SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.49Puestas naturales de la cabrilla sardinera (Mycteroperca rosacea) en cautiverio en La Paz, MéxicoRasgos de la vida temprana de la dorada común de dos bandas, Diplodus vulgaris (Perciformes: Sparidae), que habita en las aguas poco profundas de la isla de Gökçeada, Turquía índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Ciencias marinas

versión impresa ISSN 0185-3880

Cienc. mar vol.49  Ensenada ene./dic. 2023  Epub 08-Dic-2023

https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.y2023.3316 

Articles

First approximation of the growth and the spawning period of Symphodus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Pisces: Labridae) in the southeastern Black Sea

1Department of Fishing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, 53100, Turkey. E-mail: hatice.bal@erdogan.edu.tr


Abstract

The aim of this study was to provide a first approximation of the growth, reproduction, and length-weight relationships ofSymphodus ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea, Turkey. A total of 320 specimens (273 males, 47 females) were collected between June 2015 and May 2016, and their biological parameters were estimated for each sex and both sexes combined. Total length ranged from 6.90 to 13.70 cm and the parameters (a,b) in the power length-weight relationships werea= 0.065 andb= 2.38 for males anda= 0.102 andb= 2.20 for females. Age was successfully estimated by commonly accepted procedures for otolith analysis. The von Bertalanffy growth parameters from the otolith age estimation wereL = 12.66 cm,k= 0.764, andt 0 = -1.151 (0-3 years) for males, andL = 14.15 cm,k= 0.764, andt 0 = -0.188 (1-3 years) for females. The monthly gonadosomatic index values reflected a spawning period between April and July, with a spawning peak in May-June. The present study provides the first estimate of the growth and reproduction ofS. ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea of Turkey and compares the results with those from other areas.

Key words: condition factor; age estimation; length-weight relationship; spawning period; Symphodus ocellatus

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio fue proveer una primera aproximación del crecimiento, la reproducción y las relaciones entre la longitud y el peso deSymphodus ocellatusen el sureste del mar Negro, Turquía. Se recolectaron un total de 320 especímenes (273 machos, 47 hembras) entre junio de 2015 y mayo de 2016, y se estimaron sus parámetros biológicos para cada sexo y sexos combinados. Las longitudes totales variaron de 6.90 a 13.70 cm y los parámetros (a,b) en las relaciones de potencia longitud-peso fuerona= 0.065 yb= 2.38 para machos ya= 0.102 yb= 2.20 para hembras. La edad se estimó exitosamente con procedimientos comúnmente aceptados para otolitos. Los parámetros de crecimiento de von Bertalanffy de la estimación de la edad de los otolitos fueronL = 12.66 cm,k= 0.764,t 0 = -1.151 (clases de edad entre 0 y 3 años) para machos yL  = 14.15 cm,k= 0.764,t 0 = -0.188 (clases de edad de 1 a 3 años) para hembras. El índice gonadosomático mensual reflejó un periodo de desove entre abril y julio, con un pico de desove en mayo-junio. El presente estudio proporciona la primera estimación del crecimiento y la reproducción deS. ocellatusen el sureste del mar Negro de Turquía y compara los resultados con aquellos de otras áreas.

Palabras clave: factor de condición; estimación de edad; relación peso-longitud; periodo de desove; Symphodus ocellatus

Introduction

The ocellated wrasse,Symphodus ocellatus(Linnaeus 1758), is a common, resident species in the Black, Adriatic, Mediterranean, and Azov seas (Hureau 1986), where it inhabits rocky bottoms and eelgrass beds (Lejeune 1985, Hureau 1986, Harmelin 1987). AlthoughS. ocellatuscan be found from 1 to 30 m depth, these fish generally remain in the benthos throughout their lives, where they feed on mollusks, gastropods, crustaceans, and foraminifera (Bell and Harmelin-Vivien 1983, Lejeune 1985). When they venture away from the benthos,S. ocellatuscan be found in the water column foraging on plankton (e.g., copepods) when they are abundant (Bell and Harmelin-Vivien 1983, Lejeune 1985).Symphodus ocellatusrange from 8 to 12 cm in length and live for 3-5 years (Lejeune 1985, Hureau 1986, Harmelin 1987). The wide distribution and high density ofS. ocellatusin the aforementioned seas has resulted in this ichthyological species being commonly employed to estimate ecological impacts (e.g., anthropogenic or natural disturbances).

In autumn,S. ocellatusjuveniles become plentiful prey for other species given their high abundance (24-85 juveniles per 100 m2; P. Francour, pers. comm.; Levi at al. 2005).Symphodus ocellatusreproduction takes place between May and July in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea (Quignard and Pras 1986), with males exhibiting 3 distinct phenotypes with different behavioral characteristics (i.e., nesting males, satellite males, and sneaker males; Warner and Lejeune 1985, Taborsky et al.1987). Males build nests of algae in rocky depressions, which become spawning sites for females (Alonzo et al. 2000). Embryos within fertilized eggs develop for 3-4 days before hatching and entering the plankton as larvae (Alonzo et al. 2000).

Several studies have investigated the reproductive behaviors ofS. ocellatus(Warner and Lejeune 1985, Taborsky et al. 1987, Bentivegna and Benedetto 1989, Budaev and Zworykin 1998, Alonzo et al. 2000, Alonzo and Warner 2000, Stiver and Alonzo 2013, Sinopoli et al. 2014, Stiver et al. 2014). In addition, Mouillot et al. (1999) evaluated the distribution of this species, while Škeljo and Ferri (2012) evaluated its otolith morphology, and Peskov and Manilo (2018) assessed size-age relationships and sexual plasticity in the Black Sea. However, some information on age and growth comes from studies conducted more than a quarter of a century ago (Pauly 1978, Quignard and Pras 1986).

Fisheries management is important to ensure sustainable fisheries and must be adapted to meet the requirements of different fishing areas (Uzer et al. 2019). Some population parameters, such as fish age and growth, must be studied to improve our understanding of fisheries biology and current management strategies, which are critical to preserve stocks into the future. Several methods are used to determine age in fish (Treble et al. 2008). Otolith growth increments are widely used and can provide information on annual growth (Campana and Thorrold 2001). The biological information ofS. ocellatus, a non-commercial species, is very limited, despite its ecological importance in the region. Thus, the aim of this study was to describe the fundamental biological characteristics ofS. ocellatus, including age, growth, the sex-ratio, fish condition, spawning period, and length-weight relationships in the southeastern Black Sea.

Materials and methods

Sampling

This study was conducted along the Rize coast in the southeastern Black Sea, Turkey (Fig. 1). AllS. ocellatusspecimens were collected from the discards of the commercial fleet, which were obtained using trammel nets (36- and 40-mm mesh) at depths of 10-40 m from June 2015 to May 2016. The number of specimens by sex and combined sexes per month is presented in Table 1. Following transportation to a laboratory of the Fisheries Faculty of Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize (Turkey), the fish samples were immediately measured (total length, TL) to the nearest 0.10 cm and weighed to the nearest 0.10 g. Sex was determined by macroscopic examination of the gonads.

Figure 1.  Study area (Rize coast). 

Table 1.  Number ofSymphodus ocellatusspecimens by sex and combined sexes collected per month in the southeastern Black Sea. 

Sex/Month February March April May June July August September October December
Female 6 0 10 1 1 8 6 0 15 0
Male 10 14 5 29 54 85 39 29 0 8
All 16 14 15 30 55 93 45 29 15 8

Sex ratio

The monthly length frequency distributions for females and males were calculated using 0.50-cm class intervals and TL. The chi-square test was used to calculate the sex-ratio. The deviations from 1.00:1.00 were tested using the chi-square analysis (Dagnelie 1975).

Length-weight relationships, condition factor, and gonadosomatic index

The length-weight relationship (LWR) was determined with the equationW=aL b (Ricker 1975), whereWis the total weight (g),ais the intercept,bis the slope, andLis the TL (cm). The variation ofbfrom 3 was evaluated with a one-samplet-test. The degree of association between variables was determined withr 2(King 1995).

The condition factor is the ratio between body weight and length, which reflects the interaction between biotic and abiotic variables with regard to the physiological state of the fish (Le Cren 1951). The condition factor (K) was calculated with the equationK=W/aL b (Le Cren 1951), whereWis the observed total weight (g) andaL b is the estimated weight obtained from the LWR (Le Cren 1951). Seasonal age and sex were evaluated to determine how they affect fish condition using a general linear model. The data were statistically analyzed using SPSS (version 15) for Windows.

The spawning season in fish can be estimated from gonadal maturity stages or the gonadosomatic index (GSI), which is a good indicator of reproductive activity (Rizzo and Bazzoli 2020). Sex was recorded, and gonad wet weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 g. Monthly, GSI values were calculated for both females and males with the equation from Avşar (2005): GSI =Wgonad/W× 100, whereWgonadis gonad weight (g) andWis fish total weight (g).

Age and growth

To determine age, the otoliths of 320 fish were removed, cleaned, and stored in Eppendorf tubes containing 70% ethanol for 3-4 weeks. Age was estimated by counting the number of opaque (light = fast growth) and hyaline bands (dark = slow growth) on the sagittal otoliths below reflected light (Panfili et al. 2002).

The age estimations were performed by a single reader who interpreted and counted the hyaline growth bands (annuli; Landa et al. 2014; Fig. 2) following the overall agreed upon otolith margin interpretation scheme for several species (Vitale et al. 2019). The date of birth was taken to be 1 January. The age estimation scheme per quarter is shown in Table 2. Several factors, such as edge type (hyaline and opaque), age resolution, date of capture, theoretical birthday, and the number of annuli, were taken into consideration in the scheme (ICES 2017). Given the aforementioned date of birth, if a hyaline band was observed at the otolith edge during the first half of the year, it was counted as an annulus. On the contrary, if a hyaline band was observed at the otolith edge during the second half of the year, then it was not counted as an annulus (ICES 2012).

Figure 2. A sagittal otolith from anSymphodus ocellatusindividual caught in July 2015. An opaque edge is apparent, and the estimated age is 3 years. 

Table 2.  The age estimation scheme forSymphodus ocellatuswith a theoretical birthday on 1 January. 

Date of capture Otolith edge Age
First and second quarters Translucent N
Opaque N+ 1
Third and fourth quarters Translucent N- 1
Opaque N

The otoliths were imaged using a Nikon SMZ1000 digital camera connected to a Nikon SMZ1000 stereomicroscope (magnification from ×0.8 to ×8.0; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 2). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test was used to compare the length frequency for each age between sexes.

Otolith marginal analyses

Two otolith marginal analyses were performed. The nature of the margin (opaque or hyaline) was identified in 182 otoliths. The proportion of individuals with hyaline and opaque edges was evaluated by month to determine if an annual formation pattern was present and by age to evaluate possible ontogenetic differences in the time of opaque edge formation (Holden and Raitt 1974). Then, the absolute marginal distance (AMD), which was estimated using the distance between the end of the last hyaline annulus and the edge, and the distance between the last 2 hyaline annuli (Di, i-1) were used to estimate the relative marginal distance (RMD: AMD/Di, i-1; Panfili et al. 2002, Navarro et al. 2021). Only whole otoliths were selected and measured (μm) using a microscope. Each month, 5-27 otoliths were selected, which amounted to a total of 108 otoliths representative of the entire length range.

The von Bertalanffy growth function was determined with the following formula:

Lt=L1-e-k(t-t0),

wheret 0 is the theoretical age at 0 length,kis the body growth coefficient,L is the asymptotic mean maximum total length, andLtis the expected total length at agetyears (von Bertalanffy 1938). Munro’s growth performance index,Ø= log(k) + 2log(L ), was calculated in order to compare the growth results obtained with the findings of other studies (Pauly and Munro 1984). Parameters were determined separately for males, females, and combined sexes (R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2021-11-01) with the ‘FSA’ (Ogle et al. 2021), ‘FSAsim’ (Ogle 2020), and ‘nlstools’ (Baty et al. 2015) packages.

Results

Composition by sex and sex ratio

A total of 320S. ocellatusindividuals were collected during the study, of which most were males (males: 273, 85.31%; females: 47, 14.68%). A sex ratio (female:male) of 1.00:5.80 was obtained that was significantly different from the ratio of 1.00:1.00 (P< 0.05). The TL andWvalues of males ranged from 6.90 to 13.70 cm and 6.77 to 33.69 g, respectively, while those of females ranged from 10.00 to 13.70 cm and 15.23 to 33.46 g, respectively. The TL frequency distribution by sex ofS. ocellatusfrom the southeastern Black Sea is given in Figure 3. Monthly variation in the sex ratio was observed throughout the study period, with a vastly greater proportion of males than females from May to September (Table 1).

Figure 3.  Length frequency distribution by sex ofSymphodus ocellatussampled in the southeastern Black Sea. 

Length-weight relationships, condition factor, and gonadosomatic index

Both male and femaleS. ocellatusexhibited negative allometry (b< 3,t-test:P< 0.050; Fig. 4). The LWR showed a good fit (r 2= 0.93,P< 0.001), and the regression parameters are presented in Table 3.Kwas calculated for all sexes and age-groups (Table 3). No significant effect of age and sex onKwas found according to the general linear model analysis (P> 0.050), although the season had a significant effect (P< 0.050). The highestKvalues were observed in spring and summer, after which they fell sharply in autumn and were at their lowest in winter (Fig. 5a).

Figure 4.  Length-weight relationship of male and femaleSymphodus ocellatus

Table 3.  Von Bertalanffy growth parameters (L = asymptotic length,k= body growth coefficient, andt 0 = theoretical age), growth performance index (Ø), length-weight relationship parameters (a= intercept andb= slope of the relationship), and number ofSymphodus ocellatus(n) analyzed in the southeastern Black Sea (r 2= coefficient of determination of each function). 

Sex n L k t 0 r 2 Ø a b r 2
Female 47 14.150 0.764 -0.188 0.990 2.068 0.102 2.200 0.940
Male 273 12.660 0.764 -1.151 0.950 1.975 0.065 2.388 0.930
Combined sexes 320 12.630 0.791 -1.080 0.950 2.000 0.070 2.362 0.930

Figure 5.  (a) Seasonal condition factor (K) values of combined sexes and (b) monthly gonadosomatic index (GSI) values by sex and combined sexes ofSymphodus ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea. 

The spawning period for males occurs from May to September, with a peak from May to June. The full spawning period for females is not yet known because of the low number of female specimens in this study; however, females also showed a clear spawning peak from May to June. The only conclusion that can be drawn with the limited information available for females is that a peak spawning period for the entire population appears to occur from May to June (Fig. 5b).

Age and growth

The age composition analysis revealed that most individuals were 1-3 years old (85% male). Only 2 specimens were of age 0. The age composition distribution by sex is given in Figure 6. The minimum length at age 0 was determined to be 6.90 cm, whereas the maximum length at age 3 was determined to be 13.70 cm (Table 4). According to the results of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the difference in TL between sexes at age 1 was not significant (P> 0.050) when length distributions were compared for each age. A significant difference in TL between sexes was found in fish aged 2 (Z= 1.402,P< 0.050) and 3 (Z= 1.560,P< 0.050) years. The age-length keys of males and females are given in Table 5. The mean TL values at ages 2 and 3 were higher in females than in males.

Figure 6.  Age composition distribution ofSymphodus ocellatus

Table 4.  Basic biometric data by sex ofSymphodus ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea. 

      Total length (cm) Total weight (g) Condition factor
Age group Sex N Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range
0 Male 2 8.20 ± 0.65 6.90-9.50 10.66 ± 2.93 6.77-14.56 1.85 ± 0.08 1.65-2.06
1 Female 15 10.56 ± 0.22 10.00-11.10 18.35 ± 1.03 15.23-20.78 1.53 ± 0.02 1.38-1.68
Male 85 10.64 ± 0.09 9.60-11.40 18.59 ± 0.44 14.77-22.97 1.48 ± 0.01 1.26-1.69
2 Female 23 11.50 ± 0.17 11.00-11.60 21.94 ± 0.78 20.60-23.11 1.43 ± 0.02 1.34-1.62
Male 68 11.53 ± 0.10 11.00-11.80 22.41 ± 0.49 17.79-25.20 1.42 ± 0.01 1.25-1.58
3 Female 9 12.92 ± 0.29 11.80-13.70 29.03 ± 1.26 23.20-33.46 1.33 ± 0.03 1.27-1.43
Male 118 12.28 ± 0.08 11.80-13.70 26.23 ± 0.37 21.47-33.69 1.37 ± 0.00 1.22-1.58

Table 5.  Age-length keys by sex ofSymphodus ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea. 

Length (cm) Females (N) Males (N)
Age (year) Age (year) Total
N 0 1 2 3 N 0 1 2 3 N
7.00 0 1 1 1
9.50 0 1 1 1
10.00 1 1 14 14 15
10.50 7 7 19 19 26
11.00 6 5 1 33 28 5 39
11.50 9 2 7 50 24 26 59
12.00 18 15 3 81 37 44 99
12.50 0 50 50 50
13.00 1 1 14 14 15
13.50 3 3 9 9 12
14.00 2 2 1 1 3
Total 47 0 15 23 9 273 2 85 68 118 320
Mean length 10.76 11.80 13.05 8.20 10.86 11.73 12.46

The von Bertalanffy growth curve was fitted to the lengths-at-age for all fish and both sexes (Table 2). The estimated von Bertalanffy growth parameters for combined sexes wereL = 12.63 cm,k= 0.791 year-1, andt 0 = -1.080 years. The difference ofL ,k, andt 0 values between sexes was significant according to the fit1LT model selected based on the Akaike information criterion (P< 0.001). Females reached a larger asymptotic TL (L = 14.15 cm) than males (L = 12.66 cm) and also grew slightly faster (Ø= 2.068 in females) than males (Ø= 1.975).

Otolith marginal analyses

In Figure 7a, it can be seen that most otoliths showed hyaline edges in the first and second quarters and opaque edges in the third and fourth quarters. Some opaque edges were also observed in the first half of the year in April. The percentage of opaque otolith edges began to increase in February, and more than 50% of otoliths had opaque edges in April, after which this percentage decreased until July and subsequently increased from July to December (Fig. 7a). The hyaline growth increment inS. ocellatusotoliths is therefore formed in winter in the southeastern Black Sea. The AMD and RMD values were lowest from January to February and highest from March to September, although they decreased from June to July (Fig. 7b). After analyzing the edge type by age group, a downward trend was observed from March to July at ages 2 and 3, followed by a steep rise until October. For 1-year-old individuals, December exhibited a percentage of opaque edges greater than 50% (Fig. 7c).

Figure 7.  Results of otolith marginal analysis ofSymphodus ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea: (a) monthly proportion of opaque (black) and hyaline (gray) edges; (b) monthly mean values of relative marginal distance (RMD) and absolute marginal distance (AMD); (c) monthly proportion of opaque edges by age group. 

Discussion

This study constitutes a first approach to describing the biological aspects ofS. ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea based on monthly samples collected from June 2015 to May 2016. Nonetheless, additional studies that include longer sampling times are needed to determine whether the seasonal differences found in this study remain consistent over time.

Composition by sex and sex ratio

The largestS. ocellatusTL value obtained in the present study (13.70 cm) was clearly lower than the largest TL value of 18.50 cm previously recorded within its distribution (Altın et al. 2015), although our value was higher than those reported for the Aegean, Mediterranean, and Marmara seas (6.60-10.70 cm; Valle et al. 2003, Özaydın et al. 2007, İlhan et al. 2008, Gürkan et al. 2010, Keskin and Gaygusuz 2010, Kasapoglu and Duzgunes 2013, Bilge et al. 2014, Kurtele et al. 2019). This difference in TL is probably not due to sample size because variable numbers of specimens were analyzed in other studies. Thus, the reasons for this difference may be biogeographical variability in the growth rate and the differences in local fishing pressure (Pallaoro and Jardas 2003), which likely influence the structure of populations in different areas.

Sex ratio information is necessary to understand relationships between population dynamics, individuals, and the environment (Vicentini and Araújo 2003). The sex ratio varies among species, populations, and periods within the same population, and many factors, such as environmental conditions, food availability, and reproductive behavior, may cause the sex ratio to differ from 1.00:1.00 (Nikolsky 1963, Vandeputte et al. 2012). The large deviation away from the theoretical and expected sex ratio of 1.00:1.00 found in this study indicates that male individuals were clearly dominant over females. A higher, although not very high, proportion ofS. ocellatusmales has also been found in other areas. For example, a sex ratio of 1.11:1.00 was obtained forS. ocellatuscaptured along the Ukrainian coast of the Black Sea (Peskov and Manilo 2018) based on 80 specimens collected from 1958 to 2013. Similarly, males ofSymphodus tinca, a congener, were also predominant during reproductive periods throughout the sampling period in studies conducted along the Croatian coast (1.43:1.00; Pallaoro and Jardas 2003) and in northeastern Tunisia (1.38:1.00; Ben Slama et al. 2010). In the goldsinny wrasse (Ctenolabrus rupestris), Sayer et al. (1995) reported a sex ratio of 1.12:1.00 in different coastal areas of Scotland.

The sex ratio may vary seasonally and regionally depending on the habitat preferences of each sex. For example, sex-based flocking tendencies and differential sex- and age-based migration patterns have been observed (Nilsson 1970). However, additional research based on larger sampling sizes and times is required to fully address this issue in the southeastern Black Sea. The vastly greater proportion of males than females observed from May to September in this study coincides with a portion of the estimated spawning period, which could indicate differential sex-based behavior ofS. ocellatuswith regard to its distribution and thus reproduction.

Symphodus ocellatusexhibits 3 male phenotypes (nesting, satellite, and sneaker) with different behavioral and physical characteristics (Taborsky et al. 1987). Nesting males court females, build nests and defend them, and provide parental care. Sneaker males do not defend or care for nests and do not court females (Taborsky et al. 1987, Alonzo et al. 2000). Satellite males associate with a nesting male and court females but do not build nests or provide parental care (Alonzo and Warner 2000, Alonzo 2008). Numerous males are found in nesting areas during the spawning season, and the proportions of these 3 male phenotypes can vary between sites (Alonzo and Warner 2000, Alonzo and Heckman 2010).

Length-weight relationships, condition factor, and gonadosomatic index

The slope value (b) from the LWRs for combined sexes estimated in this study (2.36) was very low compared to those of other studies conducted in other Mediterranean areas (3.08-3.22; Table 6). Two studies with the largest sample sizes and TL values representative ofS. ocellatus(Keskin and Gaygusuz 2010, Altın et al. 2015) reported similarly highbvalues (3.10-3.20) in Mediterranean areas relatively close to our study area. By not including specimens smaller than 9.50 cm (except one), the present study is limited when compared to other studies, which could be responsible for the lowbvalue we obtained. Carlander (1977) and Froese (2006) demonstrated that values ofb<2.5 or >3.5 are often derived from samples with narrow size ranges. The differences in condition between large and small specimens can vary between years, localities, and seasons and thus result in different weight-length relationships (Froese 2006).

Table 6.  Length-weight relationship parameters ofSymphodus ocellatusestimated in the present study and from other studies in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. 

N Total length range (cm) Total weight range (g) a b r 2
Mediterranean
Valle et al. (2003) 456 3.00-9.00 - 0.009 3.170 0.960
Kurtela et al. (2019) 118 2.20-7.80 0.10-7.00 0.012 3.010 0.970
Aegean Sea
Özaydın et al. (2007) 216 4.70-9.70 - 0.009 3.220 0.960
İlhan et al. (2008) 328 4.70-9.20 1.10-10.56 0.009 3.190 0.970
Gürkan et al. (2010) 10 4.30-6.60 0.59-2.79 0.004 3.480 0.980
Bilge et al. (2014) 274 4.60-9.00 - 0.010 3.130 0.950
Altın et al. (2015) 1922 1.22-18.50 0.01-81.69 0.010 3.200 0.980
Marmara Sea
Keskin and Gaygusuz (2010) 575 1.80-10.70 - 0.010 3.080 0.970
Black Sea
Present study (females) 47 10.00-13.70 15.23-47.53 0.102 2.200 0.940
Present study (males) 273 6.90-13.70 6.77-79.97 0.065 2.380 0.930
Present study (combined sexes) 320 6.90-13.70 6.77-79.97 0.069 2.360 0.930

The meanKvalues ranged from 0.880 to 1.100. A highKvalue implies that the environmental conditions are suitable for a given fish population (Blackwell et al. 2000). As theKvalue in our study was higher than 1.000, the environmental conditions in the southeastern Black Sea are suitable forS. ocellatus. However, the number of females in our study was quite low and varied monthly. This can influenceKgiven that theKvalue is affected by variables such as fish length, sampling method, environment, food source, spawning period, and growth rate (Le Cren 1951).

In this study, the lowestKvalues were observed in winter, while the highest values were observed in spring and summer. Le Cren (1951) also reported that theKdecreases in winter, increases in spring and summer, and decreases again in autumn. Low sea temperature is a factor that negatively influences metabolic processes (e.g., assimilation, digestion, ingestion) and eventually the growth rate in fish. Thus, overwintering is a particularly important period for fish (reviewed by Hurst 2007). During periods of low food availability and/or temperatures,Kdeclines. TheKvalues estimated in this study increased as the spawning season approached, which was probably related to the onset of favorable environmental conditions, and then drastically decreased after summer.

Hermaphroditism, namely a change of sex with age, has been reported in someSymphodusspecies (Quignard 1966, Remacle 1970), such asSymphodus melanocercus, although this has not been observed inS. ocellatus( Warner and Lejeune 1985). MaleS. ocellatushave been reported to display different reproductive behaviors (Lejeune 1985). For example, some males build nests and care for the eggs (Gerbe 1864, Šoljan 1930, Taborsky et al. 1987), while females visit these nests and lay their eggs in multiple nests (Taborsky et al. 1987).

Fiedler (1964), Voss (1976), and Lejeune (1985) reported that the breeding period ofS. ocellatuscan last up to 2 months and occurs between May and June in the Mediterranean Sea. In addition, Quignard and Pras (1986) reported that the spawning season ofS. ocellatustakes place over 4 months in spring and summer (April-July) in the Mediterranean Sea, while Bentivegna and Benedetto (1989) reported that the spawning season takes place from May to August in the Bay of Naples in the Mediterrenean Sea. Salekhova (1971) reported that the spawning ofCrenilabrusspecies is multiportional, and reproduction in the Black Sea occurs from April to August when water temperatures range from 12 to 26 °C, with a spawning peak from the end of May to the end of June. The May-June spawning peak reported in this study for the Rize coast in the southeastern Black Sea agrees with those of previous studies in nearby areas. Along the coasts of Tunisia, the reproductive periods of the congenerS. tincaand the Labridae family were reported to occur from April to June (Ouannes-Ghorbel et al. 2002, Ben Slama et al. 2010) and March to June (Dieuzeide et al. 1954).

Sea temperature is a critical environmental factor that affects fish growth, embryonic and larval development, and reproductive activity (Avşar 2005). Seasonal changes in sea temperature affect fish reproduction. For example, increases in temperature stimulate reproduction in fish species that lay eggs in spring, while decreases in temperature stimulate reproduction in species that lay eggs in autumn (Pankhurst and Munday 2011).

Age and growth

The growth parameters ofS. ocellatusin the Black Sea were estimated in this study for the first time. Moreover, we present a first approach to establishing the age and growth of this species in the Black Sea based on otolith data. Given the absence of the other age studies ofS. ocellatusin the Black Sea, a comparison was performed with the only other study available, which was conducted four decades ago (Pauly 1978) in the neighboring Mediterranean Sea (Table 7). The maximum estimated age (5 years) ofS. ocellatusof Quignard and Pras (1986) was higher than the maximum age of 3 years estimated in this study.

Table 7. A comparison of the von Bertalanffy growth parameters ofSymphodus ocellatusandSymphodus mediterraneusin the present study in the Black Sea and in other Mediterranean areas. 

Reference Species Study area Sex L (cm) k(year-1) t 0 (year) Ø
Pauly D. (1978) Symphodus ocellatus Mediterranean Sea Female 10.300 0.645 - 1.840
Male 10.800 0.949 - 2.040
Present study Symphodus ocellatus Black Sea
Female 14.150 0.764 -0.188 2.068
Male 12.660 0.764 -1.151 1.975
    Combined 12.630 0.791 -1.080 2.000
Škeljo et al (2015) Symphodus mediterraneus Mediterranean Sea Female 14.110 0.330 -1.420 1.810
Male 16.090 0.500 -0.830 2.110
All 13.760 0.460 -1.080 1.930

A performance index can be used to determine the average growth parameters for a given species (Sparre and Venema 1992) and is beneficial when evaluating growth under environmental stress (Pauly 1991). The slightly faster growth rate in females with larger asymptotic lengths than males in this study contrasts with what has been reported in previous studies ofS. ocellatusin French Mediterranean waters (Pauly 1978) and of the congenerSymphodus mediterraneus(Škeljo et al. 2015), which exhibited higherØ,L , andkvalues in males than in females. Peskov and Manilo (2018) investigated size-at-age and sex variability inS. ocellatusalong the Ukrainian coast of the Black Sea. According to their results, males were characterized by significantly higher values than those of females. Sayer et al. (1995) pointed to the large difference in the relative size of males and females and annual gonadal development to explain the different growth rates between sexes.

Differences in growth may be due to latitudinal differences in oceanographic variables, such as temperature, or to biological differences in maintenance metabolism and diet among populations (Pauly 1994, Landa et al. 2002). Water temperature affects fish physiology and food availability, which in turn affect biological production (Weatherley and Gill 1987) and growth (Elizarov 1965). Thus, regional ecological conditions may explain the regional variation in growth, although it is not possible to discern the causes behind the differences in sexual growth between this study and that of Pauly (1978). However, the difference in growth observed inS. ocellatusbetween the coasts of France and the Black Sea could be based on differences in trophic resources and water temperature.

The analysis of otolith edges revealed that the periodicity of annulus formation inS. ocellatusis likely annual. Thus, opaque edges predominate in autumn and hyaline edges predominate during the first months of the year (although no information was available for January). The formation of opaque or hyaline bands can be attributed to variables such as seasonal sea temperature cycles, light conditions, fish feeding habits, and reproductive cycles (Beckman and Wilson 1995).

Symphodus ocellatusis not a commercially important fish species and is not a target fish species in the Black Sea. As such, no minimum landing size limits have been defined for catches. The present study provides the first data on the growth and reproduction ofS. ocellatusin the southeastern Black Sea of Turkey, which may be of great interest for future stock assessments to sustainably manage its remaining populations. Further research is needed to increase the accuracy of the estimations presented in this study regarding the period of female reproduction.

Acknowlegments

I thank Semih Engin for providing support in identifying the fish species in this study. I also thank Mr. İbrahim Çolak for providing fish samples every month.

References

Alonzo SH. 2008. Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse. Animal Behaviour. 75:1715-1723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.09.031 [ Links ]

Alonzo SH, Heckman KL. 2010. The unexpected but understandable dynamics of mating, paternity and paternal care in the ocellated wrasse. Proc Royal Soc B. 277:115-122. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1425 [ Links ]

Alonzo SH, Taborsky M, Wirtz P. 2000. Male alternative reproductive behaviors in a Mediterranean wrasse,Symphodus ocellatus: Evidence from otoliths for separate life-history pathways. Evol Ecol Res. 2:997-1007. [ Links ]

Alonzo SH, Warner RR. 2000. Allocation to mate guarding or increased sperm production in a Mediterranean wrasse. Am Nat. 156:266-275. htps://doi.org/10.1086/303391 [ Links ]

Altın A, Ayyıldız H, Kale S, Alver C. 2015. Length-weight relationships of forty-nine fish species from shallow waters of Gökçeada Island, northern Aegean Sea. Turk. J Zool. 39(5):971-975. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1412-15 [ Links ]

Avşar D. 2005. Fisheries Biology and Population Dynamics. Adana (Turkey): Akademisyen Kitapevi. 332 p. [ Links ]

Baty F, Ritz C, Charles S, Brutsche M, Flandrois JP, Delignette-Muller ML. 2015. A toolbox for nonlinear regression in R: The Package nlstools. Journal of Statistical Software. 66(5):1-21. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v066.i05 [ Links ]

Beckman DW, Wilson CA. 1995. Seasonal timing of opaque zone formation in fish otoliths. In: Secor DJ, Dean JM, Campana SE (eds.), Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research. Columbia (OH): Belle W. Baruch. p. 27-44. [ Links ]

Bell JD, Harmelin-Vivien ML. 1983. Fish fauna of French Mediterranean Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadows. 2 - Feeding habits. Téthys. 11(1):1-14. [ Links ]

Ben-Slama K, Jouini A, Ben-Sallem R, Somalo S, Sáenz Y, Estepa V, Boudabous A, Torres C. 2010. Prevalence of broad-spectrum cephalosporin-resistantEscherichia coliisolates in food samples in Tunisia, and characterization of integrons and antimicrobial resistance mechanisms implicated. Int J Microbiol Food. 137(2-3):281-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.12.003 [ Links ]

Bentivegna F, Benedetto F. 1989. Gonochorism and seasonal variation in the gonads of the labridSymphodus(Crenilabrus)ocellatus(Forsskal). J Fish Biol. 34(3):343-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03317.x [ Links ]

Bilge G, Yapıcı S, Filiz H, Cerim H. 2014. Weight-length relations for 103 fish species from the southern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyol Piscat. 44(3):263-269. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2014.44.3.11 [ Links ]

Blackwell BG, Brown ML, Willis DW. 2000. Relative weight (Wr) status and current use in fisheries assessment and management. Rev Fish Sci. 8(1):1-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641260091129161 [ Links ]

Budaev SV, Zworykin DD. 1998. Difference in shoaling behaviour between ocellated (Symphodus ocellatus) and long-striped (S. tinca) wrasses and its relation to other behavioural patterns. Mar Freshw Behav Phy. 31(2):115-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236249809387067 [ Links ]

Campana SE, Thorrold SR. 2001. Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 58:30-38. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-58-1-30 [ Links ]

Carlander KD. 1977. Handbook of freshwater fishery biology, volume 2. Ames (IA): The Iowa State University Press. 431 p. [ Links ]

Dagnelie P. 1975. Théorie et méthodes statistiques. Applications agronomiques. Tome II. Gembloux (Belgium): Presses agronomiques de Gembloux. 463 p. [ Links ]

Dieuzeide R, Novella M, Roland J. 1954. Catalogue des poissons des côtes algériennes. Bull Stn Aquic Pêche Castiglione. 6:1-384. [ Links ]

Elizarov AA. 1965. Long-term variations of oceanographic conditions and stocks of cod observed in the areas of west Greenland, Labrador and Newfoundland. ICNAF. 6:827-831. [ Links ]

Fiedler VK. 1964. Verhaltensstudien an Lippfischen der GattungCrenilabrus(Labridae, Perciformes). Z Tierpsychol. 21(5):521-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1964.tb01207.x [ Links ]

Froese R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol. 22(4):241-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x [ Links ]

Gerbe Z. 1864. Observations sur la nidification des Crenilabres. Rev Mag Zool. 16:255-258. [ Links ]

Gürkan S, Bayhan B, Akcinar SC, Taskavak E. 2010. Length-weight relationship of fish from shallow waters of Candarli Bay (North Aegean Sea, Turkey). Pakistan J Zool. 42(4):495-498. [ Links ]

Harmelin JG. 1987. Structure et variabilité de l’ichtyofaune d’une zone rocheuse protégeé en Méditerranée (Pare national de Port-Cros, France). Mar Ecol. 8(3):263-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0485.1987.tb00188.x [ Links ]

Holden MJ, Raitt DFS. 1974. Manual of fisheries science. Part 2: Methods of resource investigation and their application. Rome (Italy): FAO Fish. Technical Report 115 (Rev. 1). 223 p. [ Links ]

Hureau JC. 1986. Labridae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot ML, Hureau JC, Nielsen J, Tortonese E (eds.), Fishes of the northeastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris (France): UNESCO. p. 919-942. [ Links ]

Hurst TP. 2007. Causes and consequences of winter mortality in fishes. J Fish Biol . 71(2):315-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01596.x [ Links ]

[ICES] The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 2012. Report of the second workshop on age reading of red mullet and striped red mullet (WKACM2), 2-6 July 2012. Boulogne-sur-Mer (France): ICES. 52 p. Technical Report ICES CM 2012/ACOM:60 [ Links ]

[ICES] The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. 2017. Workshop on Ageing Validation methodology ofMullusspecies (WKVALMU), 15-19 May 2017. Conversano (Italy). Technical Report ICESCM2017/ SSGIEOM. 74 p. [ Links ]

Ílhan DU, Akalın S, Tosunoglu Z, Ozaydın O. 2008. Length-weight relationships of fiveSymphodusspecies (Pisces: Perciformes) from İzmir Bay, Aegean Sea. Ege JFAS. 25(3):245-246. [ Links ]

Kasapoglu N, Duzgunes E. 2013. Length-weight relationships of marine species caught by five gears from the Black Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci. 15(1):95-100. https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.463 [ Links ]

Keskin Ç, Gaygusuz Ö. 2010. Length-Weight Relationships of fishes in shallow waters of Erdek Bay (Sea of Marmara, Turkey). Eur J Biol. 69(2):87-94. [ Links ]

King M. 1995. Fisheries biology, assessment and management. Oxford (England): Fishing News Books. 341 p. [ Links ]

Kurtela A, Antolović N, Glavić N, Kožul V. 2019. Length-weight relations and monthly occurrence of juvenile fish species from the Donji Molunat Bay, Croatia (South-East Adriatic Sea). Naše more. 66(3):1-5. https://doi.org/10.17818/NM/2019/3.7 [ Links ]

Landa J, Antolínez A, Barrado J, Fontenla J, Hernández C, Villamor B, Dueñas C, Navarro MR. 2014. Age determination procedures for benthic fish in Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO). Santander (Spain): Instituto Español de Oceanografia. 34 p. http://www.repositorio.ieo.es/e-ieo/bitstream/handle/10508/9859/Age%20estimation%20procedures%20of%20IEO%20for%20benthic%20fish%20species_Landa%20et%20al.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Technical Report Int. Doc. IEO. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4966.9445Links ]

Landa J, Pérez N, Piñeiro C. 2002. Growth patterns of the four spot megrim (Lepidorhombus boscii) in the northeast Atlantic. Fish Res. 55(1-3):141-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00302-2 [ Links ]

Le Cren ED. 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in Perch,Perca fluviatilis. J Anim Ecol. 20(2):201-219. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540 [ Links ]

Lejeune P. 1985. Le comportement social des Labridés mediterranéens: etude ecoethologique des comportements reproducteurs et sociaux des Labridés méditerranéens des genresSymphodusRafinesque, 1810, et Coris Lacepede, 1802. Cah Ethol Appl. 5:1-208. [ Links ]

Levi F, Boutoute M, Mayzaud P. 2005. Lipid composition ofSymphodus ocellatus(Perciforme: Labridae) in the north-western Mediterranean: influence of two different biotopes. MarBio. 146:805-814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1465-9 [ Links ]

Mouillot D, Culioli JM, Lepretre A, Tomasini JA. 1999. Dispersion statistic and sample size estimating for three species (Symphodus ocellatus,Serranus scribaandDiplodus annularis) in the Lavezzi Islands Marine Reserve (South Corsica, Mediterranian Sea). Mar Ecol . 20(1):19-34. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0485.1999.00064.x [ Links ]

Navarro MR, Landa J, Villamor B, Domínguez-Petit R. 2021. First approach to the growth and age corroboration of Northeast Atlantic chub mackerel (Scomber colias) in Northern Iberian waters. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 259:107433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107433 [ Links ]

Nikolsky GV. 1963. The ecology of fishes. London (UK): Academic Press. 352 p. [ Links ]

Nilsson L. 1970. Local and seasonal variation in sex-ratios of diving ducks in south Sweden during the non-breeding season. Scandinavian Journal of Ornithology.1(2):115-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676029 [ Links ]

Ogle DH, Doll JC, Wheeler P, Dinno A. 2021. FSA: Fisheries Stock Analysis. R package version 0.9.1: Fish R Core Team; accessed 2021 July 17. https://github.com/droglenc/FSA. [ Links ]

Ogle DH. 2020. FSAsim: Simulate Data for Fisheries Stock Assessment Methods. Accessed 2020 Feb 12. http://derekogle.com/fishr, https://github.com/droglenc/FSAsim. [ Links ]

Ouannes-Ghorbel M, Bradai MN, Bouain A. 2002. Spawning period and sexual maturity ofSymphodus(Crenilabrus)tinca(Labridae) in Sfax coasts (Tunisia). Cybium. 26:89-92. [ Links ]

Özaydın O, Uçkun D, Akalın S, Leblebici S, Tosunoğlu Z. 2007. Length-weight relationships of fishes captured from Izmir Bay, central Aegean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol . 23(6):695-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439- 0426.2007.00853.x [ Links ]

Pallaoro A, Jardas I. 2003. Some biological parameters of the peacock wrasse,Symphodus(Crenilabrus)tinca(L. 1758) (Pisces: Labridae) from the middle eastern Adriatic (Croatian coast). Sci Mar. 67(1):33-41. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.2003.67n133 [ Links ]

Panfili J, Pontual (de) H, Troadec H, Wrigth PJ. 2002. Manual of Fish Sclerochronology. Brest (France): Ifremer-IRD coedition. p. 464. [ Links ]

Pankhurst NW, Munday PL. 2011. Effects of climate change on fish reproduction and early life history stages. Mar Freshw Res. 62(9):1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF10269 [ Links ]

Pauly D. 1978. A preliminary compilation of fish length growth parameters. Berichte des Institut für Meereskundean der Christian-Albrechts-Universiitat Kiel. 55:1-200. [ Links ]

Pauly D. 1991. Growth performance in fishes: rigorous description of patterns as a basis for understanding causal mechanisms. Aquabyte. 4:3-6. [ Links ]

Pauly D, Munro JL. 1984. Once more on growth comparison in fish and invertebrates. ICLARM Fishbyte. 2(1):21-23. [ Links ]

Pauly D. 1994. A framework for latitudinal comparisons of flatfish recruitment. Neth J Sea Res. 32(2):107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(94)90035-3 [ Links ]

Peskov VN, Manilo LG. 2018. Size-at-age and sex variability of plastic values in ocellated wrasse,Symphodus ocellatus(Linnaeus, 1758) (Labridae, Perciformes), in Northern part of the Black Sea. Зб пр Зоол муз. 49:3-15. [ Links ]

Quignard JP. 1966. Recherches sur les Labridae (poissons tèlèostèens perciformes) des cǒtes europèennes. Nat Monspel Ser Zool. 5:1-247. [ Links ]

Quignard JP, Pras A. 1986. Labridae. In: Whitehead PJP, Bauchot M-L, Hureau J-C, Nielsen J, Tortonese T (eds.), Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean Vol. 2. Paris (France): UNESCO . p. 919-942. [ Links ]

Remacle C. 1970. Contribution à l'ètude de la sexualitè chez certains Labridae et Sparidae (teleostèens perciformes). Bulletin de l'Institut royal des sciences naturelles de Belgique. Entomol biol. 46:1-13. [ Links ]

Ricker WE. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. J Fish Res. 191:1-367. [ Links ]

Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. 2020. Chapter 13 - reproduction and embryogenesis. In: Baldisserotto B, Urbinati EC, Cyrino JEP (eds.), Biology and Physiology of Freshwater Neotropical Fish. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press. p. 287-313. [ Links ]

Salekhova LP. 1971. Embrionalnyi i ranniy postembrionalnyi periody razvitiya chernomorskih zelenushek rodaCrenilabrus. Biologiya morya. Vyp. 23. Voprosy ekologii ryb yuznyh morey. (Respubl. mezhvedomstvennyi sborn.). Kiev (Ukraine): Naukova dumka p. 36-77. [ Links ]

Sayer MDJ, Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA. 1995. Growth, diet and condition of goldsinny on the west coast of Scotland. J Fish Biol . 46(2):317-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb05972.x [ Links ]

Sinopoli M, Cattano C, Chemello R, Timpanaro A, Timpanaro V, Gristina M. 2014. Nest building in a Mediterranean wrasse (Symphodus ocellatus): are the algae used randomly chosen or actively selected. Mar Ecol . 36(4):942-949. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12187 [ Links ]

Škeljo F, Brčić J, Vuletin V, Ferri J. 2015. Age and growth of the axillary wrasse,Symphodusmediterraneus (L.) from the eastern Adriatic Sea. Mar Biol Res. 11(7):780-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2015.1016963 [ Links ]

Škeljo F, Ferri J. 2012. The use of otolith shape and morphometry for identification and size-estimation of five wrasse species in predator-prey studies. J Appl Ichthyol . 28(4):524-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2011.01925.x [ Links ]

Šoljan T. 1930. Nestbau fines adriatischen lippfisches (Crenilabrus ocellatusforsk.). Z Morphol Oekol Tiere. 17:145-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406256 [ Links ]

Sparre P, Venema SC. 1992. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part 1. Manual. Rome (Itlay): [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 376 p. Fisheries Technical Paper No. 306. [ Links ]

Stiver KA, Alonzo SH. 2013. Does the risk of sperm competition help explain cooperation between reproductive competitors? A study in the ocellated wrasse (Symphodus ocellatus). Am Nat . 181(3):357-368. https://doi.org/10.1086/669149 [ Links ]

Stiver KA, Harris RM, Townsend JP, Hofmann HA, Alonzo SH. 2014. Neural gene expression profiles and androgen levels underlie alternative reproductive tactics in the ocellated wrasse,Symphodus ocellatus. Ethology. 121(2):152-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12324 [ Links ]

Taborsky M, Hudde B, Wirtz P. 1987. Reproductive behaviour and ecology ofSymphodus(Crenilabrus)ocellatus, a European wrasse with four types of male behaviour. Behaviour. 102(1-2):82-117. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853986X00063 [ Links ]

Treble MA, Campana SE, Wastle RJ, Jones CM, Boje J. 2008. Growth analysis and age validation of a deepwater Arctic fish, the Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides). Can J Fish Aquat. 65(6):1047-1059. https://doi.org/10.1139/F08-030 [ Links ]

Uzer U, Öztürk B, Yıldız T. 2019. Age composition, growth, and mortality of European hakeMerluccius merluccius(Actinopterygii: Gadiformes: Merlucciidae) from the northern Aegean Sea, Turkey. Acta Ichthyol Piscat . 49(2):109-117. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIEP/02465 [ Links ]

Valle C, Bayle JT, Ramos AA. 2003. Weight-length relationships for selected fish species of the western Mediterranean Sea. J Appl Ichthyol . 19(4):261-262. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0426.2003.00492.x [ Links ]

Vandeputte M, Quillet E, Chatain B. 2012. Are sex ratios in wild European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) populations biased?. Aquat Living Resour. 25(1):77-81. https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2012002 [ Links ]

Vicentini RN, Araújo FG. 2003. Sex ratio and size structure ofMicropogonias furnieri(Desmarest, 1823) (Perciformes, Sciaenidae) in Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Biol 63(4):559-566. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000400003 [ Links ]

Vitale F, Worsøe-Clausen L, Ní Chonchúir G. 2019. Handbook of fish age estimation protocols and validation methods. Copenhagen (Denmark): ICES Cooperative Research. 180 p. Report No. 346. http://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5221 [ Links ]

Von Bertalanffy L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries of growth laws II). Hum Biol. 10(2):181-213. [ Links ]

Voss J. 1976. A propos de quelques poissons de la Me´diterrane´e: le genreSymphodusRafinesque, 1810:Symphodus(Crenilabrus) melops L.,Symphodus ocellatusForskal, 1775. Revue française d’Aquariologie Herpétologie. 3:93-98. [ Links ]

Warner RR, Lejeune P. 1985. Sex change limited by paternal care: a test using four Mediterranean labrid fishes, genusSymphodus. Mar Biol. 87:89-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00397010 [ Links ]

Weatherley AH, Gill HS. 1987. The biology of fish growth. London (UK): Academic Press . 443 p. [ Links ]

Received: October 05, 2021; Accepted: July 25, 2022; Published: May 18, 2023

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License