1 Introduction
Photometric observations of asteroids are very useful due to rapid variations of the observed geometry, even during one opposition. A good average of these geometries can produce a robust physical model of the asteroid that describes its state of rotation and global shape Kaasalainen et al.(2002). Physical properties such as the rotation period, the amplitude of the light curve (the ratio between two asteroid axes, one side-on and one point-on), the absolute magnitude, H, and the slope parameter, G, are obtained from the photometric observations. To calculate the last two parameters, we need to know, in addition, the distance of the asteroid from the Earth and the Sun at the time of the observations. The first two parameters are obtained from the analysis of the light curve. Applying the inversion method to the light curves observed at different phase angles, and from at least two different oppositions Kaasalainen Torppa(2001), Kaasalainen et al.(2001), Kaasalainen et al.(2004) allows us to obtain physical parameters, such as the inclination of the rotation axis, the size and the shape of the asteroids, in a reliable manner.
In the last decades, the introduction of CCD detectors made possible a remarkable increase in the number of asteroids for which their state of rotation is known. The large amount of accumulated data has established clear patterns in the rotation of small bodies of the Solar System, and in particular, the fact that the small asteroids have short periods of rotation Pravec Harris(2000). The large population of NEAs discovered in recent years has also made possible the study of small asteroids that are very fast rotators.
The observations reported here are part of an extended program that we started in 2015 with two main goals. First, to contribute to the determination of physical parameters of MBAs and NEAs within the framework of the participation of the Mexico Campus of the Regional Centre for Space Science and Technology Education for Latin America and the Caribbean (CRECTEALC) and the INAOE Astrophysical Department in the activities of the International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN); and secondly, to reactivate the Tonantzintla Schmidt Camera (CST) as a full-time telescope for astrometric and photometric observations of minor bodies of the Solar System.
The paper is organised as follows: in § 2 we describe the CST status, in § 3 we discuss the observational strategy and data reduction procedure. How we obtained the composite light curve of the observed asteroids and the results of the Fourier analysis for each object are presented in § 4 and § 5, respectively. At the end, we present our perspectives and conclusions.
2 Reactivation of the Tonantzintla Schmidt Camera
The fundamental aim of the most recent upgrade of the CST is to use it on a dedicated basis to observe MBAs, NEOs, Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHAs, asteroids with a minimum orbit intersection distance to Earth’s orbit equal or less than 0.05 AU and an absolute magnitude (H) equal to or less than 22.0), and asteroids that could be targets of future space missions. Astrometric and photometric observations were carried out to determine precise orbital parameters of asteroids belonging to the aforementioned groups that permitted us to determine other parameters such as rotation periods, shapes, sizes and inclination of the axes of rotation.
The CST introduced Mexico into modern astrophysics. In the 1940s, the CST was one of the most important telescopes of its class in the world, due to the size of its mirror (D = 77.4 cm), as well as its location, at a latitude of 19° N, in the National Astrophysical Observatory of Tonantzintla (OANTon), in Puebla, Mexico. The CST made it possible to observe the entire plane of the Galaxy, something that was not possible from other observatories in the northern hemisphere. The optical system was built in the Harvard Observatory workshops. The telescope started operation in 1944, but its main scientific observations were carried out between 1948 and 1994. During this period, the CST telescope produced a vast collection of direct (10,446 photographic plates) and spectroscopic images (4,236 photographic plates); the latter were acquired through a 3.96° and 69.85 cm diameter objective prism. The spectroscopic plates had a primary astrophysical value, covering a 10° strip of the entire alactic disk, the galactic center, the galactic poles, and the regions of the M31 and M33 galaxies Díaz-Hernández et al.(2011). This plate collection is now part of the UNESCO Memory of the World-Mexico.
Since 1948, under the guidance of Guillermo Haro, the CST was dedicated to the development of a series of strategic research lines, among which we can mention the observation of planetary nebulae, Herbig-Haro objects, T-Tauri stars, flare stars, young stars in the direction of the galactic poles, blue emission line galaxies, quasars and the spectral classification of stars, mainly in the southern region of the celestial sphere. Most of the scientific results derived from these investigations were published in the Bulletin of the Tonantzintla and Tacubaya Observatories (1952-1973).
Due to the light pollution caused by the growth of the cities around the OANTon and the low quantum efficiency of the astronomical plates, as of the mid-1990s these detectors were no longer used in astronomical observations with the CST. A new image acquisition system was installed, using a cooled CCD detector, a field flattening lens, and a new telescope control system Jáuregui-García et al.(2014). In 2015, a new telescope upgrade was done. This included recoating of the reflecting surface of the mirror, cleaning of the corrector lens, maintenance of the mechanical system of the telescope and renewal of the electronic data acquisition system Valdés et al.(2015a), Valdés et al.(2015b). As mentioned, the current CST optical system has an additional component, a field flattening lens. Using direct images taken with the CST in its current configuration, we empirically calculated the image scale of the optical system and obtained a value of 96.6 arcsec/mm, which coincides with the results reported by Cardona et al.(2011).
It is known that in 1945 the CST mirror was returned to the Harvard Observatory to be
rectified; however, the results of this correction were never published. Because of
this, one of the objectives of the 2015 upgrade was to determine the true focal
length (F) of the mirror using a Ronchi interferometric test, which
gave a result of
In order to verify the results obtained from the optical tests performed on the
telescope mirror, a
3 Observational Strategy
3.1 The Sample
This observation program was designed in the framework of the commitments acquired by INAOE when requesting its inclusion in the IAWN, an international asteroid warning network under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) and the leadership of the NASA’s Planetary Defense Coordination Office (PDCO). IAWN was established in 2014 as a result of recommendations made by the UN General Assembly in 2013 to create an international network of organizations involved in detecting, tracking, and characterizing NEOs, as an international response to a potential NEO impact threat. At the time of writing of this article, IAWN had a membership of 40 observatories. The IAWN is tasked with developing a strategy using well-defined communication plans and protocols to assist governments in the analysis of asteroid impact consequences and in the planning of mitigation responses.
The observed asteroids presented here were selected using the Ephemeris Generator of the Collaborative Asteroid Light Curve Link1. From the list of observable asteroids from the CST location, we selected those whose periods are known as they are necessary for shape determination. In addition, we wanted to verify the accuracy of periods as observed by the CST. We chose asteroids with rotational periods between two and three hours that can be covered at least twice per night. Nevertheless, we made some exceptions. We also observed objects with periods that could not be observed completely in one night to see if we could construct the phase plot light curve by observing the object during 2-3 nights. Other selection criteria were the possibility of covering a phase angle variation greater than 20 degrees during the observed opposition and that the orbital velocities should be less than 4.45 arcsec/min in order to keep the asteroid in the same field throughout the night, avoiding the need to change the reference stars used to construct the light curve.
On the other hand, in order to apply the light curve inversion method to determine the asteroid shape, it is necessary that the selected asteroids have publicly available light curves on the Asteroid Light curve Photometry Database (ALCDEF). According to the minor planet Light curve Database (LCDB) file description Warner et al.(2009), the U code provides an assessment of the quality of the period solution, not necessarily of the data per se. The rating goes from 3, for a completely unambiguous light curve, in terms of the calculated period, to 0 for a result that later was proven to be incorrect. It is therefore desirable that the parameter defining the LCDB Status has values U=3 or 3-, which means that the quality of the light curves is optimal.
The observed set of objects consisted of 14 asteroids: nine main-belt asteroids (MBAs), four Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs), and one Mars-crossing asteroid (MCAs), as listed in Table 1.
3.2 Observations and Data Reduction
Photometric observations were carried out with the 77.4 cm Tonantzintla Schmidt
Camera of INAOE between October and December 2015 and between March and May
2018. The telescope’s current optical system has a field-flattening lens that
provides a focal distance of 2135.2 mm and an image scale of 96.6 arcsec
mm-1. During the 2015 observing runs we used a 1530 × 1020 pixel
(9.0 × 9.0
At the beginning of 2018 we upgraded the image acquisition system with the
installation of a SBIG STF-8300 color CCD Camera, equipped with a 3326 × 2540
pixel (
Selected physical parameters of the observed asteroids, such as semi-major axis
(a), eccentricity (e), taxonomic class,
absolute magnitude (H), diameter, and albedo, are listed in
Table 1, while their observational
circumstances, including geocentric (r) and heliocentric (
Asteroid | a (AU) | e | Taxonomic class | H (mag) | Diameter (km) | Albedo | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(711) Marmulla | 2.2369 | 0.1955 | S, Sr | 11.84 | 12.31 | 0.22±0.09a | MB-Inner Asteroid |
Flora family | |||||||
(1036) Ganymed | 2.6629 | 0.5335 | S,Sr | 9.25 | 40.76 | 0.218±0.048b | NEA, Amor group |
(1117) Reginita | 2.2475 | 0.1983 | S | 11.81 | 9.77 | 0.3585±0.0785b | MB-Inner Asteroid |
(1318) Nerina | 2.3073 | 0.2039 | M | 12.37 | 10.90 | 0.1721±0.0208b | MB-Inner Asteroid |
Phocaea family | |||||||
(1346) Gotha | 2.6269 | 0.1782 | S | 11.44 | 13.13 | 0.2794±0.0411b | MB-Middle Asteroid |
Eunomia family | |||||||
(1363) Herberta | 2.9036 | 0.0682 | S | 11.36 | 12.4 | 0.337±0.157c,d | MB-Outer Asteroid |
Koronis family | |||||||
(1492) Oppolzer | 2.1729 | 0.1165 | S | 13.0 | 11.34 | 0.089±0.026e | MB-Inner Asteroid |
(1627) Ivar | 1.8630 | 0.3965 | S,Sr | 12.68 | 10.71 | 0.134±0.025b | NEA, Amor group |
(1831) Nicholson | 2.2390 | 0.1279 | S | 12.57 | 7.58 | 0.296±0.053c,d | MB-Inner Asteroid |
(1847) Stobbe | 2.6114 | 0.0214 | Xc,M | 11.13 | 16.64 | 0.2315±0.0162b | MB-Middle Asteroid |
(1866) Sisyphus | 1.8933 | 0.5384 | S,Sw | 12.44 | 8.67 | 0.255±0.0162b | NEA, Apollo group |
(3800) Karayusuf | 1.5779 | 0.0757 | S | 15.09 | 1.59 | 0.657±0.123d,f | Mars-crosser |
(5692) Shirao | 2.6554 | 0.1819 | S | 12.55 | 8.84 | 0.2218±0.0290b | MB-Middle Asteroid |
(25916) 2001 CP44 | 2.5613 | 0.4979 | Sw | 13.68 | 4.83 | 0.262±0.047b | NEA, Amor group |
Asteroid | Date (UT) | RA (J2000.0) | DEC (J2000.0) |
|
r (AU) | α (degrees) | V (mag) | Filtera |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(711) Marmulla | 2018 Mar. 12.67 | 10h 19m 48.2s | + 13 36 595 | 1.5590 | 2.5180 | 7.68 | 15.2 | C |
2018 Mar. 16.66 | 10h 15m 53.5s | + 13 47 247 | 1.5727 | 2.5112 | 9.52 | 15.3 | C | |
2018 Mar. 24.69 | 10h 09m 00.9s | + 14 01 288 | 1.6102 | 2.4985 | 12.95 | 15.5 | R | |
2018 Apr. 09.63 | 10h 00m 32.1s | + 14 00 059 | 1.4824 | 2.2052 | 22.11 | 16.0 | R | |
(1036) Ganymed | 2018 Mar. 19.10 | 10h 43m 02.0s | - 18 54 380 | 3.1662 | 4.0832 | 6.21 | 15.4 | C |
2018 Mar. 20.10 | 10h 42m 18.7s | - 18 46 400 | 3.1682 | 4.0834 | 6.22 | 15.4 | C | |
2018 Mar. 21.20 | 10h 41m 31.5s | -18 37 420 | 3.1701 | 4.0835 | 6.23 | 15.4 | C | |
(1117) Reginita | 2015 Oct. 04.10 | 23h 04m 02.6s | -10 28 140 | 1.013 | 1.956 | 13.73 | 14.0 | C |
2018 Apr. 08.85 | 16h 34m 57.2s | - 14 58 382 | 1.2511 | 2.0314 | 22.70 | 14.8 | R | |
2018 Apr. 09.63 | 10h 00m 32.1s | -14 00 059 | 1.2435 | 2.0298 | 22.51 | 14.8 | R | |
(1318) Nerina | 2018 Mar. 17.59 | 11h 19m 14.5s | +11 38 336 | 0.0879 | 1.8634 | 6.52 | 13.7 | R |
2018 Mar. 27.56 | 11h 02m 43.1s | +09 13 533 | 0.0895 | 1.8547 | 12.27 | 14.0 | R | |
(1346) Gotha | 2018 Mar. 29.58 | 07h 12m 43.1s | +12 59 322 | 2.0593 | 2.4323 | 23.88 | 15.9 | R |
(1363) Herberta | 2015 Dec. 15.01 | 04h 08m 52.7s | +20 01 380 | 1.996 | 2.945 | 6.18 | 15.6 | C |
2015 Dec. 16.07 | 04h 08m 05.0s | +19 59 230 | 2.001 | 2.945 | 6.54 | 15.6 | C | |
2015 Dec. 17.08 | 04h 07m 18.7s | +19 57 110 | 2.007 | 2.946 | 6.94 | 15.7 | R | |
(1492) Oppolzer | 2018 Mar. 18.60 | 11h 26m 34.2s | +11 06 234 | 0.9991 | 1.9840 | 5.85 | 14.8 | R |
2018 Mar. 26.59 | 11h 19m 46.2s | +12 14 251 | 1.0114 | 1.9763 | 10.27 | 15.0 | R | |
(1627) Ivar | 2018 Mar. 17.26 | 15h 08m 07.2s | -02 07 190 | 0.8931 | 1.7084 | 26.71 | 14.8 | C |
2018 Mar. 27.23 | 15h 15m 17.8s | -00 19 430 | 0.7784 | 1.6543 | 24.37 | 14.4 | R | |
(1831) Nicholson | 2018 Mar. 10.79 | 10h 11m 31.8s | +21 32 155 | 1.3065 | 2.2495 | 10.42 | 15.4 | C |
2018 Mar. 11.62 | 10h 10m 44.6s | +21 35 123 | 1.3095 | 2.2481 | 10.89 | 15.4 | C | |
2018 Mar. 14.67 | 10h 11m 31.8s | +21 32 155 | 1.3065 | 2.2495 | 10.42 | 15.4 | C | |
2018 Mar. 25.59 | 10h 00m 07.4s | +21 58 487 | 1.3748 | 2.2275 | 17.00 | 15.7 | R | |
2018 Apr. 14.58 | 09h 55m 39.8s | +21 15 256 | 1.5245 | 2.1978 | 23.43 | 16.1 | R | |
2018 Apr. 20.61 | 09h 56m 55.2s | +20 47 350 | 1.5781 | 2.1889 | 24.78 | 16.2 | R | |
2018 Apr. 21.60 | 09h 57m 14.3s | +20 42 249 | 1.5872 | 2.1874 | 24.98 | 16.2 | R | |
(1847) Stobbe | 2018 Abr. 18.71 | 15h 20m 07.8s | -01 26 497 | 1.6289 | 2.5612 | 9.77 | 14.9 | R |
(1866) Sisyphus | 2018 Mar. 25.32 | 13h 26m 02.8s | +53 01 210 | 2.2221 | 2.8935 | 16.72 | 17.3 | C |
(3800) Karayusuf | 2018 Mar. 28.79 | 15h 59m 16.6s | +14 15 061 | 0.6393 | 1.4596 | 34.23 | 16.3 | R |
(5692) Shirao | 2018 Mar. 18.80 | 12h 44m 30.8s | -03 20 216 | 1.2770 | 2.2558 | 6.22 | 15.1 | R |
2018 Mar. 26.79 | 12h 39m 24.5s | -01 46 188 | 1.2505 | 2.2459 | 2.21 | 14.8 | R | |
2015 Apr. 07.74 | 124h 31m 10.7s | +00 37 209 | 1.2411 | 2.2321 | 4.86 | 14.9 | R | |
(25916) 2001 CP44 | 2018 Apr. 14.36 | 16h 41m 45.5s | +03 31 270 | 0.8411 | 1.6754 | 27.21 | 15.6 | R |
2018 Apr. 16.33 | 16h 43m 19.0s | +03 39 110 | 0.8193 | 1.6632 | 26.92 | 15.5 | R |
aC = Clear filter (no filter), R = R-band filter.
When the absolute magnitude and the albedo of observed asteroids were known,
their diameters were calculated using equation (1), where
Depending on the brightness of the observed objects and weather conditions, the integration times varied between 30 and 120 s. For each observing run, master bias, dark and flat-field images were produced. Scientific images were corrected for bias, dark and flat-field effects using Image Reduction and Analysis Facility (IRAF) packages.
Differential photometry and period analysis were done using the MPO Canopus analysis tool Warner(2014). In each case, we used four solar analogs non-variable comparison stars, in the same FOV, to generate light curves. Comparison stars were selected near the path covered by the asteroids during the night.
4 Light curve analysis
The obtained light curves for the observed asteroids are presented in Figures 1 to 14, and the results of the corresponding Fourier analysis Harris et al.(1989) in Table 3. Assuming that the light curve of an asteroid is
produced by a given geometry in rotation, the brightness of an object is
proportional to the projected area, and the ratio of minimum to maximum cross
sections (
Asteroid | Period* (h) | Period** (h) | Amplitude (mag) | Fourier fit order | CSmin /CSmax |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(711) Marmulla | 2.804±0.001 | 2.721 | 0.13 | 8th | 0.89 |
2.876±0.074 | 0.09 | 6th | 0.92 | ||
2.627±0.041 | 0.17 | 6th | 0.86 | ||
(1036) Ganymed | 10.318±0.013 | 10.297 | 0.15 | 6th | 0.87 |
(1117) Reginita | 2.944±0.012 | 2.946 | 0.16 | 4th | 0.86 |
2.945±0.002 | 0.28 | 6th | 0.77 | ||
(1318) Nerina | 2.586±0.013 | 2.528 | 0.07 | 6th | 0.94 |
2.463±0.033 | 0.10 | 8th | 0.91 | ||
(1346) Gotha | 2.563±0.057 | 2.64067 | 0.21 | 6th | 0.82 |
(1363) Herberta | 3.018±0.002 | 3.015 | 0.16 | 8th | 0.86 |
(1492) Oppolzer | 3.770±0.020 | 3.76945 | 0.11 | 8th | 0.90 |
3.566±0.076 | 0.11 | 8th | 0.90 | ||
(1627) Ivar | 4.795±0.001 | 4.795 | 0.90 | 2nd | 0.44 |
(1831) Nicholson | 3.216±0.001 | 3.228 | 0.29 | 8th | 0.77 |
3.220±0.022 | 0.31 | 6th | 0.75 | ||
3.217±0.001 | 0.41 | 8th | 0.69 | ||
(1847) Stobbe | 5.621±0.012 | 5.617 | 0.41 | 6th | 0.61 |
(1866) Sisyphus | 2.391±0.028 | 2.400 | 0.12 | 6th | 0.91 |
(3800) Karayusuf | 2.270±0.084 | 2.2319 | 0.32 | 4th | 0.74 |
(5692) Shirao | 2.957±0.032 | 2.8878 | 0.13 | 6th | 0.89 |
2.900±0.055 | 0.13 | 4th | 0.89 | ||
2.866±0.085 | 0.14 | 6th | 0.88 | ||
(25916) 2001 CP44 | 4.2020±0.0024 | 4.6021 | 0.22 | 6th | 0.82 |
*The value derived in this work.
**The value in the LCDB summary table.
This ratio, the values of the rotation period, and the amplitude of the light curve, are reported in Table 3. In order to resolve the possible ambiguities in deriving the correct rotation periods of observed asteroids, we used the constraints on amplitude variation versus harmonic order of the Fourier function proposed by Harris et al.(2014). The Fourier fit order used in the composite light curve is shown in the fifth column of Table 3.
The light curves show the relative instrumental magnitude versus the rotational phase, calculated with the rotation periods given in Table 3. The caption of the figures indicates, for each night, the plot symbol used, the UT time of observations, the JD for zero rotational phase, and the corresponding phase angle. The zero phase is corrected for the light travel-time effect. Uncertainty bars are plotted for each individual data point. The MPO Canopus Fourier analysis tool provides the period solution and the Fourier coefficients defining the shape of the composite light curve for each data set. The solution also provides the instrumental magnitude offset between each asteroid and its comparison stars, for each individual light curve that we used to calculate the peak-to-peak amplitude of the composite light curves.
5 Results
5.1 (711) Marmulla
(711) Marmulla (1911 LN, 1927 AB) is an Inner Main-Belt asteroid, that belongs to
the Flora family (a = 2.2369 AU., i = 6.0991°). It was discovered on March 1,
1911 by J. Palisa at Vienna. (711) Marmulla has albedo values that correspond to
a S-class asteroid;
We observed this asteroid at four different values of phase angle,
The best values for the periods obtained from the Fourier analysis of our three light curves (2.804 ± 0.001 h, 2.876±0.074 h, and 2.627 ± 0.041 h) are very similar to the values on the LCDB database reported by different authors.
5.2 (1036) Ganymed
Asteroid (1036) Ganymed is the largest NEA that we observed. It belongs to the Amor group, and is classified as S type with an albedo of 0.218 ± 0.048 Mainzer et al.(2011) and a corresponding diameter of 40.76 km. It was discovered by W. Baade at the Bergedorf Observatory in Hamburg on 23 October, 1924.
We observed this asteroid at three different values of phase angle,
From the Fourier analysis of the light curve we show here, we obtained a value of the period equal to 10.318 ± 0.013 h, very similar to the 35 values compiled on LCDB.
5.3 (1117) Reginita
(1117) Reginita (1927 KA) is an Inner Main-Belt asteroid. It was discovered on
May 24, 1927 by J. Comas Solú at the Fabra Observatory in Barcelona Schmadel(2012). (1117) Reginita has a very
high albedo among the taxonomic class S. Pravec
et al.(2012) reported a value of
On October 4, 2015, at a phase angle of 16.73°, we obtained 221 images with a 30 s exposure time. Fourier analysis of the light curve produced the best fit at 2.942±0.012 h, similar to the values reported by Wisniewski, Michalowski Harris(1995), Kryszczyńska et al.(2012), Chang et al.(2015), Waszczak et al.(2015), and another seven authors included on LCDB. The obtained peak-to-peak amplitude, 0.16 magnitude, is in the range of values reported by the previously mentioned authors for this asteroid. We observed again Reginita in 2018, obtaining almost the same result 2.945±0.002 h, by using 81 images of 60 s exposure time at a phase angle of 22.70°, obtained on April 8, and 74 images of 90 s exposure time, at a phase angle of 22.43°, obtained on April 9.
5.4 (1318) Nerina
(1318) Nerina is an inner Main-Belt asteroid, belonging to the Phocaea family. It
was discovered on March 24, 1934 by C. Jackson at Johannesburg Schmadel(2012). Mainzer et al.(2011) derived a value of
We observed (1318) Nerina at two values of phase angle,
The Fourier analysis of the two light curve data we obtained gave us the period values 2.586 ± 0.013 h and 2.463±0.033 h, both with a difference of less than one percent with respect to the 11 values found on the LCDB database.
5.5 (1346) Gotha
(1346) Gotha is a Main-Belt asteroid that belongs to the Eunomia family. It was
discovered in 1929, on February 5, by K. Reinmuth at Heidelberg Schmadel(2012). Mainzer et al.(2011) derived a value of
From the light curve generated with 62 images of 120 s exposure time obtained on
March 29, 2018, at a phase angle
5.6 (1363) Herberta
(1363) Herberta (1935 RA) is an Outer Main-Belt asteroid, belonging to the
Konoris family (
A total of 427 images of Herberta were taken over three nights, from December 15 to 17, 2015 with 60 s of exposure time. The phase angle values for the observation nights were 6.18°, 6.56° and 6.94°, respectively. All the observations were grouped in a single light curve.
The best value we obtained for the period, from the Fourier analysis, is equal to 3.018±0.002 h; meanwhile, the only value reported on LCDB is equal to 3.015±0.005 h.
5.7 (1492) Oppolzer
(1492) Oppolzer was discovered in 1938 by Y. Väisälä Schmadel(2012). (1492) Oppolzer is a S-type Vereet al.(2015) Inner Main-Belt asteroid.
The taxonomy for this asteroid was determined from photometry obtained at the
Pan-STARRS PS1 telescope; however, the albedo (
We observed this asteroid at two values of phase angle,
5.8 (1627) Ivar
(1627) Ivar was discovered on September 25, 1929 by E. Hertzsprung at Johannesburg Schmadel(2012).
We obtained 600 images of 30 s exposure time for this asteroid on March 17, 2018,
at phase angle
The value we obtained for the period, 4.795±0.001 h is exactly the same as the best value reported on LCDB. This asteroid has been well observed; there are 16 values reported on this database.
5.9 (1831) Nicholson
(1831) Nicholson was discovered on April 17, 1968, by P. Wild at Zimmerwald,
Switzerland Schmadel(2012). It is an
S-type asteroid Bus Binzel(2002) from the
inner region of the Main-Belt. Masiero et
al.(2012) has estimated an albedo value of
We observed this asteroid in 2018. We grouped the March 10, 11 and 14
observations in a single light curve, the March 25 observations in another, and
in a third light curve we grouped observations carried out on April 14, 20 and
21. We obtained 756 images with exposure times ranging from 30 s to 120 s. The
phase angles covered were
The best period values obtained from the Fourier analysis for our three light curves, 3.216 ± 0.001 h, 3.220±0.022 h, and 3.217±0.001 h, are completely consistent with the four values on LCDB.
5.10 (1847) Stobbe
(1847) Stobbe was discovered on 1916 February 1, by H. Thiele at Bergedorf, Germany Schmadel(2012). This is a middle Main-Belt asteroid that was originally classified as a Xc asteroid by Bus Binzel(2002) during the Phase II of the Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey. More recently, Mainzer et al.(2011), using NEOWISE photometry, suggested an M-type taxonomy for this asteroid. P-type, M-type and E-type asteroids are included in the larger X-type group and are differentiated by optical albedo values Tholen Barucci(1989).
The typical optical albedo for M-type asteroids is between 0.1 and 0.3, so the
albedo of
We observed this asteroid on April 18, 2018. We obtained 52 images with 60 s
exposure time at a phase angle
5.11 (1866) Sisyphus
(1866) Sisyphus was discovered on December 5, 1972 by P. Wild at Zimmerwald,
Switzerland Schmadel(2012). It is a NEA
that belongs to the Apollo group. Mainzer et
al.(2011) reported a value of
This asteroid was observed on March 25, 2018. We obtained 48 images with a 210 s
exposure time at a phase angle
5.12 (3800) Karayusuf
(3800) Karayusuf is an S-type Bus
Binzel(2002), Binzel et
al.(2019) Mars-crosser (MC) asteroid discovered on January 4, 1984,
by E. F. Helin at Palomar in California, USA Schmadel(2012). A very high value of its albedo,
With an exposure time of 120 s, we obtained 60 images of this asteroid on March 28, 2018. Its phase angle on that night was 34.23° and the derived period was 2.270±0.084 hours. There are 11 values reported on LCDB, all of them quite similar to the one derived from our data.
5.13 (5692) Shirao
(5692) Shirao was discovered on March 23, 1992 by K. Endate and K. Watanabe at
Kitami Schmadel(2012). It is an S-type
Vere et al.(2015) middle Main-Belt
asteroid. Mainzer et al.(2011) reported a
typical S-type albedo
We observed this asteroid in 2018, on March 18 and 26, and April 7. A total of 235 images were obtained. Exposure time for March 18 images was 30 s and 60 s for the other two nights. The phase angle for March 18 was 6.22°, for March 26 was 2.21° and 4.86° for April 7, so we decided to construct three different light curves. The corresponding periods derived from Fourier analysis are 2.957±0.032 h, 2.900±0.055 h, and 2.866±0.085 h, very similar to the best value reported on the LCDB summary table (2.8878 h).
5.14 (25916) 2001 CP44
(25916) 2001 CP44 is the only Amor-type NEA in our sample. It has a diameter of
5.7 km and was discovered by LINEAR at Socorro, New Mexico. This is clearly an
S-complex asteroid, classified as an Sq-type Thomas et al.(2014), Popescu et
al.(2019), S-type Lin et
al.(2018), and Sw-type Binzel et
al.(2019). Mainzer et
al.(2011) reported a typical S-type albedo
We obtained a total of 250 images of this asteroid in 2018. On April 14 (53 images, exposure time 120 s, phase angle 27.17°) and April 16 (197 images, exposure time 60 s, and phase angle 26.86°).
From our light curve we derived a period equal to 4.2020±0.0024 h, while, on LCDB there are two clear sets of values, one around 4.2 h, reported during 2012-2014, and another around 4.6 h, reported during 2018. The difference can be due to observations being made during different apparitions.
6 Conclusions
The results of the analyses of the photometric observations of the 14 asteroids reported in the present work validate the success of the process of reactivation of the Tonatzintla Schmidt Camera. From the light curve analyses, we noticed that even those with larger errors reproduce with very good agreement the periods previously determined by other authors. For each of the objects in our sample, we compared the best fit value of the period with those values on the summary line on LCDB, considered the most likely to be correct, and we found that the difference between them and ours was always less than 3%, and very often less than 1%.
There is one exception, (25916) 2001 CP44, which has two clearly distinct sets of values for its reported periods, one of them is equal, within the error bars, to the best value we found from our data; however, for the second one the difference is larger. As we mentioned, the difference can be due to observations being made during different apparitions.
In subsequent papers we will discuss these results as part of a larger sample of asteroids that we have already observed. We will present the analyses of the observations, including other results such as the determination of their morphological properties.
In concluding, we want to remark that the Tonantzintla Schmidt Camera is now dedicated to astrometric and photometric follow-up observations of Main Belt and Near-Earth Asteroids. It is a fundamental part of the asteroid observation program to fulfill the commitments made by INAOE and CRECTEALC regarding their contributions to the International Asteroid Warning Network (IAWN).