Introduction
The family Atractidae Railliet, 1917, includes 26 genera of intestinal parasitic nematodes of fish, amphibians and reptiles. Among those genera, Atractis Dujardin, 1845; Buckleyatractis Khalil & Gibbons, 1988; Klossinemella Costa, 1961; Orientatractis Petter, 1966; Paraorientatractis Gibbons, Khalil & Marinkelle, 1997; Paratractis Sarmiento, 1959; Pneumoatractis Bursey, Reavill & Greiner, 2009; Podocnematractis Gibbons, Khalil & Marinkelle, 1995; and Rhinoclemmysnema Gibbons & Platt, 2006, are commonly found as parasites of freshwater turtles (Berenguer, 1947; Bursey et al., 2009; Costa et al., 1968; Gibbons & Platt, 2006; Gibbons et al., 1995, 1997; Khalil & Gibbons, 1988; Petter, 1966; Sarmiento, 1959).
The genus Orientatractis was erected to accommodate Orientatractis levanhoai Petter, 1966 of Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854) from Vietnam, that showed unique shape, number and disposition of sclerotized structures surrounding the oral opening (Petter, 1966). Until now, 10 valid species are known for this genus: Orientatractis asymmetrica Gibbons & Platt, 2006; Orientatractis brycini González-Solís & Mariaux, 2017; Orientatractis campechensis González-Solís & Moravec, 2004; Orientatractis chiapasensis González-Solís & Moravec, 2004; Orientatractis hamabatrachos Bursey, Goldberg & Kraus, 2014; Orientatractis leiperi Buckley, 1969; Orientatractis levanhoai Petter, 1966 (type-species of the genus); Orientatractis longicaudata Liu, Li & Zhang, 2018; Orientatractis mekongensis Moravec, Kamchoo & Pachanawan, 2015; and Orientatractis moraveci Cavalcante, Silva, Santos, Chagas-Moutinho & Santos, 2017 (Buckley, 1969; Bursey et al., 2014; Cavalcante et al., 2017; Gibbons & Platt, 2006; González-Solís & Mariaux, 2017; González-Solís & Moravec, 2004; Liu et al., 2018; Moravec et al., 2015; Petter, 1966).
During a helminthological survey of parasites of freshwater turtles from the Amazon region, we collected and examined parasites of Podocnemis unifilis Troschel, 1848. The turtles harbored countless nematodes in the stomach, which belong to O. leiperi that has not been reported since its original description (51 years ago). Buckley (1969) mentioned that specimens found in the intestines of Podocnemis vogli Müeller, 1935 from Colombia were partially decomposed, especially the internal organs such as the ovary and the uterus which in consequence could not be described or illustrated adequately. Thus, the redescription of O. leiperi is herein presented, adding new morphometric data, new host, and locality for the species.
Materials and methods
Two specimens of P. unifilis were collected from Tocantins River, Tucuruí municipality, Pará, Brazil (8º5’8.797” S, 48º6’48.78” W) (license permission SISBIO: 53527-4). Hosts were anesthetized using Ketamine 2% injection and posteriorly euthanized. Internal organs were removed and examined under a LEICA EZ4 stereo-microscope. Nematodes collected were washed in 0.9% saline solution and fixed in A.F.A solution (2% glacial acetic acid, 3% formaldehyde, and 95% ethanol 70 ºGL). For morphological and morphometric analyses, specimens were cleared in Aman’s Lactophenol, mounted on temporary slides and examined under an Olympus BX41 light microscope with a drawing tube attached.
For scanning electron microscopy, some specimens were post-fixed in 1% OsO4, dehydrated in ethanol series, critical-point dried, coated with gold-paladium, mounted in stubs and analyzed under a Vega3 Microscope (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) at the Laboratory of Embryology and Histology of the Federal Rural University of Amazonia.
Measurements are shown in micrometers, unless otherwise stated. We tried to access the type material deposited in the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, however they were missing or absent. We also checked the collection of the Natural History Museum of London, in case of transference of the original collection or donation of specimens, but we could not find the type series. Given the significance of these findings, the neotypes have been deposited in the Helminthological Collection of Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Brazil, one of the most important parasite collections in the country and has an important tradition in parasite studies world-wide.
Redescription
Family Atractidae (Railliet, 1917 subfam.) Travassos, 1919
Genus Orientatractis Petter, 1966
Orientatractis leiperi Buckley, 1969 (Figs. 1, 2) General.
Small and slender nematodes, with cuticle finely transversely striated. Anterior end rounded (Fig. 1A, B). Lateral alae well developed starting from first third of esophagus, ending at dorsolateral pair of cauda papillae in posterior extremity of body (Figs. 1B, E, 2B, C). Oral aperture irregular, hexagonal to circular, surrounded by 8 submedian papillae in 2 circles, each with 4 papillae. Six lips: 4 submedian (2 subdorsal and 2 subventral) each lip bearing a well-sclerotized, recurved, pointed spines joined at the base and a single large median spine. Two lateral lips bearing amphidial pores and a well-sclerotized U-shaped structure, small spines posterior to each amphidial pore (Figs. 1C, 2A). Esophagus divided into muscular anterior portion and glandular posterior portion ending in a well-developed bulb with sclerotized valves. Nerve ring situated at anterior portion of esophagus, just after muscular portion (Fig. 1A, B, D). Deirids small, located at level of nerve ring. Excretory pore slightly anterior to esophageal bulb, aperture surrounded by radial cuticle striations, pore opening in a large chamber with transversal grooves (Figs. 1A, B, D, 2F). Posterior end with very slender, long, pointed tail (Figs. 1A, B, E, F, G, 2B).
Male (Based on neotype; measurements of 11 paraneotypes in parentheses). Total length 3.21 (3.12-3.37) mm, width at esophago-intestinal junction 152 (107-168). Lateral alae beginning 285 (237-285) from anterior end of body, ending 485 (360-485) from posterior end of body. Esophagus 632 (571-776) long, muscular portion 253 (181-253), glandular portion including esophageal bulb 379 (352-595). Esophageal bulb 107 (96-125) × 93 (64-96). Nerve ring, excretory pore and deirids 280 (203-280), 499 (435-499) and 256 (213-256), respectively, from anterior end of body. Nine pairs of caudal papillae plus 1 unpaired anterior to cloacal lip, of which 3 subventral precloacal pairs, 1 subventral adcloacal pair and 5 postcloacal pairs (3 subventral, 1 ventrolateral and 1 dorsolateral) (Figs. 1E, G, 2C-E). Phasmids located between pairs 4 and 5 of postcloacals papillae (Figs. 1E, 2E). Spicules unequal, lanceolate, proximal ends slightly expanded, distal ends sharply pointed, with transverse striations along their lengths, left spicule 472 (416-491), right spicule 103 (90-119) (Fig. 1I). Gubernaculum with proximal end expanded, deep medial depression, distal end pointed, 64 (58-69) long (Fig. 1H). Tail long, pointed, ventrally curved, 739 (648-781) long (Figs. 1B, E, G, 2B).
Females (Based on neotype female; measurements of 11 paraneotypes in parentheses). Total length 3.64 (3.31-3.68) mm, width at esophago-intestinal junction 160 (128-187). Lateral alae beginning 253 (219-253) from anterior end of body, ending 774 (721-847) from posterior end of body. Esophagus 590 (525-619) long, muscular portion 187 (171-216), glandular portion including esophageal bulb 403 (352-432). Esophageal bulb 99 (80-133) × 120 (101-131). Nerve ring, excretory pore and deirids 208 (179-232), 453 (387-488) and 221 (213-261), respectively, from anterior end of body. Viviparous, vulva aperture surrounded by radial cuticle striations with posterior lip slightly elevated, situated 0.96 (0.96-1.08) mm from posterior end of body (Fig. 2G), anterior to anal opening (Fig. 1A, F). Distance anus-vulva 99 (93- 109).Vagina muscular, first portion anteriorly directed, flexed posteriorly. Ovary directed anteriorly to vagina. Monodelphic, prodelphic, uterus beginning in posterior flexion of vagina, directing anteriorly, containing fully developed larvae. Larvae total length 363 and 334 (n = 2, measured in uteri of neotype; Fig. 1A). Eggs 171-139 × 64-51 (n = 7, measured in uteri of neotype). Tail subulate, 900 (874-989) long (Fig. 1A, F).
Taxonomic Summary
Neotype host: Podocnemis unifilis Troschel, 1848.
Neotype locality: Rio Tocantins Tucuruí, Pará, Brazil (8º5’8.797” S, 48º6’48.78” W).
Type-specimens: neotype male [here designed] (CHIOC 38765a), neotype female (CHIOC 38765b) and 22 paraneotypes (CHIOC 38765c-38765d) in the Helminthological Collection of Oswaldo Cruz Institute - Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Site of infection: stomach.
Prevalence: 2 infected/2 examined hosts; intensity of infection: countless nematodes per turtle.
Remarks
Here we redescribe Orientatractis leiperi based on specimens found in the stomach of P. unifilis from the Brazilian Amazon Region. The original description of O. leiperi was based on specimens collected from Podocnemis vogli sent to Buckley by Dr. C. J. Marinkelle from Colombia. The neotype described here was found in the same biogeographical region (Neotropical Region, Tucuruí, Pará, Brazil) and ecological biome (Amazon Region), parasitizing a species of host from the same genus (Podocnemis unifilis).
The specimens were allocated to this genus by the presence of 4 single horns surrounding the mouth. According to González-Solís and Moravec (2004), Orientatractis and Klossinemella Costa, 1961, are morphologically similar genera, differing by the number and disposition of sclerotized structures surrounding the oral opening: Klossinemella spp. are characterized by the presence of 8 Y-shape well-sclerotized with 2 pointed tips and 4 single horns, while Orientatractis have 4 bicornuate pieces and 4 single horns.
The morphological characteristics used to differentiate the species of this genus are number and distribution of caudal papillae shape and size of spicules, gubernaculum and morphology and length of tail. Our specimens have 9 pairs of caudal papillae and among the 10 valid species of the genus, O. asymmetrica, O. campechensis, O. chiapasensis and O. leiperi share this morphological trait. However, the specimens found in the present work can be differentiated from O. asymmetrica because the last species have a pair of double papillae at the precloacal region and enlarged on the right side (not observed in our specimens). Additionally, the specimens of the present work have larger spicules (left 416-491 and right 90-119 spicules vs. left 220-239 and right 86-104 spicules in O. asymmetrica) and the presence of a dorsal caudal papillae, which is absent in O. asymmetrica.
The specimens described herein, resembles O. campechensis by the number of cloacal papillae and the size of spicules and gubernaculum. However, our specimens have a gubernaculum with proximal end expanded, deep medial depression and pointed distal end, while O. campechensis have a gubernaculum with a proximal end showing a deep depression forming 2 branches and a dorsal pointed barb, and the females of O. campechensis have a vulvar appendix or elevated vulvar lips.
Orientatractis leiperi found in the stomach of Podocnemis unifilis are similar to O. chiapasensis by number of cloacal papillae, however O. leiperi differ by the number of post cloacal papilla (5 vs. 4 in O. chiapasensis), larger body length (males 3.12-3.37 mm, females 3.31-3.68 mm vs. males 2.709-2.967 mm, females 2.025-3.800 mm in O. chiapasensis), larger spicules (left spicule 416-491, right spicule 90-119 vs. left spicule 204-238, right spicule, 60-68 in O. chiapasensis).
Thus, our specimens can be allocated to O. leiperi by the combination of the following characters: number and distribution of cloacal papillae, size and shape of spicules and gubernaculum and tail length. The specimens of O. leiperi from P. unifilis did not show a substantial intraspecific variation of the metrical data, especially when compared with the measurements of the original description. In our specimens, males are smaller than O. leiperi described by Buckley (1969) (3.12-3.37 vs. 3.80), we also observed differences in total length of esophagus in females (525-619 vs. 660 in original description) and right spicules and gubernaculum of males are smaller in our specimens (right spicule: 90-119 vs. 160, gubernaculum 58-69 vs. 76). However, morphometric variability always occurs intraspecifically, which according to González-Solís and Moravec, (2004) might be associated with local ecological conditions and physiological traits of hosts.
According to Buckley (1969), the description of O. leiperi was based in specimens partially deteriorated, thus the description and illustration of the uterus was incomplete; moreover, the author found embryonated eggs in only one female. Since the type material seems to be lost, our specimens are herein considered as neotypes, which fit the original description by Buckley (1969). Fresh specimens allowed us to verify that females are monodelphic, prodelphic. Additionally, our specimens harbored eggs and fully developed larva in uterus.
The life cycle of Orientatractis spp. is still unknown, however according to studies done in other Atractidae members, these nematodes are viviparous, and larvae develop directly in uterus allowing the auto infection (Anderson, 2000). We found countless specimens of O. leiperi in the stomach of P. unifilis and the viviparity can considerably contribute with the development of adult nematodes directly in the infected organ, increasing the abundance of infection. Additionally, according to Leão et al. (2019), the zones of intensive use of habitat are usually overlapped among specimens of P. unifilis, where the turtles share areas for feeding, copulating, basking, and parental care, which can contribute to the transmission of this species of nematodes.
Our SEM analyses were important to observe the complexity of oral aperture and cephalic papillae, lateral alae, structure of excretory pore, vulva, anus and structures not described by Buckley (1969), such as the presence of dorsolateral caudal papillae in males, phasmids, and cephalic papillae.
This study is the first report of O. leiperi in the Brazilian Amazon region, in a different host species, and encountered after 50 years since its original description.