1. Introduction
During the past two decades, considerable efforts have been made by many researchers in various fields of physics and chemistry to reach relativistic and nonrelativistic solutions using many potentials by adopting different methods such as the Nikiforov-Uvarov method [1], the Wentzel-KramersBrillouin method [2], the proper quantization rule [3], and the exact quantization rule [4], in addition to many other methods. The exact solutions of the fundamental equations are only possible in some exceptional cases like the harmonic oscillator and the Hydrogen atom as two typical models. As for most of the cases treated by researchers, it is done by using approximations and numerical methods such as the Pekeris approximation [5], the Greene and Aldrich approximation [6], the good approximation proposed by B.H. Yazarloo et al. in the study of the oscillator strengths based on the Mobius square potential under Schrödinger equation [7] and the new approximation of the centrifugal term proposed C. S. Jia et al. [8]. The Manning-Rosen potential has been of relevant interest in recent years as it can be applied to various fields such as atomic, condensed matter, particle, and nuclear physics in both relativistic and non-relativistic regimes [9-12]. Furthermore, it is used to describe the vibrations of diatomic molecules such as HCl, CH, LiH, CO, NO, O2, I2, N2, H2, and Ar2 [13,14]. Many authors have studied Manning-Rosen potential in the nonrelativistic case, in both the s-wave and lwave cases (see for example [15-18]. Furthermore, this potential was also studied in the relativistic Klein-Gordon, and Dirac equations [19-23].
As a result of several considerations and many physical problems apparat at the level of the non-renormalizable of the electroweak interaction, quantum gravity, string theory, where the idea of non-commutativity resulting from properties of deformation of space-space (W. Heisenberg in 1930 is the first to suggest the idea and then it was developed by H. Snyder in 1947) was one of the major solutions to these problems. In the past two decades, in particular, it has attracted a great attention [24-35].
The main objective of this work is to develop the study of B.J. Falaye et al., A.I. Ahmadov et al., and Z. H. Chen et al. [13,18,19] within the framework of the Klein Gordon and Schrödinger equations. But in the context of symme- tries of noncommutative quantum mechanics for the purpose to get more investigation in the microscopic scales and from achieving more scientific knowledge of elementary particles in the field of nano-scales. The relativisti energy levels under the modified Manning-Rosen potential have not been obtained yet in the context of the RNCQM and NRNCQM. Furthermore, we hope to find new applications and profound physical interpretations using a new, updated model of the modified Manning-Rosen potential, which takes the form:
Vmpr=12Mβ2αα-1e-2r/β1-e-r/β2-Ae-r/β1-e-r/β→Vmpr^≡Vmpr-∂Vmpr∂rLΘ→→2r+OΘ2,
(1)
And
Smpr=12Mβ2λλ-1e-2r/β1-e-r/β2-Be-r/β1-e-r/β→Smpr^≡Smpr-∂Smpr∂rLΘ→→2r+OΘ2,
(2)
where the parameter β relates to the potential range while A and á are two dimensionless parameters, and 1/α is its range and r is the distance between the two particles. The coupling LΘ→→ equals L
x
Θ12 + L
y
Θ23 + L
z
Θ13, where L
x
, L
y
, and L
z
are the usual components of angular momentum operator L→ in RQM while the new noncommutativity parameter Θ
µν
equals θ
µν
/2. The new structure of (RNCQM) based on new covariant noncommutative canonical commutations relations (CNCCRs) in Schrödinger , Heisenberg and interactions pictures (SP, HP, and IP), respectively, as follows [36-46]:¨
*xμ^,Pν^=*xμ^t,Pν^t=*xμI^t,PνI^t=iℏeffδμν,
(3.1)
*xμ^,xν^=*xμ^t,xν^t=*xμI^t,xνI^t=iθμν.
(3.2)
We generalize the CNCCRs to include HP and IP. It should be noted that, in our calculation, we have used the natural units c= ℏ = 1. Here ℏeff=ℏ1+Trθθ-/4 ℏ is the effective Planck constant and here θ- observed in the NC commutator
*xμ^,Pν^=*xμ^t,Pν^t=xμI^t,PνI^t=iℏθμν-,
and θ
µν
= ε
µν
θ (θ is the non-commutative parameter), which is an infinitesimals parameter if compared to the energy values and elements of antisymmetric 3 × 3 real matrix and δ
µν
is the identity matrix. The symbol (∗) denotes the Weyl Moyal star product, which is generalized between two ordinary functions f(x)g(x) to the new modified form f̂(x̂)ĝ(x̂) ≡f(x) *g(x) in the symmetries of RNCQM as follows [47-55]:
f(x)g(x)→(f*g)(x)=exp(iθεμν∂xμ∂xν)f(xμ)g(xν)≅fg(x)-iεμν2θ∂μxf∂νxgxμ=xν+O(θ2).
(4)
The indices µ,ν ≡ 1,3¯ and O(θ
2) stand for the second and higher-order terms of the NC parameter. Physically, the second term in Eq. (4) presents the effects of space-space noncommutativity properties. Furthermore, the new unified two operators ξμH^t=xμ^orpμ^t and ξμI^t=xμI^orpμI^t in HP and IP are depending on the corresponding new operators ξμH^t≡xμ^~\txor~pμ^ in SP from the following projection relations, respectively:
ξμHt=expiHrmp^TξμSexp-iHrmp^T⇒ ξμH^t=expiHnc-rmp^T*ξ^μS*exp-iHnc-rmp^T,
(5.1)
and
ξμHt=expiHormp^TξμSexp-iHormp^T⇒ ξμH^t=expiHnc-ormp^T*ξ^μS*exp-iHnc-ormp^T,
(5.2)
where T = t − t
0 and the three unified coordinates ξμS≡xμorpμ, ξμHt≡xμorpμt and ξμIt≡xμI or pμIt are represented in three relativistic quantum mechanics pictures, while the dynamics of new systems dξH^ (t)/dt are described from the following motion equations in the modified Heisenberg picture as follows:
dξμHtdt=ξμHt,Hrmp^+∂ξμHtt⇒dξH^tdt=*ξμH^t,Hnc-rmp^+∂ξμH^t∂t.
(6)
The operators (Ĥ
or
mp
and Ĥ
r
mp
) are the free and global Hamiltonian for equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen
potential while (Ĥ
nc−or
mp
and Ĥ
nc− r
mp
) the corresponding Hamiltonians for the modified Manning-Rosen potentials.
The present investigation aims at constructing a relativistic noncommutative
effective scheme for the modified Manning-Rosen potential.
The paper is sketched in six sections. The rest of the five sections is organized as follows: We briefly review the usual relativistic Klein-Gordon equation with equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potentials in the next section. Section 3 is devoted to the solutions of the deformed Klein-Gordon equation with the modified equal vector and scalar equal vector scalar ManningRosen potentials using Bopp’s shift method and improved approximation of the centrifugal term to obtain the corresponding effective potential in addition to the standard perturbation theory in the first-order in the noncommutativity parameters (Θ,σ,χ) we find the expectation values of some radial terms. Section 4 is reserved to present the new main global energy shift and the global energy spectra of the molecular physics such as (HCl, CH, LiH, CO, NO, O2, I2, N2, H2, and Ar2, and HCl) produced studied potential in the RNCQM symmetries. In Sec. 5, we apply our study for determining the energy spectra under this potential in the nonrelativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics (NRNCQM). Finally, we conclude this paper in Sec. 6.
2. Revised of the eigenfunctions and the energy eigenvalues for equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen in RQM
To achieve the main objective of the current study of finding solutions of deformed Klein-Gordon equation (KGE) in the RNCQM symmetries under the modified equal vector and scalar modified Manning-Rosen potential, it is helpful for the reader to see solutions in RQM. The equal vector and scalar modified Manning-Rosen potential [19] is given as:
Vmpr=ℏ22Mβ2αα-1\E-2rβ1-\E-rβ2-A\E-rβ1-\E-rβ
(7.1)
and
Smpr=ℏ22Mβ2λλ-1\E-2rβ1-\E-rβ2-B\E-rβ1-\E-rβ.
(7.2)
To achieve this goal of our current research it is useful to make a summary for the Klein?Gordon equation KGE threedimensional relativistic quantum mechanics:
-∇2+Mr+Smpr2-Enl-Vmpr2 Ψr,θ,φ=0.
(8)
The vector potential V
mp
(r) due to the four-vector linear momentum operator A
µ
(V
mp
(r),A→ = 0) and the space-time scalar potential S
my
(r) whereas the interaction of scalar and vector bosons are considering by usual substitutions (M → M + S
mp
and p
µ
→ p
µ
− A
µ
), E
nl
is the relativistic energy eigenvalues, ∇→ is the ordinary 3-dimensional Nabla operator while (n = 0,1,2,... and l) are represents the principal and orbital quantum numbers, respectively. Since equal vector scalar,Manning-Rosen potential has spherical symmetry, allowing the solutions of the time-independent KGE of the known form Ψ(r,θ,φ) = (U
nl
(r)/r)Y
l
m
(θ,φ) to separate the radial U
nl
(r) and angular Y
l
m
(θ,φ) parts of the wave function, thus Eq. (8) becomes:
d2dr2-M2-Enl2-2EnlVmpr+MSmpr+Vmp2r-Smp2r-ll+1r2Unlr=0.
(9)
Using the shorthand notation
Veffmyr≡2EnlVmpr+MSmpr-Vmp2r+Smp2r+ll+1r2
And Eeffmp≡M2-Enl2, we obtain the following second-order Schrödinger -like equation:¨
d2dr2-Eeffmy+VeffmyrUnlr=0.
(10)
When the vector potential is equal to the scalar potential V
mp
(r) = S
mp
(r) the effective potential leads to the following simple form:
Veffmpr≡2Enl+MVmpr+ll+1r2.
(11)
The Ref. [19] gives the total wave function and the corresponding energy eigenvalues
E
nl
of the KGE with equal scalar and vector scalar and vector modified Manning-Rosen potential as follows:
Ψr,θ,φ=Nnlre-r/βλ1-e-r/β21/2+ϑl/2F1-n,2λnl+ϑl+n+1;1+2λnl,e-r/βYlmθ,φ,
(12)
and
λnl≡βM2-Enl2=-nn+121+ϑnl-n2+Aη-ωll+12n+1+ϑnl,
(13)
where s = e
−r/β
, λ
nl
≡ βM2-Enl2,ϑnl=4ηnlαα-1+2l+12 , η
nl
= (E
nl
+ M/M), N
nl
is a normalization constant and 2
F
1(−n,2λ
nl
+ ϑ
l
+ n + 1;1 + 2ε
nl
,s) are the hypergeometric polynomials. From the definition of Jacobi polynomials [56]:
2F1-n,2λnl+ϑnl+n+1;1+2εnl,s=n!Γ2λnl+1Γn+2λnl+1Pn2λnl,ϑnl1-2s.
(14)
In terms of the definition of Jacobi polynomials, Eq. (12) can be written as:
Ψr,θ,φ=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+1sλnlr1-s1/2+ϑnl/2Pn2λnl,ϑnl1-2sYlmθ,φ.
(15)
3.The solution of DKGE under modified Manning-Rosen potential in RNCQM
The beginning of this section is devoted to reformulate the Manning-Rosen potential in the relativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics symmetries (RNCQM). We achieve this goal by rewriting the KGE by applying the notion of the Weyl-Moyal star product introduced previously (see Eq. (3)) on the differential equation that satisfied by the radial wave function U
nl
(r) in the second section (see Eq. Eq. (9)); thus, the radial wave function U
nl
(r) in the RNCQM symmetries becomes as follows [56-67]:
d2dr2-M2-Enl2-2Enl+MVmpr-ll+1r2*Unlr=0.
(16)
It is known to the specialized physicists that F. Bopp was the first to propose pseudo-differential operators obtained from a symbol by the quantization rules (x → x
nc
= x − (i/2)∂/∂p) and (p → p
nc
= p − (i/2)∂/∂x) instead of the ordinary correspondence x → x and (p → (i/2)∂/∂x); the latter are known as Bopp’s shifts and the quantization procedure is the so-called Bopp quantization [55,68-70]. This method has attracted the attention of many researchers and is used as an alternative to the complicated star product calculations. As a consequence, we can rewrite the deformed Schrödinger equation, deformed Klien-Gordon equation, and deformed Dirac equation with the notion of star product to the Schrödinger equation, Klien-Gordon equation, and Dirac equation with the notion of ordinary product, respectively. This useful simplification can be achieved through reformulating the new algebraic relations which are known as noncommutative canonical commutation relations in the symmetries of relativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics with star product in Eqs. (2) and (3.1) and (3.2) without the notion of star product as follows (see, e.g., [56,59,61,62]:
x^μS,x^νS=x^μHt,x^νHt=x^μIt,x^νIt=iθμν.
(17)
The generalized positions and momentum coordinates: x^μS,p^μS, x^μH,p^μHt in the symmetries of RNCQM are defined in terms of the corresponding coordinates xμS,pμS, xμH,pμHt and xμI,pμIt in the symmetries of RQM via, respectively [39-49]:
xμS,pμS⇒x^μS=xμS-θμν2PνS,p^μS=pμS,
(18.1)
xμH,pμHt⇒x^μHt=xμHt-θμν2PνHt,p^μH=pμHt,
(18.2)
xμI,pμIt⇒x^μIt=xμIt-θμν2PνIt,p^μI=pμIt,
(18.3)
This allows us to find the operator r
nc
2 = r
2 − LL→ΘΘ in the symmetries of RNCQM [59-61]. It is convenient to introduce a shorthand notation which will save us a lot of writing r
nc
→ rˆthe previously relation reduced to the rˆ2 = r
2 −LL→ΘΘ. According to the Bopp shift method, Eq. (17) becomes similar to the following like the Schrödinger equation (without the notions of star product):
d2dr2-M2-Enl2-2Enl+MVmpr-ll+1r2Unlr=0.
(19)
The new operators Vmprand1/r2 are expressed as in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
Vmpr=Vmpr-L→Θ→2r∂Vmpr∂r+OΘ2,
(20.1)
and
1r2=1r2+L→Θ→r4+OΘ2.
(20.2)
Consequently, we can rewrite:
Enl+MVmpr^=Enl+MVmpr-Enl+MLΘ→→2r∂Vmpr∂r+OΘ2.
(21)
Moreover, to illustrate the above equation in a simple mathematical way and attractive form, it is useful to enter the following symbol Vnc-effmpr, thus the radial Eq. (20) becomes:
d2dr2-Eeffmp+Vnc-effmprUnlr=0,
(22)
with
Vnc-effmpr=Veffmpr+Vpertmyr,
(23)
where Vpertmpr is given by the following relation:
Vpertmpr=ll+1r4-Enl+Mr∂Vmpr∂rL→Θ→.
(24)
It becomes obvious that the radial modified differential equation obtained in Eq. (22) cannot be solved analytically for any state l 6= 0 because of the centrifugal term. The effective perturbative potential, given in Eq. (24), has a strong singularity r → 0; we need to use the new approximation of the centrifugal term proposed by C. S. Jia et al. [8] for a short-range potential, an excellent approximation to the centrifugal term. Unlike the following new approximation used in the previous work in ordinary quantum mechanics [8,20,21,23]:
1r2≈1β2ωexp-r/β1-exp-r/β+exp-2r/β1-exp{-r/β}2=1β2ωs1-s+s21-s2,
(25.1)
where ω is an adjustable dimensionless parameter. This allows us to obtain:
1r4≈1β4ωexp-r/β1-exp-r/β+exp-2r/β1-exp{-r/β}22=1β4ω2s21-s2+2ωs31-s3+s41-s4,
(25.2)
which after straightforward calculations we obtain ∂V
my
(r)/∂r as follows:
∂Vmyr∂r=αα-1δMβ2e-3δr1-e-δr3-e-2δr1-e-δr2+A2Mβ2δe-δr1-e-δr-A2Mβ2δe-2δr1-e-δr2,
(26)
with (1/β) = δ. The above equation can be simplified to the following form :
∂Vmpr∂r=λ1s2(1-s)2+λ2s3(1-s)3+λ3s1-s
(27)
with
λ1≡-αα-1δMβ2-Aδ2Mβ2,λ2≡-αα-1δMβ2
and
λ3≡Aδ2Mβ2.
Obviously, Eq. (25.1) cannot be determined from 1/r. Therefore, we must use the improved approximation of the centrifugal term proposed by Badawi et al. [71]; this method proved its power and efficiency when compared with the Greene and Aldrich approximation for a short-range potential [6]. Unlike the following approximation used in the previous work in QM and NCQM [17,18,59,60,62,72] :
1r2≈exp-r/ββ2(1-exp(-r/β))2=sβ2(1-s)2.
(28.1)
This allows us to obtain:
1r≈exp-r/2ββ1-exp-r/β=s1/2β1-s.
(28.2)
The approximation (25.1) reduces to Eq. (28.1) when the adjustable dimensionless parameter ω = 1. Inserting Eqs. (25.2), (27), (28.2) into Eq. (24) allows us to obtain the perturbed effective potential in the symmetries of RNCQM as follows:
Vpertmpr=ll+1β4s4(1-s)4-Enl+Mβλ1s5/2(1-s)3+λ2s7/2(1-s)4+λ3s3/2(1-s)2L→Θ→.
(29)
The Manning-Rosen potential is extended by including new terms proportional to the radial terms
s4(1-s)4,s5/2(1-s)3,s7/2(1-s)4
and
s321-s2.
to become the modified Manning-Rosen potential in RNCQM symmetries. Obviously, the newly generated effective potential Veffmpr for the modified Manning-Rosen potential is also proportional to the infinitesimal vector ΘΘ, allowing us to consider it as a perturbation potential compared with the parent potential operator Vpertmpr in the symmetries RNCQM, that is, the inequality Vpertmpr≪Veffmpr has become achieved. In other words, all the physical justifications for applying the timeindependent perturbation theory become satisfied. Now, we apply the perturbative theory, in the case of RNCQM, we find the expectation values of the radial terms
s4(1-s)4,s5/2(1-s)3,s7/2(1-s)4
and
s3/2(1-s)2,
taking into account the wave function of Manning-Rosen potential which we have seen previously in the second section. After straightforward calculations, we obtain the following expectations values:
s41-s4n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫0+∞s2λnl1-s1+ϑnlPn2λnl,ϑnl1-2s2s4dr1-s4,
(30.1)
s5/21-s3n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫0+∞s2λnl1-s1+ϑnlPn2λnl,ϑnl1-2s2s5/2dr1-s3,
(30.2)
s7/21-s4n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫0+∞s2λnl1-s1+ϑnlPn2λnl,ϑnl1-2s2s7/2dr1-s4.
(30.3)
and
s3/21-s2n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫0+∞s2λnl1-s1+ϑnlPn2λnl,ϑnl1-2s2s3/2dr1-s2.
(30.4)
We have used useful abbreviations ⟨n,l,m|B̂|n,l,m⟩ ≡ ⟨B̂⟩
(n,l,m)
to avoid the extra burden of writing equations. Furthermore, we have applied the property of the spherical harmonics, which has the form
∫Ylmθ,φYl'm'θ,φsinθdθdφ=δll'δmm'.
We have s = exp(−δr) (with δ = 1/β), implying dr = −(1/δ)(ds/s). After introducing a new variable z = 1 − 2s, we have s = (1−z)/2, dr = (1/δ)(dz/1−z) and 1−s = (z+1)/2. From the asymptotic behavior of s = exp(−δr) and z = 1−2s,
when r → 0 (z → −1) and r → +∞ (z → 1) this allows the reformulation of Eqs. (30, i=1,4¯) as follows:
22λnl+ϑnl+1δs41-s4n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫-1+11-z2λnl+31+zϑnl-3Pn2λnl,ϑnlz2dz,
22λnl+ϑnl+1/2δs5/21-s3n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫-1+11-z2λnl-3/21+zϑnl-2Pn2λnl,ϑnlz2dz,
22λnl+ϑnl+1/2δs7/21-s4n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫-1+11-z2λnl+5/21+zϑnl-3Pn2λnl,ϑnlz2dz,
(31.1)
and
22λnl+ϑnl+1/2δs3/21-s2n,l,m=n!Γ2λnl+1NnlΓn+2λnl+12∫-1+11-z2λnl+1/21+zϑnl-1Pn2λnl,ϑnlz2dz.
(31.4)
For the ground state n = 0, we have Pn=02λ0l,ϑ0lz=1, thus the above expectation values in Eqs. (31, i=1,4¯) are reduced to the following simple form:
22λ0l+ϑ0l+1δs41-s40,l,m=N0l2∫-1+11-z2λ0l+31+zϑ0l-3dz,
(32.1)
22λ0l+ϑ0l+1/2δs5/21-s30,l,m=N0l2∫-1+11-z2λ0l-3/21+zϑ0l-2dz,
(32.2)
22λ0l+ϑ0l+1/2δs7/21-s40,l,m=N0l2∫-1+11-z2λ0l+5/21+zϑ0l-3dz,
(32.3)
and
22λ0l+ϑ0l+1/2δs3/21-s20,l,m=N0l2∫-1+11-z2λ0l+1/21+zϑ0l-1dz.
(32.4)
where λ0l≡βM2-E0l2=Aη0l-ωll+1/1+ϑ0l, ϑ0l=4η0lαα-1+2l+12 and η
0l
= (E
0l
+ M)/M
Comparing Eqs. (31, i=1,3¯) with the integral of the form [73]:
∫-1+11-xα1+xβPmα,βxPnα,βxdx=2α+β+1Γn+α+1Γn+β+12n+α+β+1Γn+α+β+1n!δmn⇒∫-1+11-xn+α1+xn+βdx=22n+α+β+1Γn+α+1Γn+β+12n+α+β+1Γ2n+α+β+1.
(33)
A direct calculation gives the expectation values in Eqs. (34. i=1,3¯). Namely,
s41-s40,l,m=N0l2Γ2λ0l+4Γϑ0l-2ρ0l+1δΓρ0l+1,
(34.1)
s521-s30,l,m=N0l2Γ2λ0l-1/2Γϑ0l-14ρ0l-5/2δΓρ0l-5/2,
(34.2)
s721-s40,l,m=N0l2Γ2λ0l+7/2Γϑ0l-2ρ0l+1/2δΓρ0l+1/2,
(34.3)
s321-s20,l,m=N0l2Γ2λ0l+3/2Γϑ0lρ0l+1/2δΓρ0l+1/2,
(34.4)
where ρ0l equal 2λ0l+ϑ0l For the first excited state n= 1, the Jacobi polynomial reduced to Pn=12λ1l,ϑ1lz=Ω1l+Ξ1l1-z, here Ω
1l
=ϑ
1l
+ 1, Ξ1l=-2λ1l+ϑ1l+2 , with λ1l≡βM2-E1l2=-3/2ϑ1l-2+Aη1l-ωll+1/3+ϑ1l, ϑ1l=4η1lαα-1+2l+12, η1l=E1l+M/M. Thus, the expectation values in (33 i=1,6¯). Are reduces to the following simple form:
s4(1-s)41,l,m=T11+T12+T13,s5/2(1-s)31,l,m=T21+T22+T23,
(35.1)
and
s7/21-s41,l,m=T31+T32+T33, s3/21-s21,l,m=T41+T42+T43.
(35.2)
where the 12-factors Tiji=1,4¯,j=1,3 are given by:
T11T12T13=122λ1l+ϑ1l+1δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+3(1+z)ϑ1l-3dz2Ω1lΞ1l∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+4(1+z)ϑ1l-3dzΞ1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+5(1+z)ϑ1l-3dz,
(36.1)
T21T22T23=122λ1l+ϑ1l+1/2δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l-3/2(1+z)ϑ1l-2dz2Ω1lΞ1l∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l-1/2(1+z)ϑ1l-2dzΞ1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+1/2(1+z)ϑ1l-2dz,
(36.2)
T31T32T33=122λ1l+ϑ1l+1/2δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+5/2(1+z)ϑ1l-3dz2Ω1lΞ1l∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+7/2(1+z)ϑ1l-3dzΞ1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+9/2(1+z)ϑ1l-3dz,
(36.3)
and
T41 T42 T43 = 122λ1l + ϑ1l + 1/2 δ N1l 2 λ1l + 1 2Ω1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+1/2(1+z)ϑ1l-1dz2Ω1lΞ1l∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+3/2(1+z)ϑ1l-1dzΞ1l2∫-1+1(1-z)2λ1l+5/2(1+z)ϑ1l-1dz
(36.4)
By using the integral formula in Eq. (33) we obtain the analytical expressions of the 12-factors Tiji=1,4¯,j=1,3 as follows:
T11T12T13=1δN1l2λ1l+12Γ2λ1l+4Γϑ1l-2Ω1l2ω1l+1Γω1l+14Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+5Γϑ1l-2ω1l+2Γω1l+24Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+6Γϑ1l-2ω1l+3Γω1l+3,
(37.1)
T21T22T23=1δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2Γ2λ1l-1/2Γϑ1l-18ω1l-5/2Γω1l-5/24Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+1/2Γϑ1l-14ω1l-3/2Γω1l-3/24Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+3/2Γϑ1l-12ω1l-1/2Γω1l-1/2,
(37.2)
T31T32T33=1δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2Γ2λ1l+7/2Γϑ1l-2ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/24Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+9/2Γϑ1l-2ω1l+3/2Γω1l+3/24Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+11/2Γϑ1l-2ω1l+5/2Γω1l+5/2,
(37.3)
and
T41T42T43=1δN1l2λ1l+12Ω1l2Γ2λ1l+3/2Γϑ1l2ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/22Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+5/2Γϑ1l2ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/2Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+7/2Γϑ1l8ω1l+5/2Γω1l+5/2
(37.4)
with
ω
1l
≡ 2
λ
1l
+
ϑ
1
l. The substitution of Eqs. (37.1) (37.2), (37.3) and (37.4) into Eqs. (35.1), (35.2) (35.3), and (35.4) gives the expectation values in the first excited state (1,l,m):
s41-s41,l,m=1δN1l2λ1l+12Γϑ1l-2 Ω1l2Γ2λ1l+4ω1l+1Γω1l+1+4Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+5ω1l+2Γω1l+2+4Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+6ω1l+3Γω1l+3,
(38.1)
s5/21-s31,l,m=N1l2λ1l+12Γϑ1l-1Ω1l2Γ2λ1l-1/28ω1l-5/2Γω1l-5/2+4Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+1/24ω1l-3/2Γω1l-3/2+4Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+3/22ω1l-1/2Γω1l-1/2,
(38.2)
s7/21-s41,l,m=1δN1l2λ1l+12Γϑ1l-2Ω1l2Γ2λ1l+7/2ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/2+4Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+9/2ω1l+3/2Γω1l+3/2+4Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+11/2ω1l+5/2Γω1l+5/2,
(38.3)
and
s3/21-s21,l,m=1δN1l2λ1l+12Γϑ1l Ω1l2Γ2λ1l+3/22ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/2+2Ω1lΞ1lΓ2λ1l+5/22ω1l+1/2Γω1l+1/2+Ξ1l2Γ2λ1l+7/28ω1l+5/2Γω1l+5/2.
(38.4)
The relativistic study of the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential is divided into three principal parts. The first one is devoted to studying the spin-orbit effect generated by the noncommutativity space-space. This is achieved by replacing the coupling of the angular momentum operator with noncommutativity coupling L→ Θ→ by the new equivalent coupling ΘΘ→ S → (with Θ = (Θ2
12 + Θ2
23 + Θ2
13)
1/2
). We have oriented the spin vector of the diatomic molecules such as HCl, CH, LiH, CO, NO, O2, I2, N2, H2, and Ar2 to the direction of the vector Θ→ under modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential. Then we replace it with the corresponding value: (Θ/2) Θ/2 J2→- L2→- S2→ Furthermore, in quantum mechanics, the operators H^nc-rmp, J2, L2, S2, and J
z
) forms a complete set of conserved physics quantities, the eigenvalues of the operator J2→- L2→- S2→ are equal the values 2k(l) ≡j(j+1) −l(l+1) −s(s+1), with |l−s| ≤j≤ |l+s|. Consequently, the energy shift Δ E^mypso n= 0, Θ, j , l, s ≡ Δ E^mypso 0, Θ, j , l, s and Δ E^mypso n= 1, Θ, j , l, s ≡ Δ E^mypso 1, Θ, j , l, s due to the perturbed effective potential produced
V
pert
mp
(r) for the ground state and the first excited state, respectively, in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpSO(0,Θ,j,l,s)=12(j[j+1]-l[l+1]-s(s+1)ΘX0,l,mrmp,
(39.1)
ΔEmpSO(0,Θ,j,l,s)=12(j[j+1]-l[l+1]-s(s+1)ΘX0,l,mrmp,
(39.2)
where the global expectation value X0,l,mR is determined from the following expression:
⟨X⟩(0,l,m)R=ll+1β4⟨s4(1-s)4⟩0,l,m-Enl+Mβ×(λ1⟨s5/21-s)30,l,m+λ2⟨s7/21-s)40,l,m+λ3⟨s3/21-s)20,l,m),
(40)
While X1,l,mrmp=X1→0,l,mrmp. We can now generalize the above results ΔEmpSOn,Θ,j,l,s to the case of n
th
excited states in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpSO(n,Θ,j,l,s)=12(j[j+1]-l[l+1]-s(s+1)ΘXn,l,mrmp.
(41)
Thus, we can express the general expectation value as follows: Xn,l,mrmp
Xn,l,mrmp=ll+1β4⟨s4(1-s)4⟩n,l,m-Enl+Mβ (λ1⟨s5/2(1-s)3⟩n,l,m+λ2⟨s7/2(1-s)4⟩n,l,m+λ3⟨s3/2(1-s)2⟩n,l,m).
(42)
The second main part in the relativistic study of the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential is corresponding to replace both (L→Θ→ and Θ12) by (σℵL
z
and σℵ), respectively, here ℵ and σ are, respectively symbolize the intensity of the induced magnetic field by the effect of deformation of space-space geometry and a new infinitesimal noncommutativity parameter, so that the physical unit of the original noncommutativity parameterD E Θ12 (length)2 is the same unit of σℵ, we have also need to apply n,l,mLz^n',l',m'=m'δnn'δll'δmm' (with − (l,l′) ≤ (m,m′) ≤ + (l,l′)). All of this data allows for the discovery of the new energy shift ΔEmpmn=0,σ,l,m≡Emym0,σ,l,m and ΔEmpmn=1,σ,l,m≡Emym1,σ,l,m due to the perturbed Zeeman effect created by the influence of the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen for the ground state and the first excited state in (RNC: 3D-RS) symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpm0,σ,l,m=ℵX0,l,mrmpσm,
(43.1)
ΔEmpm1,σ,l,m=ℵX1,σ,l,mrmpσm.
(43.2)
Thus, we can generalize the above particular cases to the general case ∆E
mp
m
(n,σ,l,m) of the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential which corresponds to the n
th
excited states in (RNC: 3D-RS) symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpm(n,σ,l,m)=ℵ(ll+1β4⟨s4(1-s)4⟩n,l,m-Enl+Mβ [λ1⟨s5/2(1-s)3⟩n0,l,m+λ2⟨s7/2(1-s)4⟩n,l,m+λ3⟨s3/2(1-s)2⟩n,l,m]σm.
(44)
Now, for our purposes, we are interested in finding a new third automatically important symmetry for modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential at zero temperature in RNCQM symmetries. This physical phenomenon is induced automatically from the influence of a perturbed effective potential Vpertmpr, which we have seen in Eq. (31). We discover these important physical phenomena when our studied system consists of N non-interacting is consider as Fermi gas, it is formed from all the particles in their gaseous state under rotation with angular velocity
Ω~
if we make the following two simultaneous transformations to ensure that previous calculations are not repeated:
Θ→→χΩ→.
(45.1)
Here χ is just infinitesimal real proportional constants. We can express the effective potential Vpert-rotmpr, which induced the rotational movements under the effect of modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential at zero temperature for the diatomic molecules as follows:
Vpert-rotmpr=χll+1β4s4(1-s)4-Enl+Mβλ1s5/2(1-s)3+λ2s7/2(1-s)4+λ3s3/2(1-s)2Ω→L→.
(45.2)
To simplify the calculations without compromising physical content, we choose the rotational velocity Ω→ = Ωe
z
. The next step is to transform the spin-orbit coupling to the new physical phenomena as follows:
χgsΩ→L→→χgrΩLz,
(46)
with
gs=ll+1β4s41-s4-Enl+Mβλ1s5/21-s3+λ2s7/21-s4+λ3s3/21-s2.
(47)
All of this data allows for the discovery of the new energy shift ΔEmpfn=0,χ,l,m≡ΔEmpf0,χ,l,m and ΔEmpfn=1,χ,l,m≡ΔEmpf1,χ,l,m due to the perturbed Fermi gas effect which generated automatically by the influence of the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential for the ground state and the first excited state in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpf0,χ,l,m=X0,l,mrmpχΩm,
(48.1)
and
ΔEmpf1,χ,l,m=X1,l,mrmpχΩm.
(48.1)
Thus, we can generalize the above particular cases to the general case which correspond to the n
th
excited states in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpfn,χ,l,m=Xn,l,mrmpχΩm.
(49)
It is worth mentioning that K. Bencheikh et al. [74,75] studied rotating isotropic and anisotropic harmonically confined ultra-cold Fermi gas in a two and three-dimensional space at zero temperature but in this study, the rotational term χg(s)Ω→L→ was added to the Hamiltonian operator. In contrast to our case, where this rotation term automatically appears due to the large symmetries resulting from the deformation of the space-phase.
4. Results and discussion
In this section of the paper, we summarize our obtained results (ΔEmpSO0,Θ,j,l,s), (ΔEmpSO1,Θ,j,l,s), (ΔEmpm0,σ,l,m), (ΔEmpm1,σ,l,m), and (ΔEmpf0,χ,l,m), and (ΔEmpf1,χ,l,m), for the ground state and first excited state due to the spin-
orbital complying, modified Zeeman effect, and perturbed Fermi gas potential which induced by Veffmpr on based to the superposition principle. Accordingly, we can deduce the additive energy shift ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,0,j,l,s,m and ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,1,j,l,s,m under the influence of modified Manning-Rosen potential in RNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,0,j,l,s,m=χ0,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm,
(50.1)
and
ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,0,j,l,s,m=χ0,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm.
(50.2)
It is easily to generalize the above special cases to the n
th
excited states ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,n,j,l,s,m under the influence of modified Manning-Rosen potential in RNCQM symmetries as
ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,0,j,l,s,m=χ0,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm.
(51)
The above results present the global energy shift, which is generated by the effect of noncommutativity properties of spacespace; it depends explicitly on the noncommutativity parameters (Θ,σ,χ), the parameters of equal vector scalar ManningRosen (β,A,α) in addition to the atomic quantum numbers (n,j,l,s,m). We observed that the obtained global effective energy ΔEmptot (Θ,σ,χ,n,j,l,s,m) under Modified Manning-Rosen potential carries units of energy because it is combined from the carrier of energy (M
2−E
nl
2 ). As a direct consequence, the energy Er-ncmp (Θ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m) produced with modified equal vector and scalar equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potentials, in the symmetries of RNCQM, corresponding the generalized n
th
excited states, the sum of the square-roots [Emptot (Θ,σ,χ,n,j,l,s,m]
1/2
of the shift energy, and E
nl
due to the effect of equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen in RQM, which determined from Eq. (12), as follows:
Er-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m=Enl-M+χn,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm1/2.
(52)
For the ground state and first excited state, the above equation can be reduced to the following form:
Er-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n=0,j,l,s,m=E0l-M+χ0,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm1/2.
(53.1)
and
Er-ncymΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n=1,j,l,s,m=E1l-M+χ1,l,mrmpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm1/2.
(53.2)
Equation (52) can de describe the relativistic energy of some diatomic molecules such as HCl, CH, LiH, CO, NO, O2, I2, N2, H2, and Ar2 under the modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential in RNCQM symmetries.
5. Nonrelativistic spectrum under the modified Manning-Rosen potential
The radial part U
nl
(r) of the complete wave function
Ψr,θ,φ=UnlrrYlmθ,φ
in ordinary nonrelativistic QM satisfied the following equation for Manning-Rosen potential:
d2Unlrdr2+2MEnlnr-mp-Veffnr-mprUnlr=0,
(54)
where
Veffnr-mpr=ℏ22Mβ2αα-1e-2r/β1-\e-r/β2-Ae-rβ1-e-rβ+ll+12Mr2
is the nonrelativistic effective potential in ordinary NRQM. The radial wave function U
nl
(r) in nonrelativistic noncommutative three-dimensional real space NRNCQM symmetries becomes as follows [56-67]:
d2Unlrdr2+2MEnlnr-mp-Veffnr-mpr*Unlr=0.
(55)
According to the Bopp shift method, Eq. (55) becomes similar to the Schrödinger equation (without the notions of star product):
d2Unlrdr2+2MEnlnr-mp-Veffnr-mpr^Unlr=0.
(56)
We can express the new effective potential Veffnr-mpr^ in NRNCQM symmetries:
Veffnr-mpr^=Veffnr-mp+Vmppertr.
(57)
The global effective potential Vmppertr is the perturbative potential produced with modified equal vector scalar Manning-
Rosen potential in NRNCQM symmetries plus the additive part ll+12Mr4L→Θ→ in Eq. (20.2):
Vmppertr=ll+12Mr4L→Θ→-∂Vmpr∂rL→Θ→2r+OΘ2.
(58)
We have applied the type of approximations suggested by Greene and Aldrich and Dong et al. for a short-range potential (see Eq. (28.1)) and we have calculated ∂V
my
(r)/∂r (Eq. (27)). Now, substituting Eq. (27) into Eq. (55) and replacing 1/r by its corresponding approximation in Eq. (28.2), we get the perturbative potential in (NC: 3D-RS) symmetries,
Vmypertr=ll+12Mβ4s41-s4L→Θ→-1βλ1s5/21-s\tre+λ2s7/21-s4+λ3s3/21-s2L→Θ→+OΘ2.
(59)
Thus, we need the expectation values of s
4
/(1 − s)4, s
5/2
/(1 − s)3, s
7/2
/(1 − s)4, and s
3/2
/(1 − s)2 to find the nonrelativistic energy corrections produced with the perturbative potential Vmppertr. By using the wave function in Eq. (15) and the expectation values in Eq. (34, i=1,4¯), and Eq. (38, i=1,4¯). For the ground state and first excited state, respectively, we get the corresponding global expectation values χ0,l,mnr-mp and χ1,l,mnr-mp
χ0,l,mnr-mp=ll+12Mβ4s41-s40,l,m-1βλ1s5/21-s30,l,m+λ2s7/21-s40,l,m+λ3s3/21-s20,l,m,
(60.1)
and
χ1,l,mnr-mp=ll+12Mβ4s41-s41,l,m-1βλ1s5/21-s31,l,m+λ2s7/21-s41,l,m+λ3s3/21-s21,l,m.
(60.2)
By following the same physical methodology that we have developed in our previous relativistic study, the energy corrections ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n=0,j,l,s,m and ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n=1,j,l,s,m for the ground state and first excited state due to the spin-orbit complying, modified Zeeman effect and nonrelativistic perturbed Fermin gas potential which induced by Vmppertr under the influence of modified Manning-Rosen potential in NRNCQM symmetries
ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n=0,j,l,s,m=χ0,l,mnr-mpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm,
(61.1)
and
ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n=1,j,l,s,m=χ1,l,mnr-mpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm.
(61.2)
It is easily to generalize the above special cases to the n
th
excited states under the influence of modified Manning-Rosen potential in NRNCQM symmetries as follows:
ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m=χn,l,mnr-mpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩm,
(62)
With χn,l,mnr-mp is given by
χn,l,mnr-mp=ll+12Mβ4s41-s4n,l,m-1βλ1s5/21-s3n,l,m+λ2s7/21-s4n,l,m+λ3s3/21-s2n,l,m.
(63)
The nonrelativistic energy Enr-ncmpΘ,σ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m for the diatomic molecules (HCl, CH, LiH, CO, NO, O2, I2,
N2, H2, and Ar2) produced with modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential, in the symmetries of (NC: 3D-RS), corresponding to the generalized n
th
excited states, the sum of the nonrelativistic energy Enlnr due to the effect of equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen in NRQM, and the corrections produced with the perturbed spin-orbit interaction and modified Zeeman effect, as follows:
Enr-ncmpΘ,σ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m=12μb2ll+1c-ℏ22μb2A+αα-1τn,l,α-τn,l,α42+χn,l,mnr-mpkj,l,sΘ+ℵσm+χΩ,
(64)
here τn,l,α=2n+1+1-2α2+4ll+1,b → β and c is a
dimensionless constant and equal 1/12 when (r/b) 《
1, while the case of c = 0 is identical to the conventional
approximation given in Eq. (28.1). The first two terms are the nonrelativistic
energy due to the Manning-Rosen potential in NRQM, which is determined directly from
the study of Z.Y. Chen, et al. [18].
Now, considering composite systems such as molecules made of N = 2 particles of masses m
n
(n = 1,2) in the frame of noncommutative algebra, it is worth taking into account features of descriptions of the systems in the non-relativistic case, it was obtained that composite systems with different masses are described with different noncommutative parameters [76-78]:
*xμs^,xμs^=*xμH^t,xνH^t=*xμI^t,xνI^t=iθμνc,
(65)
where the noncommutativity parameter θμνc is given by:
θμνc=∑n=12μn2θμνn,
(66)
with μn=mn/∑nmn the indices (n = 1,2) label the particle, and θμνn is the parameter of noncommutativity, corresponding to the particle of mass m
n
. Note that in the case of a system of two particles with the same mass m
1 = m
2 such as the diatomic (O2, I2, N2, H2, and Ar2) molecules, the parameter θμνn=θμν. Thus, the three parameters Θ, σ and χ which appears in Eq. (63) are changed to the new form:
Θc2=∑n=12μn2Θ12n2+∑n=12μn2Θ23n2+∑n=12μn2Θ13n2,
(67.1)
σc2=∑n=12μn2σ12n2+∑n=12μn2σ23n2+∑n=12μn2σ13n2,
(67.2)
χc2=∑n=12μn2χ12n2+∑n=12μn2χ23n2+∑n=12μn2χ13n2.
(67.3)
As it is mentioned above, in the case of a system of two particles with the same mass m
1 = m
2, we have Θμνn=Θμν, σμνn=σμν, and χμνn=χμν Finally, we can generalize the nonrelativistic global energy Enr-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,munder the modified Manning-Rosen potential considering that composite systems with different masses are described with different noncommutative parameters for the diatomic molecules (HCl, CH, LiH, CO, and NO) as:
Enr-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m=ll+1c2μb2-12μb2A+αα-1τn,l,α-τn,l,α42+χn,l,mnr-mpkj,l,sΘc+ℵσcm+χcΩm,
(68)
The important result in this work is to consider DKGE and DSHE under modified Manning-Rosen has a physical behavior similar to the Duffin-Kemmer equation, which provides us a basis to study relativistic spin-zero and spin-one bosons [79], it can describe a dynamic state of a particle with spin one in the symmetries of relativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics. Worthwhile it is better to mention that for the two simultaneous limits (Θ,σ,χ) → (0,0,0) and (Θ
c
,σ
c
,χ
c
) → (0,0,0), we recover the results of the in Refs. [13,18,19].
6. Summary and conclusion
This paper covers the perspective of modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential in both relativistic and nonrelativistic regimes that correspond to high and low energy physics. We have employed both simultaneous methods, the Bopp’s shift and standard perturbation theory methods, to obtain the new bound state solutions the deformed Klein-Gordon and Schrödinger equations by applying the improved approximation scheme to deal with the centrifugal term. The obtained new bound state solutions Er-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m and Enr-ncmpΘ,σ,χ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m corresponding to the generalized n
th
excited states appear as a sum of the total shift energy ΔEmptotΘ,σ,χ,n,j,l,s,m the nonrelativistic corrections ΔEmpnrΘ,σ,β,A,α,n,j,l,s,m relativistic energy E
nl
, and nonrelativistic energies in RQM and NRQM, respectively, for the equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential. The total shift energy and nonrelativistic corrections appeared as a function of the Gamma function, the discreet atomic quantum numbers (j,l,s,m), and the potential parameters (β,A,α) in addition to noncommutativity three parameters (Θ,σ and χ) of noncommutativity space-space. This behavior is similar to the perturbed both modified Zeeman effect, modified perturbed spin-orbit coupling in which an external magnetic field is applied to the system and the spin-orbit couplings which are generated with the effect of the perturbed effective potential Vpertmpr in the symmetries of relativistic and nonrelativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics. In addition, we can conclude that the DKGE becomes similar to the Duffin-Kemmer equation under modified equal vector scalar Manning-Rosen potential, it can describe a dynamic state of a particle with spin one in the symmetries of relativistic noncommutative quantum mechanics. Furthermore, we have applied our results to composite systems such as molecules made of N = 2 particles of masses m
n
(n = 1,2). It is worth mentioning that, for all cases, when to make the two simultaneously limits (Θ,σ,χ) → (0,0,0) and (Θ
c
,σ
c
,χ
c
) → (0,0,0), the ordinary physical quantities are recovered. Finally, our research findings are very relevant in areas of atomic physics, vibrational and rotational spectroscopy, mass spectra, nuclear physics, and other applications [13,18,19].
Acknowledgments
This work has been partly supported by the AMHESR and DGRSDT under project No. B00L02UN280120180001 and by the Laboratory of Physics and Material Chemistry, University of M’sila-ALGERIA. I would be grateful to the referees for their constructive feedback, as they strive to improve, enrich and develop our work.
References
1. A.F. Nikiforov, V.B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics (Birkhauser, Bassel, 1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1595-8.
[ Links ]
2. B.I. Ita et al., J. Phys. 19 (2018) 37, <http://DOI.org/ 10.4038/sljp.v19i1.8050>
[ Links ]
3. H. Louis, B.I. Ita and N.I. Nzeata, Approximate solution of the equation with Manning-Rosen plus Hellmann potential and its thermodynamic properties using the proper quantization rule, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 (2019). <doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12835-3>
[ Links ]
4. M.X. Shao, Y.Z. Mao and D.T. Zhang, Geometric Proof of Exact Quantization Rules in One Dimensional Quantum Mechanics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 48 (2009) 36, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9779-x
[ Links ]
5. C. L. Pekeris, The Rotation-Vibration Coupling in Diatomic Molecules, Phys. Rev. 45 (1934) 98. <doi: 10.1103/physrev.45.98>
[ Links ]
6. R.L. Greene and C. Aldrich, Variational wave functions for a screened Coulomb potential, Phys. Rev. A. 14 (1976) 2363. <doi: 10.1103/physreva.14.2363>
[ Links ]
7. B.H. Yazarloo, H. Hassanabadi and S. Zarrinkamar, Oscillator strengths based on the Möbius square potential under equation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127 (2012) 51. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2012-12051-9
[ Links ]
8. C. S. Jia, J. Y. Liu, and P. Q. Wang, A new approximation scheme for the centrifugal term and the Hulthén potential. Phys. Lett. A 372 (2008) 4779-4782. <doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2008.05.030>
[ Links ]
9. M. F. Manning, A potential function for the vibrations of diatomic molecules, Phys. Rev. 44 (1933) 953. <doi: 10.1103/physrev.44.951>
[ Links ]
10. M.F. Manning and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 44 (1933) 953. doi:10.1103/physrev.44.951
[ Links ]
11. M. F. Manning, Energy Levels of a Symmetrical Double Minima Problem with Applications to the NH3 and ND3 Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 3 (1935) 136, <doi: 10.1063/1.1749619>
[ Links ]
12. M. F Manning, Exact Solutions of the Equation. Phys. Rev. 48 (1935) 161, <doi: 10.1103/physrev.48.161 >.
[ Links ]
13. B. J. Falaye, K. J. Oyewumi, T. T. Ibrahim, M. A. Punyasena and C. A. Onate, Bound state solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential, Canadian Journal of Physics 91 (2013) 98, <doi: 10.1139/cjp-2012-0330>
[ Links ]
14. S. M. Ikhdair, On the bound-state solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential including an improved approximation to the orbital centrifugal term, Phys. Scr. 83 (2011) 015010, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/83/01/015010.
[ Links ]
15. S.-H. Dong and J. García-Ravelo, Exact solutions of the s-wave equation with Manning-Rosen potential, Phys. Scr. 75 (2007) 307, https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/75/3/013.
[ Links ]
16. S.M. Ikhdair, Approximate l-States of the Manning-Rosen Potential by Using Nikiforov-Uvarov Method, Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2012 (2012) 201525, <doi: 10.5402/2012/201525>.
[ Links ]
17. W. C. Qiang and S. H. Dong, Analytical approximations to the solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential with centrifugal term. Phys. Lett. A 368 (2007) 13, <doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.03.057>.
[ Links ]
18. Z. Y. Chen andC. S. Jia , Approximate analytical solutions of the Shrodinger equation with the Manning-Rosen potential model, Mod. Phys. Lett. A , 24 (2009) 1863, <doi: 10.1142/s0217732309030345>.
[ Links ]
19. N. Hatami and M. R. Setare, Analytical solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation for Manning-Rosen potential with centrifugal term through Nikiforov-Uvarov method. Indian
J. Phys. 91 (2017) 1229, <doi: 10.1007/s12648-017-1020-4>.
[ Links ]
20. G.-F. Wei, Z. -Z. Zhen and S. -H. Dong, The relativistic bound and scattering states of the Manning-Rosen potential with an improved new approximate scheme to the centrifugal term. Open Phys. 7 (2009) 175, https://doi.org/10.2478/s11534-008-0143-9.
[ Links ]
21. G. F. Wei and S. H. Dong, Approximately analytical solutions of the Manning-Rosen potential with the spin-orbit coupling term and spin symmetry, Phys. Lett. A 373 (2008) 49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.10.064.
[ Links ]
22. M. K. Bahar and F. Yasuk, Approximate Solutions to the Dirac Equation with Effective Mass for the Manning-Rosen Potential in N Dimensions, Few-Body Syst 53 (2012) 515, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-012-0461-8.
[ Links ]
23. G. F. Wei, Z. Z. Zhen and S. H. Dong, The relativistic bound and scattering states of the Manning-Rosen potential with an improved new approximate scheme to the centrifugal term, Open Phys. 7 (2009) 175, <doi: 10.2478/s11534-008-0143-9>
[ Links ]
24. S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase and G. Scarpetta, Generalized uncertainty principle from quantum geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39 (2000) 15, <doi: 10.1023/A:1003634814685>.
[ Links ]
25. S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen and J. E. Roberts, Spacetime quantization induced by classical gravity, Phys. Lett. B. 331 (1994) 39, <doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(94)90940-7>
[ Links ]
26. E. Witten, Refection on the fate spacetime, Phys. Today 49 (1996) 24. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.881493
[ Links ]
27. A. Kempf, G. Mangano and R.B. Mann, Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation, Phys. Rev. D. 52 (1995) 1108, doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1108.
[ Links ]
28. A. Addazi and A. Marcianó, A modern guide to è-Poincaré. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 35 (2020) 2042003, <doi: 10.1142/s0217751x20420038>.
[ Links ]
29. R. J. Adler and D. I. Santigo, On gravity and the uncertainty principal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14 (1999) 1371, <doi: 10.1142/s0217732399001462>.
[ Links ]
30. T. Kanazawa, G. Lambiase , G. Vilasi and A. Yoshioka, Noncommutative Schwarzschild geometry and generalized uncertainty principle, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 95, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6610-1.
[ Links ]
31. F. Scardigli, Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole Gedanken experiment, Phys. Lett. B. 452 (1999) 39, <doi: 10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00167-7>.
[ Links ]
32. P. M. Ho and H. C. Kao, Noncommutative quantum mechanics from noncommutative quantum field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151602. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.151602.
[ Links ]
33. Kh. P. Gnatenko, Parameters of noncommutativity in Lie-algebraic noncommutative space, Phys. Rev. D. 99 (2019) 026009, doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.026009.
[ Links ]
34. O. Bertolami, J. G. Rosa, C. M. L. Dearagao, P. Castorina, and D. Zappala, Scaling of variables and the relation between noncommutative parameters in noncommutative quantum mechanics, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21 (2006) 795, <doi: 10.1142/s0217732306019840>.
[ Links ]
35. J. Gamboa, M. Loewe and J. C. Rojas, Noncommutative quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. D. 64 (2001) 067901, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.067901.
[ Links ]
36. A. E. F. Djemaï and H. Smail, On quantum mechanics on noncommutative quantum phase space, Commun. Theor. Phys. 41 (2004) 837, <doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/41/6/837>.
[ Links ]
37. A. A. Safaeia, H. Panahia, and H. Hassanabadic, Analysis of nonrelativistic particles in noncommutative phase-space under new scalar and vector interaction terms, Rev. Mex. Fis 67 (2021) 84, https://doi.org/10.31349/RevMexFis.67.84
[ Links ]
38. J. Jing , L. -B. Kong, Q. Wang, andS. H. Dong , On the noncommutative Aharonov-Bohm effects, Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135660, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135660.
[ Links ]
39. O. Bertolami and P. Leal, Aspects of phase-space noncommutative quantum mechanics, Phys. Lett. B. 750 (2015) 6, <doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.024>.
[ Links ]
40. C. Bastos, O. Bertolami , N. C. Dias and J. N. Prata, Weyl-Wigner formulation of noncommutative quantum mechanics, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008) 072101, <doi: 10.1063/1.2944996>.
[ Links ]
41. J. Zhang, Fractional angular momentum in non-commutative spaces, Phys. Lett. B. 584 (2004) 204, <doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.01.049>.
[ Links ]
42. M. Chaichian, Sheikh-Jabbari and A. Tureanu, Hydrogen atom spectrum and the Lamb Shift in noncommutative QED, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2716, <doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.86.2716>.
[ Links ]
43. A. Maireche, Nonrelativistic Bound State Solutions of the Modified 2D-Killingbeck Potential Involving 2D-Killingbeck Potential and Some Central Terms for Hydrogenic Atoms and Quarkonium System, J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 11 (2019) 04024, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.11(4).04024.
[ Links ]
44. A. Maireche, New bound state energies for spherical quantum dots in presence of a confining potential model at Nano and Plank’s Scales, NanoWorld J. 1 (2016) 122, <doi: 10.17756/nwj.2016-016>.
[ Links ]
45. M. A. De Andrade and C. Neves, Noncommutative mapping from the symplectic formalism, J. Math. Phys. 59 (2018) 012105. <doi: 10.1063/1.4986964>.
[ Links ]
46. E. M. C. Abreu, C. Neves and W. Oliveira, Noncommutativity from the symplectic point of view, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A . 21 (2006) 5359, <doi: 10.1142/s0217751x06034094>.
[ Links ]
47. E. M. C. Abreu et al., Lagrangian formulation for noncommutative nonlinear systems, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A . 27 (2012) 1250053, <doi: 10.1142/s0217751x12500534>.
[ Links ]
48. A. Maireche, Nonrelativistic treatment of Hydrogen-like and neutral atoms subjected to the generalized perturbed Yukawa potential with centrifugal barrier in the symmetries of noncommutative Quantum mechanics, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 17 (2020) 2050067, <doi: 10.1142/S021988782050067X>.
[ Links ]
49. A. Maireche, Investigations on the Relativistic Interactions in One-Electron Atoms with Modified Yukawa Potential for Spin 1/2 Particles, Int. Front. Sci. Lett. 11 (2017) 29, https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/IFSL.11.29.
[ Links ]
50. A. Maireche, A New Approach to the approximate analytic solution of the three-dimensional Schrӧinger equation for Hydrogenic and neutral atoms in the generalized Hellmann potential model, Ukr. J. Phys. 65 (2020) 987, https://doi.org/10.15407/ujpe65.11.987.
[ Links ]
51. A. Maireche, Effects of two-dimensional noncommutative theories on bound states diatomic molecules under New modified Kratzer-type interactions, Int. Lett. Chem. Phys. Astron. 76 (2017) 1, https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILCPA.76.1.
[ Links ]
52. J. Wang and K. Li, The HMW effect in noncommutative quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A 40 (2007) 2197, <doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/40/9/021>.
[ Links ]
53. K. Li and J. Wang, The topological AC effect on non-commutative phase space, Eur. Phys. J. C 50 (2007) 1007, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0256-0.
[ Links ]
54. A. Maireche, A theoretical investigation of nonrelativistic bound state solution at finite temperature using the sum of modified Cornell plus inverse quadratic potential, Sri Lankan J. Phys. 21 (2020) 11, https://doi.org/10.4038/sljp.v21i1.8069.
[ Links ]
55. A. Maireche, Extended of the Equation with New Coulomb Potentials plus Linear and Harmonic Radial Terms in the Symmetries of Noncommutative Quantum Mechanics, J. Nano-Electron. Phys. 10 (2015) 06015, https://doi.org/10.21272/jnep.10(6).06015.
[ Links ]
56. M. Abramowitz and I.A. Stegum, Handbook of mathematical function with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, 1964).
[ Links ]
57. L. Mezincescu, Star operation in quantum mechanics, e-print arXiv: hep-th/0007046v2.
[ Links ]
58. A. Maireche, The Klein-Gordon equation with modified Coulomb plus inverse-square potential in the noncommutative three-dimensional space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A . 35 (2020) 052050015, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732320500157.
[ Links ]
59. A. Maireche, Modified unequal mixture scalar vector Hulthén-Yukawa potentials model as a quark-antiquark interaction and neutral atoms via relativistic treatment using the improved approximation of the centrifugal term and Bopp’s shift method, Few-Body Syst . 61 (2020) 30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-020-01559-z.
[ Links ]
60. A. Maireche, A model of modified Klein-Gordon equation with modified scalar-vector Yukawa potential. Afr. Rev Phys. 15 (2020) 0001, http://lamp.ictp.it/index.php/aphysrev/article/view/1777/618
[ Links ]
61. A. Maireche, The Klein-Gordon equation with modified Coulomb potential plus inverse-square-root potential in three-dimensional noncommutative space, To Phys. J.3 (2019) 186, https://purkh.com/index.php/tophy/article/view/489
[ Links ]
62. A. Maireche, Bound state solutions of Klein-Gordon and equations with linear combination of Hulthén and Kratzer potentials, Afr. Rev Phys. 15 (2020) 0003, http://lamp.ictp.it/index.php/aphysrev/article/view/1779/620.
[ Links ]
63. H. Motavalli and A. R. Akbarieh, Klein-Gordon equation for the Coulomb potential in noncommutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25 (2010) 2523, doi:10.1142/s0217732310033529.
[ Links ]
64. M. Darroodi, H. Mehraban andH. Hassanabadi , The Klein-Gordon equation with the Kratzer potential in the noncommutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A . 33 (2018) 1850203, <doi: 10.1142/s0217732318502036>
[ Links ]
65. A. Saidi and M. B. Sedra, Spin-one (1+3)-dimensional DKP equation with modified Kratzer potential in the non-commutative space, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 (2020) 2050014, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732320500145.
[ Links ]
66. A. Maireche, Solutions of Klein-Gordon equation for the modified central complex potential in the symmetries of noncommutative quantum mechanics, Sri Lankan J. Phys. 22 (2021) 1, http://doi.org/10.4038/sljp.v22i1.8079.
[ Links ]
67. A. Maireche, Theoretical Investigation of the Modified Screened cosine Kratzer potential via Relativistic and Nonrelativistic treatment in the NCQM symmetries, Lat. Am.J. Phys.
Educ. 14 (2020) 3310.
[ Links ]
68. L. Gouba, A comparative review of four formulations of noncommutative quantum mechanics. International Journal of Modern Physics A 31 (2016) 1630025, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X16300258.
[ Links ]
69. F. Bopp, La mécanique quantique est-elle une mécanique statistique classique particuliére?, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré 15 (1956) 81.
[ Links ]
70. Y. Yi, L. Kang, W. Jian-Hua and C. Chi-Yi, Spin-1/2 relativistic particle in a magnetic field in NC phase space, Chinese Physics C. 34 (2010) 543, <doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/34/5/005>.
[ Links ]
71. M. Badawi, N. Bessis and G. Bessis, On the introduction of the rotation-vibration coupling in diatomic molecules and the factorization method, J. Phys. B 5 (1972) L157, <doi: 10.1088/0022-3700/5/8/004>.
[ Links ]
72. A. I. Ahmadov, M. Demirci, S. M. Aslanova and M. F. Mustamin, Arbitrary ℓ-state solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation with the Manning-Rosen plus a Class of Yukawa potentials, Phys. Lett. A 384 (2020) 126372. doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2020.126372
[ Links ]
73. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series and Products, 7th ed., edited by A. Jeffrey and D. Zwillinger (Academic Press, Cambridge, 2007).
[ Links ]
74. S. Medjedel and K. Bencheikh, Exact analytical results for density profile in Fourier space and elastic scattering function of a rotating harmonically confined ultra-cold Fermi gas. Phys. Lett. A 383 (2019) 1915, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2019.03.021.
[ Links ]
75. K. Bencheikh, S. Medjedel and G. Vignale, Current reversals in rapidly rotating ultracold Fermi gases. Phys. Rev. A 89 (2014) 063620, https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.063620
[ Links ]
76. K. P. Gnatenko and V. M. Tkachuk, Upper bound on the momentum scale in noncommutative phase space of canonical type, Europhys. Lett. 127 (2019) 20008, https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/127/2000.
[ Links ]
77. Kh. P. Gnatenko and V. M. Tkachuk, Composite system in rotationally invariant noncommutative phase space, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1850037, <doi: 10.1142/s0217751x18500379>.
[ Links ]
78. Kh. P. Gnatenko, Composite system in noncommutative space and the equivalence principle, Phys. Lett. A 377 (2013) 3061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.09.036.
[ Links ]
79. N. Kemmer, The Particle Aspect of Meson Theory. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 173 (1939) 91, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1939.0131.
[ Links ]