SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.102 número1Arvenses en cultivos de maíz de temporal en las tres provincias biogeográficas del estado de Aguascalientes, MéxicoVerbesina molinaria (Asteraceae, Heliantheae) no es lo mismo que Verbesina oncophora índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Botanical Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2007-4476versión impresa ISSN 2007-4298

Bot. sci vol.102 no.1 México ene./mar. 2024  Epub 13-Feb-2024

https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3369 

Taxonomy and Floristics

Vascular plants of the Médanos de Samalayuca natural protected area, Chihuahua, Mexico

Plantas vasculares del área natural protegida Médanos de Samalayuca, Chihuahua, México

Laura De León-Pesqueira1  , Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing
http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4413-8887

Ana Bertha Gatica-Colima1  , Conceptualization, Project administration, Data curation, Writing – review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-1327

M. Socorro González-Elizondo2  *  , Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4047-154X

1Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Departamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico.

2Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Durango, Durango, Mexico


Resumen

Antecedentes:

Las dunas de arena de interior se están expandiendo e incrementando movilidad. El conocimiento sobre sus plantas es clave para su manejo. En México, uno de los mayores sistemas de dunas de interior es el área de los Médanos de Samalayuca.

Preguntas:

¿Cuántas y cuáles especies de plantas vasculares hay en Samalayuca? ¿Qué patrón de distribución presenta esa flora? ¿Hay endemismos? ¿Existen especies en estado de riesgo?

Especies de estudio:

Plantas vasculares.

Sitio y años de estudio:

Área de protección Médanos de Samalayuca, Chihuahua, México; 2017-2022.

Métodos:

Se generó una base de datos con base en revisión de literatura, fuentes electrónicas, especímenes de herbario, fotografías y colección e identificación de material botánico. Se registró la distribución, grado de endemismo y estado de conservación de cada especie.

Resultados:

La lista florística incluye 400 especies de 246 géneros y 65 familias. La mayoría crecen en Matorral desértico micrófilo y en Vegetación de dunas arenosas. Casi la mitad se restringen a la región conocida como Megamexico 1 y 32 % son Norteamericanas. Una está Amenazada de acuerdo a la Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059, mientras dos son Vulnerables y una Casi amenazada de acuerdo a la IUCN. Ribes fontinale parece estar extinta.

Conclusiones:

Considerando el clima árido y extremo y la inestabilidad de la vegetación psamófila, la flora de Samalayuca es más rica de lo esperado. El área alberga endemismos regionales y locales. La información generada puede apoyar programas de manejo y acciones para proteger estos frágiles ecosistemas.

Palabras clave: Arena; Desierto Chihuahuense; duna; endemismo; psamófila

Abstract

Background:

Inland sand dunes are expanding and increasing mobility. Knowledge on the plants growing on them is keystone for their management. One of the largest inland dune systems in Mexico is the Médanos de Samalayuca area.

Questions:

How many and which species of vascular plants are in Samalayuca? Which is the distribution pattern of that flora? Are there endemisms? Are there species of conservation concern?

Studied species:

Vascular plants.

Study site and dates:

Médanos de Samalayuca protected area, northern Chihuahua, Mexico; 2017-2022.

Methods:

A database was generated based on literature, electronic sources, herbarium specimens, photographing, and collection and identification of materials. Distribution, endemism level and conservation status were recorded.

Results:

The updated checklist of vascular plants for Samalayuca includes 400 species of 246 genera and 65 families. Most species grow in Mixed desert scrub and in Sand dune vegetation. Almost a half are restricted to the Megamexico 1 region, followed by the North American element. One species is Threatened according to the Mexican Official Norm NOM-059, while two are Vulnerable and one is Almost threatened according to the IUCN. Ribes fontinale appears to be extinct.

Conclusions:

Considering the arid, extreme climate and the low stability of the psammophilous vegetation, the flora of Samalayuca is richer than expected. The area is home to regional and local endemics. The data and information generated here is baseline for further management programs and action planning to protect these fragile ecosystems and the adjacent communities.

Keywords: Chihuahuan Desert; dune; endemic; psammophile; sand

Sand dune fields and the psammophile organisms adapted to their extreme conditions have a great environmental and scientific value, and their knowledge is baseline for the management of these systems. Psammophytes, the plants able to grow on sandy, often unstable soils, are of special interest (Liu et al. 2016, Azizi et al. 2021, El-Sheikh et al. 2021, Macheroum et al. 2021). The plants of inland sand dunes are adapted to harsh environments of unstable substrates and extreme climates and have a high value as soil stabilizers, water collectors, and habitat for many organisms. As Earth warms, dune fields in arid zones are expanding and moving faster, posing danger to adjacent ecosystems and infrastructure (Redsteer et al. 2011, Baas & Delobel 2022). In southwestern USA, higher temperatures and prolonged droughts have increased dune mobility (Thomas & Redsteer 2016). Inland sand dunes are wind driven, generated by airflow erosion and by fragmentation of the rock surfaces due to the extreme temperatures of the deserts. There are different types, depending on the wind patterns and of the presence or lack of vegetation.

One of the largest inland dune systems in Mexico is the Médanos de Samalayuca area, in northern Chihuahua. Others are the Gran Desierto de Altar in the Sonoran Desert, and the gypsum dunes of Cuatro Ciénegas in the Chihuahuan Desert in Coahuila. The Samalayuca dune fields, locally known as Médanos de Samalayuca or just “Los Médanos”, possesses dramatic landscapes, archeological sites and an interesting biota that provide the area of excellent touristic and recreational potential. The development of tourism in the area may help to diversify the activities and improve the economy of the local population, but also requires parallel conservation actions.

The Médanos de Samalayuca hold one of the most fragile ecosystems of the Chihuahuan Desert because the extreme temperatures, low and erratic precipitation, evaporation about 10 times higher than precipitation, and unstable soils (CONANP 2013). The extreme ecological conditions of the site give it a high biological value due to the development and adaptation of extremophile organisms. It is included as one of the conservation priority regions in Mexico (RTP-48) (Arriaga 2000, CONABIO 2004) and in 2009 it was declared as a natural protected area: Flora and Fauna Protection Area Médanos de Samalayuca (Área de Protección de Flora y Fauna Médanos de Samalayuca) (SEMARNAT 2009). One of the objectives of its management program is to get systematized and updated information about its biodiversity and ecosystems (Gatica Colima 2019). The first botanist passing through Samalayuca was Friedrich A. Wislizenus, in 1846 (Wislizenus 1848). As for not vascular plants, 12 species of Bryopsida in the families Pottiaceae, Grimmiaceae, Bryaceae, and Fabrionaceae have been recorded for the area (Delgadillo Moya 2015, Gatica Colima 2019).

Data on the flora and vegetation of Samalayuca have been included in the Territorial Ecological Planning (Barraza-Pacheco et al. 1997) and in the Management Program (CONANP 2013), where 225 species of vascular plants were recorded; in a more recent inventory (Gatica Colima 2019), 50 more were added. Vegetation was described by Enríquez & Olivas (1999). Other studies of the flora have focused on Cactaceae (Enríquez Anchondo 2003, Esparza García 2017), Fabaceae (Rueda-Torres et al. 2022a), and the relation of plant communities and micorrhizae in the dry ecosystems (Quiñonez Martínez et al. 2018). The objective of this work is to present an updated checklist of the vascular flora of the Médanos de Samalayuca with data of their distribution and conservation status.

Materials and methods

Study area. The Médanos de Samalayuca protected area includes 63,182 ha. It is located at the northern part of the state of Chihuahua, Mexico, about 45 km south of the US-Mexico border where El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua converge, in the municipalities of Juárez, Guadalupe, and a small portion of Ahumada (Gatica Colima 2019) (Figure 1). It lies among the extreme coordinates 31.10 °N to 31.38 °N, -106.19 °W to -106.64 °W, being part of the Chihuahuan Desert region and the North American Deserts ecoregion (Commission for Environmental Cooperation 1997), located on the belt of the greatest deserts north of the Tropic of Cancer.

Figure 1 Localization, vegetation types and land use in the Médanos de Samalayuca natural protected area. 

It features dramatic landscapes that are visible from the Federal highway 45 south of Ciudad Juárez, with dune fields being continuously reshaped by the northwest prevailing winds. Dunes are aklé type (CONANP 2013, Gatica Colima 2019), like those found in western Sahara, forming a network of sinuous ridges at right angles to the wind and crescent-shaped sections that alternately face it. The sand is whitish or tan, mostly siliceous, i.e., composed by quartz (SiO2), 90-95 % silica and 5-10 % mixed rock particles of irregular, nodular and spheroid shapes (Cruz Sánchez et al. 2007). Located in an arreic basin, it includes the sand dune fields as well as other zones with stable soil, and valleys with alluvial and residual deposits. Soils are slightly saline to saline-sodic, alkaline (pH 7.8-8) (Quiñonez Martínez et al. 2018). There are two small sierras of sedimentary origin except for a narrow basaltic portion in the first: Sierra Samalayuca in the north and Sierra Presidio along the eastern limits. Because a legal modification of the delimitation of the protected area, the Sierra Samalayuca was recently excluded; but it was included in the management plan and sampled for this work. Elevations reach 1,450 m asl in the dune fields and up to 1,843 m asl in the Sierra Presidio. The high dunes originate because this sierra, which forms a 300 m high barrier perpendicular to the wind’s predominant direction. The strong winds from the west collide on it and generate strong turbulence and intense revolving that drive the wind on the opposite direction near the ground, eroding the not consolidated sandstone and moving the dunes already formed (CONANP 2013). Loose substrate and strong winds cause dust storms (tolvaneras).

Climate.- It is continental, very dry, with a mean annual precipitation of 257 mm (almost 60 % of which are received in the summer), a mean evaporation of about 2,218 mm (8.6 times higher than the mean annual precipitation), mean annual temperature of 17 °C with warm summers, and very extreme (BWkw(x’) according Köppen classification) (SEGOB 2015). Temperatures are warm in summer and cool in winter, with periods of freezing and occasional snow (Henrickson & Johnston 1986; Enríquez Anchondo 2003); the highest temperatures are above 46 °C and the lower of -16 °C. Differences among the medium temperature in the warmer and coldest months can be up to 23 °C and the daily oscilation of temperatures can reach 24 °C (adapted from different sources).

Vegetation.- The plant communities and land use categories were defined on the basis on the physognomic dominance of one or a few species (Figure 1), mainly following the classification of Henrickson & Johnston (1986) for the ChD, as follows: a) Mixed desert scrub (Chihuahuan Desert scrub), often dominated by Larrea -creosote bush, or sometimes by Fouquieria or Prosopis; b) Sand dune vegetation; c) Rosetophyllous scrub dominated by Agave lechuguilla, Yucca, or Dasylirion leiophyllum; d) Alkali grassland and scrub; e) Woodland elements scattered on the higher parts of the sierras; f) Secondary vegetation in disturbed places, induced grassland on old agricultural fields, and in human settlements and urban zone in the village of Samalayuca; g) Irrigated agriculture. Additionally, a few aquatic, subaquatic and riparian plants are recorded from natural and artificial water bodies.

Data gathering and analysis. A database was generated based on field work, collection and identification of specimens, specialized literature, databases (CONABIO 2022, SEINet 2022, Red de Herbarios del Noroeste de México 2022), and digital images of herbarium materials from the following collections: ARIZ, ASU, BRYV, CCIB, CIIDIR, COLO, DES, HCIB, HNT, MEXU, MDE, MICH, MSC, NMC, NLU, NY, RSA, SBBG, TEX-LL, UACJ, UASLP, UCR, USF, UTEP, WIS and WLM. Acronyms according to (Thiers 2022, continuously updated).

Field work for the project Inventario multitaxonómico del ANP Médanos de Samalayuca (CONABIO PJ018) allowed the collection of 713 plant specimens and additional georeferenced observations (collection permit SGPA/DGVS/04785/17). An additional source of information was the digital platform NaturaLista (www.naturalista.mx/projects) where the project “Inventario multitaxonómico del ANP “Médanos de Samalayuca” was created (https://www.naturalista.mx/projects/inventario-multitaxonomico-del-anp-medanos-de-samalayuca-pj018). Identification was made using taxonomic treatments and floras, including the Chihuahuan Desert Flora (Henrickson & Johnston 2007), as well as revision of herbarium specimens, mainly at CIIDIR and UACJ, where the vouchers were deposited, and of type images at JSTOR. Names of families are according to PPG I (2016) for ferns and allies, Christenhusz et al. (2011) for gymnosperms, and APG IV (2016) / (Stevens 2001 onwards) for angiosperms; species names are according recent taxonomic treatments and Tropicos (www.tropicos.org). Data on general distribution, origin (native or non-native), endemism level and conservation status were recorded and assessed.

Results

A checklist of the wild and naturalized vascular flora from the Médanos de Samalayuca natural protected area was compiled, including 400 species of 246 genera and 65 families (Table S1). Nineteen additional species are known from the area only as cultivated and were not included in in the analyses (Table S2). Richness by taxonomic groups is shown in Table 1. The most diverse families are Asteraceae and Poaceae (Table 2), while the richest genera are Euphorbia, Opuntia, Boerhavia, and Aristida. Examples of the plant communities and flora in the zone are in Figures 2 and 3.

Table 1 Richness of vascular plants by taxonomic group in the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. 

Group Families Genera Species Subsp./var.
Ferns and fern allies 2 5 9
Pinophyta 2 2 4
Magnoliophyta - Monocots 6 41 70
Magnoliophyta - Dicots 55 198 317 2
Total 65 246 400 2

Table 2 Most diverse families of vascular plants of the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. 

Family Number of genera Number of species
Asteraceae 51 68
Poaceae 32 55
Cactaceae 12 28
Fabaceae 15 26
Nyctaginaceae 7 18
Euphorbiaceae 4 17

Figure 2 Landscape and vegetation of the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. A) Mixed desert scrub dominated by Larrea; B) Sand dune vegetation with Artemisia filifolia; C) Sand dune vegetation with Artemisia sp.; D) Rosetophyllous scrub with Yucca and Agave lechuguilla; E) Echinocereus dasyacanthus in mixed desert scrub with Larrea; F) Artemisia filifolia scrub on semi-fixed dunes; G) Grasses on sand dunes; H) Sphaeralcea hastulata in secondary vegetation; I) Aquatic vegetation. 

Figure 3 Examples of the flora of the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. A) Opuntia arenaria; B) Homalocephala parryi; C) Dalea lanata; D) Euphorbia carunculata; E) Euploca convolvulacea; F) Penstemon ambiguus; G) Quercus pungens; H) Juniperus arizonica

Distribution by vegetation type or land use. Most species grow in Mixed desert scrub and in Sand dune vegetation (Table 3; Table S1).

Table 3 Distribution of the flora by vegetation type and land use in the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. Distribution data are not mutually exclusive. 

Vegetation or land use Species
Mixed desert scrub (MDS) 330
Sand dune vegetation (SD) 224
Woodland element (W) 103
Secondary vegetation (SV) 56
Humid places and wetlands (HP) 46
Rosetophyllous scrub (RS) 40
Irrigated agriculture (IA) 27
Alkali grassland and scrub (A) 25
Riparian (R) 25

General distribution and origin. Almost a half of the species (48.5 %) are restricted to the Megamexico 1 region, as defined by Rzedowski (1991); a second set is composed by the North American elements (31.7 %); additional patterns of distribution are shown in Table 4. As about the geographic origin, most species are native but there are also 26 (6.5 %) exotics (Table S1).

Table 4 General distribution of the vascular flora of the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. 

Distribution Species %
Megamexico 1* 194 48.5
North America** 127 31.75
American continent 26 6.5
Pantropical and subtropical 23 5.75
Near Cosmopolitan 11 2.75
Megamexico 3 5 1.25
Southwestern United States to South America 4 1.00
Other 3 0.75
Microendemic*** 2 0.50
Non available data 5 1.25
Total 400 100

*Rzedowski’s (1991) Megamexico concept is based in the natural continuity and sharing of ecosystems and flora between Mexico and its neighboring countries. Megamexico 1 encompasses the Sonoran and Chihuahuan deserts and the Tamaulipan scrub in Mexico and southern United States; Megamexico 2 includes Mexico and the zone of Central America northern of the Nicaraguan depression, while Megamexico 3 applies to species whose distribution combines the former two.

** North America including Canada, the United States and Mexico (Nearctic realm).

***Only known for Samalayuca or northern Chihuahua.

Conservation status. Five species with a risk category in the Mexican Official Norm NOM-059 and/or in the IUCN Red List are indicated in Table 5. One species is classified as Threatened according to the Mexican Official Norm NOM-059 while two are Vulnerable and one is Near Threatened according to the IUCN. The complete list of species in the NOM-059 and the IUCN Red List (including those listed as of Low concern, LC) are in Table S3. One species not included on those lists, Ribes fontinale, appears to be extinct.

Table 5 Species with conservation status of the Médanos de Samalayuca protected area. NOM-059 - Risk category in the Mexican Official Norm NOM-059 (SEMARNAT 2010): A - Threatened, Pr - special protection category. IUCN - Risk category in the IUCN Red List: LC - Low concern, NT - Near threatened, VU - Vulnerable, dec - population decreasing, st - population stable. 

Species NOM-059 IUCN
Agave havardiana Trel. VU dec
Epithelantha micromeris (Engelm.) F.A. C.Weber ex Britton & Rose Pr LC st
Ferocactus wislizeni (Engelm.) Britton & Rose VU dec
Homalocephala parryi (Engelm.) Vargas & Bárcenas A NT st
Opuntia arenaria Engelm. Pr

Discussion

The Médanos de Samalayuca are part of the Chihuahuan Desert (ChD), a relatively well studied ecoregion. The flora of the ChD has been recorded in papers and in a superb assessment coordinated by Henrickson & Johnston (2007). Yet, many areas and many groups still require be explored. Precise information on the species and their ecological requirements is useful to scholars, land managers and general users (Villaseñor & Meave 2022). The updated checklist of the wild and naturalized vascular flora of Samalayuca compiled here adds 117 species (30 %) to the previous inventory (Gatica Colima 2019) and to a preliminary list included in the Management Program (CONANP 2013).

Floristic richness. Dicots (Magnoliopsida) is the most diverse group, as is in Mexico and in most of the world, but ferns and gymnosperms are scarcely represented. Ferns in the area are associated to rock outcrops and soil crust. As for gymnosperms, only four species were found (0.1 % of the flora, as compared with 0.8 % for northern Mexico) (González-Elizondo et al. 2017), including only a conifer (Juniperus arizonica). The most diverse families are Asteraceae (17 %) and Poaceae (14 %), followed by Cactaceae (7 %), Fabaceae (6.5 %), Amaranthaceae (4.7 %), and Nyctaginaceae (4.5%). A comparison with Villaseñor (2016) data for Mexico reveals that Nyctaginaceae is almost 10 times richer in Samalayuca than in general for Mexico (4.5 vs 0.47 %) (despite Mexico having a surface > 3,000-fold larger than Samalayuca), Amaranthaceae (including Chenopodiaceae) is five times richer, while Poaceae and Brassicaceae are three times richer. Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae are also well represented in Samalayuca in relation to Mexico (Table 6). On the other hand, some families are underrepresented. Fabaceae downs to the fourth position in Samalayuca from the second place in Mexico, but the most striking differences are Lamiaceae and Cyperaceae. Those two are among the most diverse families in the country but are barely represented in Samalayuca; Lamiaceae is proportionally 5 times richer in Mexico than in Samalayuca, and Cyperaceae is almost twice richer in Mexico than in Samalayuca. Although, our inventory is still preliminary, and it is almost certain that more members of those families will be recorded later. The arid conditions of the area are unfavorable for these families: Lamiaceae is better adapted to temperate climates in mountain regions (Martínez-Gordillo et al. 2017), while many Cyperaceae grow better in humid places, which are very scarce in Samalayuca. Relative differences in the diversity of several families with regards to Mexico and several geographically close areas in northern Mexico and southwestern United States are presented in Table 6.

Table 6 Comparison of richness (%) of plant families among several floras. 1. This work; 2. Estrada-Castillón & Villarreal-Quintanilla (2010); 3. Royo-Márquez & Melgoza-Castillo (2001); 4. Vega-Mares et al. (2014); 5. Villaseñor (2016); 6. Pinkava (1984); 7. Anderson (2007). The data for Mexico (Villaseñor 2016) involve only native species; all the others are based on native and introduced species. 

Region Aster Poac Cact Fabac Amar Nyctag Euph Brass Lam Cype
Samalayuca1 17 13.7 7.0 6.5 4.7 4.5 4.2 3.2 0.5 1.0
Central Chihuahua2 17.8 12.3 2.3 10.1 2.3 1.6 2.8 1.9 2.0 1.5
La Campana3 17.8 27.2 0.2 12.5 3.9 0.9 2.1 1.6 1.1 1.4
Janos4 16.8 18.3 4.0 8.5 3.0 0.91 6.7 2.7 1.2 0.9
Mexico5 13.1 4.5 2.9 8.1 0.9 0.46 3.1 0.9 2.6 1.8
Cuatro Ciénegas6 14.6 8.7 5.9 2.9 2.4 1.5 3.4 2.4 2.3 1.8
White Sands, NM7 17.1 14.4 3.2 5.7 2.8 1.7 3.5 3.4 1.8 1.1

Amaranthaceae s.l., including Chenopodiaceae.

When comparing the flora of Samalayuca with other sandy areas, we found strong similitudes regarding the representation of the families: Asteraceae and Poaceae, in the gypsophylous area of White Sands, NM (Table 6). The same two are also the most important in a steppe zone of north-west Algeria (Habib et al. 2020), while in another zone in northern Algeria the larger are Asteraceae and Fabaceae (Macheroum et al. 2021). Poaceae and Brassicaceae, well represented in Samalayuca, are the most important in sandy soils of northern Sahara (Azizi et al. 2021).

The richest genera in Samalayuca are Euphorbia, Opunia, Boerhavia, and Aristida. Euphorbia is also the richest genus in the gypsum dunes of Cuatro Ciénegas, White Sands, USA, the halophytic grasslands of Janos, and in different Mexican coastal sand dunes (Pinkava 1984, Anderson 2007, Vega-Mares et al. 2014, Espejel et al. 2017). As for Opuntia, nine species are recognized following the criteria of specialists, but a lot of taxonomic work is still needed in that genus. For example, Opuntia camanchica is part of the Opuntia phaeacantha complex and may represent a morphotype of that species. However, since there is no clear understanding yet in the group, O. aff. camanchica is kept in the list. On the other hand, Salvia, the largest genus in Mexico and in the Lamiaceae (Martínez-Gordillo et al. 2017; González-Gallegos et al. 2019), has not been found yet in Samalayuca; although, it is well represented in gypsophylous areas as Cuatro Cienegas (eight species) (Pinkava 1984) and White Sands (six species) (Anderson 2007), as well as in the nearby Franklin mountains of Texas and New Mexico (five species) (Worthington 2014).

Samalayuca is relatively close to the gypsum sand dunes from Cuatro Ciénegas, Coahuila. (Pinkava 1979, 1984) and the New Mexico’s White Sands dune fields, that are also gypsum rich (Worthington 2003, Anderson 2007), but it differs in its mostly siliceous (composed by quartz) sand. Cuatro Ciénegas harbors more than 860 species (871 taxa) of native and naturalized vascular plants, which is more than twice than in Samalayuca. The explanation for this is the wide elevational span in Cuatro Ciénegas (2,260 m, from 740 to 3,000 m asl) in about 2,000 km2, hence a high variety of ecosystems range from gypsum dunes and wetlands to pine-oak woodlands and conifer forests (Pinkava 1984). Samalayuca, on the other hand, is a smaller area less than a third the surface of Cuatro Ciénegas and only 393 m of difference among the lowest and the highest points, so only xerophytic communities develop there, aside scarce woodland elements restricted to the colder places. Still, the plant diversity in Samalayuca is higher than the found in other zones with predominancy of dune fields. For example, Azizi et al. (2021) recorded only 29 species for a zone in northern Sahara, Algeria. It could be due to drier conditions (annual precipitation is < 36-76 mm) and to the fact that no other plant communities were sampled aside the sand dunes vegetation. For another area in northern Algeria, Macheroum et al. (2021) recorded 63 species. This area is half the surface of Samalayuca (28,600 ha), receives a higher precipitation (372 mm/yr), and harbors steppe vegetation.

Distribution by vegetation type. As around the world, in the ChD, the plant communities strongly intergrade. The distribution of species in the recognized categories is not mutually exclusive, so we indicate their relative proportions. The highest diversity was found in the Mixed desert scrub (38 %) and Sand dune vegetation (26 %). The first is the most broadly distributed community in the ChD; in Samalayuca it is often dominated by Larrea, along with Fouquieria, Vachellia, Opuntia, Prosopis, and other shrubs. Some elements, as Hedeoma nana and Oenothera brachycarpa, while growing to Mixed desert scrub, require special rocky microhabitats. Others, as the association of Artemisia-Poliomintha, are found on fixed dunes but also on active sand dunes. While Flourensia cernua is codominant with Larrea tridentata in many areas of the ChD, this association does not occur in Samalayuca, where F. cernua is infrequent. In fact, it was not observed during this study, and its inclusion in the inventory is based in its record in the Management Program. The rareness of F. cernua in the area might be due to the prevalence of sandy soils, given that this species prefers soils of finer texture (LTER Network 2019), particularly loams (Ji et al. 2019).

For Sand dune vegetation, 224 species were recorded. In strong contrast with this relatively high diversity, the plant cover is so sparse that most of its surface has been represented in previous maps in a category named “Sin vegetación aparente” (With no apparent vegetation) (e.g.,INEGI 2005). Physiognomic dominants, often in separate areas, are of the genera Prosopis, Atriplex, Artemisia-Poliomintha, as well as grasses. The sand dune communities cover large surfaces but can be also intercalated with other communities. Movement of sand dunes prevents the formation of true soils; these substrates lacking horizons are called psamment Entisoils (Steila 1976, in Pavlik 1979). The term psammophytes, for the plants adapted to grow on those sandy, unstable soils, was coined by M. Vahl in Warming’ Oecology of plants (1909). Many psammophytes are extremophiles (Azizi et al. 2021), very valuable as keepers of the ground moisture, potential stabilizers, enrichers of the substrate, habitat for other species, and pioneers for other vegetation stages. Assessing the types and characteristics of psammophytes allows to identify those useful to stabilize rangeland dunes (Thomas & Redsteer 2016). Obligated psammophytes in Samalayuca are Dysphania atriplicifolia and Euphorbia carunculata. However, most species growing on the dunes are not strict psammophytes. While many grow preferentially on sand dunes, they are not restricted to them, e.g., Artemisia carruthii, A. filifolia, Mimosa rupertiana, Euploca convolvulacea, Penstemon ambiguus, Poliomintha incana, and several Nyctaginaceae. The genus Prosopis includes recognized dune stabilizers, e.g., Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. (Pasiecznik 2017); this name has been widely applied to plants of the Chihuahuan Desert, but it corresponds to a species restricted to coastal zones of the Yucatán peninsula and south (Palacios 2006). While the three species of Prosopis in Samalayuca (Table S1) have not been recorded as dune stabilizers, they also act as such (personal observation). There are also tolerant elements from the xerophytic scrub that grow on sand, and other species growing well on semi-stabilized dunes or sandy soils in other types of vegetation, e.g., Baccharis wrightii, Fouquieria splendens, and Salsola spp.

Woodland elements. The oak or juniper woodland and chaparral are communities not represented in Samalayuca. However, there are elements of those communities (12 % of the flora) restricted to the coldest sites of the small sierras (Samalayuca and Presidio) in spots that are not depicted in the vegetation map. Among those are Castilleja spp., Juniperus arizonica, Quercus pungens, Fendlera rupicola, and Philadelphus mearnsii. As relics of a colder past, they are particularly vulnerable to the regional climate trend to higher and extreme heat (Union of Concerned Scientists 2016).

Other communities. About 6.4 % of the plants in Samalayuca grow in Secondary vegetation, which covers disturbed places, human settlements, and induced grassland on old agricultural fields. Many of the wild and naturalized plants recorded for the secondary vegetation grow also in the agriculture fields (3.1 %). The Rosetophyllous scrub, a xerophytic scrub dominated by Agave lechuguilla, Yucca, or Dasylirion leiophyllum, holds about 4.4 % of the species, while Alkali scrub and grassland, with halophytic species, includes only 2.9 %. Additionally, 5.3 % of the species grow in Humid places, including few aquatic, subaquatic and water tolerant plants that develop in the natural and artificial water bodies of the area; the most conspicuous of them are Typha and Arundo. Related with the former category are 2.9 % of Riparian species, herbs, shrubs and a few trees (Populus, Tamarix) bordering the water bodies. The three springs known from Samalayuca are at present highly modified and a species described from that habitat (R. fontinale) was not found during this work.

The names of the plant communities recognized here are adapted from the classification of Henrickson & Johnston (1986) for the ChD. Of 16 plant communities recognized by them, six are represented in Samalayuca: Chihuahuan Desert scrub (with three of its five facies), lechuguilla scrub, Yucca woodland, Prosopis-Atriplex scrub, Alkali scrub, and Montane Chaparral. The last is represented by scattered woodland elements. The facies of the Chihuahuan Desert scrub present in Samalayuca are the Larrea scrub (Gobernadora), the Mixed desert scrub (Chaparrillo or Acacia scrub), and Sand dune scrub (Matorral de Dunas or Médanos). The first two facies (Larrea scrub and Chaparrillo or Acacia scrub) are recognized in this work as part of the Mixed desert scrub, while the last is part of the Sand dune vegetation. According to Muldavin (2002), the three northernmost communities of the ChD in its limits with the Colorado Plateau are dominated by Larrea tridentata, Bouteloua eriopoda, and B. gracilis; Larrea and Bouteloua eriopoda are present in Samalayuca, not so B. gracilis, a species broadly distributed in North America but not located here. Previous classifications of the vegetation of Samalayuca (Enríquez & Olivas 1999), include plant communities names that are not recognized in this work (e.g., Microphyllous desert scrub, Small-leafed spineless scrub, Sub-spineless dune scrub, among others).

General distribution and endemism. The flora of Samalayuca has a strong Nearctic and regional endemic component. Almost a half of the species are distributed in “Megamexico 1” (MM1) (Rzedowski 1991) and a third that are distributed in North America. MM1 is a region concept based in the natural continuity of ecosystems between Mexico and southwestern United States, mainly from the Chihuahuan and Sonoran deserts, hence it represents a regional endemism. Some species have a rather restricted distribution inside MM1, e.g., Agave havardiana, known only for SW Texas, N Chihuahua, and N Coahuila; Agave x gracillipes, from SE New Mexico, SW Texas, and N Chihuahua, as well as several Nyctaginaceae.

The separation among the distribution patterns of the MM1 and North American elements is subtle for some species that go a little further north of the southwestern region. Our criterion was to leave as MM1 to species that reach southern Utah, but not for those that may be present in northern Utah. Species as Argyrochosma limitanea, Palafoxia sphacelata, Pectis angustifolia and Sporobolus giganteus are considered as North American because their distribution reach Wyoming, northern Utah, Nebraska, and/or eastern Texas. Others, as Notholaena standleyi and Parthenium incanum, while reaching southern Nevada, Utah, Colorado or Kansas, are still MM1.

Additionally, in Samalayuca there are two microendemics, one to northern Chihuahua (Homalocephala parryi/Echinocactus parryi) and one to Samalayuca (Ribes fontinale). No other taxa were found restricted to the limits of Mexico, besides these two microregional endemics, which is explained by the closeness of Samalayuca with the international border Mexico - USA. This is also the reason for the high proportion of endemics from the MM1 region. Among these, stand out many Asteraceae as well as most Cactaceae and Agave, as occurs for northern Mexico (González-Elizondo et al. 2017) and the ChD (Villarreal-Quintanilla et al. 2017). Nyctaginaceae, Boraginaceae and Brassicaceae are distributed either in MM1 or NA.

The second largest contingent of the flora (32 %) are the North American elements (distributed from Canada to Mexico), which belong to the Nearctic realm. Some of them barely reach Mexico at northern Chihuahua, e.g., Mirabilis glabra (S. Watson) Standl., which is known for the country only for Samalayuca and near Casas Grandes, Chih. (Hernández-Ledesma & Flores-Olvera 2023).

Other biogeographic elements are scarcely represented. The species distributed in the American continent are 6.5 %, the pantropical and subtropical element is 5.7 %, and others still scarcer. Some of the American species (e.g., Scleropogon brevifolius, Hoffmannseggia glauca) grow from the southwestern United States to southern South America, often as disjunct.

Introduced species.- Most of the recorded species are native, except for 26 exotic (6.5 % of the flora). From these, 10 are Poaceae, most of them from Africa. Among the introduced, two Poaceae and two Amaranthaceae are invasive. What we cite as Salsola x gobicola (a hybrid between S. paulsenii and S. tragus), may be S. paulsenii; the taxonomic revision of this complex is beyond of the scope of this work. The introduced and native successful colonizers thrive mainly in secondary vegetation and in disturbed places. The only family that includes only introduced species (3) is Tamaricaceae.

Conservation status. The species catalogued as threatened or vulnerable in the Mexican Official Norm NOM-059 (SEMARNAT 2010) and in the Red List of the IUCN are listed in Table 5. Most of the species with a risk category are cacti, as also pointed out by Royo-Márquez et al. (2014) for Chihuahua. Sclerocactus papyracanthus is listed in Appendix I of CITES (Threatened with extinction, trade only in exceptional circumstances) (UNEP WCMC 2003). The Mexican Official Norm NOM-059 (SEMARNAT 2010) is the official report that lists the wild flora in Mexico catalogued as with some risk category. For example, Homalocephala parryi (assessed as Echinocactus parryi in the NOM-059) is an endemic with the category of Threatened.

For the plants with some risk category according to the IUCN (included those of Low concern), the population tendencies are: 5 decreasing, 5 increasing, and 57 stable.

Species previously recorded and not found during this study.- Ribes fontinale was described from springs in Samalayuca. The three springs, which are seasonal and have somewhat saline water, are now highly transformed (one of them is dry, while the borders of the other two have been cemented). Ribes fontinale was known only from the type collection and it may be considered as probably extinct. However, the taxonomy of the species needs to be assessed; it is worth to explore its taxonomic position as part of the complex of R. aureum Pursh, a highly variable species known from Canada to Chihuahua (www.tropicos.org/collection/4795281). If materials from southwestern United States and Chihuahua that are presently identified as R. aureum prove to be R. fontinale, then this species may be locally extinct in Samalayuca but still extant elsewhere. Another option could be that R. fontinale represents a morphotype of R. aureum.

Hoffmannseggia drepanocarpa was cited by Simpson (1999) in her revision of the genus and included here with basis in an herbarium specimen at LL. It has not been recently recorded, being probably an unfrequent plant.

Other unfrequent species are Houstonia humifusa and Ayenia microphylla, which are known for the area exclusively from the records in Naturalista. Flourensia cernua, as mentioned above, was not observed during this work, indicating rareness or probable absence in Samalayuca. It was recorded in the Management Program and is included here since its absence from the area is not certain.

Sclerocactus papyracanthus was recently recorded for the first time for Mexico (Ortiz-Brunel et al. 2023). Although in the second edition of the Cites Cactaceae Checklist, Hunt (1999) included Mexico in the distribution of S. papyracanthus, no voucher or record was mentioned; later, in the third edition of the same list (Hunt 2016), Mexico was deleted. In the assessment for the IUCN (Heil et al. 2013), S. papyracantus was also treated as an endemic to the United States (Arizona, New Mexico and Texas).

Excluded species.- Among the 225 species recorded in the Management Program (CONANP 2013) and other references, the following are based on misidentifications and hence, excluded from this work: Myriopteris microphylla (Sw.) Grusz & Windham, known from Florida to South America and West Indies; Escobaria chihuahuensis Britton & Rose, known from central Chihuahua to eastern Durango; Sphaeralcea axillaris S. Watson, distributed in eastern Sonora and Baja California; Lappula redowskii (Hornem.) Greene, a species from the old world whose citation may be based in the fact that L. occidentalis (S. Watson) Greene (which occurs in the area), has been considered as a synonym or as a subspecies of L. redowskii; Nama parvifolia (Torr.) Greenm. and Nama retrorsa Howell have been recorded with basis in misidentified specimens in UACJ; the first is known from southeastern Texas and northeastern Mexico, while N. retrorsa is recorded for southern Colorado and northern Arizona and New Mexico; Penstemon alamosensis Pennell & G.T. Nisbet, endemic to the Sacramento Mts. and surroundings of Alamos, New Mexico. An unidentified Penstemon from Samalayuca differs in having not pubescent corollas. Salsola kali L. is a coastal species. Urochloa ciliatissima (Buckley) R.D. Webster, recorded with basis in misidentified U. texana. A specimen in UACJ previously identified as Abronia carletonii Coult. & Fisher is a wide-leaved form of A. angustifolia.

Anthropogenic activities and the associated flora.- In some areas, the original plant cover has been replaced by irrigated crops, mainly pecan (Carya illinoinensis), with about 400 ha (Rueda-Torres et al. 2022b), as well as vines (Vitis vinifera) and pistachios (Pistacia vera), besides the impact of extensive cattle farming. The area is also a popular recreational destination for ecotourism and adventure tourism, has been the scenery for some movies (Chihuahuan Frontier 2009), and has been considered with potential industrial use (Cruz Sánchez et al. 2007). The plants associated with crops are mainly species of Poaceae, Asteraceae, Solanaceae, and Boraginaceae (Rueda-Torres et al. 2022b). Land use change, mainly to irrigated crops and urbanization, as well as ecoturism/recreational activities pose threats to the biodiversity and the fragile ecosystems of Samalayuca, so policies focused on a better interaction among people and the natural system are needed (Gatica Colima 2019).

Probably because the extreme climate and the moving substrates that reduce the stability of the vegetation, the flora of the Médanos de Samalayuca has a relatively low diversity. Still, it is richer than we expected prior to this work, with many elements adapted to extreme edaphic and climatic conditions. The area is home to regional endemics and threatened species, and more work is needed to know the status of rare species and if some plants previously cited for the area but not located during this study, may still be found. Understanding the composition and ecology of sand dunes communities is keystone to improve the strategies to protect these fragile ecosystems from anthropogenic impacts and invasive organisms and, at the same time, to prevent the ecological and economic damages that dune expansion poses on adjacent ecosystems and infrastructure.

Supplementary material

Supplemental material for this article can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3369

Supplemental material

Acknowledgements

We thank to the owners and persons in charge of the land in Samalayuca for allowing us sampling the flora and plant communities. To J.R. Rueda-Torres, M. Villanueva, C. Contreras, A. García, C. Ponce and E. Esparza, who enthusiastically participated in the field work. N. Piedra-Leandro elaborated the vegetation map and J. Tena-Flores helped with data searching and analysis. G. Yatskievych and J.L. Panero shared information from the databases LL and TEX. Y. Herrera-Arrieta, M. González-Elizondo, L.F. Colín-Nolasco, E. Estrada-Castillón, J. González-Gallegos, A. Castro-Castro, R. Spellenberg, T. Collins and T. Van Devender helped with identifications, as well as Ó. González-Martínez, Aaron Balam, I. Zurita-Suárez, P. Nájera-Quezada, J.M. Martínez-Calderas and other colleagues through Naturalista. J.M. Martínez-Calderas provided a photo for Figure 2. To C. Figueroa-Batalla, curator of UACJ, and to the curators of herbaria where materials are deposited: ARIZ, ASU, BRYV, CCIB, CIIDIR, COLO, DES, HCIB, HNT, MEXU, mde, MICH, MSC, NMC, NLU, NY, RSA, SBBG, TEX-LL, UACJ, UASLP, UCR, USF, UTEP, WIS and WLM. CONABIO and CONANP provided financial support for the project Inventario multitaxonómico del ANP Médanos de Samalayuca (PJ018) and administrative and academic personal at the UACJ helped in different ways in that project. Staff of the FFPA Médanos de Samalayuca provided logistical aid. We appreciate the suggestions of two anonymous reviewers as well as of the editor and section editor, which helped to improve the manuscript.

Literature cited

Anderson DL. 2007. Floral checklist for White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. White Sands Missile Range. https://floraneomexicana.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/wsmr_floral_checklist.pdf (accessed June, 2023) [ Links ]

APG IV. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385 [ Links ]

Arriaga L, Espinoza JM, Aguilar C, Martínez E, Gómez L. (coord.) 2000. Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México. México: CONABIO (Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad). ISBN: 970-9000-16-0 [ Links ]

Azizi M, Chenchouni H, Belarouci MEH, Bradai L, Bouallala, M. 2021. Diversity of psammophyte communities on sand dunes and sandy soils of the northern Sahara Desert. Journal of King Saud University - Science 33: 101656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101656 [ Links ]

Baas ACW, Delobel LA. 2022. Desert dunes transformed by end-of-century changes in wind climate. Nature Climate Change 12: 999-1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01507-1 [ Links ]

Barraza-Pacheco L, Enriquez-Anchondo I, Gatica-Colima A, Rivas-Cáceres R, Olivas-Sánchez P, Goodell P, Vásquez M, Salas R. 1997. Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial de los Médanos de Samalayuca, Chihuahua, México. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez y Gobierno del Estado de Chihuahua. Unpublished document. [ Links ]

Chihuahuan Frontier. 2009. Samalayuca dunes declared natural protected zone. https://archive.ph/20130119015806/http://www.chihuahuanfrontier.com/state/news/65-samalayuca.html (accessed January 23, 2023). [ Links ]

Christenhusz MJM, Reveal JL, Farjon A, Gardner MF, Mill RR, Chase MW. 2011. A new classification and linear sequence of extant gymnosperms. Phytotaxa 19: 55-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.19.1.3 [ Links ]

Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 1997. Terrestrial Ecoregions: Level II. http://www.cec.org/north-american-environmental-atlas/terrestrial-ecoregions-level-ii/ accessed 21 February 2023). [ Links ]

CONABIO [Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad]. 2004. Regiones terrestres prioritarias de México, RTP-48, Médanos de Samalayuca. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/conocimiento/regionalizacion/doctos/rtp_048.pdf (accessed July, 2021) [ Links ]

CONABIO [Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad]. 2022. Herbario virtual. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/otros/cgi-bin/herbario.cgi (accessed January 12 2022). [ Links ]

CONANP [Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas]. 2013. Programa de Manejo Área de protección de Flora y Fauna Médanos de Samalayuca. DF, México: SEMARNAT-CONANP. [ Links ]

Cruz Sánchez EC, Esparza-Ponce H, Díaz C, Saenz F, Boone K. 2007. Use of Samalayuca Dune Sand on Glass and Ceramics Processes. American Ceramic Society Bulletin 86: 9401-9404. [ Links ]

Delgadillo Moya C. 2015. Grimmia (Grimmiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Neotropics. DF: Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. ISBN: 978-607-02-7285-4 [ Links ]

El-Sheikh MA, Thomas J, Arif IA, El-Sheikh HM. 2021. Ecology of inland sand dunes ‘‘nafuds” as a hyper-arid habitat, Saudi Arabia: floristic and plant associations diversity. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 28: 1503-1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.002 [ Links ]

Enríquez Anchondo ID. 2003. Las Cactáceas de Samalayuca. Ciencia en la Frontera 2: 55-62. [ Links ]

Enríquez I, Olivas MP. 1999. La vegetación de nuestro desierto de Samalayuca, un ambiente fascinante. Ciencia en la Frontera 1: 33-37. [ Links ]

Esparza García E. 2017. Cactáceas de la Sierra Presidio, Samalayuca. BSc Thesis. Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez. [ Links ]

Espejel I, Jiménez-Orocio O, Castillo-Campos G, Garcillán PP, Álvarez L, Castillo-Argüero S, Durán R, Ferrer M, Infante-Mata D, Iriarte S, León de la Luz JL, López-Rosas H, Medel Narváez A, Monroy R, Moreno-Casasola P, Rebman JP, Rodríguez-Revelo, N, Sánchez-Escalante J, Vanderplank S. 2017. Flora en playas y dunas costeras de México. Acta Botanica Mexicana 121: 39-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm121.2017.1290 [ Links ]

Estrada-Castillón E, Villarreal-Quintanilla JA. 2010. Flora del centro del estado de Chihuahua, México. Acta Botanica Mexicana 92: 51-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm92.2010.283 [ Links ]

Gatica Colima AB. 2019. Inventario multitaxonómico del ANP Médanos de Samalayuca (PJ018). Reporte final. CONANP-CONABIO-UACJ. https://acortar.link/jFMNf1 (accesed June, 2020) [ Links ]

González-Elizondo MS, González-Elizondo M, López-Enríquez IL, Tena-Flores JA, González-Gallegos JG, Ruacho-González L, Melgoza-Castillo A, Villarreal-Quintanilla JÁ, Estrada-Castillón AE. 2017. Diagnóstico del conocimiento taxonómico y florístico del norte de México. Botanical Sciences 95: 760-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1865 [ Links ]

González-Gallegos JG, Vega-Mares JH, Fernández JA. 2019. Salvia reginae and S. spellenbergii (Lamiaceae), two new species from Chihuahua, Mexico. Willdenowia 49: 319-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.49.49303 [ Links ]

Habib N, Regagba Z, Djamel Miara M, Ait Hammou M, Snorek J. 2020. Floristic diversity of steppe vegetation in the region of Djelfa, North-West Algeria. Acta Botanica Malacitana 45: 37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24310/abm.v45i.7987 [ Links ]

Heil K, Terry M, Corral-Díaz R. 2013. Sclerocactus papyracanthus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2022-2. https://www.iucnredlist.org/search?query=Sclerocactus%20papyracanthus&searchType=species (accesed December, 2022) [ Links ]

Henrickson J, Johnston MC. 1986. Vegetation and community types of the Chihuahuan Desert. In: Barlow JC, Powell MA, Timmermann BN, eds. U.S. and Mexico II. Alpine, Texas. Sul Ross State University, pp. 20-39. [ Links ]

Henrickson J, Johnston MC. coords. 2007. A flora of the Chihuahuan Desert region. 1695 pp. Los Angeles, USA: Published by J. Henrickson. [ Links ]

Hernández-Ledesma P, Flores-Olvera H. 2023. El género Mirabilis (Nyctaginaceae) en México: diversidad, distribución y tratamiento taxonómico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 94: e945014, https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2023.94.5014 [ Links ]

Hunt D. 1999. comp. Cites Cactaceae Checklist, 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. ISBN 9781900347457. [ Links ]

Hunt D. 2016. Cites Cactaceae Checklist, 3nd ed. United Kingdom: Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. [ Links ]

INEGI [Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática]. 2005. Carta de uso actual del suelo y vegetación. Serie III. México. Escala 1:250000. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. [ Links ]

IUCN [International Union for Conservation of Nature]. 2022. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. ISBN 978-0-9933113-2-1, https://www.iucnredlist.org/ (accessed November 16, 2022). [ Links ]

Ji W, Hanan NP, Browning DM, Monger HC, Peters DPC, Bestelmeyer BT, Archer SR, Ross CW, Lind BM, Anchang J, Kumar SS, Prihodko L. 2019. Constraints on shrub cover and shrub-shrub competition in a U.S. southwest desert. Ecosphere 10: e02590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2590 [ Links ]

Liu M, Zhu R, Zhang Z, Liu L, Hui R, Bao J, Zhang H. 2016. Water use traits and survival mechanisms of psammophytes in arid ecosystems. Arid Land Research and Management 30: 166-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2015.1090498 [ Links ]

LTER Network. 2019. Got shrubs? Woody plants are changing ecological communities around the globe. National Science Foundation, National Science Foundation, https://lternet.edu/stories/got-shrubs/ (accesed July, 2023) [ Links ]

Macheroum A, Kadik L, Neffar S, Chenchouni H. 2021. Environmental drivers of taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity patterns of plant communities in semi-arid steppe rangelands of North Africa. Ecological Indicators 132: 108279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108279 [ Links ]

Martínez-Gordillo M, Bedolla-García B, Cornejo-Tenorio G, Fragoso-Martínez I, García-Peña MR, González-Gallegos JG, Lara-Cabrera SI, Zamudio S. 2017. Lamiaceae de México. Botanical Sciences 95: 780-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1871 [ Links ]

Muldavin E. 2002. Some floristic characteristics of the northern Chihuahuan Desert: a search for its northern boundary. Taxon 51: 453-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1555063 [ Links ]

NaturaLista. 2022. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. http://www.naturalista.mx (accessed 2022, different dates). [ Links ]

Ortiz-Brunel JP, Delladdio A, Raya-Sánchez RD, Pérez-Badillo C, Zurita-Suárez I, Flores J. 2023. First record of Sclerocactus papyracanthus (Cactaceae) in Mexico. Acta Botanica Mexicana 130: e2215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm130.2023.2215 [ Links ]

Palacios R. 2006. Los mezquites mexicanos: biodiversidad y distribución geográfica. Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 41: 99-121. [ Links ]

Pasiecznik N. 2017. Prosopis juliflora (mesquite). CABI Compendium, https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.43942 [ Links ]

Pavlik BM. 1979. The biology of endemic psammophytes, Eureka Valley, California, and its relation to off-road vehicle impact. Riverside, California: US Bureau of Land Management-University of California, Davis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.59171 [ Links ]

Pinkava DJ. 1979. Vegetation and flora of the Bolson of Cuatrociénegas Region Coahuila México. I. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 38: 35-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1168 [ Links ]

Pinkava DJ. 1984. Vegetation and flora of the Bolson of Cuatro Ciénegas region, Coahuila, México: IV. Summary, endemism and corrected catalogue. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science 19: 23-47. [ Links ]

PPG I [Phylogeny Pteridophyte Group]. 2016. A community-derived classification for extant lycophytes and ferns. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 54: 563-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12229 [ Links ]

Quiñonez Martínez M, Enríquez Anchondo ID, Flores Margez JP, Palacios Ramírez KY, Olivas Sánchez MP, Garza Ocañas F, Lebgue Keleng T, Nájera Medellín JA. 2018. Comunidades vegetales en suelo de ecosistema semiárido y su relación con hongos micorrízicos. Terra Latinoamericana 36: 381-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v36i4.401 [ Links ]

Red de Herbarios del Noroeste de México. 2022. https://herbanwmex.net/portal/ (accessed 2022, different dates). [ Links ]

Redsteer MH, Bogle RC, Vogel JM. 2011. Monitoring and Analysis of Sand Dune Movement and Growth on the Navajo Nation, Southwestern United States. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2011-3085, at Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2011-3085, at http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2011/3085/ (accessed March 5, 2023) [ Links ]

Royo-Márquez MH, Melgoza-Castillo A. 2001. Listado florístico del Campo Experimental La Campana y usos de su flora. Técnica Pecuaria 39: 105-126. [ Links ]

Royo-Márquez MH, Melgoza-Castillo A, Quintana-Martínez G. 2014. Especies vegetales en peligro, su distribución y estatus de conservación de los ecosistemas donde se presentan. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Forestales 5: 86-103. [ Links ]

Rueda-Torres JR, De León-Pesqueira L, Gatica-Colima AB. 2022a. Fabáceas del área de protección de flora y fauna médanos de Samalayuca, Chihuahua, México. Polibotánica 53: e-pub. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18387/polibotanica.53.1 [ Links ]

Rueda-Torres JR, Gatica-Colima AB, Vital-García C. 2022b. Evaluation of pocket gopher diet in a perennial productive area. Therya 13: 315-323. [ Links ]

Rzedowski J. 1991. El endemismo en la flora fanerogámica mexicana: una apreciación analítica preliminar. Acta Botanica Mexicana 15: 47-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm15.1991.620 [ Links ]

SEGOB [Secretaría de Gobernación]. 2015. DOF: 29/06/2015. Acuerdo por el que se da a conocer el resultado de los estudios técnicos de aguas nacionales subterráneas del acuífero Samalayuca, clave 0810, en el Estado de Chihuahua, Región Hidrológico Administrativa Río Bravo. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5398624&fecha=29/06/2015 (accessed July 4, 2023). [ Links ]

SEINet. 2022. Southwest Environmental Information Network, SEINEt Arizona-New Mexico Chapter. https://swbiodiversity.org/ (accessed February 12, 2022). [ Links ]

SEMARNAT [Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2009. Decreto por el que se declara área natural protegida, con el carácter de área de protección de flora y fauna, la zona conocida como Médanos de Samalayuca, localizada en los municipios de Juárez y Guadalupe, en el Estado de Chihuahua. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 1a Sección, 5 de junio de 2009. [ Links ]

SEMARNAT [Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales]. 2010. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-SEMARNAT-2010, Protección ambiental - Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres - Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio - Lista de especies en riesgo. Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2da Sección, 30 de diciembre de 2010. [ Links ]

Simpson BB. 1999. A revision of Hoffmannseggia (Fabaceae) in North America. Lundellia 2: 14-54. [ Links ]

Stevens PF. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12, July 2012 [and more or less continuously updated since]. http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ (accesed Jan 2022). [ Links ]

Thiers B. 2022. [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/ (accessed 4 March 2023). [ Links ]

Thomas KA, Redsteer MH. 2016. Vegetation of semi-stable rangeland dunes of the Navajo Nation, Southwestern USA. Arid Land Research and Management 30: 400-411, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2016.1138157 [ Links ]

UNEP WCMC [UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre]. 2003. Checklist of CITES Species. 1-339. UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge. [ Links ]

Union of Concerned Scientists. 2016. Confronting Climate Change in New Mexico. 14 pp. http://www.ucsusa.org/NewMexicoClimateChange (accessed June 2, 2023). [ Links ]

Vega-Mares JH, Estrada-Castillón AE, Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Quintana-Martínez G. 2014. Flora of the halophytic grasslands in the Valle de Janos, Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 8: 151-163. [ Links ]

Villarreal-Quintanilla JA, Bartolomé-Hernández JA, Estrada-Castillón E, Ramírez-Rodríguez H, Martínez-Amador SJ. 2017. El elemento endémico de la flora vascular del Desierto Chihuahuense. Acta Botanica Mexicana 118: 65-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21829/abm118.2017.1201 [ Links ]

Villaseñor JL. 2016. Checklist of the native vascular plants of México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87: 559-902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.06.017 [ Links ]

Villaseñor JL, Meave JA. 2022. Floristics in Mexico today: insights into a better understanding of biodiversity in a megadiverse country. Botanical Sciences 100 (Special Issue), S14-S33. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.3050 [ Links ]

Warming E. 1909. Oecology of plants. An introduction to the study of plant communities. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 424 pp. [ Links ]

Wislizenus FA. 1848. Memoir of a tour to Northern Mexico: Connected with Col. Doniphan's Expedition, in 1846 and 1847. Washington, D.C. Tippin & Streeper. [ Links ]

Worthington RD. comp. 2003. Preliminary inventory of the flora of White Sands National Monument, New Mexico [Second Working Document]. El Paso, Tx. https://floraneomexicana.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/wsnm.pdf (accesed July, 2023) [ Links ]

Worthington RD. 2014. Inventory of the Vascular Plant Flora of the Franklin Mountains, Texas and New Mexico. El Paso Southwest Botanical Miscellany 5. El Paso, Tx. 46 pp. https://floraneomexicana.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/franklinmts.pdf (accessed July 2023) [ Links ]

Supporting Agencies: The Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO) and Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP) provided financial support for the project.

Recibido: 11 de Julio de 2023; Aprobado: 01 de Septiembre de 2023; Publicado: 11 de Diciembre de 2023

*Author for correspondence: herbario_ciidir@yahoo.com.mx

Associate editor: Salvador Arias

Author contributions: LDLP, carried out field work, examined and identified specimens, and compiled and curated the database; AGC, conceived the project, was in charge of direction and planning and participated in the field work and curation of the database; MSGE, examined and identified specimens, curated and complemented the checklist and analyzed data. All authors were involved in the writing of the manuscript and have read and approved the final version.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons