SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 número3Supervivencia del virus de la fiebre porcina clásica en jamones elaborados a partir de la carne procedente de cerdos vacunados con la cepa PAV-250 y de cerdos no vacunadosEfectos de la inyección de dosis aumentadas de vitaminas C y E en los parámetros reproductivos del ganado lechero Holstein índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay artículos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

versión On-line ISSN 2448-6698versión impresa ISSN 2007-1124

Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias vol.10 no.3 Mérida jul./sep. 2019

https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i3.4714 

Articles

Dietary supplementation of inulin or flavomycin and type of cut of rabbit meat: changes on fatty acid profile and sensorial characteristics

María Eugenia Juárez-Silvaa  * 

Mario Cuchillo-Hilarioa 

Enrique Villarreal-Delgadoa 

a Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ). Departmento de Nutrición Animal Fernando Pérez-Gil Romo, Ciudad de México, México.


Abstract

The demand for meat from animals raised with the minimum use of antibiotics is growing. Also, the use of prebiotics, antibiotics, type of cut of meat to modify the fatty acid profile and the effects on consumer preferences are still not clear. The present study investigated the fatty acid profile, the health, and risk fatty acid indices and the consumer sensory evaluation of rabbit’s meat fed inulin and flavomycin as additives. Forty-eight (48) New Zealand rabbits were randomly arranged into 4 treatments of 12 animals each. The control group did not receive antibiotic or inulin supplementation. The second group was supplemented with inulin (2.5 g of inulin/kg of feed) while the third group received flavomycin as supplement (0.1 g of flavomycin/kg of feed). The fourth group received both inulin and flavomycin. Inulin addition in rabbit’s diet increases beneficial fatty acids (CLA, P=0.0001; and n3-PUFA, P=0.0001) and enables a better health-promoting index (P=0.0004) while reducing the atherogenic (P=0.001) and thrombogenic indices (P=0.042) of meat. The type of cut of meat (loin, fore legs and hind legs) had a minor impact on changing the fatty acid profile. In contrast, inulin or flavomycin addition showed larger modifications than type of cut of meat on this respect. Flavomycin reduced hedonic properties of meat (taste, P=0.0001; color, P=0.01; and aroma, P=0.0001). Loin tended to be the most preferred cut of meat (P=0.01). Inulin is a good alternative to avoid the utilization of antibiotics in rabbit’s feeding.

Key words Fatty acids; Growth promoter; Prebiotic; CLA; Aroma; Meat rabbit

Resumen

La demanda de animales criados con un uso mínimo de antibióticos está aumentando. Por otra parte, aún no se tiene claridad sobre el uso de prebióticos y antibióticos y el tipo de corte de carne para modificar el perfil de ácidos grasos y sus efectos en las preferencias de los consumidores. El presente estudio investigó el perfil de ácidos grasos, la salud y los índices de riesgo de ácidos grasos, así como la evaluación sensorial por los consumidores de carne de conejos alimentados con inulina y flavomicina como aditivos. Se distribuyeron al azar cuarenta y ocho (48) conejos de Nueva Zelanda en 4 tratamientos de 12 animales cada uno. El grupo testigo no recibió suplementación con antibióticos ni inulina. Al segundo grupo se le suministró como suplemento inulina (2.5 g de inulina/kg de alimento), y al tercer grupo se le suministró flavomicina (0.1 g de flavomicina/kg de alimento). El cuarto grupo recibió tanto inulina como flavomicina. La adición de inulina a la dieta de los conejos incrementa los ácidos grasos benéficos (ALC, P= 0.0001; y n3-PUFA, P= 0.0001) y permite un mejor índice de promoción de la salud (P= 0.0004) a la vez que reduce los índices aterogénico (P= 0.001) y trombogénico (P= 0.042) de la carne. El tipo de corte de carne (lomo, patas delanteras y patas traseras) tuvo un impacto menor en cuanto a modificación del perfil de ácidos grasos. Por el contrario, la adición de inulina o flavomicina mostró modificaciones mayores a este respecto que el tipo de corte de carne. La flavomicina redujo las propiedades hedónicas de la carne (sabor, P= 0.0001; color, P= 0.01, y aroma P= 0.0001). El lomo tendió a ser el corte de carne preferido (P= 0.01). La inulina es una buena alternativa para evitar la utilización de antibióticos en el alimento de los conejos.

Palabras clave Ácidos grasos; Promotor del crecimiento; Prebiótico; ALC; Aroma; Carne de conejo

Introduction

In recent years, increasing interest in the lipid composition of meat and in the impact of fatty acids on human health has occurred. Rabbit’s meat is highly valued for its nutritional properties due to the high content of protein with excellent biological value1 , 2, low fat content with low amounts of cholesterol2. There is considerable interest in increasing the levels of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), especially n-3 fatty acids in animal products to enhance the functional properties of foods while promoting human health3 , 4.

Diet is a crucial way to modify the fatty acid profile of rabbit’s meat5. The addition of functional substances to animal’s diet can generate favorable response in the meat quality increasing the content of polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acids6. Fatty acids n-3 consumption may help to balance the n-6/n-3 ratio, which might impact on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, arthritis, osteoporosis, among other diseases2,4. Moreover, the close relationship between diet and health has modified consumer’s habits, with an increasing demand for products that not only meet nutritional needs but also healthy food choices 7. Food research linked to human health has included cholesterol and fatty acid profile to represent foods as promoters or threats to health8-11. Rabbit’s meat is a good source of n-6 fatty acids and is a limited source of n-3 fatty acids as well as eicosapentaenoic fatty acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic fatty acid (DHA)12. Due to this low n-3 fatty acids content, the n-6/n-3 ratio in rabbit meat is high with values ranging from 7 to 1112 , 13. Therefore, lowering the n-6/n-3 ratio in rabbit’s meat is highly desirable.

Flavomycin is an antibiotic frequently used in pig, poultry, and cattle farming14,15. However, the use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production has been associated with bacterial resistance in humans. The European Union banned the use of antibiotics as additives in 2006. These circumstances have stimulated the study of alternative products, such as inulin, a prebiotic fiber composed of a chain of fructose units with a terminal of glucose16. Many studies have shown that fructooligosaccharides supplementation have advantageous effects in humans and animals. Supplementation promotes the maturation of the gastrointestinal tract of suckling rabbits, i.e. gastric pH gradually reach lower values if young rabbits are supplemented with prebiotics. Lower pH (around 2.0) promotes enzyme activity (amylase and proteases) in comparison to higher gastric pH values (around 4.0). Further, complementary effects of supplementation comprise better immune response and enhancement of the growth (number) and permanency of beneficial microbiota including Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus 17 in the gut while reducing the risk of pathogenic infections18 . Inulin added to rabbit and poultry diets reduces the total deposition of fat in the body, lowers abdominal fat and modifies the cholesterol, lowers triglyceride values and lowers lipoprotein concentrations19 . Therefore, the meat of rabbits fed inulin may be a good alternative for human consumption, because inulin adjusts microbiota metabolism, induces the synthesis of favorable compounds, and effectively increases desirable nutrients to maintain human wellbeing status. In contrast, the utilization of flavomycin in emerging economies as in Mexico is not prohibited despite consumers from such regions of the globe are increasing their preference for products free of antibiotics.

Sensory evaluation and preference of consumers can be modified by the addition of ingredients in the animal diets that change the hedonic properties of animal products. Also, different cuts of meat may drive the consumer preferences, owing to variations on physical and specific sensory properties of animal muscles. Therefore, consumer preferences can shift the markets according to specific demands. Therefore, it was tested inulin and flavomycin and their combination to investigate the potential benefits on nutritional aspects and the consumer preferences of non-antibiotic versus antibiotic agents’ utilization. Though flavomycin has an impact on disease prophylaxis, the present study did not focus on those effects. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the dietary supplementation of inulin or flavomycin as well as the type of cut of meat (loin, fore legs and hind legs) on the profile of long fatty acids and on the sensorial characteristics and consumer preference of rabbit’s meat.

Material and methods

Experimental setup

Forty-eight (48) New Zealand rabbits (female= 24/male= 24) 40 d old (790 ± 150 g) were randomly arranged into four treatments of 12 animals each. Rabbits were obtained from the experimental farm “Granja Veracruz” at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). The study lasted 57 d, the first 15 d of the trial were used for adaptation to the animal management, the housing and the experimental diets. The ingredients and composition of the diets for each treatment are displayed in Table 1. The diets covered the necessary nutritional needs indicated for the species. Each treatment was prepared by mixing the individual ingredients. The control group (CG) did not receive antibiotic (Flaveco40 ECO-Animal Health) or inulin (IPS Raftifeed, Megafarma-Orafti) supplementation. The second group (I+) was supplemented with 2.5 g of inulin/kg of feed. The third group (F+) received 0.1 g of flavomycin/kg of feed. The fourth group (IF) received both inulin and flavomycin doses as previously discussed (2.5 g of inulin/kg and 0.1 g of flavomycin/kg of feed). Rabbits were housed individually in stainless steel cages. Food and water were provided ad libitum throughout the research period. Protocols for animal housing, management and sampling were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee (Comité de Investigación en Animales-CINVA) at the INCMNSZ under the registration number NAN-059-09-10-1. Rabbits were slaughtered following the guidelines of the Official Mexican Standard of methods for slaughter domestic and wild animals (NOM-033-SAG/ZOO-2014).

Table 1 Ingredients and chemical composition of the diet (g/kg) 

Ingredients Control Inuline (I) Flavomycin (F) IF
Corn 116 116 116 116
Wheat bran 251 251 251 251
Soybean meal 129 129 129 129
Soybean oil 31 31 31 31
Alfalfa 438 438 438 438
Calcium phosphate 10 10 10 10
Vitamin and mineral Premixa a a a a
Antioxidant BHTb 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Potassium sorbate fungicide 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Inulin 0 2.5 0 2.5
Flaveco 40®c 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Coccidiostatd 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Binderd 20 20 20 20
Sodium chloride 5 5 5 5
Chemical composition
Crude protein, g/kg 169 169 168 171
NDF, g/kg 525 530 517 514
ADF, g/kg 225 202 193 250
Ether extract, g/kg 39 30 29 42
Gross energy, MJ/kg 10.8 13.5 11.7 12.8

aMixture of vitamins and minerals content in grams per kilogram: vit A 32 000 UI, vit D3 4000 UI, vit E 100 g, vit K3 4g, vit B1 8.0 g, vit B2 8.0 g, vit B6 8.0 g, vit B12 40 g, Biotin 200 mg, Panthotenic acid 40 g, Iron 4 g, Copper 6 g, Cobalt 1 g, Zinc 60 g, Manganese 43 g, Iodine 32 mg and Selenium 8 mg. (BASF, Mexico).

bBHT, hidroxitolueno butilado;

cFlaveco 40 contains 40 g of flavophospholipol per kg.

dCoccidiostat robenidine hydrochloride at 33 ppm (Alpharma AS).

eCarboxymetil cellulose.

Collection and preparation of samples

The rabbits were slaughtered by cervical dislocation, following the recommendation of the NOM-062-ZOO-1999 (Mexican Official Norm - NOM, 2001). The hot carcasses were placed in a ventilated area for 1 h before being cut to get the three meat cuts (loin, fore legs and hind legs) per single rabbit on each of the four treatments according to the guidelines of 20. Cuts of meat were individually packed into hermetically sealed plastic bags and stored at -18 °C until evaluation. For fatty acid evaluation, the experimental unit was the cut of meat (loin, fore legs and hind legs) of six animals within the treatments. The rest of cuts of meat from the animals of each treatment (six rabbits) were used for sensorial evaluation. The experimental unit was the pool of the same cuts of meat of two animals to obtain enough material for 10 panelists.

Chemical analysis of diets

Crude protein was measured by Kjeldahl nitrogen analysis AOAC cod 976.0521 . The neutral detergent fiber (NFD) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents were determined according to the Ankom method, following the protocol of the manufacturer, using model F-57 filter bags (Ankom Technology, NY, USA). The ether extract was extracted by anhydrous diethyl ether using a Soxhlet apparatus AOAC 920.15 and 963.3921. Energy was calculated for each diet in a Parr calorimeter model 1241 (Parr Instrument Company, IL, USA), following the protocol of the manufacturer22.

Fatty acid extraction and determination of methyl-esters fatty acids (FAME) and conjugated linoleic acid (CLA)

Fatty acids were extracted from the meat using a 2:1 chloroform-methanol mixture23 and a gravimetric calculation according to the official method 696.33, AOAC21. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were quantified by gas chromatography-GC (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) using a CP-3380 chromatograph equipped with a split injector, FID, and an autosampler CP 8400, in a DB 23 column (30 m×0.25 mm inner diameter; Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a film thickness of 0.25 μm. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 30 ml/min. The column temperature was held for 1 min at 120 °C, then increased at a rate of 10 °C/min to 200 °C, and finally at 5 °C/min to 230 °C. The injector and FID temperatures were 250 °C and 300 °C, respectively. The volume of injection was 1 μL. Integration of each fatty acid was performed with a Varian Star Chromatography Workstation Software version 4.51. Identification of the peaks was made on the basis of retention times of standard methyl esters of each individual fatty acid (FAME mix C4-C24 no. 18919-1 AMP; Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA). Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in particular was identified using a CLA methyl ester standard with a mixture of cis- and trans-9,11-, and -10,12- octadecadienoic acids (Cat. no. O5632. Sigma-AldrichCo., USA). Myristoleic acid (C: 14 9-tetradecenoic acid; Cat. no. M3525 Sigma-Aldrich Co., USA) was added to the methylated meat fat samples prior to GC analysis and using an internal standard. We only evaluated the long chain fatty acids because of their high relevance on human health while volatile fatty acids were not considered in the present study. Results were reported as the percentage of long chain fatty acids (g/100 g).

Health and risk indices (AI, TI and HPI)

Atherogenic (AI) and thrombogenic (TI) indices, were calculated according to Ulbricht and Southgate9 using the following formulas: AI = C12:0 + (4 x C14:0) + C16:0 / n-6 PUFA + n-3 PUFA + MUFA. TI = C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0 / (0.5 MUFA) + (0.5 n-6 PUFA) + (3 n-3 PUFA) + (n-3 PUFA/ n-6 PUFA). Health promoting index (HPI) was calculated according to the recommendation of Chen et al 10: HPI= n-6 PUFA + n-3 PUFA + MUFA / C12:0 + (4x C14:0) + C16:0.

Consumer sensory panel evaluation

Twelve hours before the sensorial evaluation’s day, cuts of meat were defrosted at a refrigeration temperature (4 °C). Further, cuts of meat were chopped (dices, 2 x 1 x 1 cm) and later were pooled within each treatment. The cuts of meat of the four treatments were cooked using water (1:1 w/v) at an intern temperature of 71 °C using conventional pots with lids (diameter 25 cm and volume of 4 L) for 60 min. The four pots were heated simultaneously (100 °C) on a gas stove (IEM). No additive was added during the cooking process. The cooked samples (2 cm3/12 g and pH 5) were offered on disposables plastic white plates. The evaluation was performed at the sensorial evaluation laboratory of the INCMNSZ. A mild-white light was used at the individual evaluation rooms24. A total of 30 untrained panelist (male and women 15:15) generated 1,080 results (30 panelist x 4 treatments x 3 types of cut of meat x 3 meat sensory characteristics). Double-blind evaluation was carried out. To score the preference of taste, color and aroma, a scale from 1 to 4 was used (4= like it very much; 3= like it; 2= do not like; 1= dislike). Plain water and a slice of white bread was offered to clean and eliminate residuals between samples.

Statistical analysis

The data was processed by ANOVA using the Proc GLM25. The model utilized was:

Yij = μ + AAi + PMj + AAi x PMj + eij;

Where:

Y is the target variable;

μ is the mean;

AAi = Additive agent i [Inulin (I+), Flavomycin (F+) and Inulin plus flavomycin (IF)]; PMj = Piece of meat j (loin, fore legs and hind legs);

e = experimental error.

Differences were stablished with Tukey test (α= 0.05).

Results

Table 1 shows the chemical composition of the different diets. No differences were observed between diets in any of the analized variables. Total protein content of the four diets was on average 169 ± 1 g/kg, whereas NDF and ADF were 522 ± 7 and 218 ± 26 g/kg, respectively. The content of ether extract did not differed significantly among treatments. Also, inulin did not modify the gross energy of the diets in which this ingredient was added (I+ and IF).

Fatty acid concentration of rabbit’s meat was influenced by the addition of inulin or flavomycin as well as the type of cut of meat (Table 2). However, feeding treatment showed to have more impact on fatty acid concentration than type of cut of meat on this respect and there were few interactions of these two main factors. For example, no significant effect was observed for myristic acid (C14:0) because of the type of cut of meat; however, I+ and IF treatments were lower in the values of this fatty acid, due to the diet effect (P=0.0001). Palmitic (C16:0) acid was numerically higher in CG, moreover was only different from the fore legs when rabbits were fed F+ and IF (P=0.004). Differences in heptadecanoic acid (C17:1) in all feeding treatments and cut of meat were not detected, except for loin (F+) and fore legs (IF) with an effect type of cut of meat (P=0.04). Stearic acid (C18:0) increased when rabbits were fed with F+ and the same results were observed when flavomycin was combined with inulin. Flavomicine (F+) influenced the increase in stearic acid (C18:0) content in the three types of cut of meat (loin, fore legs and hind legs), however, the hind legs in F+ and IF showed the maximum value while the lowest was for CG. Oleic acid (C18:1) concentration was highly influenced by feeding treatment, type of cut of meat, and their interaction (P=0.02; P=0.01, P=0.001). The concentration of α-linolenic acid (C18:3) was highest when rabbits were fed I+, in contrast, IF reported the lowest value of this fatty acid. Eicosanoic acid (C20:0) in fore legs from rabbits fed F+ was higher than the rest of types of cut of meat in all treatments (P=0.007). Arachidonic acid (C20:4 n-6) was eleven times (3.4 %) higher in hind legs from IF group than fore legs from CG (0.3 %). This outcome was affected by the two main factors and their interactions (P=0.001; P=0.0001; P=0.0003).

Table 2 Percentage of long chain fatty acids (g/100 g) of cooked rabbit’s meat influenced by the adittion of inulin and flavomycin and type of cut of meat (n=6) 

Control Inulin (I) Flavomycin (F) IF P value
Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs SEM Diet Cut of meat Diet x Cut of meat
C 12:0 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.11 0.17 0.09 0.12 0.1 0.23 0.16 0.13 0.08 0.01 0.47 0.74 0.11
C14:0 1.53a 1.6a 1.7a 1.34ab 1.2ab 0.8b 1.4a 1.6a 1.5a 1.4a 1.3ab 1.2ab 0.04 <0.0001 0.27 0.08
C 16:0 21.35a 20.5a 21.7a 20.23ab 20.2abc 20.2abc 19.2abc 17.2bc 19.2abc 19.5abc 17.08c 19.5abc 0.2 <0.0001 0.004 0.49
C 16.1 n-9 1.98 1.5 1.7 1.42 1.9 2.03 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.3 1.4 0.07 0.001 0.43 0.14
C 17:1 0.54ab 0.5ab 0.6ab 0.62ab 0.5ab 0.6ab 0.5b 0.7ab 0.6ab 0.6ab 0.8a 0.6ab 0.02 0.10 0.04 0.27
C 18:0 6.72cd 6.8bcd 6.5d 6.9bcd 7.07abcd 7.6abcd 8.12ab 8.1ab 8.3a 7.5abcd 7.9abc 8.3a 0.11 <0.0001 0.16 0.50
C:18.1 n-9 33.62ab 35.2a 36.3a 37.4a 36.5a 34.3ab 34.3ab 35.9a 33.6ab 36.8a 33.5ab 30.3b 0.41 0.02 0.01 0.001
C18:2 n-6 19.65c 20.8abc 20.9abc 20.7abc 20.3bc 20.9abc 21.33abc 23.02a 22.7ab 21.2abc 20.3abc 20.5abc 0.23 0.0003 0.37 0.25
C 18:3 n-6 0.03 0.02 0.07 0.11 0.03 0.05 0.006 0.1 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.27 0.98 0.03
C18:3 n-3 3.45ab 3.6ab 4.03ab 3.8ab 4.2a 3.8ab 3.5ab 3.6ab 3.4b 3.4b 3.3b 2.5c 0.06 <0.0001 0.07 0.0003
C 20:0 0.51b 0.6b 0.6b 0.72b 0.7b 0.5b 0.5b 1.2a 0.7b 0.6b 0.7b 0.6b 0.03 0.09 0.007 0.0005
C 20:4 n-6 1.93abc 0.3d 1.3cd 0.83cd 1.1cd 2.9ab 1.4bcd 0.5cd 1.4bcd 1.2cd 1.8abcd 3.4a 0.13 0.001 <0.0001 0.0003
C 20:5 n-3 0.14ab 0.06abc 0.07abc 0.12ab 0.1abc 0.12abc ND 0.06bc ND 0.2a 0.2a 0.14ab 0.01 <0.0001 0.36 0.24
C 22:6 n-3 0.07ab 0.04ab 0.03ab 0.04ab 0.05ab 0.07ab ND 0.02ab ND 0.05ab 0.1a 0.09a 0.01 0.0001 0.46 0.20
SFA 30.18 29.7 30.6 29.34 29.2 29.2 29.3 28.1 29.9 29.07 27.04 29.7 0.33 0.12 0.06 0.77
MUFA 36.14ab 37.3a 38.5a 39.4a 39.03a 36.9ab 36.12ab 37.9a 35.7ab 38.7a 35.5ab> 32.3b 0.42 0.008 0.03 0.004
PUFA 25.36 24.9 26.4 25.5 25.7 27.8 26.2 27.2 27.5 26.01 25.8 26.7 0.34 0.18 0.04 0.90
n -3 PUFA 3.7abc 3.7abc 4.14ab 3.9abc 4.3a 3.9abc 3.5bcd 3.6abc 3.4cd 3.7abc 3.6abc 2.7d 0.06 <0.0001 0.055 0.0005
n-6/n-3 5.9bcd 5.8cd 5.4cd 5.5cd 4.9d 6.14bcd 6.6bc 6.5bc 7.2b 6.2 bcd 6.3bcd 8.9a 0.12 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
SFA/ PUFA 1.21 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.05 1.121 1.03 1.09 1.12 1.073 1.11 0.02 0.03 0.40 0.80
n-6 PUFA 21.6 21.2 22.2 21.6 21.4 23.9 22.7 23.6 24.2 22.4 22.2 23.9 0.31 0.03 0.008 0.84
CLA 5.3abc 3.9abc 4.09abc 8.3a 6.04abc 7.8ab 2.6c 1.9c 3.1c 2.9c 4.05abc 3.9bc 0.37 <0.0001 0.40 0.60

SFA= saturated fatty acids; PUFA= polyunsaturated fatty acids; MUFA= monounsatured fatty acids; CLA= conjugated linoleic acid isomers (cis-9, trans-11; trans-9, cis-11; trans-10, cis-12; mg g-1 of fat); SEM= standard error of the mean; ND= not detected.

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same row are significantly different (P<0.05).

In the analysis of SFA and PUFA the results indicated that they were not modified by inulin, flavomycin or the type of cut. MUFA content was affected by feeding and type of cut of meat and showed significant interaction (P= 0.008; P= 0.03 and P= 0.004). Moreover, the n3-PUFA and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) content increased with the inulin adittion and in CG. The ratio n6/n3 decreased in the CG and I+ with respect to F+ and IF, but only hind legs from IF was different from the rest (P= 0.0001). This is more evident when we analized the effects by cuts of meat; i.e., inulin decreased the n-6/n-3 ratio in fore legs (4.9) while IF increased this value in hind legs (8.9 %). CLA content (8.3 %) of loin from animals fed with inulin was three times higher than the average of the three cuts of meat (2.5 %) from rabbits fed with flavor. Atherogenic and health promoting indices were influenced by feeding while thrombogenic, was influenced by feeding and type of cut of meat factors (Figure 1).

AI = atherogenic index [C12:0 + (4 x C14:0) + C16:0 / n-6 PUFA + n-3 PUFA + MUFA].

TI = thrombogenic index [C14:0 + C16:0 + C18:0 / (0.5 MUFA) + (0.5 n-6 PUFA) + (3 n-3 PUFA) + (n-3 PUFA/ n-6 PUFA)]

HPI = health promoting index [n-6 PUFA + n-3 PUFA + MUFA / C12:0 + (4 x C14:0) + C16:0].

a,b,c Means with different letters are significantly different (P<0.05).

CG = Control group; I+= 2.5 g of inulin/kg; F+= 0.1 g of flavomycin/kg; IF= inulin and flavomicyn.

Figure 1 Atherogenic, thrombogenic and health promoting indices of rabbit’s meat influenced by the adittion of inulin or flavomycin and type of cut of meat (n= 30) 

Fore legs from control group was the most preferred cut of meat (taste= 3.4, color= 3.2 and aroma= 3.3) within all analyzed treatments. In contrast, hind legs from F+ and IF (taste= 2.47 and 2.47; color= 2.90 and 2.50; aroma= 2.53 and 2.57, respectively) were the least preferred cut of meat of all samples evaluated.

Discussion

Inulin addition to animal diet did not change the gross energy of the diets in which this ingredient was added (I+ and IF). In another study where inulin was used, the protein and fat digestibility increased while the gross energy of diet remained unchanged26. Though, inulin is a source of carbohydrates, the percentage of inclusion of inulin in both studies was not enough to modify the gross energy values of diets. In the present study, although ADF content slightly decreased while NDF increased in I+ treatment, no statistical differences were detected.

Feeding treatment modified the fatty acid profile as in other studies27 , 28. The fatty acid profile in monogastric animals is almost a direct reflection of their dietary fatty acids. In the present study, inulin (I+) which is a linear polymer and oligomer of fructose with a terminal of glucose, favored the increase of fatty acids such as oleic (C18:1), α-linolenic (C18:3) and DHA (C22:6) while reducing the content of myristic acid (C14:0). It has been shown that cecal fermentation of rabbits can be modified with the use of inulin, by shifting the precursor of n-6 fatty acids (linoleic acid, C18:2) to α-linolenic acid (C18:3), the n-3 precursor, stimulating the production of healthier unsaturated fatty acids27. In contrast, the antibiotic flavomycin inhibited the viability and growth of not only pathogen microbiota but also the beneficial microbiota along the gut and caecum29 . According to Bovera et al 30, endogenous production of saturated fatty acids as palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) made it impossible to lower the values with the addition of inulin. Flavomycin alone and inulin plus flavomycin supplemented together, decreased the concentration of C16:0 when these ingredients were added. In contrast, flavomycin alone and Inulin plus flavomycin supplemented together, increased the concentration of C18:0. Divergent effects on particular fatty acids are possible, because gut and cecal microorganisms are capable of hydrogenating unsaturated fatty acids into more saturated ones, or vice versa through elongation (addition of two-carbon units to the carboxyl ends) and desaturation (introduction of double bonds into the long-chain acyl CoAs) of palmitic acid as discussed by other authors29,30. This explains why in the present study, F+ and IF had lower value of palmitic acid (C16:0) than I+ and CG. In contrast to palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0) increased in F+ and IF and decreased in I+ and CG. The possible explanation is that microbial population is altered, yielding distinct microbiota composition, further, modifying the metabolites produced. Likely, palmitic acid is elongated to stearic acid more rapidly in F+ and IF than in I+ and CG as shown in Table 2.

Coprophagia of soft feces performed by rabbits mainly at diurnal cycles, can increase PUFA concentration in meat31. However, in the present study, no differences were observed in the total PUFA content. Moreover, I+ increased CLA (C18:2 cis-9, trans-11), total PUFA-n3 and MUFA as palmitoleic acid (16:1), which were able to positively affect the HPI while reducing the atherogenic and thrombogenic indices. Consequently, the n-6/n-3 ratio decreased in the CG and I+ with respect to F+ and IF. In contrast, CG showed the highest TI and AI indices and a reduced HPI, possibly due to the high content of SFA as myristic (C14:0), palmitic (C16:0) and the reduced content of PUFA. These results are in accordance to those found by Bovera et al 30 , when feeding rabbits a prebiotic mannanoligosccharide additive (at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 of g/kg of diet), which resulted in a reduction in the TI but no differences were detected in the AI. In the present study, inulin inclusion positively affected AI and TI indices in comparison to CG, but the addition of inulin did not decrease the AI and TI indices in relation to F+ and IF. Therefore, it would be prudent to boost the concentration of desirable fatty acids such as conjugated linoleic acid isomers (CLA), α-linolenic, EPA and DHA to intensify this trend. The inclusion of rich sources of n-3 fatty acids in the rabbit diets e.g. oils and meals from oleaginous, would be good option for this purpose13,28. The occurrence of these metabolites in rabbit meat may contribute to its shelf life and improved human health as was reported in other animal products11 , 32-34. Daily intake recommendation for eicosapentanoic (C20:5) and docosahexanoic (C22:6) acids, which belong to the family n3, is 500 mg to maintain a healthy cardiovascular system in humans. The intake of rabbit meat fed from CG, I+, F+ and IF contribute to the n-3 fatty acids daily ingestion of about 145, 165, 121 and 110 mg/100 g of meat, corresponding to 29, 33, 24 and 22 % of the recommended daily allowance, respectively35. Analyzing the contribution of n-3 fatty acids by cuts of meat; loin, fore legs and hind legs would contribute to 135, 144 and 126 mg/100g of meat, corresponding to 27, 28 and 25 % of the recommended daily allowance, respectively.

The n-3-PUFA and MUFA content slightly increased with the inulin addition and the health promoting index while reducing the atherogenic and thrombogenic indices, thus indicating smaller feasibility to cause an atherogenic and a thrombogenic event. This may be due to the caecotrophes ingestion by rabbits that increase the recycle of nutrients, i.e., rabbits eating soft faeces, increased the availability of unsaturated fatty acid in the diet29.

In that process, non-utilized lipids, which escape from intestinal digestion, are hydrogenated/dehydrogenated in the ceacum by the microbial population and then liberated to the lower part of the hindgut, further, the rabbits ingest them through the caecotrophes. Likely, inulin may exert the metabolic pathway to produce unsaturated fatty acids. This explains why CG showed the highest thrombogenic and atherogenic indices and a reduced health-promoting index. Also, the utilization of inulin by some bacteria as a food source, produced short chain fatty acids, which might favor the acidification of the gut and ceacum environment, facilitating the colonization of beneficial lactic acid bacteria and hampering the presence and activity of potential pathongens15,29.

In respect to cuts of meat influence on fatty acid profile, no clear difference was found among cuts for SFA, MUFA and PUFA. Petracci et al6 found that the content of n-3 PUFA in rabbit’s fed 3%, 6% and 9% linseed diets, increased more in leg (2.4, 6.0, 8.5 11.0 % of the total fatty acids) than in loin (2.1, 4.6, 6.8 and 8.85 % of the total fatty acids). Leg pieces tended to increase the PUFA amount than loin. These results are higher than those found in the present study, where n-3 PUFA averaged 3.7 % for loin, fore legs and hind legs. The authors concluded that the large percentage of linseed (up to 9 %), which is a rich source of PUFA, probably increased the α-linolenic acid (18:3) and further the n-3 fatty acids content. The lower concentration of α-linolenic acid (18:3) in the present study compared to the higher content in the study reported by Petracci6, helps to explain these differences. Moreover, their results are similar to the present study findings, because hind legs showed the highest concentration of PUFA compared to loin and fore legs.

Currently, no studies have assessed consumer’s sensory evaluation of rabbit meat fed a functional supplement versus an antibiotic as growth promoter. However, it is feared that over use of antibiotics employed as growth promoters in animal feeding may cause bacteria and microorganism resistance. In the current investigation, flavomycin reduced the preferences of panelists in terms of taste, color, and aroma of meat. Because of flavomycin modifying the thickness of intestinal wall, constrained intestinal bacteria growth by inhibition of peptidoglycan biosyntesis, and increase the absorption of nutrients15,16, these might substantially modify nutrient transport to animal blood stream and to animal tissues. Therefore, nutrient availability and lipid deposition changes triggered by flavomicyn might help to explain at some extent those differences19 Diet is a major driver for sensorial modifications of animal products28 ,32. Inulin may favor the hedonic traits as shown by Mendez-Zamora et al 36 who evaluated the inclusion of 15% (dry weight basis) of inulin as a flavor additive in sausages. In that study, inulin improved the color and the overall acceptance of sausages by consumers. These results suggest that inulin added to the diet would have similar effects in the rabbit meat apart from the prebiotic benefit by increasing hedonic properties. However, this effect was not evident when inulin was mixed with flavomycin.

Table 3 Sensorial evaluation and consumer preference of rabbit’s meat influenced by the addition of inulin or flavomycin and type of cut of meat (n = 30) 

Control Inulin (I) Flavomycin (F) IF SEM P value
Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs Loin Fore legs Hind legs Diet Cut of meat Diet x Cut of meat
Taste 3.3abc ±0.52 3.46a ±0.57 2.97abcd ±0.80 3.03abcd ±0.41 2.73cd ±0.63 2.90abcd ±0.54 3.03abcd ±0.66 2.87bcd ±0.73 2.47d ±0.68 3.43abc ±0.67 2.80cd ±0.92 2.47d ±0.73 0.007 <0.0001 0.01 0.0003
Color 3.10ab ±0.60 3.23a ±0.56 2.90ab ±0.75 3.0ab ±0.45 2.83ab ±0.74 3.03ab ±0.71 3.0ab ±0.78 2.77ab ±0.72 2.90ab ±0.71 3.30a ±0.65 2.83ab ±0.91 2.50b ±0.90 0.008 0.01 0.01 0.18
Aroma 3.13ab ±0.43 3.30a ±0.70 3.06abc ±0.73 3.03abcd ±0.49 2.77bcd ±0.56 3.0abcd ±0.45 3.13ab ±0.50 2.80abcd ±0.71 2.53d ±0.73 3.10ab ±0.54 2.83abcd ±0.74 2.57cd ±0.67 0.006 <0.0001 0.33 0.03

a,b,c,d Means with different letters within the same row are significantly different (P<0.05). SEM= standard error of the mean.

When main effects (feeding and cuts of meat) were tested, loin tended to be the most preferred cut in all sensorial traits evaluated, but when specific effects of feeding treatment by single cut of meat was evaluated; fore legs from CG was the most preferred piece among all cuts evaluated. Though we did not evaluate rheological properties, they may play an important role for this result, where texture, hardness, tenderness, springiness and chewiness between pieces of meat are determinants for consumer’s preferences2.

Conclusions and implications

Inulin addition in rabbit’s diet increases beneficial fatty acids (CLA and n3-PUFA) and enables a better health promoting index while reducing the atherogenic and thrombogenic indices of meat. The cuts of meat had a smaller impact on changing the fatty acid profile than inulin or flavomycin addition. Flavomycin reduced the score of the preferences among panelists in terms of taste, color, and aroma. Rheological properties of meat should be take into account to determine their influence on consumers’ preference. Inulin is a good alternative to avoid the utilization of antibiotics in the rabbits feeding. Complementary research on animal performance and economic benefits should be done to support the use of inulin as prebiotic.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Irene Torres Acosta for the assistance during the experimental phase with the animals and to Silvia Carrillo Dominguez for the statistical analysis recommendations. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards Protocols for animal housing, management, slaughter and sampling were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee (Comité de Investigación en Animales-CINVA) at the INCMNSZ under the registration number NAN-059-09-10-1. All procedures were in accordance with the Mexican Official Norm on Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NOM 062-ZOO-1999).

Literature cited

1. Combes S. Valeur nutrionnelle de la viande de lapin (Nutritional value of rabbits meat). INRA - Prod Anim 2004;17(5):373-383. [ Links ]

2. Dalle Zotte A, Szendrő Z. The role of rabbit meat as functional food. Meat Sci 2011;88(3):319-331. [ Links ]

3. Ganesan B, Brothersen C, McMahon DJ. Fortification of foods with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2014;54(1):98-114. [ Links ]

4. Simopoulos A. An increase in the omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid ratio increases the risk for obesity. Nutrients 2016;8(3):128. [ Links ]

5. Salas-Montiel R, Acosta-Torres I, Delgado-Villareal E, Juárez-Silva ME, Azaola A, Pérez-Gil Romo F. Inulin as a growth promoter in diets for rabbits. R Bras Zootec 2013;42:885-891. [ Links ]

6. Petracci M, Bianchi M, Cavani C. Development of rabbit meat products fortified with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Nutrients 2009;1(2):111-118. [ Links ]

7. Mattioli S, Dal Bosco A, Szendrő Z, Cullere M, Gerencsér Z, Matics Z, et al. The effect of dietary Digestarom® herbal supplementation on rabbit meat fatty acid profile, lipid oxidation and antioxidant content. Meat Sci 2016;121 238-242. [ Links ]

8. Connor S, Artaud-Wild S, Classick-Kohn C, Gustafson J, Flavell D, Hatcher L, et al. The cholesterol/saturated-fat index: an indication of the hypercholesterolaemic and atherogenic potential of food. The Lancet 1986;327(8492):1229-1232. [ Links ]

9. Ulbricht TLV, Southgate DAT. Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. The Lancet 1991;338(8773):985-992. [ Links ]

10. Chen S, Bobe G, Zimmerman S, Hammond EG, Luhman CM, Boylston TD, et al. Physical and sensory properties of dairy products from cows with various milk fatty acid compositions. J Agri Food Chem 2004;52(11):3422-3428. [ Links ]

11. Cuchillo HM, Puga DC, Wrage N, Pérez-Gíl RF. Feeding goats on scrubby Mexican rangeland and pasteurization: Influences on milk and artisan cheese quality. Trop Anim Health Prod 2010;42(6):1127-1134. [ Links ]

12. Ramı́rez JA, Dı́az I, Pla M, Gil M, Blasco A, Oliver MA. Fatty acid composition of leg meat and perirenal fat of rabbits selected by growth rate. Food Chem 2005;90(1-2):251-256. [ Links ]

13. Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, Bianchi L, Mugnai C. Effect of dietary α-linolenic acid and vitamin E on the fatty acid composition, storage stability and sensory traits of rabbit meat. Meat Sci 2004;66(2):407-413. [ Links ]

14. Edwards JE, Bequette BJ, McKain N, McEwan NR, Wallace RJ. Influence of flavomycin on microbial numbers, microbial metabolism and gut tissue protein turnover in the digestive tract of sheep. Br J Nutr 2007;94(1):64-70. [ Links ]

15. Sharifi SD, Dibamehr A, Lotfollahian H, Baurhoo B. Effects of flavomycin and probiotic supplementation to diets containing different sources of fat on growth performance, intestinal morphology, apparent metabolizable energy, and fat digestibility in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2012;91(4):918-927. [ Links ]

16. Maertens L. Strategies for the reduction of antibiotic utilization during rearing. World Rabbit Sci 2008;1611-120. [ Links ]

17. Roberfroid M, Gibson GR, Hoyles L, McCartney AL, Rastall R, Rowland I, et al. Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits. Br J Nutr 2010;104(S2):S1-S63. [ Links ]

18. Mourão JL, Pinheiro V, Alves A, Guedes CM, Pinto L, Saavedra MJ, et al. Effect of mannan oligosaccharides on the performance, intestinal morphology and cecal fermentation of fattening rabbits. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006;126(1-2):107-120. [ Links ]

19. Velasco S, Ortiz LT, Alzueta C, Rebolé A, Treviño J, Rodríguez ML. Effect of inulin supplementation and dietary fat source on performance, blood serum metabolites, liver lipids, abdominal fat deposition, and tissue fatty acid composition in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2010;89(8):1651-1662. [ Links ]

20. Blasco A, Ouhayoun J. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Sci 1996;4(2):93-99. [ Links ]

21. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis. 23 ed.; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC. USA. 2003. [ Links ]

22. Parr, Instrument Company. Oxygen bomb calorimetric and combustion methods. : Parr Instrument Company (Technical manual No. 130). ed.; Moline, llinois. USA. 1966. [ Links ]

23. Folch JM, Less M, Sloane-Stanley G. A simple method of the isolation and purification of total lipids. J Biol Chem 1957;226497-504. [ Links ]

24. Juárez S, Carlin S, Rebollo F, Verdugo R, Martínez G. Sensory evaluation of cooked pork meat (M. bícepsfemoris) fed with and without ractopamine hydrochloride associated to age but not gender of the non-trained panelist. J Anim Plant Sci 2016;26(1):40-45. [ Links ]

25. SAS SAS/STAT® 9.2. User's Guide. Second edition, 1; SAS. Institute Inc: Cary, North Carolina, USA. 2009. [ Links ]

26. Alzueta C, Rodríguez ML, Ortiz LT, Rebolé A, Treviño J. Effects of inulin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and metabolisable energy in broiler chickens. Br Poul Sci 2010;51(3):393-398. [ Links ]

27. Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Roscini V, Paci G, Castellini C. Effet of genotype on estimated indexes of fatty acid metabolism in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci 2014;22(2):21-28. [ Links ]

28. Jiya E, Ijaiya A, Ayanwale BA, Olorunsanya AO. Fatty acid composition of meat from the hind leg cut of rabbits (Oryctolagus cunniculus) fed doets containing graded levels of processed tallow (Detarium Microcarpum) seed meal. Biotech Anim Husb 2015;31(2):283-290. [ Links ]

29. Bovera F, Lestingi A, Iannaccone F, Tateo A, Nizza A. Use of dietary mannanoligosaccharides during rabbit fattening period: Effects on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass traits, and meat quality. J Anim Sci 2012;90(11):3858-3866. [ Links ]

30. Bovera F, Lestingi A, Piccolo G, Iannaccone F, Attia YA, Tateo A. Effects of water restriction on growth performance, feed nutrient digestibility, carcass and meat traits of rabbits. Animal 2013;7(10):1600-1606. [ Links ]

31. Leiber F, Meier JS, Burger B, Wettstein H-R, Kreuzer M, Hatt J-M, et al. Significance of coprophagy for the fatty acid profile in body tissues of rabbits fed different diets. Lipids 2008;43(9):853-865. [ Links ]

32. Cuchillo HM, Puga DC, Navarro OA, Pérez-Gíl RF. Antioxidant activity, bioactive polyphenols in Mexican goats' milk cheeses on summer grazing. J Dairy Res 2010;77(1):20-26. [ Links ]

33. Galina MA, Osnaya F, Cuchillo HM, Haenlein GFW. Cheese quality from milk of grazing or indoor fed Zebu cows and Alpine crossbred goats. Small Rumin Res 2007;71(1-3):264-272. [ Links ]

34. Delgadillo PC, Sánchez MB, Nahed TJ, Cuchillo HM, Díaz MM, Solis ZR, et al. Fatty acid content, health and risk indices, physicochemical composition, and somatic cell counts of milk from organic and conventional farming systems in tropical south-eastern Mexico. Trop Anim Health Prod 2014;46(5):883-888. [ Links ]

35. EFSA. Labelling reference intake values for n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. ESFA. 2009;7(7):1-11. [ Links ]

36. Méndez-Zamora G, García-Macías JA, Santellano-Estrada E, Chávez-Martínez A, Durán-Meléndez LA, Silva-Vázquez R, et al. Fat reduction in the formulation of frankfurter sausages using inulin and pectin. Food Sci Technol 2015;35(1):25-31. [ Links ]

Received: December 04, 2017; Accepted: May 16, 2018

*Corresponding author: eugenia.juarezs@incmnsz.mx

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License