Introduction
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive death of cortical upper motor neurons (UMN) and lower motor neurons (LMN) at the bulbar and spinal cord level1. It is well recognized that the disease of ALS starts long before symptom onset, a human autopsy study indicated that ∼ 20% loss of motor neurons had already occurred in anterior roots in the presymptomatic stage2. A significant loss of neurons before the clinical onset has also been described in Parkinson´s disease, another neurodegenerative disorder3. ALS is characterized by progressive loss of function of the muscles in the limbs and those needed for speech, swallowing, and breathing. Most of these patients die due to respiratory failure around 3 years after clinical onset.
Clinical observations demonstrate that there is a considerable variation in the phenotypic expression of ALS, the variability goes far beyond the site of onset, also including, age of beginning, familial occurrence, type and degree of UMN or LMN involvement and extent of extramotor contribution1. Since the first description by Jean-Martin Charcot in 1874, the diagnosis is based in clinical features4. ALS is the most common adult motor neuron disease with an estimated incidence of two per 100,000 persons and estimated prevalence of five cases per 100,000 persons. The mean age at onset in hispanic ALS patients was reported to be 47.5 ± 10.5 years, the age at onset was earlier than in the Caucasian series5. Familial ALS accounts for 10-15% of cases, and the remaining ALS cases, 85-90% are sporadic with undefined etiology6,7. So far, more than 50 causative or disease modifying genes have been ide.jpgied and the genetic analysis, can consider gene mutations associated to ALS6.
ALS diagnosis
No definitive diagnostic test for ALS has been developed, originally the diagnostic criteria were established because the variety of clinical features early in the course of ALS compromises the certainty of diagnosis for clinical research and therapeutic trials. The El Escorial criteria were created and initially published in 1994 to str.jpgy patients and facilitate ALS research. These criteria described four categories of disease: Definite, Probable, Possible, and Suspected ALS. El Escorial revised criteria in 2000, included a category called "laboratory supported probable ALS" that allowed the use of electromyography data, and the category of suspected ALS was deleted8.
The Awaji criteria announced in 2008, modified the El Escorial revised criteria to further integrate electrophysiological data with clinical examination findings, and to add the presence of fasciculations as a lower motor neuron sign. The Awaji criteria maintained the definite, probable, and possible categories. The revised El Escorial and the Awaji criteria are difficult to apply in patients being evaluated for ALS scoring low for both criteria, as well as the reliability for neurophysiologists of variable experience. These categories indicate how many body regions are affected by ALS, however, are often unrecognized by patients and clinicians as a probability of ALS9. El Escorial and the Awaji criteria have limitations including complexity to apply, prone to error, difficulties to determine when a possible ALS evolves through other ALS categories and does not ascertain type, site, and extension of the clinical signs of UMN dysfunction. Moreover, neurophysiological and neuroimaging probes of UMN dysfunction are not included9.
Biomarkers
Since the publication of the Awaji criteria, significant advances have been made in the genetics of ALS, fluid biomarkers including neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (pNfH)2, a number of cytokines, neuroimaging tractography by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the pyramidal tract with fractional anisotropy (FA), and neurophysiological probes of UMN dysfunction by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation, these biomarkers have been reported in the literature10-12. Recent reports, describe that NfL serum levels are considered useful for an early diagnosis of ALS2. Current diagnosis criteria do not include none of these biomarkers in the diagnosis of ALS or in establishing the abnormal function of the UMN9-12.
A consensus conference organized in Gold Coast Australia and sponsored by the World Federation of Neurology evaluated whether new guidelines could simplify the diagnosis and a proposal for new diagnostic criteria for ALS was published9. In 2019, the Gold Coast criteria were developed with the aim of simplifying diagnosis of ALS with a single clinical diagnostic entity while taking new data into account, particularly involvement of more than the motor system and cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric disturbances. The new criteria are simple and capture disease characteristics that are necessary and sufficient for diagnosis of ALS. The old revised El Escorial and Awaji criteria only intended for str.jpgying patients for clinical trials, the new Gold Coast criteria can be used in both clinical setting and clinical trials.
Advances in the genetics of ALS, fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological modalities will play a role in the early diagnosis of ALS7,10,12. While the available data at the present does not support the use of biomarkers serum levels, the NfL and pNfH are considered as the most promising biomarkers for an early diagnosis of ALS2,9. Several neuroimaging reports have described a different MRI signs in ALS patients including: I. The bright-tongue sign13, (Fig. 1A and B), this sign does not constitute a reliable diagnostic criterion for ALS and usually appears late in bulbar and bulbospinal ALS; II. The motor-band sign is an hypointense signal in the precentral gyrus in MRI susceptibility-weighted images that it is not frequently observed and also usually exists in advanced illness14; III. The corticospinal hyperintensity signal, it is not a useful marker to define progression of the illness and appears late in some ALS patients (Fig. 2). In the other hand, the FA of the pyramidal tract derived from MRI-DTI is an informative measure of axonal fiber degeneration and myelin breakdown and this neuroimaging method may be useful to confirm UMN impairment in ALS patients as well as to determine effectiveness of therapies in clinical trials (Fig. 3)15. The split-hand phenomenon, the bright tongue sign, the motor-band sign and the corticospinal hyperintense signal are not supported as possible early biomarkers in ALS and they are usually observed when the ALS patients are in advanced clinical stage.
The new Gold Coast diagnostic criteria
To diagnose ALS using Gold Coast criteria the patient must have: (1) progressive motor impairment of history of repeated clinical evaluation, preceded by normal motor function; (2) presence of both UMN and LMN abnormalities in at least one body region (with UMN and LMN noted in the same body region if only 1 region is affected) or LMN abnormalities in two body regions; and (3) excluding other disease processes (Table 1). The Gold Coast criteria have been introduced along with genetic testing and serum and cerebrospinal fluid NfL levels to establish an early diagnosis of ALS. Then an early initiation of care in multidisciplinary clinics as well as starting disease-modifying drugs (riluzole, edaravone, and sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol) will improve quality of life and survival in ALS patients. It is crucial to accelerate the diagnostic process of ALS among neurologists to protect viable motor neurons and slow down the process of neurodegeneration.
- Documented history or repeated clinical assessment indicating progressive motor impairment, preceded by normal motor function |
- Presence of UMN* and LMN† dysfunction in at least one body region (bulbar, cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral), with UMN and LMN dysfunction noted in the same body region if only one body region is involved, or LMN dysfunction in at least two body regions. The abnormalities must be in two limbs muscles innervated by different roots and nerves, or one bulbar muscle, or one thoracic muscle either by clinical examination or by electromyography |
- Investigations that exclude other diseases processes, depending upon clinical presentation, and may include nerve conduction studies and Needle EMG, magnetic resonance imaging or other imaging, fluid studies of blood or cerebrospinal fluid, or other modalities as clinical necessary |
UMN dysfunction defined by at least one of the following: |
- Increase deep tendon reflexes, including the presence of a reflex in a clinical weak and wasted muscle, or spread to adjacent muscles |
- Presence of pathological reflexes, including Hoffman sign, Babinski sign, crossed adductor reflex, or snout reflex |
- Increase in velocity-dependent tone (spasticity) - Slowed, poorly coordinated voluntary movement that is not attributable to weakness of LMN origin or Parkinsonian features |
LMN dysfunction in a given muscle defined as one of the following |
- Clinical examination evidence of muscle weakness and muscle wasting |
- EMG‡ abnormalities that must include: |
- Evidence of chronic neurogenic change (large motor unit potentials of increased duration). Polyphasia and motor unit instability are regarded as supportive but not requisite evidence |
- Evidence of ongoing denervation including fibrillation potentials or positive sharp waves, or fasciculation potentials |
*UMN: upper motor neuron;
†LMN: lower motor neuron;
‡EMG: electromyography.
With the growing of multidisciplinary care clinics around the world including in our country16, ALS patients are submitted to a thorough clinical evaluation ide.jpgying abnormalities that are managed appropriately. Early enrollment of patients with ALS into multidisciplinary clinics was associated with early initiation of non-invasive ventilator, clearly leading to an extension of survival and significant cost savings, which can be substantial2,16,17. Moreover with the advances in clinical trials ALS has become a treatable (but not curable) disease6. Three medications have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) riluzole (in 1995), edaravone (in 2017), and sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol (2022)7,18-20.
Results of Clinical Trials
RILUZOLE (RILUTEK®)
A 2-aminobenzothiazide, until the last decade was the only disease-modifying therapy available for ALS18,21,22. Although it is known that this medication modulates excitatory neurotransmission, the precise neuroprotective mechanisms remain largely speculative. A study based on the analyses from a large PRO-ACT data base revealed that early initiation of riluzole led to survival benefits. The greatest benefits occurred when this medication was initiated during the first 18-24 months after diagnosis2,18,23.
Edaravone (Radicava®)
A potent pyrazalone free radical scavenger provided as a sterile injection solution for IV infusion containing 30 mg in 100 mL isotonic solution19. The mechanism of action in ALS may be due to its known antioxidant properties since oxidative stress is a part of the process that kills neurons in ALS patients. A 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study conducted in Japanese patients with ALS demonstrated the efficacy of edaravone for the treatment of ALS. The decline in ALSFRS-R scores from baseline was significantly less in the edaravone group (−5.01 ± 0.64) compared with the placebo group (−7.50 ± 0.66) (p = 0.0013)19,24,25. In May 2022 the FDA approved edaravone oral suspension for the treatment of adults with ALS.
Sodium Phenylbutyrate-Taurursodiol (Relyvrio™)
This recently approved medication is a coformulation of sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol20. It was designed to mitigate the effects of accumulation of misfolded proteins and promote neuron survival26. The neuroprotective effect of this medication, minimizes cell death triggered through oxidative stress by blocking apoptotic responses27. The recent placebo-controlled phase 2 CENTAUR trial, sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol treatment group showed statistically significant slowing in functional decline over 24 weeks according to the ALSFRS-R by 24 weeks (−1.24 points per month with sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol vs. −1.66 points per month with placebo; difference, 0.42 points per month; 95% CI: 0.03-0.81; p = 0.03). When all participants who had completed the 24-week placebo-controlled phase, they were invited to be enrolled in an open-label extension of the trial and treated with sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol28. ALS patients who had originally been randomized to sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol experienced a 44% reduction in the risk of death and a median 6.5-month increase in overall survival relative to those who had received placebo (p = 0.023), highlighting the importance of early ALS diagnosis and initiation of disease-modifying treatment26. This medication was FDA approved on September 2022. Additional investigational drugs are being evaluated for their abilities to prolong survival and slow disease progression.
Discussion
In ALS, the loss of neurons occurs long before symptom onset and neuronal death have occurred in the anterior roots in the presymptomatic stage1. The diagnostic delay remains unchanged at least during the past two decades2. The delay is due to a several reasons including (a) variable phenotypic expression of ALS1; (b) deprived knowledge of general physicians to recognize characteristic features of ALS2; (c) El Escorial and the Awaji criteria are complex to apply, prone to error and with difficulties to ascertain changes through the categories to diagnose definite ALS9; and (d) neurologist question the need to hasten a diagnosis of ALS since no definitive diagnostic test has been developed and ALS remains as an incurable disease2. However, there are some important changes in the management of ALS patients: (1) early enrollment of patients with ALS into multidisciplinary clinics are associated with clearly leading to an extension of survival, quality of life and significant cost savings14,15; (2) the new developed Gold Coast criteria were developed to simplify and hastening ALS diagnosis9; and (3) riluzole18, edaravone19, and sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol20 approved by the FDA, have shown improvement in survival, quality of life, as well as in the score of the ALSFRS-R and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), highlighting the importance of an early diagnosis of ALS and prompt initiation of disease-modifying treatment18-28.
Conclusion
At the present time, it is considered the advantage of using the Gold Coast criteria to confirm ALS diagnosis at an early stage of the disease. ALS diagnosis without delay is essential for initiating disease-modifying treatment and care in a multidisciplinary ALS clinic that will improve quality of life and survival in ALS patients. It is a necessity to enable an early recognition of possible ALS among primary care physicians as well as to foster among neurologists to accelerate the diagnostic process of ALS to protect viable motor neurons and slow down the process of neurodegeneration.