SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número2Densidad, biomasa y estructura de tallas del pez león en el arrecife Tuxpan, VeracruzEvaluación de la restauración activa mediante el índice de función arrecifal en arrecifes del Parque Nacional Islas Marietas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Hidrobiológica

versión impresa ISSN 0188-8897

Hidrobiológica vol.33 no.2 Ciudad de México may./ago. 2023  Epub 13-Mayo-2024

https://doi.org/10.24275/aohh9236 

Artículos

Two biomarkers of gene expression plasticity in Pocillopora corals from the Carrizales reef, Mexican Tropical Pacific

Dos biomarcadores de la plasticidad de la expresión génica en corales Pocillopora del arrecife Carrizales, Pacífico Tropical Mexicano

M. Alejandro Delgadillo-Nuño124

Marco A. Liñán-Cabello3 

Maider Justel-Díez45 

Erick Delgadillo-Nuño45 

Tadashi Kono-Martínez1 

Clara E. Galindo-Sánchez4 

Rafael A. Cabral-Tena2 

Eugenio J. Carpizo-Ituarte1* 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3253-2357

1Instituto de Investigaciones Oceanológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Km 103 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, 22860. México

2Departamento de Ecología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada. Km 103 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, 22860. México

3Facultad de Ciencias Marinas, Universidad de Colima. Km 19.5 Carretera Manzanillo-Barra de Navidad, Manzanillo, Colima, 28868. México

4Departamento de Biotecnología Marina, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada. Km 103 Carretera Tijuana-Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, 22860. México

5Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Centro de investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo. Circunvalación ao Campus Universitario, Vigo, Pontevedra, 36310. España


ABSTRACT

Background.

Gene expression (GE) plasticity is an acclimation response that allows organisms to adjust rapidly to environmental changes, providing an adaptive advantage. GE biomarkers are emerging as a valuable tool for linking the organism’s physiological plasticity with the synergetic effects of large-scale climatic conditions and local impacts such as temperature and nutrients.

Objectives.

In this study, we investigate the GE plasticity of the 70-kDa heat shock protein (hsp70) and the carbonic anhydrase enzyme (CA) to confirm the ability of those two genes as biomarkers of the Cellular Stress Response and Cellular Homeostasis Response, respectively.

Methods.

Using qPCR, we evaluate the GE plasticity of coral colonies from Pocillopora capitata, Pocillopora damicornis, and Pocillopora verrucosa at the Carrizales reef (Colima coast of Mexico) naturally exposed to environmental changes in the Sea Surface Temperature (SST), productivity and nutrients using the cellular density of Symbiodiniaceae and chlorophyll content as health indices.

Results.

Our results clearly show GE plasticity in the hsp70 for Pocillopora verrucosa and Pocillopora damicornis related to a daily environmental change in temperature and nutrients. On the other hand, the CA gene expression shows no change in response to daily variations. However, there was a significantly high expression of CA and a lower expression of hsp70 in Pocillopora capitata. Furthermore, we found no significant differences in the health indices, suggesting some degree of physiological plasticity in Pocillopora corals like its extensive morphological plasticity that could reflect different adaptation capacities to low temperatures and high nutrients during the spring season in the central Mexican Pacific.

Conclusions.

Evaluating the phenotypic plasticity (morphology and molecular physiology) could help identify coral colonies with a more significant potential to survive environmental stressors. The latter is an essential consideration for managing, conserving, and restoring coral reefs in the Mexican Pacific.

Keywords: coral acclimatization; molecular physiology; phenotypic plasticity

RESUMEN

Antecedentes.

La plasticidad de la expresión génica (GE) es una respuesta inmediata de aclimatación al cambio ambiental que puede proporcionar una ventaja adaptativa. Los biomarcadores de GE están emergiendo como una herramienta valiosa para vincular la plasticidad fisiológica del organismo con los efectos sinérgicos del cambio climático y el impacto local como la temperatura y nutrientes.

Objetivos.

Investigamos la plasticidad de la expresión de genes que codifican para la proteína de choque térmico de 70-kDa (hsp70) y la enzima anhidrasa carbónica (CA) para confirmar su utilidad como biomarcadores de la respuesta de estrés y de homeostasis celular, respectivamente.

Métodos.

Evaluamos la GE mediante qPCR en colonias de corales Pocillopora capitata, Pocillopora damicornis y Pocillopora verrucosa del arrecife Carrizales (Colima, México) expuestas a un cambio natural en la temperatura de la superficie del mar (SST), productividad primaria y nutrientes utilizando la densidad de Symbiodiniaceae y el contenido de clorofila como indicadores de salud.

Resultados.

La plasticidad de la GE de hsp70 en Pocillopora damicornis y Pocillopora verrucosa se asocia con la variación diaria de temperatura y nutrientes, mientras que el gen de la CA no muestra cambios de expresión relacionada con esta variabilidad. Sin embargo, en Pocillopora capitata se encontró una expresión significativamente mayor de CA y una menor expresión de hsp70. Estos resultados reflejan un grado de plasticidad fisiológica en corales Pocillopora similar a la extensa plasticidad morfológica dentro de este género, lo que podría sugerir diferentes capacidades de adaptación a la temporada primaveral de bajas temperaturas y alto contenido de nutrientes en la región.

Conclusiones.

Evaluar la plasticidad fenotípica (morfología y fisiología molecular) podría ser útil para identificar colonias de corales con un mayor potencial de sobrevivencia al estrés ambiental. Lo anterior resulta relevante para la conservación, manejo y restauración de los arrecifes de coral del Pacífico mexicano.

Palabras clave: aclimatación coralina; fisiología molecular; plasticidad fenotípica

INTRODUCTION

Coral reefs currently face the challenges of increased sea surface temperatures and severe changes in ocean chemistry due to global warming and ocean acidification (Hughes et al., 2017) under an unprecedented climate change crisis (Barnes et al., 2022). In addition, accelerated industrialization, urbanization, and agriculture have played a significant role in coral reefs’ degradation through eutrophication, sedimentation, and turbidity (Suggett & Smith, 2020; Donovan et al., 2021). Those environmental challenges, if extreme and prolonged, cause signs of severe stress effects on coral calcification, and massive bleaching and mortality due to the loss of the endosymbiotic relationship between corals and Symbiodiniaceae (Eakin et al., 2019).

Recent studies, however, have shown that differential changes in gene expression, via physiological plasticity, between and within coral species (Rivera et al., 2021; Strader & Quigley, 2022) could contribute to emergent stress responses such as thermal tolerance (van Oppen & Oakeshott, 2020; Avila-Magaña et al., 2021) and resistance to ocean acidification (Yuan et al., 2019; Scucchia et al., 2021); with particular links between specific environmental stressors (nutrient/thermal) that could benefit or synergistically affect heat-stressed corals at the cellular level (Rodríguez-Casariego et al., 2020; Montalbetti et al., 2021; Thummasan et al., 2021) resulting in tolerant and susceptible populations that show distinct transcriptional resilience and acclimation potential (Savary et al., 2021; Drury et al., 2022). The latter highlights the ability of qPCR-based gene expression biomarkers to elucidate gene expression plasticity (Poli et al., 2017) and their potential as molecular tools to assess and predict coral reef health and function under climate change scenarios (Hook et al., 2014; Palumbi et al., 2014; Zoccola et al., 2016), with further applications on coral reef restoration and conservation as an aid in determining what readily quantifiable phenotypes are most indicative of resilience (Parkinson et al., 2020; Kenkel & Wright, 2022).

Molecular markers (biomarkers) are defined as early detectable changes in the expression of one or several genes that indicate physiological effects or alterations (Smith et al., 2009), and those gene expression biomarkers have been widely used to measure environmental and anthropogenic impacts on marine species (Hook et al., 2014; Tarrant et al., 2019). As the earliest steps of an organism’s response to environmental stress occur at the molecular level comprising the cellular stress response (CSR), gene expression analyses of the CSR provide a valuable tool to link an organism’s physiology with large-scale climatic conditions (Kenkel et al., 2014). The CSR is activated only by severe stress, which causes a proportional increase in macromolecular damage and exceeds the elastic limit of cellular homeostasis (Kültz, 2020); once cell damage control has taken place and cells have been repaired, a complementary response called the cellular homeostasis response (CHR) is triggered to reestablish homeostasis under the new environmental conditions (Kültz, 2005). Therefore, gene expression analyses of the CSR and CHR genes have been proposed as a standard metric for quantifying stress and evaluating an organism’s condition in situ (Evans & Hofmann, 2012).

The CSR genes include those coding for molecular chaperones of the Hsp family (hsp110, hsp90, hsp70, hsp40, hsp60, and small Hsps), antioxidants, redox enzymes, and enzymes that mitigate stress-induced damage to cellular components such as membranes, proteins, and DNA (Kültz, 2005; Shitaoka et al., 2021); while the CHR genes include those coding for Ca2+ homeostasis enzymes, ribosomal proteins, cytoskeleton and, in the case of calcifying/photosynthetic organisms (such as corals), extracellular matrix proteins and the carbonic anhydrase enzyme family (Kenkel et al., 2013, 2018). The immediate up-regulation of the Hsps family is a ubiquitous, vital, and dynamic response associated with thermal stress tolerance and bleaching resistance (Barshis et al., 2013; Palumbi et al., 2014; Poli et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018), in which the coral holobiont expresses the genes at high levels at all times in stressful conditions/locations (Mayfield et al., 2013, 2019). Furthermore, the carbonic anhydrase (CA) isoforms are a potential biomarker family for global and local impacts in calcifying organisms (Zebral et al., 2019), such as ocean acidification and contamination effects in corals (Kenkel et al., 2014, 2018; Zoccola et al., 2016).

Before the expression of any gene can be applied as a universal biomarker, however, there must be an understanding of its promises and limitations concerning natural environmental sensitivity, species-specificity response, environmental history, and current anthropogenic impacts and how expression patterns relate to the physiological and ecological consequences of stress tolerance and resilience due to those varying factors (Kenkel et al., 2014; Rivera et al., 2021; Drury et al. 2022). For instance, the hsp70 gene expression can change drastically with a variety of environmental stress such as extreme temperatures (high or low), high light intensity and salinity changes, nutrient enrichments, and cellular stress caused by coral bleaching and pathogen invasion in corals (Seveso et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018; Dellisanti et al., 2022). Furthermore, when nutrient enrichment is coupled with thermal stress, severe damage occurs to the coral holobiont of Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus, 1758) (compared with the individual effects) due to the Hsps upregulation-induced apoptosis and bleaching mechanism amplification by high nitric oxide (NO) production (Thummasan et al., 2021).

This study aims to confirm and validate the ability of the hsp70 and CA genes as biomarkers of differential stress responses and acclimation potential in corals under natural high nutrient concentrations and low thermal variations. For this, we performed a field study of the hsp70 and CA (qPCR-based) gene expression on Pocillopora capitata Verrill, 1864, P. damicornis, and Pocillopora verrucosa (Ellis & Solander, 1786) (Pocillopora mtORF type 1; sensuPinzón & LaJeunesse, 2011) from the Mexican Pacific. We mainly chose those biomarkers because they have proven effective in identifying gene expression plasticity in Pocillopora (Delgadillo-Nuño et al., 2020). Therefore, we hypothesize that equally healthy corals assessed through Symbiodiniaceae density and chlorophyll content will have some level of gene expression plasticity as part of a differential acclimation and adaptation potential, having the highest plasticity in the most abundant corals at the Carrizales reef, which could explain its differences in coverage and frequency (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2013).

Such new information will highlight the importance of including the evaluation of phenotypic plasticity (morphology/molecular physiology) and temporal variability (daily/seasonal) to accurately predict and anticipate Pocillopora coral’s response to future conditions. Moreover, knowing which readily quantifiable Pocillopora phenotypes could have lower or higher resilience under global change scenarios should be an essential consideration for the experimental designs, management plans, and conservation and restoration efforts of coral reefs in the Mexican Pacific.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area. The Carrizales coral reef is located on the central Mexican Pacific at the Colima coast (19°05´42” N, 104°26’21” W) (Fig. 1), which is on the list of Priority Marine Regions (RMP) as part of the Punta Graham-El Carrizal PMR#27 (Arriaga-Cabrera et al., 1998); such regions are a framework to propose new natural protected areas in Mexico due to their high biodiversity potential and value (Arriaga-Cabrera et al., 2009). Accordingly, the Carrizales reef is a relatively well-developed, undisturbed, and ecologically rich coral community (Liñán-Cabello & Michel-Morfin, 2018) dominated by branching corals (Pocillopora spp.) at shallow and mid-shallow depths (1 to 8 m), with a change in dominance by encrusting and submassive corals (Porites spp. and Pavona spp.) in deeper waters (8 to 10 m), with fewer records of Psammocora spp. (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2013), similar to other coral reefs in the central Mexican Pacific (Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017). Coral species occupy many microenvironments within the reef (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2013), with highly variable temporal conditions (Liñán-Cabello et al., 2016; Delgadillo-Nuño et al., 2020). We focused on low temperatures and high nutrients during the spring-dry season (Muñiz-Anguiano et al., 2017) to reduce the specific conditions of poor light quality and high turbidity and sedimentation during the rainy season.

Figure 1 Location of the Carrizales reef on the coast of Colima, central Mexican Pacific. 

Morphospecies identification. During the last week of April 2016, we used SCUBA diving in the Carrizales reef to visually identify the three most abundant Pocillopora morphospecies based on the macro-morphology of the colonies (after Schmidt-Roach et al., 2014), namely P. capitata, P. damicornis, and P. verrucosa nominal species (after Veron et al., 2016). However, considering the discrepancies between morphological and molecular identification (Gélin et al., 2017; Johnston et al., 2017), those are regarded here, according to Pinzón & LaJeunesse (2011), as Pocillopora morphospecies of a single genetic lineage (mtORF type 1). No other phenotypic characteristics besides macro skeletal morphology were considered in our study (i.e., color phenotypes or rare morphologies). Nevertheless, all colonies were recorded in situ (photographically) for further revision.

Sampling design. After visual identification, we carried out two samplings separately on April 22 and 24, 2016. To reduce the effects of light intensity on the hsp70 and CA gene expression and Symbiodiniaceae indexes (Delgadillo-Nuño et al., 2020) and ensure as much as possible that environmental variation corresponded to temperature and nutrient conditions, all samplings were conducted at midday, from the top of coral colonies at 3 m depth within the main body of the reef avoiding any microenvironments such as large rocks, caves, sandy patches, and isolated or separated colonies (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2013). We collected 72 coral fragments (~1 cm2) from 36 different colonies of Pocillopora morphospecies that occurred in sympatric groups (i.e., one coral colony of P. capitata, P. damicornis, and P. verrucosa were next to the other); each group of sympatric morphospecies was established as an independent experimental sampling unit (n = 6) and those were separated at least 5 to 10 meters to reduce the potential of having collected clones.

Hydrographic analysis. We collected three samples of seawater (200 mL) on each of the sampling days (April 22 and 24, 2016) at 2 m depth on the Carrizales reef and 1 m close to the coral colonies for the determination of dissolved inorganic nutrients (aliquots of 50 mL) according to the methods described by Strickland & Parsons (1972) and Grasshoff et al. (2009) using a segmented flow autoanalyzer (Skalar SanPlus II). These parameters were used as a proxy of the environmental variation at the local scale independent of the microenvironment. Given the lack of temperature measurements in the sampling site, we used sea surface temperature records in the study area made by the Red Mareográfica at Manzanillo station of the Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE) (http://redmar.cicese.mx/emmc/DATA/MNZN). Additionally, for the mesoscale, we used temperature and chlorophyll data from satellite images (8 days compound at processing level 3) from the MODIS Aqua sensor (http://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov).

Total RNA isolation. The excess of RNALater from coral fragments stored at -20 °C was removed, and coral fragments were crushed with a sterile porcelain mortar and pestle. Immediately, ~100 mg of the slurry was placed in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes with 1 mL of TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies©) and homogenized using a mechanical disruptor (FastPrep®24, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, California, USA). We isolated total RNA from each sample following the manufacturer’s specifications and, according to Anderson et al. (2016), up to 2 µL of 6 M HCl was added to avoid the neutralization reaction that occurs between the calcium carbonate of the skeleton and the acidity of TRIzol. Total RNA was eluted in 50 μL of RNase-free water. The quantity and quality of the nucleic acid were analyzed using a Nanodrop® spectrophotometer and through visual inspection in 1.5 % agarose gel. DNA contamination was removed from the RNA samples by treatment with the enzyme DNase I (RNase-Free), following the manufacturer’s specifications (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc). RNA samples were stored at -80 °C until further processing to avoid degradation.

Gene expression. For the analysis of qPCR-based gene expression biomarkers (hsp70 and CA), we used sequence-specific primers for Pocillopora corals obtained from the literature (Mayfield et al., 2013) and the 18S ribosomal RNA gene (18S rRNA) as an internal control designed from Pocillopora sequences on the GenBank (accession No. HM013849.1). The set of primers was as follows: 1) hsp70 (Forward: 5′-CCGCCGGTGGGGTAATGA-3′, Reverse: 5′-CTTGTCGCGTTTCTTCTCG-3′), 2) CA (Forward: 5′-AGGATGATGAGGAGGATGAGG-3′, Reverse: 5′-ATAGCAGGGAGGGGTGGTAA-3′), and 3) 18S rRNA (Forward: 5′-GGTGGTTGAGATGGATGG-3′, Reverse: 5′-ACGTAGGCAGGCACC-3′). Before the gene expression analysis of the biomarkers, we performed a reverse transcription of RNA (200 ng) into complementary DNA (cDNA), using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit and following the manufacturer’s specifications (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies, CA). Aliquots of 20 ng μL-1 of cDNA were then used for the qPCR amplifications, carried out in 20 μL of the total volume containing 6.3 μL of 2X SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.6 μL of one set of primers (10 mmol L−1), 5.0 μL of the cDNA sample (20 ng μL-1), and 6.9 μL of RNase/DNase-free water in a StepOnePlus™ thermocycler (Applied Biosystems), with the following thermocycling conditions: 1) “hot start” at 95 °C for 10 min, 2) amplification of 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s followed by 60 s at 60 °C, and 3) fusion at 95 °C for 15 s followed by 60 s at 60 °C and 15 s at 95 °C. Results expressed the relative mRNA expression of target genes and internal control using the 2−∆∆Ct quantification method (Schmittgen & Livak, 2008).

Health indices. For Symbiodiniaceae cells extraction, coral fragments previously preserved in 10 mL of 10 % formaldehyde were thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and incubated in 10 mL of 4M NaOH at 37.5 °C until the tissue was removed from the skeleton (modified from Zamoum & Furla, 2012). The cell density of Symbiodiniaceae was quantified from an aliquot of 10 μL using a Neubauer hemocytometer (n = 8 replicates). Results express Symbiodiniaceae cells per unit of surface area occupied by the living tissue in the coral skeleton (cells cm−2), obtained by measuring each fragment with millimeter precision calipers. For Chlorophyll (Chl a) extractions, we used ~ 100 mg of frozen fragments crushed in a mortar and placed in microcentrifuge tubes with 1.5 mL of 100 % methanol stored in the dark for 24 h (4 °C). The resulting slurry was sonicated for 15 s and then centrifuged at 1 500 g for 5 min (4 °C), and the supernatant was used immediately for quantification. Pigment measurements were performed in duplicates with a Spectronic® Genesys™ 5 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), using a 96 wells microplate. Chl a concentration was calculated at 664 nm (Jeffrey & Humphrey, 1975), using the extinction coefficient 90 L gm-1 cm-1 (Vernon, 1960), with the recommended turbidity correction. Results expressed pigment concentration per unit of surface area (Chl a μg cm−2).

Statistics. We used R software (R Core Team, 2013) to perform all statistical analyses; we proved normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test and homoscedasticity with Bartlett’s test for all data (95 % confidence intervals). As normality and homoscedasticity assumptions were true for nutrients and gene expression data, a two-sample unpaired t-test was used to analyze significant differences in nutrients between days (P > 0.05) and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons (Tukey’s test) to evaluate significant differences of gene expression between days and morphospecies (P > 0.05). In the cases when normality or homoscedasticity assumptions were false (Symbiodiniaceae cell density and Chl a concentration), a non-parametric two-way Friedman test and pairwise sign test were used to evaluate significant differences between days and morphospecies (P > 0.05). Additionally, we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) using the built-in R functions prcomp to identify differences between morphospecies in Symbiodiniaceae cell density, Chl a concentration, and changes in the differential expression of hsp70, and CA genes. A logarithmic transformation was applied to eliminate the data variation due to the unit difference.

RESULTS

Remote sensing showed low SST (22 °C) and high productivity (80 mg m-3) along the central Mexican Pacific (including the Manzanillo coast) during the first week of April 2016 (March 29-April 05). Then, the SST increased to 26 °C, while productivity decreased (10 mg m-3) during the second week (April 06-April 13). The SST continued to change between 22 and 26 °C during the third (April 14-April 21, 2016) and fourth week (April 22-April 29), but productivity remained low until the end of April 2016 (Fig. 2). In the same way, the temperature records close to the Carrizales reef showed a thermal change from 22 to 24 °C in nine days (April 01 to 09), followed by an increase from 24 to 26 °C in another nine days (April 10 to 18). Later, the temperature dropped from 26 to 24 °C in only three days (April 19 to 21) and suddenly decreased from 24 °C on the first day of sampling (April 22) to reach almost 20 °C on the second day of sampling (April 24), to increase again in the next day at 24 °C and remain until the end of April 2016 (Fig. 3). The results of the t-test showed significant variations in dissolved inorganic nutrients (P < 0.05), with higher nitrogen concentrations on April 22, while phosphorus and silicates were higher on April 24, 2016 (Table 1).

Figure 2 Seawater temperature measurements at the Tidal Station on Manzanillo Bay, Colima, Mexico. Recorded each minute on April 2016 from the Redmar, Coastal and Meteorological Station of CICESE. 

Figure 3 Satellite images of SST (A, B, C and D) and chlorophyll (E, F, G and H) from the MODIS Aqua sensor. Each column shows a data compound of 8 days (processing level 3) for the central Mexican Pacific in April 2016. The dot marks the location of the Carrizales reef. 

Table 1 Comparison of nutrient concentrations (Average ± SD) in Carrizales reef between April 22 and April 24, 2016 (n = 3 samples). 

Nutrient April 22 April 24 t p-value
NO3 + NO2 (µMoles) 9.20 + 0.14 7.62 + 0.28 8.7860 0.0005
NH4 (µMoles) 0.28 + 0.03 0.22 + 0.02 3.3793 0.0139
PO4 (µMoles) 1.16 + 0.23 2.41 + 0.12 -8.4408 0.0005
DIN:PO4 ratio 8.43 + 1.45 3.26 + 0.20 4.9741 0.0038
SiO2 (µMoles) 12.25 + 0.56 14.58 + 0.51 -5.3431 0.0030

For the qPCR-based biomarkers, the relative hsp70 mRNA expression of P. damicornis and P. verrucosa morphospecies showed significant differences between the two days of sampling (P < 0.05). Furthermore, both morphospecies showed significantly higher values of relative mRNA expression (P < 0.05) compared to those of P. capitata morphospecies (Fig. 4A). On the other hand, the relative mRNA expression of CA did not show significant differences between the sample days for none of the three Pocillopora morphospecies. However, the expression of CA in P. capitata morphospecies showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher values of relative mRNA expression compared to those of P. damicornis morphospecies and P. verrucosa morphospecies (Fig. 4B). Regarding the health indices, there were no significant differences in Symbiodiniaceae density or chlorophyll between sampling days and Pocillopora morphospecies (Fig. 5AandB). Finally, the principal component analysis showed a clear separation between P. damicornis and P. verrucosa morphospecies from P. capitata morphospecies. The first two principal components (PCs) explained 63.5 % of the variation (Fig. 6).

Figure 4 mRNA relative expression in Pocilloporamorphospecies from the Carrizales reef on April 22 and 24, 2016; A) heat shock protein (hsp70) and B) carbonic anhydrase (CA). 

Figure 5 Health indexes in Pocilloporamorphospecies from the Carrizales reef on April 22 and 24, 2016; A) Symbiodiniaceae density and B) Chlorophyll (a + c2). 

Figure 6 Principal component analysis (PCA) of the hsp70 and CA mRNA relative expression, Symbiodiniaceae density and Chlorophyll content in Pocillopora morphospecies on April 22 and 24, 2016 from the Carrizales reef. 

DISCUSSION

Interpreting how or whether a coral holobiont phenotype (i.e., a morphotype, morphospecies, or ecomorph) can employ gene expression plasticity to ensure short and long-term survival (Rivera et al., 2021) will be critical for understanding global and local impacts of climate change and coastal anthropogenic activities (Hughes et al., 2017; Donovan et al., 2021) across diverse taxa (Suggett & Smith, 2020; Barnes et al., 2022) and in determining which phenotypes are most indicative of resilience to those impacts (Parkinson et al., 2020; Rivera et al., 2021). In this sense, our study proves some degree of physiological plasticity through diversity in the cellular response between the three Pocillopora morphospecies and provides determining information on their distinctive acclimation responses which could suggest different capacities for genetic or biochemical adaptation (Bernhardt & Leslie, 2013; Stillman & Paganini, 2015) in Pocillopora morphospecies of the Carrizales reef.

First, we observed a significant increase in the hsp70 gene expression in Pocillopora morphospecies (Fig. 4A), clearly associated with the short-term temperature change within the sampling days (±2 °C in 3 days, followed by ±4°C in 24 h) at Manzanillo coast (Fig. 2) coupled with high nutrients concentration at Carrizales reef, particularly in Nitrogen (7-9 µMoles) (Table 1); without significant changes in the symbiotic condition whatsoever (Fig. 5A and B). Both the changes in temperature (up or down) and the high nutrient concentrations can cause positive expression of Hsp proteins (Seveso et al., 2016; Thummasan et al., 2021), and these conditions occur naturally during the spring season at the Carrizales reef (Muñiz-Anguiano et al., 2017). Therefore, as expected, the prominent molecular response in Pocillopora morphospecies was an induction of the hsp70 gene related to local environmental changes in the short term. However, the magnitude and direction of this plasticity were different between P. damicornis/P. verrucosa and P. capitata (Fig. 6), suggesting two different levels of hsp70 gene expression plasticity in Pocillopora morphospecies: higher plasticity (P. damicornis/P. verrucosa) and lower or reduced plasticity (P. capitata).

As we hypothesized, Pocillopora morphospecies would have some degree of physiological plasticity at the molecular level when exposed to environmental stress (thermal/nutrients). In terms of gene-by-gene expression analysis, plasticity occurs after the environmental change (stress signal) when the expression of a gene significantly increases to reach a peak of expression under the new stress condition (Hédouin & Berteaux-Lecellier, 2014; Rivera et al., 2021), in this case, thermal and nutrients stresses. Higher hsp70 levels in Pocillopora corals are generally related to a protective response toward environmental and cellular stressors (Poli et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018; Dellisanti et al., 2022), with the tolerant phenotypes exhibiting higher expression levels than the susceptible ones.

This is true when stress-tolerant populations show higher baseline expressions before the stress condition and less (induction) positive change in gene expression after (Poli et al., 2017), which confers protection from frequent stresses through a pre-emptive response (frontloading) and by maintaining cellular integrity under constant pressure (Brener-Raffalli et al., 2022). While low baseline expression and a high induction are observed in sensitive populations (Rivera et al., 2021), this has been observed in high thermal regimens mainly (Kenkel et al., 2013; Palumbi et al., 2014; Poli et al., 2017). However, this is not the case in our results, in which a lower baseline expression of the hsp70 gene was shown before the condition without stress for all the morphospecies studied, with the sole difference in the magnitude of the hsp70 gene expression between P. damicornis/P. verrucosa and P. capitata after the environmental change.

In our study, the lower plasticity of the hsp70 gene expression could suggest some tolerance to the combination of low temperature and high nutrient stress in P. capitata morphospecies by a lowered induction of the hsp70 gene expression. This is a more general pattern also associated with genes involved with thermal stress (Bay & Palumbi, 2017) as part of a cellular response that appears muted (dampening) under the new stress condition, which allows for reducing the energy requirement of the stress response and utilizes it in cellular maintenance and homeostasis (Rivera et al., 2021). The latter is supported by a higher constitutive expression of the CA gene through the sampling days in P. capitata morphospecies, which suggests that CA gene expression could have been sustained for more extended periods to maintain cellular homeostasis during the highly variable conditions, of low temperature and high nutrients, on the Carrizales reef during the spring season.

Broadly, the positive regulation of the CA (as an adaptive mechanism) sustains all the vital metabolic processes in the coral holobiont, such as photosynthesis, calcification, cellular homeostasis, and growth simultaneously (Bertucci et al., 2013). This process of adaptive metabolism by increasing CA gene expression in P. capitata morphospecies could help to cope with the energy requirements of an environmental stress regime (Kültz, 2003), reflecting a higher resilience potential by long-term physiological acclimation (Kenkel et al., 2014, 2020), since higher induction of hsp70 gene comes at a substantial energy cost (Kenkel et al., 2013; Poli et al., 2017). Therefore, the differences in basal expression of the CA gene and the levels of hsp70 gene induction reveal some physiological plasticity between P. capitata and P. damicornis/P. verrucosa, probably through diversity in the cellular response of the morphospecies, which could confer slight differences in stress tolerance and resilience.

Finally, the results suggest that there was no substantial effect on the ability of Symbiodiniaceae to capture light (Brown, 1997; Douglas, 2003), translocate nutrients to coral host cells (Saxby et al., 2003; Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2005; Smith et al., 2005), and maintain metabolic homeostasis of the holobiont (Hinrichs et al., 2013), and this is another important consideration in our study since the coral bleaching machinery-induced apoptosis seems absent. That is, no evidence of Symbiodiniaceae and Chl a loss, coral de-pigmentation, or tissue detachment due to the oxidative stress-induced mechanism, which increases ROS levels, damages the photosynthetic machinery, alters the ionic balance in the symbiont thylakoid membranes and disrupts the symbiosome microenvironment (Rodríguez-Casariego et al., 2020; Thummasan et al., 2021). Therefore, no differences in energy supply are inferred, and the hsp70 and CA gene expression levels could be considered within the acclimation or adaptation potential with the sole difference in the response thresholds of P. capitata and P. damicornis/P. verrucosa.

In conclusion, the most prominent result of this study could be interpreted as a diversity in the CSR and CHR of Pocillopora morphospecies that affected the patterns of magnitude and direction of physiological plasticity (high or reduced), as shown by the constitutive expression and induction of the CA and hsp70 genes, respectively. We demonstrated that P. capitata and P. damicornis/verrucosa could have specific tolerance to cope with the natural stressful conditions in the Carrizales reef. However, this only partially explains the differences in coverage and frequency between the three morphospecies in the Carrizales reef (Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2013; Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017) and might seem contradictory for the spatial differences of the three morphospecies through the Mexican Central Pacific (see supplementary material on Hernández-Zulueta et al., 2017) so, further study of complete transcriptional response (i.e., RNAseq) is needed for a better understanding of how Pocillopora morphospecies are (more or less) resilient to environmental changes and anthropogenic impacts. Considering that the Pocillopora morphospecies studied here are potential early colonizers and ecological activators of impacted reefs (Buitrago-López et al., 2020) and some of the most critical and principal reef-builders of the Tropical Eastern Pacific (Cabral-Tena et al., 2020); our results could be used for linking phenotypic plasticity (morphological and physiological) with some degree of diversity in the cellular response of Pocillopora corals, and this could have important implications for future experimental designs and the ecological success of management plans, and conservation and restoration efforts of coral reefs in the Mexican Pacific.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT, Mexico) through the Basic Science-2012 project, no. 181597, for which EJCI was responsible. MADN received a doctoral scholarship (no. 486385) from CONACYT to carry out this study and appreciates the support provided. We thank Aramís Olivos-Ortíz at the Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Oceanológicas (CEUNIVO-UdC) for his help in the determination of the dissolved inorganic nutrients and all the members of the Laboratorio de Ecología y Biología del Desarrollo (IIO-UABC) and Laboratorio de Acuacultura/Biotecnología (FACIMAR-UdC), in particular to Roberto Escobar-Fernández and Joel Bracamontes-Ramírez. We also thank Claudia Lucia Tejada-Begazo and Lucy Coral Alarcón-Ortega for their help in improving the final version of the manuscript. We also thank for the comments of three anonymous reviewers that helped improve our study.

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. A., M. E. Walz, E. Weil, P. Tonellato & M. C. Smith. 2016. RNA-Seq of the Caribbean reef-building coral Orbicella faveolata (Scleractinia-Merulinidae) under bleaching and disease stress expands models of coral innate immunity. PeerJ 4: e1616. DOI: 10.77177/peerj.1616 [ Links ]

Arriaga-Cabrera, L., V. Aguilar & J. M. Espinoza 2009. Regiones prioritarias y planeación para la conservación de la biodiversidad. In: Dirzo R., R. Gonzáles & I. J. March (Eds.). Capital Natural de México, vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, pp. 433-457. [ Links ]

Arriaga-Cabrera, L., E. Vázquez-Domínguez, J. González-Cano, R. Jiménez-Rosenberg, E. Muñoz-López & V. Aguilar-Sierra. 1998. Regiones Marinas Prioritarias de México. 1a Ed., Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, 198p. [ Links ]

Avila-Magaña, V., B. Kamel, M. DeSalvo, K. Gómez-Campo, S. Enríquez, H. Kitano, R. V. Rohlfs, R. Iglesias-Prieto & M. Medina. 2021. Elucidating gene expression adaptation of phylogenetically divergent coral holobionts under heat stress. Nature Communications 12 (1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25950-4 [ Links ]

Barnes, M. L., A. Datta, S. Morris & I. Zethoven. 2022. Navigating climate crises in the Great Barrier Reef. Global Environmental Change 74: 102494. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102494 [ Links ]

Barshis, D. J., J. T. Ladner, T. A. Oliver, F. O. Seneca, N. Traylor-Knowles & S. R. Palumbi 2013. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (4): 1387-1392. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210224110 [ Links ]

Bay, R. A. & S. R. Palumbi 2017. Transcriptome predictors of coral survival and growth in a highly variable environment. Ecology and Evolution 7 (13): 4794-4803. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2685 [ Links ]

Bernhardt, J. R. & H. M. Leslie. 2013. Resilience to climate change in coastal marine ecosystems. Annual Review of Marine Science 5 (1): 371-392. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-marine-121211-172411 [ Links ]

Bertucci, A., A. Moya, S. Tambutté, D. Allemand, C. T. Supuran & D. Zoccola. 2013. Carbonic anhydrases in anthozoan corals-A review. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 21 (6): 1437-1450. DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.10.024 [ Links ]

Brener-Raffalli, K., J. Vidal-Dupiol, M. Adjeroud, O. Rey, P. Romans, F. Bonhomme, M. Pratlong, A. Haguenauer, R. Pillot, L. Feuillassier, M. Claereboudt, H. Malagon, P. Gélin, P. Pontarotti, D. Aurelle, G. Mitta & E. Toulza. 2022. Gene expression plasticity and frontloading promote thermotolerance in Pocillopora corals. Peer Community Journal 2: e13. DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.79 [ Links ]

Brown, B. E. 1997. Coral bleaching: causes and consequences. Coral Reefs 16 (1): S129-S138. DOI: 10.1007/s003380050249 [ Links ]

Buitrago-López, C., K. G. Mariappan, A. Cárdenas, H. M. Gegner & C. R. Voolstra. 2020. The genome of the cauliflower coral Pocillopora verrucosa. Genome Biology and Evolution 12 (10): 1911-1917. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evaa184 [ Links ]

Cabral-Tena, R. A., A. López-Pérez, L. Alvarez-Filip, F. J. González-Barrios, L. E. Calderon-Aguilera & C. Aparicio-Cid 2020. Functional potential of coral assemblages along a typical Eastern Tropical Pacific reef tract. Ecological Indicators 119: 106795. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106795 [ Links ]

Delgadillo-Nuño, M. A., M. A. Liñán-Cabello, E. Delgadillo-Nuño, C. E. Galindo-Sánchez & E. J. Carpizo-Ituarte. 2020. Gene expression plasticity in Pocillopora corals from 2 locations on the Carrizales Reef, Pacific coast of Mexico. Ciencias Marinas 46 (2): 89-100. DOI: 10.7773/cm.v46i2.3062 [ Links ]

Dellisanti, W., D. Seveso & J. Kar-Hei Fang 2022. Nutrition of corals and their trophic plasticity under future environmental conditions. In: Chimienti G. (Ed.). Corals-Habitat Formers in the Anthropocene. IntechOpen, pp. 1-22. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104612 [ Links ]

Donovan, M. K., D. E. Burkepile, C. Kratochwill, T. Shlesinger, S. Sully, T. A. Oliver, G. Hodsong, J. Freiwald & R. van Woesik 2021. Local conditions magnify coral loss after marine heatwaves. Science 372 (6545): 977-980. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd9464 [ Links ]

Douglas, A. E. 2003. Coral bleaching-how and why?. Marine Pollution Bulletin 46 (4): 385-392. DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00037-7 [ Links ]

Drury, C., J. Dilworth, E. Majerová, C. Caruso & J. B. Greer. 2022. Expression plasticity regulates intraspecific variation in the acclimatization potential of a reef-building coral. Nature Communications 13 (1): 1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32452-4 [ Links ]

Eakin, C. M., H. Sweatman & R. E. Brainard 2019. The 2014-2017 global-scale coral bleaching event: insights and impacts. Coral Reefs 38 (4): 539-545. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-019-01844-2 [ Links ]

Evans, T. G. & G. E. Hofmann 2012. Defining the limits of physiological plasticity: how gene expression can assess and predict the consequences of ocean change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367 (1596): 1733-1745. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0019 [ Links ]

Gélin, P., B. Postaire, C. Fauvelot & H. Magalon. 2017. Reevaluating species number, distribution and endemism of the coral genus Pocillopora Lamarck, 1816 using species delimitation methods and microsatellites.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 109: 430-446. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.01.018 [ Links ]

Grasshoff, K., K. Kremling & M. Ehrhardt 2009. Methods of Seawater Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Germany, 599 p. [ Links ]

Hédouin, L. & V. Berteaux-Lecellier.2014. Traditional vs new approaches for assessing coral health: a global overview and the paradigm of French polynesia. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 22 (1): 25-35. DOI: 10.6119/JMST-013-0813-2 [ Links ]

Hernández-Zulueta, J., F. A. Rodríguez-Zaragoza, R. Araya, O. Vargas-Ponce, A. P. Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. L. Cupul-Magaña, L. Díaz-Pérez, E. Ríos-Jara & M. Ortiz. 2017. Multi-scale analysis of hermatypic coral assemblages at Mexican Central Pacific. Scientia Marina 81 (1): 91-102. DOI: 10.3989/scimar.04371.12A [ Links ]

Hinrichs, S., N. L. Patten, R. J. N. Allcock, S. M. Saunders, D. Strickland & A. M. Waite. 2013. Seasonal variations in energy levels and metabolic processes of two dominant Acropora species (A. spicifera and A. digitifera) at Ningaloo Reef. Coral Reefs 32 (3): 623-635. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-013-1027-z [ Links ]

Hoegh-Guldberg, O., M. Fine, W. Skirving, R. Johnstone, S. Dove & A. Strong 2005. Coral bleaching following wintry weather. Limnology and Oceanography 50 (1): 265-271. DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.1.0265 [ Links ]

Hook, S. E., E. P. Gallagher & G. E. Batley 2014. The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 10 (3): 327-341. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1530 [ Links ]

Hughes, L., W. Steffen, D. Alexander & M. Rice 2017. Climate Change: A deadly threat to coral reefs. Climate Council of Australia, Sydney, 28 p. [ Links ]

Jeffrey, S. T. & G. F. Humphrey 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c 1 and c 2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochemie und Physiologie der Pflanzen 167 (2): 191-194. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-3796(17)30778-3 [ Links ]

Johnston, E. C., Z. H. Forsman, J. F. Flot, S. Schmidt-Roach, J. H. Pinzón, I. S. Knapp & R. J. Toonen 2017. A genomic glance through the fog of plasticity and diversification in Pocillopora. Scientific Reports 7 (1): 5991. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06085-3 [ Links ]

Kenkel, C. D. & R. M. Wright 2022. Can Gene Expression Studies Inform Coral Reef Conservation and Restoration? In: van Oppen, M.J.H. & M. Aranda-Lastra (Eds.). Coral Reef Conservation and Restoration in the Omics Age. Coral Reefs of the World, vol 15. Springer, pp. 151-166. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-07055-6_10 [ Links ]

Kenkel, C. D. , A. Moya, J. Strahl, C. Humphrey & L. K. Bay. 2018. Functional genomic analysis of corals from natural CO2-seeps reveals core molecular responses involved in acclimatization to ocean acidification. Global Change Biology 24 (1): 158-171. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13833 [ Links ]

Kenkel, C. D. , C. Sheridan, M. C. Leal, R. Bhagooli, K. D. Castillo, N. Kurata, E. McGinty, T. L. Goulet & M. V. Matz 2014. Diagnostic gene expression biomarkers of coral thermal stress. Molecular Ecology Resources 14 (4): 667-678. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12218 [ Links ]

Kenkel, C. D., E. Meyer & M. V. Matz2013. Gene expression under chronic heat stress in populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different thermal environments. Molecular Ecology 22 (16): 4322-4334. DOI: 10.1111/mec.12390 [ Links ]

Kenkel, C. D., V. J. Mocellin & L. K. Bay 2020. Global gene expression patterns in Porites white patch syndrome: Disentangling symbiont loss from the thermal stress response in reef-building coral. Molecular Ecology 29 (20): 3907-3920. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15608 [ Links ]

Kültz, D. 2003. Evolution of the cellular stress proteome: from monophyletic origin to ubiquitous function. Journal of Experimental Biology 206 (18): 3119-3124. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00549 [ Links ]

Kültz, D. 2005. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response. Annual Review of Physiology 67: 225-257. [ Links ]

Kültz, D. 2020. Evolution of cellular stress response mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological and Integrative Physiology 333 (6): 359-378. DOI: 10.1002/jez.2347 [ Links ]

Liñán-Cabello, M. A. & J. E. Michel-Morfin 2018. Recreational beaches as factors of involvement in a coral community: Colima case study. In: Botero, C., O. Cervantes & C. Finkl (Eds.). Beach Management Tools-Concepts, Methodologies and Case Studies. Springer, pp. 145-157. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58304-4_7 [ Links ]

Liñán-Cabello, M. A., A. Olivos-Ortiz, S. Quijano-Scheggia, D. Muñiz-Anguiano, M. L. Reséndiz-Flores & C. D. Ortega-Ortiz 2016. Effects of terrestrial runoff on the coral communities in Santiago Bay, Colima, Mexican Pacific Coast. Revista de Biología Tropical 64 (3): 1185-1200. [ Links ]

Mayfield, A. B., A. C. Dempsey & C. S. Chen. 2019. Modeling environmentally mediated variation in reef coral physiology. Journal of Sea Research 145: 44-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2019.01.003 [ Links ]

Mayfield, A. B., T. Y. Fan & C. S. Chen 2013. Physiological acclimation to elevated temperature in a reef-building coral from an upwelling environment. Coral Reefs 32 (4): 909-921. DOI: 10.1007/s00338-013-1067-4 [ Links ]

Montalbetti, E., T. Biscéré, C. Ferrier-Pagès, F. Houlbrèque, I. Orlandi, M. Forcella, P. Galli, M. Vai & D. Seveso. 2021. Manganese benefits heat-stressed corals at the cellular level. Frontiers in Marine Science 8: 681119. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.681119 [ Links ]

Muñiz-Anguiano, D., M. Verduzco-Zapata & M. A. Liñán-Cabello. 2017. Factors associated with response Pocillopora spp. (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) during a restoration process on the Mexican Pacific coast. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 52 (2): 299-310. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-19572017000200009 [ Links ]

Palumbi, S. R., D. J. Barshis, N. Traylor-Knowles & R. A. Bay 2014. Mechanisms of reef coral resistance to future climate change. Science 344 (6186): 895-898. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251336 [ Links ]

Parkinson, J. E., A. C. Baker, I. B. Baums, S. W. Davies, A. G. Grottoli, S. A. Kitchen, M. V. Matz, M. W. Miller, A. A. Shantz & C. D. Kenkel. 2020. Molecular tools for coral reef restoration: Beyond biomarker discovery. Conservation Letters 13 (1): e12687. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12687 [ Links ]

Pinzon, J. H. & T. C. LaJeunesse 2011. Species delimitation of common reef corals in the genus Pocillopora using nucleotide sequence phylogenies, population genetics and symbiosis ecology. Molecular Ecology 20 (2): 311-325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04939.x [ Links ]

Poli, D., E. Fabbri, S. Goffredo, V. Airi & S. Franzellitti. 2017. Physiological plasticity related to zonation affects hsp70 expression in the reef-building coral Pocillopora verrucosa. PLOS One 12 (2): e0171456. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171456 [ Links ]

R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available online at: http://www.R-project.org/ (downloaded October 31, 2022) [ Links ]

Reyes-Bonilla, H., L. E. Escobosa-González, A. L. Cupul-Magaña, P. Medina-Rosas & L. E. Calderón-Aguilera 2013. Community structure of zooxanthellate corals (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) in Carrizales coral reef, Pacific coast, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical 61 (2): 583-594. [ Links ]

Rivera, H. E., H. E. Aichelman, J. E. Fifer, N. G. Kriefall, D. M. Wuitchik, S. J. Wuitchik & S. W. Davies. 2021. A framework for understanding gene expression plasticity and its influence on stress tolerance. Molecular Ecology 30 (6): 1381-1397. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15820 [ Links ]

Rodríguez-Casariego, J. A., A. E. Mercado-Molina, D. Garcia-Souto, I. M. Ortiz-Rivera, C. Lopes, I. B. Baums, A. M. Sabat & J. M. Eirin-Lopez 2020. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation analysis reveals a conserved epigenetic response to seasonal environmental variation in the Staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis. Frontiers in Marine Science 7: 560424. DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2020.560424 [ Links ]

Savary, R., D. J. Barshis, C. R. Voolstra, A. Cárdenas, N. R. Evensen, G. Banc-Prandi, M. Fine & A. Meibom. 2021. Fast and pervasive transcriptomic resilience and acclimation of extremely heat-tolerant coral holobionts from the northern Red Sea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (19): e2023298118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2023298118 [ Links ]

Saxby, T., W. C. Dennison & O. Hoegh-Guldberg 2003. Photosynthetic responses of the coral Montipora digitata to cold temperature stress. Marine Ecology Progress Series 248: 85-97. DOI: 10.3354/meps248085 [ Links ]

Schmidt-Roach, S., K. J. Miller, P. Lundgren & N. Andreakis 2014. With eyes wide open: a revision of species within and closely related to the Pocillopora damicornis species complex (Scleractinia; Pocilloporidae) using morphology and genetics. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 170 (1): 1-33. DOI: 10.1111/zoj12092 [ Links ]

Schmittgen, T. D. & K. J. Livak 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C T method. Nature Protocols 3 (6): 1101. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [ Links ]

Scucchia, F., A. Malik, H. M. Putnam & T. Mass. 2021. Genetic and physiological traits conferring tolerance to ocean acidification in mesophotic corals. Global Change Biology 27 (20): 5276-5294. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15812 [ Links ]

Smith, D. J., D. J. Suggett & N. R. Baker 2005. Is photoinhibition of zooxanthellae photosynthesis the primary cause of thermal bleaching in corals?. Global Change Biology 11 (1): 1-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00895.x [ Links ]

Smith, M. G., R. K. Bechmann, A. J. Hendriks, A. Skadsheim, B. K. Larsen, T. Baussant, S. Bamber & S. Sanni 2009. Relating biomarkers to whole-organism effects using species sensitivity distributions: A pilot study for marine species exposed to oil. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal 28 (5): 1104-1109. DOI: 10.1897/08-464.1 [ Links ]

Stillman, J. H. & A. W. Paganini 2015. Biochemical adaptation to ocean acidification. Journal of Experimental Biology 218 (12): 1946-1955. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.115584 [ Links ]

Strader, M. E. & K. M. Quigley 2022. The role of gene expression and symbiosis in reef-building coral acquired heat tolerance. Nature Communications 13 (1): 1-8. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32217-z [ Links ]

Strickland, J. D. H. & T. R. Parsons 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, 310 p. DOI: 10.25607/OBP-1791 [ Links ]

Suggett, D. J. & D. J. Smith 2020. Coral bleaching patterns are the outcome of complex biological and environmental networking. Global Change Biology 26 (1): 68-79. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14871 [ Links ]

Tarrant, A. M., B. Nilsson & B. W. Hansen 2019. Molecular physiology of copepods-from biomarkers to transcriptomes and back again. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 30: 230-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2019.03.005 [ Links ]

Thummasan, M., B. E. Casareto, C. Ramphul, T. Suzuki, K. Toyoda & Y. Suzuki 2021. Physiological responses (Hsps 60 and 32, caspase 3, H2O2 scavenging, and photosynthetic activity) of the coral Pocillopora damicornis under thermal and high nitrate stresses. Marine Pollution Bulletin 171: 112737. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112737 [ Links ]

Van Oppen, M. J. & J. G. Oakeshott. 2020. A breakthrough in understanding the molecular basis of coral heat tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (46): 28546-28548. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.20202011 [ Links ]

Vernon, L. P. 1960. Spectrophotometric determination of chlorophylls and pheophytins in plant extracts. Analytical Chemistry 32 (9): 1144-1150. DOI: 10.1021/ac60165a029 [ Links ]

Veron, J. E. N., M. G. Stafford-Smith, E. Turak & L. M. DeVantier 2016. Corals of the world. Available online at: http://www.coralsoftheworld.org/page/home/ (downloaded October 31, 2022) [ Links ]

Yuan, X., Y. Guo, W. J. Cai, H. Huang, W. Zhou & S. Liu. 2019. Coral responses to ocean warming and acidification: Implications for future distribution of coral reefs in the South China Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 138: 241-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.053 [ Links ]

Zamoum, T. & P. Furla. 2012. Symbiodinium isolation by NaOH treatment. Journal of Experimental Biology 215 (22): 3875-3880. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.074955 [ Links ]

Zebral, Y. D., J. da Silva Fonseca, J. A. Marques & A. Bianchini 2019. Carbonic anhydrase as a biomarker of global and local impacts: insights from calcifying animals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20 (12): 3092. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20123092 [ Links ]

Zhang, Y., Z. Zhou, L. Wang & B. Huang 2018. Transcriptome, expression, and activity analyses reveal a vital heat shock protein 70 in the stress response of stony coral Pocillopora damicornis. Cell Stress and Chaperones 23: 711. DOI: 10.1007/s12192-018-0883-4 [ Links ]

Zoccola, D., A. Innocenti, A. Bertucci, E. Tambutté, C. T. Supuran & S. Tambutté 2016. Coral carbonic anhydrases: regulation by ocean acidification. Marine Drugs 14 (6): 109. DOI: 10.3390/md14060109 [ Links ]

Received: December 01, 2022; Accepted: May 30, 2023

*Corresponding author: Eugenio J. Carpizo-Ituarte: e-mail: ecarpizo@uabc.edu.mx

To quote as: Delgadillo-Nuño, M. A., M. A. Liñán-Cabello, M. Justel-Díez, E. Delgadillo-Nuño, T. Kono- Martínez, C. E. Galindo-Sánchez, R. A. Cabral-Tena & E. J. Carpizo-Ituarte. 2023. Two biomarkers of gene expression plasticity in Pocillopora corals from the Carrizales reef, Mexican Tropical Pacific. Hidrobiológica 33 (2): 115-125.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License