Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), an enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded ribonucleic acid virus. In late December 2019, an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown cause occurred in Wuhan, China, and subsequently spread rapidly in that country. Soon after, a new coronavirus was determined to be the causative agent.1,2 By April 13, 2020, the outbreak had become a pandemic that affected 213 countries, areas, or territories worldwide, with more than 1.8 million confirmed cases, among which 117,217 (6.3 %) had a fatal outcome.3 In Mexico, 5014 cases and 332 (6.6 %) deaths from this disease had been confirmed. The state with the highest number of positive cases and deaths until the moment of this report was and is Mexico City.4
SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted mainly through respiratory droplets (of between 5 and 10 μm) and by contact. This coronavirus has also been detected in feces and tears; its incubation period is five days on average, with a range of one to 14 days. Practically all patients (95 %) have symptoms within the first 12.5 days after contact. However, there are asymptomatic carriers who are a potential source of infection. Most common symptoms are fever, fatigue and non-productive cough, followed by headache, nasal congestion, odynophagia, myalgia and arthralgia.1,2 However, since late February, the first reports of COVID-19 patients with neurological manifestations appeared.5,6 Those initial reports were followed by others that seem to point in the same direction.7 Due to the above, this review addresses the basic and clinical aspects concerning nervous system involvement in this disease.
Basic aspects
Coronaviruses are not completely unknown in neurology; they have been used, for example, in the development of murine models of demyelinating diseases.8 There is evidence that identifies neurotropism as a characteristic of coronaviruses.9 SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the betacoronavirus genus (together with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV, among others) and the propensity of beta-coronaviruses to neuroinvasiveness is currently known.9
The first proposals about SARS-CoV-2 potential neuroinvasiveness were inferred by analogy, considering the evidence obtained from other beta-coronaviruses, especially SARS-CoV, since both share sequences (79.5 %) and, in addition, use the same receptor to enter human cells, a transmembrane protein called angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2),9,10 which is normally expressed in the endothelium of cerebral vasculature.11,12 Cathepsin L, a lysosomal endopeptidase that is widely distributed in the central nervous system is the mediator in the initial interaction between the virus and the host cell.12
Another relevant aspect is the pathophysiology underlying olfactory dysfunction in patients with COVID-19, which apparently is not exclusive to SARS-CoV-2 and can be found in infections with other coronaviruses, which are detected in the nasal discharge of patients with olfactory dysfunction. Some of these patients did not recover olfaction after recovering from the infection, even though acoustic rhinometry results were normal, which could indicate that nasal inflammation and associated obstruction are not the only underlying factors for olfactory dysfunction in these infections.13 SARS-CoV-2 direct dissemination through retrograde (olfactory or vagal) neuronal transport or systemic circulation has been suggested;11,12 the first of both these hypotheses has already been demonstrated in other coronaviruses using murine models.14 In one of these models, after passing through the olfactory bulb, SARS-CoV spread to areas anatomically related to the olfactory pathway, including the piriform cortex.13
Clinical aspects
More than one third (36.4 %) of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 can present with neurological manifestations, both central and peripheral. The former include dizziness and headache, and the latter, changes in taste and smell. Neurological manifestations are more common in patients with severe pneumonia, including cerebral infarction and hemorrhage. In this context, focal seizures can also occur;5,6 some reports suggest that seizures during this infection may have a higher frequency than that reported in the literature.15 Except for cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and waking state alteration, most neurological disorders usually occur early in the course of the disease, i.e., one or two days after the onset of symptoms, or they can even be the first manifestations.5,6
Smell and taste alterations occur in most patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 (85.6 % and 88.8 %, respectively); in one out of 10 patients, olfactory dysfunction precedes the rest of symptoms. These disorders have been reported more frequently in female patients. The most common specific dysfunctions are anosmia (79.6 %) and hypogeusia (78.9 %). Apparently, olfactory dysfunction in the context of COVID-19 is not entirely explained by nasal obstruction or rhinorrhea, as observed in SARS-CoV. In just below one quarter of patients, gustatory dysfunction has been reported as fluctuating. Less than half (44 %) of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 recover olfaction in the early period. On the other hand, residual gustatory dysfunction has also been observed, although less frequently than olfactory dysfunction.13
In the CVD spectrum, infarction is the most common presentation in patients with COVID-19; other manifestations include hemorrhage and venous thrombosis.7 Some authors maintain that cerebral hemorrhage in patients with COVID-19 is more common than it has been reported in the literature.16 In general, age (71.6 ± 15.7 years), disease severity and cardiovascular risk are higher in patients with COVID-19 and CVD. The most common cardiovascular risk factors in these patients are hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a history of CVD. A preliminary report indicated 38 % of mortality in these patients.7
One article indicated that SARS-CoV-2 potential neuroinvasiveness could be associated with the respiratory failure that can be caused by COVID-19; in that same document, the findings in one of the survivors9 could be interpreted as Ondine syndrome, i.e., respiratory automatism failure during wakefulness.
Other less frequent manifestations are ataxia,5,6 myelitis17 and acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.18 In Beijing, early in May 2020, the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in the CSF was reported for the first time in a 56-year-old man with symptoms consistent with encephalitis.10,14 In a case of meningoencephalitis reported in Japan, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in the CSF, but not in the nasopharyngeal sample.19 One case of COVID-19 associated with acute hemorrhagic necrotizing encephalopathy was reported in Detroit, although determining the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in CSF was not possible.20
Patients with neurological manifestations of central origin often also present with lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and azoemia.5,6 It is important to consider that possibly not all SARS-CoV-2 effects on the nervous system are direct and could be mediated by hypoxia or the immune response.10,15
Although various publications have suggested that patients who died from severe COVID-19 had cerebral edema and partial neuronal degeneration, brain tissue21 was not included in the histopathological analysis of tissues obtained during the autopsy.10 Subsequent reports did not include this tissue either.22 Due to the above, a standardized neuropathological study has recently been proposed in patients with COVID-19.23
Therapeutic possibilities
Some authors have suggested that COVID-19 should be early treated in order to reduce extrapulmonary complications, including neurological involvement;24 however, this recommendation is not based on solid evidence. A consensus on the prevention and management of COVID-19 specifically targeted at neurologists was published in Stroke and Vascular Neurology. Among the multiple recommendations, treating patients with mild infection with umifenovir or chloroquine (500 mg every 12 hours for 10 days) for the first few days is suggested.25 Recently, it has been discussed that the use of chloroquine in China is associated with a multicenter clinical trial26 whose results are not available for consultation.27 Currently, multiple clinical trials in China and other countries are recruiting patients to assess the effect and safety of chloroquine in COVID-19.26-28 It should be borne in mind that chloroquine can be associated with multiple adverse effects, including QT segment prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias.28 On the other hand, umifenovir is not available in Mexico.
Currently, intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy have not been reported in patients with COVID-19 who have been treated with antiplatelet agents (acetylsalicylic acid or clopidogrel) or anticoagulants (low molecular weight heparin) when they have CVD.7
Conclusions
Neurological conditions are not uncommon in COVID-19 and can sometimes represent the first manifestation of the disease; therefore, neurologists should consider this diagnostic possibility in their routine practice. Given that probably not all neurological manifestations of COVID-19 patients are due to SARS-CoV-2 direct effects, it is important to monitor the rest of patient clinical variables, for example, oxygenation.