x Kathadin (1.8 mm), DP (1.8 mm), Pelibuey x Rambouillet (1.7 mm), and Pelibuey x Suffolk (1.4 mm) lambs16,17. On the other hand, higher values of dorsal fat thickness (6.33 ± 1.22 mm) have been reported in lambs obtained by crossing Kathadin ewes with Charollais rams16. This may be because the Katahdin and Charollais breeds undergo rapid growth and accumulate dorsal fat at a young age compared to the Pelibuey breed, which is slower-growing and tends to accumulate more visceral fat than dorsal fat2.
The rib eye area is an indicator of the muscle conformation of the carcass18; the greater the rib eye area, the better is the muscle conformation. In this study, genotype did not influence the rib eye area or the area of the longissimus dorsi muscle (ChP= 14.66 ± 0.69 cm2, DP= 15.43 ± 0.81 cm2, and P= 15.83 ± 1.33 cm2). Lower values have been reported in DP (11.01 cm2), Pelibuey, Pelibuey x Rambouillet and Pelibuey x Suffolk (5.16 ± 0.13 cm2) and Black Belly (10.89 cm2) lambs5,16,17,19. The highest rib eye area values (19.8 ± 0.5 cm2) were found in Kathadhhin x Charollais and Katahdin x Dorper lambs treated with β-adrenergic agonists during fattening20. Breed, diet, and hormonal treatment affect muscle development21.
Classification, conformation of the carcass, and commercial cuts
The estimated probabilities of carcass conformation and quality grade according to genotype are shown in Figure 3. The f analysis showed a statistically significant effect among genotypes
Figure 1 shows the photographic standards used to evaluate the carcasses obtained in this experiment. The crossing of Pelibuey ewes with rams from the Charollais and Dorper breeds conferred better carcass conformation and quality grade because the latter two breeds present better meat conformation1 than the pure Pelibuey breed. In this study, the crossing of Katahdin x Charollais was shown to yield carcasses with excellent conformation and MEX EXT quality grade; in that case, both of the breeds used in the cross are suitable for meat production16.
The average weight of the half carcass and the weight and yield of commercial cuts according to genotype are shown in Table 3. The analysis of variance showed a highly significant effect of genotype on the average weight of the neck (
Variable | ChP (n = 11) | DP (n = 10) | P (n = 18) |
---|---|---|---|
Half-carcass weight | 10.45 ± 0.26 | 10.17 ± 0.27 | 10.36 ± 0.20 |
Commercial cuts (kg) | |||
Neck | 0.58 ± 0.03b | 0.56 ± 0.03b | 0.71 ± 0.02a |
Shoulder | 1.57 ± 0.05 | 1.57 ± 0.05 | 1.54 ± 0.04 |
Foreshank+breast | 2.43 ± 0.12 | 2.23 ± 0.13 | 2.13 ± 0.09 |
Ribs | 1.18 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.07 | 1.14 ± 0.06 |
Loin | 1.58 ± 0.08ab | 1.46 ± 0.08b | 1.72 ± 0.06a |
Leg | 3.44 ± 0.09a | 3.13 ± 0.09b | 3.15 ± 0.08b |
Yield of commercial cuts (%) | |||
Neck | 5.68 ± 0.37b | 5.64 ± 0.35b | 6.96 ± 0.28a |
Shoulder | 15.52 ± 0.44 | 15.51 ± 0.42 | 14.83 ± 0.33 |
Foreshank+breast | 24.28 ± 1.05a | 21.91 ± 0.99ab | 20.59 ± 0.79b |
Ribs | 10.51 ± 0.35 | 11.22 ± 0.33 | 10.47 ± 0.26 |
Loin | 15.31 ± 0.71ab | 14.39 ± 0.68b | 16.57 ± 0.53a |
Leg | 32.81 ± 0.58a | 31.35 ± 0.55ab | 30.41 ± 0.43b |
The data are reported as the mean ± the standard error (SE).
ab Means within the same row marked with different letters are significantly different (
The leg and loin are cuts of great commercial value and represent 43.3 % of the yield of the carcass10. In this study, the yield obtained for both cuts was greater than the reported value in all three genotypes: ChP (48.12 %), DP (45.74 %), and P (46.98 %). In this study, the crossing of Pelibuey with Charollais resulted in greater weight of the leg, which is a cut of high commercial value5. However, 1 to 4 % differences among the genotypes were observed in the weights of the neck, loin, leg, and foreshank+breast cuts minimal differences in the weights of the majority of commercial cuts in the evaluation of 15 wool breeds specialized for the production of wool or meat22. In crossbred lambs of hair breeds (DP) and hair x wool breeds and reported differences in cut yield of approximately 1%, similar to the differences found in this study23.
pH, temperature, and instrumental color of the carcass and meat
Table 4 presents the average values of pH, temperature, and instrumental color of the rectus abdominis muscle, meat, and subcutaneous fat according to genotype. Of the variables measured in the carcass, T30min (
Variable | ChP (n = 11) |
DP (n = 10) |
P (n = 18) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
pH30min | 6.64 ± 0.06 | 6.72 ± 0.06 | 6.75 ± 0.04 | |
pH24h | 5.66 ± 0.02a | 5.61 ± 0.02ab | 5.59 ± 0.02b | |
T30min (°C) | 39.88 ± 0.23a | 39.37 ± 0.24ab | 39.19 ± 0.18b | |
T24h (°C) | 4.64 ± 0.19 | 4.20 ± 0.20 | 4.33 ± 0.15 | |
Rectus abdominis | L* | 41.35 ± 0.78b | 38.20 ± 0.82c | 44.32 ± 0.61a |
a* | 12.78 ± 1.40b | 13.30 ± 1.46b | 17.80 ± 1.09a | |
b* | -0.81 ± 0.33 | -0.94 ± 0.35 | -1.22 ± 0.26 | |
Longissimus dorsi 24h | L* | 33.69 ± 0.66b | 32.61 ± 0.69b | 37.31 ± 0.51a |
a* | 14.73 ± 0.42b | 13.84 ± 0.45b | 17.24 ± 0.33a | |
b* | 4.29 ± 0.23a | 3.33 ± 0.24b | 4.66 ± 0.18a | |
Subcutaneous fat | L* | 68.41 ± 1.38b | 67.98 ± 1.45b | 73.15 ± 1.08a |
a* | 3.32 ± 0.45 | 3.6 ± 0.48 | 3.14 ± 0.35 | |
b* | 4.29 ± 0.46 | 4.31 ± 0.49 | 4.93 ± 0.36 |
The data are reported as the mean ± the standard error (SE).
ab Means within the same row marked with different letters are significantly different (
The pH and color of meat are important indicators of quality and influence the visual appearance of the meat24. The difference in pH at 24 h post mortem among the genotypes in this study was probably because the T30min of the carcass tends to be lower in hair breeds than in wool breeds25, and it has been shown that the meat of fast-growing lambs tends to have a higher pH26. However, the pH24h values for the three genotypes in this study fell within the preferred range for this parameter27.
The color of the rectus abdominis muscle (30 min post mortem) was significantly affected by genotype in this study. The values of a* were similar to those reported in Rasa Aragonesa lamb carcasses for different thicknesses of dorsal fat with a slaughter weight of 50-60 kg28. Values higher reported in the present study for L* (51.12) and a* (11.64) in Rasa Aragonesa lambs, with a slaughter weight of 24 kg29.
In the color of meat (longissimus dorsi), the ChP and DP genotypes presented indices of L* (luminosity) and a* (red) lower than those presented by the P genotype. During storage, the ferric metmyoglobin (MetMb) accumulation rate on the surface of the meat is governed by intrinsic factors (age of the animal, breed, sex, diet, pH, and metabolic type of the muscle) and extrinsic factors (temperature, oxygen availability, lighting, growth of surface microbes, and type of packaging) or a combination of these factors30,31. In this study, it was observed that genotype affected the color of the meat; meat color was probably also affected by the exposure time of the carcasses prior to cold-room storage26. Found an effect of genotype on the a* and b* indices of meat color in hair breed lambs and lambs obtained by crossing hair and wool breeds32.
With respect to subcutaneous fat, there were no significant differences in the indices a* (
Conclusions and implications
Breed had a significant effect on the growth, characteristics, and classification of lamb carcasses. The crossing of Pelibuey sheep with the Charollais breed (ChP) resulted in higher DWG. ChP and DP lambs reached commercial weight one month earlier than P lambs. With the ChP crossing, there is a high probability (0.72) of obtaining carcasses that show good conformation and good quality grade (MEX 1). Therefore, the ChP crossing can be an option for the commercial breeding and fattening of lambs to produce quality meat in hot, humid climates. In this study it was found that the genotype of the evaluated sheep presented different conditions in the composition of the meat, such as an increase in pH, temperature variations, changes in the instrumental color of the carcass, amount of meat and subcutaneous fat, however, these parameters are within the acceptable ranges of meat quality for each breed. In this sense, it is feasible for sheep producers in the Center of Veracruz, México that they can use the crosses of the breeds evaluated in this study to maintain or increase the productivity of their herds.