SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 número2Asociación entre actividad física y calidad de vida: Encuesta Nacional de SaludAcreditación de servicios y calidad de la atención a neonatos en hospitales mexicanos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Salud Pública de México

versión impresa ISSN 0036-3634

Salud pública Méx vol.64 no.2 Cuernavaca mar./abr. 2022  Epub 13-Mar-2023

https://doi.org/10.21149/12540 

Artículos originales

Association between life-course leisure-time physical activity and prostate cancer

Actividad física a lo largo de la vida y su asociación con cáncer de próstata

Ruth Argelia Vázquez-Salas, D en C1  2 

Luisa Torres-Sánchez, D en C2 

Marcia Galván-Portillo, D en C2 

Lizbeth López-Carrillo, D en SP2 

Hortensia Moreno-Macías, PhD3 

Francisco Rodríguez-Covarrubias, Urol4 

Martín Romero-Martínez, PhD2 

Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Ríos, Urol5 

(1) Cátedra Conacyt, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

(2) Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

(3) Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. Mexico City, Mexico.

(4) Departamento de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán. Mexico City, Mexico.

(5) Servicio de Urología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México. Mexico City, Mexico.


Abstract:

Objective:

To evaluate the association between life-course leisure-time physical activity (PA) and prostate cancer (PC) among males living in Mexico City.

Materials and methods:

Information from 394 incident PC cases and 794 population controls matched by age (± 5 years), was analyzed. Using leisure-time PA information at different life stages, life-course PA patterns were constructed. The association between PA and PC was estimated using an unconditional logistic regression model.

Results:

Three life-course PA patterns were identified: low PA (71.0%), moderate PA (22.0%), and high PA (7.0%); this last pattern was characterized by higher levels and consistent PA practice. Compared with inactive males, those in the high PA pattern (OR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.26-0.93) had significantly lower PC odds.

Conclusion:

Intense and regular PA could reduce the possibility of PC. These results are in accordance with PA World Health Organization recommendations.

Keywords: life-course; METS; Mexico; physical activity; prostate cancer

Resumen:

Objetivo:

Evaluar la asociación entre la actividad física (AF) en la vida y el cáncer de próstata (CP) en hombres.

Material y métodos:

Se analizó la AF de 394 casos incidentes de CP y 794 controles poblacionales pareados por edad (± 5 años). Se utilizó la información de AF en diferentes etapas para generar los patrones de AF a lo largo de la vida. La asociación entre AF y CP se estimó mediante regresión logística no condicionada.

Resultados:

Se identificaron tres patrones de AF: baja (71.0%), moderada (22.0%) y alta (7.0%); este último patrón se caracterizó por una AF consistentemente mayor a lo largo de la vida. Comparado con los hombres inactivos, aquéllos en el patrón de alta AF (RM= 0.50; IC95% = 0.26-0.93) presentaron menos posibilidades de tener CP.

Conclusión:

El papel protector de la AF parece estar en función de la intensidad y regularidad de su práctica y apoyan las recomendaciones de la OMS.

Palabras clave: patrones; METs; México; actividad física; cáncer de próstata

Introduction

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer and the fifth cause of death among men worldwide, mainly in low-and-middle-income countries.1 Several risk factors for PC have been identified, such as age, PC family history, and African American ethnicity;2 however, the link between PC and lifestyle factors such as physical activity (PA) is inconclusive.3 PA is an important, modifiable, and preventive factor associated with a lower risk of colon, endometrium, and post-menopausal breast cancer.3

Overall, PA is associated with a 10% decrease in the risk of developing PC,4 with differences by type of PA. Occupational PA has been consistently associated with lower PC risk,4 while a mixed association with leisure-time PA has been observed.5 These mixed results could be a consequence of the inability to capture the intra-individual variability in leisure-time PA that occurs across the lifespan. PA is a behavior that does not develop uniformly between individuals and its practice depends on motivation, age, sex, health, and socioeconomic status.6,7 Longitudinal studies using finite mixture modeling confirm the existence of at least three or four different PA trajectories across the lifespan, which seem to be mainly determined during childhood and adolescence, remaining more stable during adulthood.6

To date, most studies have focused on the accumulated PA throughout life or in specific life stages. For instance, longitudinal studies using self-reported PA have measured it at baseline (follow-up time 3-24.8 years),8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 and/or accumulated as the sum of leisure-time PA over different periods.15 In case-control studies, leisure-time PA has been evaluated at interview considering information from childhood until diagnosis/interview, generating lifetime accumulated PA,17,18 or from adult life only.19 Some of these studies considered the frequency, time, and/or intensity of the PA; however, none of these approaches measured the variability of PA throughout life.

Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between leisure-time PA and PC among males living in Mexico City, using a life-course PA approach and compare these results with those obtained through a lifetime accumulated PA approach.

Materials and methods

From November 2011 to August 2014, we conducted a population-based case-control study on males who were 42 to 94 years old and living in Mexico City for at least one year. Study details have been previously described.20 Briefly, information was obtained from 402 incident PC cases (participation rate 85.9%), histologically confirmed, without a history of any other type of cancer, who were identified and interviewed in two secondary- and four tertiary-level hospitals in Mexico City. The PC cases were categorized according to Gleason score at diagnosis, into well-differentiated (Gleason ≤6), moderately-differentiated (Gleason =7), or poorly-differentiated (Gleason ≥8) PC.21

Controls (n=805) were males who were age-matched (±5 years) to cases, without a history of previous cancer or prostate diseases. Subjects reporting urological symptoms such as dysuria, hematuria, or those under clinical prostatic evaluation or who reported a prostate-specific antigen ≥4 ng/mL, were not considered as potential controls. For control selection and based on the 2005 National Households Count and Population survey, we chose 33 basic geostatistical areas in Mexico City considering the probability of finding one male ≥40 years old at these households. Ten blocks were randomly selected and starting from the northeast corner of each block all consecutive households were visited. In each home, we verified the presence of a male who met the eligibility criteria; if more than one male was found, a random selection was made to obtain just one. If the potential control was not present, we made up to three attempts to find him before searching for another control. All the interviews of controls were conducted at their homes with a participation rate of 87.5%. All subjects declining participation provided information regarding age, birthplace, marital status, and educational level.

The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration and was also approved by the Ethics Committee of the National Public Health Institute (CI: 980), as well as the ethics committees of all participating hospitals.

Interview

Trained staff who were unaware of the specific study hypothesis conducted face-to-face interviews. Using a structured questionnaire, we obtained information regarding sociodemographic features, PC family history in first-degree relatives, personal history of chronic diseases as well as sexual history, PA, diet, and smoking history.

Leisure-time PA

Through a modified version of a PA questionnaire which was previously validated in Spanish speaking population22 and used in a Mexican urban cohort,23 we obtained information about selected leisure-time activities in four life stages: 15-18, 19-29, >30 years old, and last three years before the interview. For each stage, we requested the number of hours per day, days per week, and months per year spent carrying out the following activities: volleyball, weightlifting, cycling, brisk walking for at least 20 minutes, dancing, aerobics, boxing, basketball, doubles tennis, cycling at a moderate speed, swimming, soccer, skating, tennis, climbing, running, and other activities (figure 1a). These activities were identified in a pilot study as the ones that are most frequently performed by Mexican males.

a: Physical activity according to the intensity

b: Considering three life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, and >30 years old

c: Considering four life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, >30 years old, and the last three years before the interview

Low: showed a consistently low physical activity; Moderate, presented a moderated physical activity throughout life, and High showed a higher and consistently physical activity practice

METs: Metabolic Equivalent of Task

Figure 1 Physical activities according to the intensity and leisure-time life-course physical activity patterns. Mexico City, 2011-2014 

At each life stage, we estimated time invested in each activity separately (hour/week/year) and considering the energy expenditure stated for each activity in the PA compendium,24 we calculated Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METs) hour/week/year for each activity. Afterward, the lifetime accumulated leisure-time PA was estimated as the sum of total METs hour/week/year across the first three (15-18, 19-29, and >30 years old) or four (previous stages plus last three years) life stages. For subjects performing any activity, the lifetime accumulated leisure-time PA was categorized into tertiles according to the controls’ distribution.

Taking the total METs hour/week/year for each life stage among those males who performed at least one activity during one life stage and using KmL packages (k-means+ method) for longitudinal data in R software,25 the individual leisure-time life-course PA patterns were constructed considering the first three or four life stages. These patterns were verified using Calinski and Harabasz’s quality criteria25 as well as using K-means++ method26 and we obtained similar results.

Dietary, weight, and smoking information

Dietary information was obtained from a validated, semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire27 which retrieved information on a 3-year time frame before diagnosis, for cases, or before the interview, for controls. For each food-item, reported intake frequency ranged from “never” to “up to six times per day”. Using the dietary information, and the energy density approach, we calculated the Energy Dietary Inflammatory Index (E-DII).28

Since PC could affect weight at diagnosis, we constructed the life-course weight patterns considering the perceived body silhouette at different life stages29 (from 5-50 years old): Pattern A was characterized by males who showed a weight increment throughout adolescence and held normal weight (silhouette I and II) until they were 50 years old; pattern B males had heavy weight since childhood and a small weight increase during adulthood; meanwhile, pattern C included males that had a greater weight increase throughout life and reached a state of overweight between ages 40 and 50.

Two life-course smoking patterns among ever smokers were identified: Pattern A was characterized by males who reported low and constant smoking intensity and Pattern B, which referred to males with an initial period of low smoking intensity, followed by an increase during the second stage of life.30

The final study population included 394 cases and 794 controls due to the exclusion of cases (n=8) and controls (n=11) with extremely low (<800 calories) or high (>4 500 calories) total energy intakes.

Statistical analysis

PA and other selected characteristics were compared between cases and controls, using Student’s t or chi-squared test as appropriate. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between leisure-time life-course PA patterns or lifetime accumulated PA and PC. Males who did not perform PA were considered as the reference category. For the lifetime accumulated approach, we tested a potential monotonic trend to evaluate if increasing levels of PA were associated with lower PC.

Age was included as a covariate in all analyses. A directed acyclic graph was used to select additional variables included in the model as confounders: educational level, history of chronic diseases, life-course smoking patterns, life-course weight patterns, and E-DII. PC family history in first-degree relatives is an established risk factor for PC but not necessarily associated with PA, and thus should not be included in the model; however, we decided to adjust by this variable. Finally, among controls, we evaluated the possibility and magnitude of an exposure measurement error comparing the proportion of males categorized by lifetime accumulated PA versus the observed life-course PA patterns. All analyses were performed using Stata 15.0* and R Studio 3.6.

Results

Mean age was similar among cases and controls (67.69±8.39 vs. 66.94±8.94); however, a higher proportion of cases reported college education (20.6 vs. 11.7%), history of chronic diseases (58.1 vs. 41.2%), PC family history (10.4 vs. 2.5%), as well as weight patterns consistent with a history of obesity or overweight (83.0 vs. 76.4%) (table I).

Table I Selected characteristics of the study population according to case and control status. Mexico City, 2011-2014 

Characteristics

Cases

(n=394)

Controls

(n=794)

p value*

Age (years old)

Mean ± SD

67.69 ± 8.39

66.94 ± 8.94

0.17

Marital status (%)

Not united

90 (22.8)

158 (19.9)

0.24

United

304 (77.2)

636 (80.1)

Education level (%)

Elementary school or lower

177 (44.9)

358 (45.1)

<0.001

Junior high school

66 (16.7)

199 (25.1)

High school

70 (17.8)

144 (18.1)

College education or higher

81 (20.6)

93 (11.7)

Life-course smoking (%)§

Never

128 (32.5)

261 (32.9)

<0.42

A

228 (57.9)

474 (59.7)

B

38 (9.6)

59 (7.4)

History of chronic diseases (%)#

No

165 (41.9)

467 (58.8)

<0.001

Yes

229 (58.1)

327 (41.2)

Family history of prostate cancer (%)&

No

353 (89.6)

774 (97.5)

<0.001

Yes

41 (10.4)

20 (2.5)

Life-course weight (%)

A

67 (17.0)

187 (23.6)

0.02

B

200 (50.8)

352 (44.4)

C

127 (32.2)

254 (32.0)

Energy adjusted dietary inflammatory index

Mean ± SD

0.43 ± 1.60

0.52 ± 1.53

0.35

*t test and chi2

United: Married and common law

§Life-course smoking patterns among ever smokers: Pattern A characterized by males who reported low and constanst smoking intensity and Pattern B, males with an initial period of low smoking intensity, followed by an increase during the second life stage

#Hypertension, diabetes or dyslipidemia

&Family history of prostate cancer in first degree relatives

Life-course weight: Pattern A characterized by males that showed a weight increment throughout adolescent and held normal weight (silhouette I and II) until 50 years old; pattern B males that showed high weight from childhood and small weight increase since adulthood; meanwhile pattern C included males that had the greater weight increase throughout life and reached overweight between 40 and 50 years old. Patterns B or C are considered as an indicator of obesity

The most frequent activities practiced throughout life were soccer (~28%), running (~12%), and brisk walking for at least 20 minutes (~12%). Of all participants, 11.0% reported not been engaged in PA throughout their lifetime. Regardless of the number of life stages considered among males who reported any leisure-time PA in at least one life stage (89.0%), three PA patterns throughout life were identified (figure 1b-1c): low PA (71.0%), moderate PA (22.0%), and high PA (7.0%) patterns. Independently of case and control condition, the highest activity level was observed between ages 15-18 years (table II).

Table II Average physical activity at life stages considering leisure-time life-course physical activity pattern among cases and controls. Mexico City, 2011-2014 

Life stages

Physical activity patterns throughout life*

(METs/hour/week/year)

Low PA

Moderate PA

High PA

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

Cases

Controls

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

Mean ± SD

(n=215)

(n=524)

(n=96)

(n=139)

(n=25)

(n=57)

Considering three life stages (years old)

15-18

43.76 ± 30.44

44.10 ± 28.87

127.72 ± 45.60

120.72 ± 53.86

253.78 ± 70.41

287.43 ± 85.07

19-29

31.29 ± 27.78

26.98 ± 24.43

104.32 ± 49.35

90.56 ± 44.34

177.97 ± 95.20

187.79 ± 94.14

>30

19.06 ± 24.31

11.60 ± 20.71

74.31 ± 58.64

54.21 ± 61.52

85.01 ± 90.22

85.44 ± 99.59

% change

56.44

73.70

41.82

55.09

66.50

70.27

Considering four life stages (years old)

(n=214)

(n=523)

(n=97)

(n=142)

(n=27)

(n=57)

15-18

42.67 ± 30.08

43.83 ± 28.77

126.12 ± 45.80

119.49 ± 54.38

246.23 ± 73.12

287.43 ± 85.07

19-29

31.16 ± 27.90

26.75 ± 24.28

99.81 ± 49.33

89.71 ± 44.59

179.33 ± 91.84

187.79 ± 94.14

>30

18.27 ± 23.44

11.18 ± 19.28

72.50 ± 57.76

54.71 ± 61.95

89.36 ± 88.39

85.44 ± 99.59

Last three years before the interview

9.98 ± 19.03

5.12 ± 16.15

28.30 ± 34.45

23.75 ± 45.43

35.19 ± 50.94

35.43 ± 42.02

% change

76.61

88.32

77.56

80.12

85.71

87.67

*Pattern low showed a consistently low physical activity; Pattern moderate presented a moderated physical activity throughout life, and Pattern high showed a higher and consistently physical activity practice

Physical activity at >30 years old vs. at 15-18 years old or physical activity at last three years vs. at 15-18 years old. All changes were significant p<0.01

METs: Metabolic Equivalent of Task

PA: physical activity

Table III shows the adjusted association between PA approaches and PC. Compared to non-active males, those physically active (Low - High patterns) have a decrease in PC odds (ORPattern low-high vs. inactive = 0.60; 95%CI = 0.41-0.89). However, the main decrease was observed among males who performed higher and consistent PA levels throughout life (OR = 0.50; 95%CI = 0.26-0.93). Using the lifetime accumulated approach of three or four life stages, PA was inversely associated with PC in the first and second tertile, but not in the highest accumulated PA tertile (table III). We did not observe a monotonic trend of accumulated PA and PC.

Table III Case-control distribution and association between the leisure-time physical activity approaches (life-course patterns and lifetime accumulated) with prostate cancer. Mexico City, 2011-2014 

Physical activity

Cases

Controls

All

(n=394)

(%)

(n=794)

(%)

OR* (95%CI)

Life-course patterns

None

58 (14.7)

74 (9.3)

1.00

Low

215 (54.6)

524 (66.0)

0.54 (0.36-0.81)

Moderate

96 (24.4)

139 (17.5)

0.90 (0.57-1.42)

High

25 (6.4)

57 (7.2)

0.50 (0.26-0.93)

Lifetime accumulated§

None

58 (14.7)

74 (9.3)

1.00

≤ 71.89

79 (20.1)

242 (30.5)

0.44 (0.28-0.68)

71.90-150.97

103 (26.1)

239 (30.1)

0.58 (0.37-0.89)

≥ 150.98

154 (39.1)

239 (30.1)

0.84 (0.55-1.29)

p for trend 0.21

Life-course patterns,#

None

56 (14.2)

72 (9.1)

1.00

Low

214 (54.3)

523 (65.9)

0.54 (0.36-0.81)

Moderate

97 (24.6)

142 (17.9)

0.89 (0.56-1.41)

High

27 (6.9)

57 (7.2)

0.55 (0.29-1.01)

Lifetime accumulated#

None

56 (14.2)

72 (9.1)

1.00

≤ 76.49

79 (20.1)

242 (30.5)

0.44 (0.28-0.69)

76.50-162.95

106 (26.9)

240 (30.2)

0.59 (0.38-0.91)

≥ 162.96

153 (38.8)

240 (30.2)

0.82 (0.54-1.27)

p for trend 0.26

*Adjusted by age, education level, PC family history in first degree relatives, history of chronic diseases, life-course smoking patterns among ever smokers, life-course weight patterns, and energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index

Pattern low showed a consistently low physical activity; Pattern moderate presented a moderated physical activity throughout life, and Pattern high showed a higher and consistently physical activity practice

§METs/hour/week/year considering three life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, and >30 years old

#METs/hour/week/year considering four life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, >30 years old, and the last three years before the interview

METs: Metabolic Equivalent of Task

Comparison between PA approaches among controls (table IV) highlights the fact that the highest category of lifetime accumulated PA, considering three or four life stages, is a mixture of the three PA patterns, where the highest proportion corresponds to moderate PA pattern. Meanwhile, the low PA pattern has a different proportion of subjects classified across the three categories of lifetime accumulated leisure-time PA.

Table IV Comparison between lifetime accumulated and leisure-time life-course physical activity among controls. Mexico City, 2011-2014 

Life course PA pattern

Leisure-time physical activity

Low*

Moderate*

High*

n (%)

Median

n (%)

Median

n (%)

Median

(Min-Max)

(Min-Max)

(Min-Max)

Lifetime accumulated

≤ 71.89

242(100.0)

41.66

(3.16-71.89)

0 (0.0)

---

0 (0.0)

---

71.90-150.97

239(100.0)

108.71

(72.13-150.97)

0 (0.0)

---

0 (0.0)

---

≥ 150.98

43(18.0)

168.96

(151.93-221.39)

139 (58.2)

265.49

(164.00-520.62)

57(23.8)

560.65

(344.96-1137.38)§

Lifetime accumulated#

≤ 76.49

242(100.0)

43.03

(3.16-76.09)

0 (0.0)

---

0 (0.0)

---

76.50-162.95

240(100.0)

113.80

(77.40-162.95)

0 (0.0)

---

0 (0.0)

---

≥ 162.96

41(17.1)

188.02

(165.35-246.11)

142(59.2)

287.66

(164.00-790.36)

57(23.7)

596.09

(355.27-1145.11)§

*Pattern low showed a consistently low physical activity; Pattern moderate presented a moderated physical activity throughout life, and Pattern high showed a higher and consistently physical activity practice

METs/hour/week/year considering three life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, and >30 years old

§Wilcoxon rank-sum test p<0.01

#METs/hour/week/year considering four life stages 15-18 years old, 19-29 years old, >30 years old, and the last three years before the interview

METs: Metabolic Equivalent of Task

PA: physical activity

Discussion

We aimed to evaluate the association between leisure-time PA and PC among males living in Mexico City. Using a life-course PA approach, we identified three different PA patterns and those males who performed higher and had consistent PA levels throughout their life had lower PC odds. Meanwhile, the lifetime accumulated PA approach did not show a clear inverse dose-response relationship because the highest category was a mixture of the three different life-course PA patterns.

Comparing our results to other studies is difficult because, to our knowledge, this is the first study that used a life-course approach to evaluate the association between PA and PC. However, our findings are partially congruent with those from other studies. In a prospective study in which three groups of PA patterns were identified (maintainers, increasers, and decreasers), a significant decrease in cancer-related mortality was observed among males classified as PA maintainers.31 A prospective cohort study that evaluated PA using lifetime accumulated PA at different ages (current, 30, and 50 years), found a significant PC risk reduction associated only with the fourth quartile of accumulated PA.15 Meanwhile, results from two population-based case-control studies carried out in Canada17 and Australia18 that evaluated different life stages and kinds of PA, suggest that the major protective association between PA and PC occurs in early life stages and mainly in individuals who carried out vigorous PA; moderate-intensity PA was not associated with PC odds reduction.

Our life-course PA patterns suggest the importance of regular PA practice throughout life and the reported anti-carcinogenic mechanisms seem to support this finding. For example, a single bout of PA has shown to increase insulin sensitivity for about 60 hours.5 Consistent PA practice decreases serum insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I),5 and as a result, the liver production of Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG) increases, reducing testosterone and estradiol serum levels.32 Low serum IGF-I stimulates p53 activity, which could regulate cell growth and facilitate apoptosis.32 Another anti-proliferative effect appears to be mediated by activin, inhibin, and myostatin, which are produced by skeletal muscles during PA. Activin could arrest PC cell growth by blocking the cell cycle (cells in G0/G1or G2/M), which could be further enhanced by inhibin. Myostatin facilitates tumor cell apoptosis through a metabolic change from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis.33 Additionally, other PA anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic mechanisms could explain this association.33,34

For an adequate interpretation of these results, some methodological aspects need to be considered. We do not reject the possibility that our results could be underestimated; self-report tends to underestimate PA practice and we did not consider occupational, household, or transportation activities. Nevertheless, when only moderate or high-intensity activities are considered, leisure-time PA is the main contributor to total PA35 and there is evidence that on average, Mexican men devote less time to household activities than women (10.76 ± 10.61 vs. 38.91 ± 20.04).36 PA practice is highly variable, and subjects could have had problems recalling it; however, we consider it unlikely that our results could be a consequence of recall bias since both participants and interviewers were not aware of the specific study hypotheses. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding eighteen cases that considered the lack of PA as a potential PC risk and the association remained in the same direction and magnitude.

Compared to the lifetime accumulated leisure-time PA, life-course PA patterns seem to discriminate the regularity and variability of PA throughout life (table IV). Although to our knowledge this is the first study that estimated life-course PA patterns in the Mexican population, the number of PA patterns and their characteristics were similar to those reported in longitudinal studies at different life stages.6 Finally, the third life stage has a wide age range and this could affect our results if the recent PA were the most relevant one for prostate carcinogenesis, or if PA practice significantly increases during this life stage. Nevertheless, there is evidence that stable PA trajectories are the most prevalent during the middle and oldest life stages6 and we obtained similar PA patterns when we considered three or four life stages.

Participation rates between cases and controls were similar (85.9 vs. 87.5%), and we did not find differences in sociodemographic characteristics between males who agreed or did not agree to participate in the study.20 The lack of information about PA trajectories in the Mexican population limited our ability to assess if the prevalence of life-course PA patterns among controls is representative of the population prevalence. Nevertheless, some cross-sectional studies suggest that PA decreases with increasing age37,38 and our accumulated prevalence of physical inactivity was like that reported for Mexican males who were ≥ 15 years old (31.0 vs. 37.1 %).37 Regarding the sample size, this limited our ability to identify a significant association between PA patterns and PC differentiation, as well as to detect the possible existence of an additional PA pattern. The moderate pattern could be a mixture of at least two different PA patterns; this limitation, could be a possible explanation for the lack of association observed between this pattern and PC. Although our final models were adjusted by the main known PC risk factors, we do not rule out the possibility of residual confounding. We did not have information about alcohol consumption, and it has been positively associated with both increasing and decreasing PA trajectories18 as well as with PC risk.39

Conclusion

Our results do not suggest the existence of a sensitive period; nevertheless, PA protection against PC seems to be the result of an accumulative effect throughout life. PA World Health Organization recommendations [150 minutes of moderate PA (brisk walking) or 75 minutes of vigorous PA (soccer) per week] are enough to achieve the average levels observed in the high PA pattern at different ages. However, our results highlight the importance of promoting this habit throughout life, starting from adolescence or childhood. From a research standpoint, the leisure-time life-course PA approach seems to reduce misclassification errors and our results should be validated using prospective studies with a larger sample size.

Funding

This study was supported by Fondo Sectorial en Salud del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (Conacyt) under funding number 140482 and 272810.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff of each of the participating hospitals: Hospital General de México, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (belonging to SS), Hospital de Oncología del Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI, Hospital General Regional No. 1 Dr. Carlos McGregor Sánchez Navarro (belonging to IMSS), and Hospital Regional Adolfo López Mateos (belonging to ISSSTE), who facilitated our work.

References

Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2013 [cited June 26, 2020]. Available from:Available from:https://gco.iarc.fr/Links ]

Grönberg H. Prostate cancer epidemiology. Lancet. 2003;361(9360):859-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12713-4 [ Links ]

World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. Arlington, VA: American Institute for Cancer Research, 2018 [cited November 15, 2020]. Available from:Available from:https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/resources-and-toolkits/Links ]

Liu Y, Hu F, Li D, Wang F, Zhu L, Chen W, et al. Does physical activity reduce the risk of prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):1029-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.07.007 [ Links ]

Brown JC, Winters-Stone K, Lee A, Schmitz KH. Cancer, physical activity, and exercise. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(4):2775-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c120005 [ Links ]

Lounassalo I, Salin K, Kankaanpää A, Hirvensalo M, Palomäki S, Tolvanen A, et al. Distinct trajectories of physical activity and related factors during the life course in the general population: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):271. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6513-y [ Links ]

Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet . 2012;380(9838):258-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1 [ Links ]

Moore SC, Peters TM, Ahn J, Park Y, Schatzkin A, Albanes D, et al. Physical activity in relation to total, advanced, and fatal prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(9):2458-66. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0403 [ Links ]

Johnsen NF, Tjønneland A, Thomsen BL, Christensen J, Loft S, Friedenreich C, et al. Physical activity and risk of prostate cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(4):902-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24326 [ Links ]

Patel AV, Rodriguez C, Jacobs EJ, Solomon L, Thun MJ, Calle EE. Recreational physical activity and risk of prostate cancer in a large cohort of U.S. men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 2005;14(1):275-9. [ Links ]

Hrafnkelsdóttir SM, Torfadóttir JE, Aspelund T, Magnusson KT, Tryggvadóttir L, Gudnason V, et al. Physical activity from early adulthood and risk of prostate cancer: A 24-year follow-up study among Icelandic men. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8(10):905-11. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0035 [ Links ]

Singh AA, Jones LW, Antonelli JA, Gerber L, Calloway EE, Shuler KH, et al. Association between exercise and primary incidence of prostate cancer: Does race matter? Cancer. 2013;119(7):1338-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27791 [ Links ]

Zeegers MP, Dirx MJ, Van den Brandt PA. Physical activity and the risk of prostate cancer in the Netherlands cohort study, results after 9.3 years of follow-up. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 2005;14(6):1490-5. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0771 [ Links ]

Nilsen TI, Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ. Recreational physical activity and risk of prostate cancer: A prospective population-based study in Norway (the HUNT study). Int J Cancer . 2006;119(12):2943-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.22184 [ Links ]

Orsini N, Bellocco R, Bottai M, Pagano M, Andersson SO, Johansson JE, et al. A prospective study of lifetime physical activity and prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Br JCancer . 2009;101(11):1932-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605404 [ Links ]

Littman AJ, Kristal AR, White E. Recreational physical activity and prostate cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2006;17(6):831-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0024-8 [ Links ]

Friedenreich CM, McGregor SE, Courneya KS, Angyalfi SJ, Elliott FG. Case-control study of lifetime total physical activity and prostate cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(8):740-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh106 [ Links ]

Sorial E, Si S, Fritschi L, Darcey E, Leavy JE, Girschik J, et al. Lifetime recreational physical activity and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2019;30(6):617-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-019-01138-6 [ Links ]

Parent MÉ, Rousseau MC, El-Zein M, Latreille B, Désy M, Siemiatycki J. Occupational and recreational physical activity during adult life and the risk of cancer among men. Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;35(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2010.09.004 [ Links ]

Vázquez-Salas RA, Torres-Sánchez L, López-Carrillo L, Romero-Martínez M, Manzanilla-García HA, Cruz-Ortíz CH, et al. History of gonorrhea and prostate cancer in a population-based case-control study in Mexico. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;40:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.12.001 [ Links ]

National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2016) Prostate Cancer (Version 3.2016) [cited July 26, 2016]. Available from:Available from:https://www2.tri-kobe.org/nccn/guideline/archive/urological2016-2017/english/prostate.pdfLinks ]

Martínez-González MA, López-Fontana C, Varo JJ, Sánchez-Villegas A, Martinez JA. Validation of the Spanish version of the physical activity questionnaire used in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals’ Follow-up Study. Public Health Nutr. 2005;8(7):920-7. https://doi.org/10.1079/phn2005745 [ Links ]

Méndez-Hernández P, Flores Y, Siani C, Lamure M, Dosamantes-Carrasco LD, Halley-Castillo E, et al. Physical activity and risk of metabolic syndrome in an urban Mexican cohort. BMC Public Health . 2009;9:276-86. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-276 [ Links ]

Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Herrmann SD, Meckes N, Bassett DR Jr, Tudor-Locke C, et al. 2011 Compendium of Physical Activities: a second update of codes and MET values. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1575-81. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31821ece12 [ Links ]

Genolini C, Falissard B. KmL: a package to cluster longitudinal data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2011;104(3):e112-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.05.008 [ Links ]

Genolini C, Alacoque X, Sentenac M, Arnaud C. kml and kml3d: R packages to cluster longitudinal data. J Stat Softw. 2015;65(4):1-34. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v065.i04 [ Links ]

Hernández-Ramírez RU, Galván-Portillo MV, Ward MH, Agudo A, González CA, Oñate-Ocaña LF, et al. Dietary intake of polyphenols, nitrate and nitrite and gastric cancer risk in Mexico City. Int J Cancer . 2009;125(6):1424-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24454 [ Links ]

Vázquez-Salas RA, Shivappa N, Galván-Portillo M, López-Carrillo L, Hébert JR, Torres-Sánchez L. Dietary inflammatory index and prostate cancer risk in a case-control study in Mexico. Br J Nutr. 2016;116(11):1945-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114516003986 [ Links ]

Stunkard AJ, Sørensen T, Schulsinger F. Use of the Danish Adoption Register for the study of obesity and thinness. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis. 1983;60:115-20. [ Links ]

Jiménez-Mendoza E, Vázquez-Salas RA, Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Labra-Salgado IR, Manzanilla-García HA, et al. Smoking and prostate cancer: a life course analysis. BMC Cancer . 2018;18(1):160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4065-7 [ Links ]

Saint-Maurice PF, Coughlan D, Kelly SP, Keadle SK, Cook MB, Carlson SA, et al. Association of leisure-time physical activity across the adult life course with all-cause and cause-specific mortality. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190355. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0355 [ Links ]

Barnard RJ, Aronson WJ. Preclinical models relevant to diet, exercise, and cancer risk. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2005;166:47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26980-0_4 [ Links ]

Wekesa A, Harrison M, Watson RW. Physical activity and its mechanistic effects on prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015;18(3):197-207. https://doi.org/10.1038/pcan.2015.9 [ Links ]

Kawakami R, Kashino I, Kasai H, Kawai K, Li YS, Nanri A, et al. Leisure-time physical activity and DNA damage among Japanese workers. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212499. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212499 [ Links ]

Khaing-Nang EE, Khoo EY, Salim A, Tai ES, Lee J, Van Dam RM. Patterns of physical activity in different domains and implications for intervention in a multi-ethnic Asian population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health . 2010;10:644. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-644 [ Links ]

Campaña JC, Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA. Gender differences in the distribution of total work-time of Latin-American families: the importance of social norms. IZA Discussion Papers. 2015;(8933) [cited November 15, 2020]. Available from:Available from:https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/8933/gender-differences-in-the-distribution-of-total-work-time-of-latin-american-families-the-importance-of-social-normsLinks ]

Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet . 2012;380(9838):247-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1 [ Links ]

Gallegos-Carrillo K, Honorato-Cabañas Y, Macías N, García-Peña C, Flores YN, Salmerón J. Preventive health services and physical activity improve health-related quality of life in Mexican older adults. Salud Publica Mex. 2019;61(2):106-15. https://doi.org/10.21149/9400 [ Links ]

Zhao J, Stockwell T, Roemer A, Chikritzhs T. Is alcohol consumption a risk factor for prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer . 2016;16(1):845. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2891-z [ Links ]

*StataCorp. Stata Stadistical Software 15.0. Collage Station, TX: Stata-Corp LLC, 2017.

RStudio. RStudio 3.6.0. Boston, MA: RStudio, 2019.

Received: February 12, 2021; Accepted: August 27, 2021; Published: April 08, 2022

Corresponding author: Luisa Torres-Sánchez. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Av. Universidad 655, col. Santa María Ahuacatitlán. 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. email: ltorress@insp.mx

Declaration of conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License