Nota Científica
Recent records of Avicennia bicolor (Acanthaceae) on
the Mexican Pacific coast with notes on its distribution and conservation
status
Registros recientes de Avicennia bicolor
(Acanthaceae) en la costa del Pacífico mexicano con notas sobre su
distribución y estado de conservación
Salvador Santamaría-Damián1
Emilio I. Romero-Berny2
*
Cristian Tovilla-Hernández1
Margarita E. Gallegos-Martínez3
1 Departamento de Ciencias de la Sustentabilidad,
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur-Unidad Tapachula. Carretera a Antiguo Aeropuerto
km 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas, 30700. México
2 Centro de Investigaciones Costeras, Instituto
de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. Calle J.J.
Calzada y Av. Prolongación Calzada de Guadalupe, Col. Evolución, Tonalá,
Chiapas, 30500. México
3 Departamento de Hidrobiología, División de
Ciencias Biológicas y de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma
Metropolitana-Iztapalapa. Av. San Rafael Atlixco 180, Col. Vicentina, Del.
Iztapalapa, Ciudad de México, 09340. México
ABSTRACT
Background:
The mangrove Avicennia bicolor was first recorded in Mexico
in 1946, however until now there is no basic information about its
distribution supported by herbarium specimens.
Goals:
Three recent records of A. bicolor are provided at a new
location in Mexico on the coastal wetlands of the Gulf of Tehuantepec,
Chiapas; and the information about its known records on the American Pacific
is summarized.
Methods:
Plant specimens were collected, which then, were dried, corroborated and
deposited in four national herbaria. In the field, some structural
attributes of the mangroves were determined such as density, basal area and
height. A database and publications of species records were reviewed to
preliminarily analyze their known distribution in the Pacific.
Results:
In Mexico, A. bicolor has been recorded only on the coastal
wetlands of Mar Muerto and Los Patos-Solo Dios. The preliminary ecological
diagnosis showed its presence in relatively dense stands (234 ± 86 trees
ha-1) and with high structural development (basal area: 16.1
m2 ha-1, height: 13.9 m). Although its presence is
apparently conspicuous in several localities of Panama and Costa Rica, data
on the species in the coastal strip between the Gulf of Fonseca and the Gulf
of Tehuantepec is lacking.
Conclusions:
The importance of these records is evident, considering the scarce
information available on A. bicolor and its restricted
distribution in Mexico. We consider it appropriate to increase the
ecological studies in its distribution area and give it protection through
its inclusion in the Official Mexican Standard (NOM-059).
Key words: mangrove; distribution; Chiapas; Gulf of Tehuantepec; NOM-059
RESUMEN
Antecedentes:
El mangle Avicennia bicolor fue registrado por primera vez
en México en 1946, sin embargo, hasta ahora se carece de información básica
sobre su distribución respaldada en ejemplares de herbario.
Objetivos:
Aportar tres registros recientes de A. bicolor en una nueva
localidad para México en humedales costeros del Golfo de Tehuantepec,
Chiapas y resumir la información sobre sus registros conocidos en el
Pacífico americano.
Métodos:
Se recolectaron ejemplares botánicos, los cuales fueron herborizados,
corroborados y depositados en cuatro herbarios nacionales. En campo se
determinaron algunos atributos estructurales de los manglares (densidad,
área basal, altura). Se revisó una base de datos y publicaciones de
registros de la especie para analizar preliminarmente su distribución
conocida en el Pacífico.
Resultados:
En México, A. bicolor se ha registrado únicamente en los
humedales costeros de Mar Muerto y Los Patos-Solo Dios. El diagnóstico
ecológico preliminar demostró su presencia en rodales relativamente densos
(234 ± 86 arbóles ha-1) y con elevado desarrollo estructural
(área basal: 16.1 m2 ha-1; altura: 13.9 m). Aunque su
presencia es aparentemente conspicua en varias localidades de Panamá y Costa
Rica, se carece de datos sobre la especie en la franja costera comprendida
entre el Golfo de Fonseca y el Golfo de Tehuantepec.
Conclusiones:
Se evidencia la importancia de estos registros, considerando la escasa
información disponible y su restringida distribución en México. Consideramos
congruente incrementar los estudios ecológicos en su área de distribución y
darle protección mediante su inclusión en la Norma Oficial Mexicana
(NOM-059).
Palabras clave: manglar; distribución; Chiapas; Golfo de Tehuantepec; NOM-059
Mangroves are tree and shrub communities that occupy intertidal zones of tropical and
subtropical regions. The few species that compose this group display distinctive
morphological, physiological and ecological traits that make them adaptable to the
coastal environment dynamics (Hogarth, 2007; Tomlinson, 1995). Mangroves are highly productive
ecosystems, they provide several environmental services; including protection from
coastal erosion, sediment trapping and they are efficient carbon sinks, also, they work
as nursery and feeding areas for many fishery species (Sanjurjo-Rivera & Welsh-Casas, 2005; Polidoro et al., 2010; Donato et al., 2011). In Mexico four species of mangroves
are widely distributed in both the Atlantic and the Pacific coasts: Rhizophora
mangle L. (Red Mangrove; Rhizophoraceae), Avicennia
germinans Jacq. (Black Mangrove; Acanthaceae), Laguncularia
racemosa Gaertn. (White Mangrove; Combretaceae) and Conocarpus
erectus L. (Button Mangrove; Combretaceae) with two varieties
(erectus and sericeus) (López-Portillo & Ezcurra, 2002; Pennington & Sarukhán, 2005). Additionally, in the state of Chiapas the
presence of Rhizophora harrisonii Leechman (considered a natural hybrid
between R. mangle and R. racemosa G. Mey.) and
Avicennia bicolor Standl. (Salty Mangrove) has been reported (Moldenke, 1960; Rico-Gray, 1981; Lot et
al., 2015).
Avicennia bicolor is a native mangrove of the Central American Pacific
and found in the restricted areas between Buenaventura Bay in Colombia and the southern
Mexican Pacific coast (Jiménez, 1990, 1994; Tomlinson,
1995; Duke, 2010). Avicennia
bicolor and A. germinans can occur in mixed stands and can
be easily distinguished by morphological characteristics (leaves and inflorescence
arrangement) (sensuGibson, 1970;
Tomlinson, 1995). Microsatellite data
suggests that a contemporary genetic isolation between the two species exists (Nettel et al., 2008).
The following is a dichotomous key to differentiate the two species of
Avicennia present in Mexico (Tomlinson, 1995).
-
Corolla conspicuously hairy within, appreciably zygomorphic, stamens slightly
to appreciably
unequal..................................................................................
2
2A. Flowers 10-15 mm long and almost as wide at anthesis, stamens
excerpted and only slightly unequal; style long, excerpted from
calyx when corolla is shed. Fruit distinctly beaked, glaucous,
surface rough but not pitted. Leaf ovate to elliptic at most. Widely
distributed from the Pacific and the Gulf of Mexico
coasts.........................Avicennia
germinans
2B. Flowers 5-6 mm long and about as wide at anthesis; stamens
included and markedly unequal, with a short filament (0.5 mm) on the
inner pair and a longer filament (1 mm) on the outer pair; style
short, either deciduous or not excerpted from calyx when corolla is
shed. Fruit blunt, globose, greenish yellow, surface irregularly
pitted. Leaf blade oblong, elongate, often less than three times as
long as wide. Restricted distribution in Chiapas (Mexico) and
Central American Pacific
coasts.......................................... Avicennia
bicolor
Records of A. bicolor in Mexico are particularly scarce. Its occurrence
has been cited without location data (e.g., López-Portillo & Ezcurra, 2002; Rodríguez-Zúñiga et al., 2013) or valid specimens,
generating uncertainty on the actual occurrence and on its distribution in the country.
The aim of this note is to report three recent records of A. bicolor in
the state of Chiapas. Also, we provided data on the mangrove community structure with
emphasis in A. bicolor and the general characteristics of its habitat.
Additionally, information gaps of the species were determined through an analysis of its
records in the Central American Pacific.
Previous records. The Japanese botanist Eizi Matuda collected the first
record of A. bicolor in Mexico in 1946. This specimen collected in
Paderón [sic], Chiapas (16° 2´ 25.5´´ N, 093° 51´ 59.91´´ W approximately) was deposited
in the U.S. National Herbarium (US 1889845; we revised photographs of this specimen in
April 10, 2015). A second specimen was collected after 40 years later, on the east of
the Mar Muerto coastal lagoon (Chiapas state) during an ungraduated research project in
1987 (see section material examined) (Gallegos &
Gómez, 1989). The information provided by the mangrove forests inventory made
on the coasts of Chiapas and Oaxaca (Tovilla-Hernández
et al., 2007; 2010) suggests that A. bicolor is found in some sites on
the northeastern of the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico (Fig.
1).
Recent records.
Avicennia bicolor stands were in the Mangrove Priority Site Los
Patos-Solo Dios, municipalities of Pijijiapan and Tonalá, Chiapas (CONABIO-PS28; Rodríguez-Zúñiga et al., 2013). In
this new locality, forest structure parameters (DBH ≥ 2.5 cm, density height, basal
area) were determined in three plots (300 m2) where A.
bicolor was found. In April 2015 and November 2016, we collected specimens
using standard field and herbarium techniques (Lot &
Chiang, 1986), and for botanical determination, we used the keys of Gibson (1970) and Pool & Rueda (2001). Herbarium specimens were deposited at MEXU
(National Herbarium, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), UAMIZ (Metropolitan
Herbarium “Dr. Ramón Riba y Nava Esparza”, Universidad Autónoma
Metropolitana-Iztapalapa), HEM (Herbarium “Eizi Matuda”, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes
de Chiapas) and ECO-SC-H (El Colegio de la Frontera Sur-San Cristóbal).
Material examined. Mexico. Chiapas. Municipality of Tonalá: Mar Muerto,
Estero Cinco Arrobas, ca. 7.5 km southeast of Paredón, 15° 51´ N, 093° 51´ W, 28
February 1987, A. Gómez and M. Gallegos, 268 (UAMIZ 32515); Panama. Province of Coclé:
On Isla del Pozo in salinas (salt flats) of Rio Estero Salado, 8° 11´ N, 080° 30´ W, 12
February 1982, S. Knapp, K. Clary and D. Piperno, 3401 (MEXU 378957); Province of
Panama: Punta Chame, 10-15 miles from Pan-American Highway, 8° 40´ N, 79° 45´ W, 17
September 1981, S. Knapp, 1244 (MEXU 382325).
Additional material from the new locality. Mexico. Chiapas. Municipality of
Pijijiapan: Los Patos-Solo Dios lagoon system, ca. 120 m east of the San José estuary
channel and 500 m north of the beach, 15° 43’ 39.50” N, 93° 29’ 50.20” W, S.
Santamaría-Damián 001 and E. I. Romero-Berny, s/n (MEXU,
UAMIZ. HEM, ECO-SC-H), 13 April 2015 (Fig. 2). Ca.
40 m east of the San José estuary channel and 510 m north of the beach, 15° 42’ 55.60”
N, 093° 28’ 52.70” W, S. Santamaría-Damián 002 and E. I.
Romero-Berny, s/n (MEXU, UAMIZ. HEM, ECO-SC-H), 15 April 2015. Municipality
of Tonalá: Los Patos-Solo Dios lagoon system, ca. 50 m south of the La Ceiba fishing
pier, 15° 45’ 30.66” N, 093° 31’ 48.74” W, S. Santamaría-Damián 003 and
E. I. Romero-Berny, s/n (HEM, ECO-SC-H), 18 November 2016.
Tree community structure. In Los Patos-Solo Dios lagoon system, mean density
of A. bicolor trees (DBH≥ 2.5 cm) was estimated at 234 ± 86 trees
ha-1. Average basal area and mean height were 16.1 m2
ha-1 and 13.9 m, respectively. Avicennia bicolor stands
were observed in an intertidal creek adjacent to the main estuarine channel. These
stands are located to the side of the sandbar that separates the estuary from the open
ocean and it has a surface salinity of 34 psu (dry season, February 2010).
Rhizophora mangle trees occurred at the borders of the creek
(605±177 trees ha-1) while the A. germinans stands (661±107
trees ha-1) are surrounding the stands of A. bicolor. The
composition and structure of dry climate mangroves along the Pacific of Central America
show differences among stands in the inland and edge sections of the forest where the
runoff seasonally modifies the patterns of local drought and salinity, which is evident
in A. bicolor- A. germinans mixed stands (Jiménez, 1990). In general, the communities of A.
bicolor in this new Mexican locality have a more developed forest structure
in comparison to those of the Gulf of Fonseca (southeastern El Salvador), where low
values of density, height and basal area are reported (Chicas-Batres et al.,2016).
Distribution records. To summarize the distribution records of A.
bicolor in the Central American Pacific, we compiled locality data using
the Global Biodiversity Information Facility dataset (GBIF, 2013) and literature. The search of GBIF returned 176 records with
georeferenced data (including the synonym A. tonduzii). The species has
been collected in seven countries including Mexico. Most records come from Costa Rica
and Panama (Fig 1). However, there are no records
north of the Gulf of Fonseca and the coast of Guatemala, with exception of those
mentioned for Mexico in this note.
In Mexico, this species is restricted to a coastal stretch along the Mar Muerto lagoon to
the Joaquín Amaro-La Conquista dredged channel (40.3 km). The Mar Muerto record
(Paredón, Chiapas) represents the northernmost locality for this species in the Eastern
Pacific, although it is necessary to intensify exploration in the northern region of the
Gulf of Tehuantepec to locate a more precise distribution limit. It is also advisable to
carry out a more complete characterization of its habitat to determine the environmental
drivers that define its distribution and structural patterns.
Federal laws protect mangrove ecosystems in Mexico; however there is a gap with respect
to A. bicolor, which is not listed in the Official Mexican Standard
(Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2001), although the UICN Red List categorized
it as Vulnerable (Duke, 2010; SEMARNAT, 2010). Our records show that A.
bicolor is distributed in a limited but important area in the northern
Mesoamerica, in relatively dense stands with high structural development. The mangrove
system of Los Patos-Solo Dios lacks conservation status and is threatened by changes in
land use and selective logging (Santamaría-Damián
et al., 2015). Therefore, it is considered congruent to
give legal protection to the site and necessary to include A. bicolor
in the NOM-059.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank D. S. Gernandt and staff of the Herbario Nacional (UNAM-IB) for their
invaluable assistance in several activities of this research; J. Santana Carrillo
(UAMIZ), B. V. Juárez Jaimes (MEXU), H. Gómez Dominguez, M. A. Pérez Farrera (HEM),
I. Vasquez Lara and M. Ishiki Ishihara (ECO-SC-H) for their assistance with database
queries of collections and deposit of specimens; J. De la Presa, F. Ovalle, A. Lang
and E. Serrano for field support; fishermen of S.C.P.P. El Remolino allowing access
to the collecting sites; M. R. García Peña for the photographs of the specimens
deposited at the National Herbarium of the Smithsonian Institute; SEMARNAT for
collection permit (SGPA/DGGFS/712/2105/14). Comments on manuscript from W.A.
Matamoros and two anonymous reviewers helped to substantially improve the final
version.
REFERENCES
Chicas-Batres, F. A., J. A. González-Leiva & J. A. Sayes 2016.
Composición florística y estructura del manglar de la Bahía de La Unión, El
Salvador. Revista Comunicaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas 2
(1): 52-64.
[ Links ]
Donato, C. D., J. B. Kauffman, D. Murdiyarso, S. Kurnianto, M.
Stidham & M. Kanninen 2011. Mangroves among the most carbon rich forests in
the tropics. Nature Geoscience 4: 293-297. DOI:10.1038/NGEO1123
[ Links ]
Duke, N. C. 2010.Avicennia bicolor. The IUCN Red
List of Threatened Species. V.2015.2. Available on line at http://iucnredlist.org/details/178847/0 (downloaded July 28,
2015).
[ Links ]
Gallegos, M. & A. Gómez. 1989. Análisis estructural del
manglar de la laguna costera Mar Muerto, Chiapas, México. Boletín
de Resúmenes del III Congreso Venezolano sobre Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de
Oriente, Instituto Oceanográfico de Venezuela. 45 p.
[ Links ]
GBIF. 2013. Avicennia bicolor Standley. GBIF
Backbone Taxonomy. Available online at http://gbif.org/species/4196610 (downloaded July 28,
2015).
[ Links ]
Gibson, D. N. 1970. Verbenaceae. In: Standley, P.
C. & L. O. Williams (eds.). Flora of Guatemala. Fieldiana
Botany 24 (9/1-2): 167-236.
[ Links ]
Hogarth, P. J. 2007. The Biology of Mangroves and
Seagrasses. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 284
p.
[ Links ]
Jiménez, J. A. 1990. The structure and function of dry weather
mangroves of the Pacific coasts of Central America, with emphasis on
Avicennia bicolor forests. Estuaries 13
(2): 182-192.
[ Links ]
Jiménez, J. A. 1994. Los manglares del Pacífico
centroamericano. Fundación UNA. Heredia, Costa Rica. 352
p.
[ Links ]
López-Portillo, J. & E. Ezcurra. 2002. Los manglares de México:
una revisión. Madera y Bosques 8 (1): 27-51.
[ Links ]
Lot, A. & F. Chiang (Comps.). 1986. Manual de Herbario:
administración y manejo de colecciones, técnicas de recolección y
preparación de ejemplares botánicos. Consejo Nacional de la Flora
de México A.C., Mexico. 142 p.
[ Links ]
Lot, A., C. Zepeda & A. Mora. 2015. Vegetación acuática y
subacuática de México. In: Lot, A. (ed.). Catálogo de
la flora y vegetación de los humedales mexicanos, Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México. México. pp. 27-104.
[ Links ]
Moldenke, H. N. 1960. Materials toward a monograph of the genus
Avicennia. Phytologia 7:
123-168.
[ Links ]
Nettel, A., R. S. Dodd, Z. Afzal-Rafii & C. Tovilla-Hernández.
2008. Genetic diversity enhanced by ancient introgression and secondary contact
in East Pacific Black mangroves. Molecular Ecology 17:
2680-2690. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03766.x
[ Links ]
Pennington, T. D. & J. Sarukhán. 2005. Árboles
tropicales de México. Manual para la identificación de las principales
especies. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México-Fondo de Cultura
Económica, México. 523 p.
[ Links ]
Polidoro, A. B., K. E. Carpenter, L. Collins, N. Duke, A. M.
Ellison, J. C. Ellison, E. J. Farnsworth, E. S. Fernando, K. Kathiresan, N. E.
Koedam, S. R. Livingston, T. Miyagi, G. E. Moore, V. Ngoc Nam, J. Eong Ong, J.
H. Primavera, S. G. Salmo III, J. C. Sansiangco, S. Sukardjo, Y. Wang & J.
W. Jong-Yong. 2010. The loss of species: Mangrove extinction risk and geographic
areas of global concern. Plos One 5: e0010095. DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0010095
[ Links ]
Pool, A. & R. M. Rueda. 2001. Verbenaceae. In:
Stevens, W. D., C. Ulloa, A. Pool & O. M. Montiel (eds.). Flora de
Nicaragua. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri
Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, pp. 2497-2525.
[ Links ]
Rico-Gray, V. 1981. Rhizophora harrisonii
(Rhizophoraceae), un nuevo registro para las costas de México. Boletín
de la Sociedad Botánica de México 7: 163-165.
[ Links ]
Rodríguez-Zúñiga, M. T., C. Troche-Souza, A. D. Vásquez-Lule, J. D.
Márquez-Mendoza, B. Vásquez-Balderas, L. Valderrama-Landeros, S.
Velázquez-Salazar, M. I. Cruz-López, R. Ressl, A. Uribe-Martínez, S.
Cerdeira-Estrada, J. Acosta-Velázquez, J. Díaz-Gallegos, R. Jiménez-Rosenberg,
L. Fueyo-MacDonald & C. Galindo-Leal. 2013. Manglares de México.
Extensión, distribución y monitoreo. CONABIO, México. 128 p.
[ Links ]
Sanjurjo-Rivera, E. & S. Welsh-Casas. 2005. Una descripción del
valor de los bienes y servicios ambientales prestados por los manglares.
Gaceta Ecológica 74: 55-68.
[ Links ]
Santamaría-Damián, S., J. Acosta-Velázquez, E. I. Romero-Berny &
C. Tovilla-Hernández. 2015. Cambios en la cobertura de los manglares y
modificación del terreno en el sistema lagunar Los Patos-Solo Dios, en la costa
de Chiapas, México. Lacandonia 9 (9):21-30.
[ Links ]
SEMARNAT (Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos naturales). 2010.
Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM 059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental - Especies
nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y
especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en
riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación, México, D.F. 35 p.
[ Links ]
Tomlinson, P. B. 1995. The Botany of Mangroves.
Cambridge University Press. 432 p.
[ Links ]
Tovilla-Hernández, C., R. L. Salas-Roblero, J. C. De la Presa-Pérez,
E. Romero-Berny, F. Ovalle-Estrada, R. Gómez-Ortega, J. Hernández-Sandoval, E.
De la Cruz-Montes & A. Hernández-Guzmán. 2007. Inventario forestal
de los bosques de manglar de la costa de Chiapas. Informe final,
ECOSUR-COCYTECH, México. 92 p.
[ Links ]
Tovilla-Hernández, C. , F. Ovalle-Estrada, J. C. De la Presa-Pérez
& D.T. González-Castillo. 2010. Inventario y monitoreo del estado
actual de los bosques de manglar de Chiapas y Oaxaca. 2º Informe,
ECOSUR-CONABIO, México . 129 p.
[ Links ]