SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.54 issue160Affordances como mutualismo organismo-entorno: reconsiderando la propuesta ecológica original de Gibson author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Crítica (México, D.F.)

Print version ISSN 0011-1503

Abstract

ACCORINTI, Hernán Lucas. El problema de la representación: ¿razonamientos subrogantes válidos o sólidos?. Crítica (Méx., D.F.) [online]. 2022, vol.54, n.160, pp.57-81.  Epub May 02, 2023. ISSN 0011-1503.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.l8704905e.2022.1310.

In this article, I will try to provide good reasons that show the weakness of the arguments given by Contessa to support valid surrogate reasoning (SR) over solid ones as a source of representing. Firstly, I will analyze certain epistemic advantages of the criterion supported by solid SR, showing the limits of the criterion stipulated by Contessa. Secondly, I will show that the arguments given by Contessa to dismiss solid SR criteria are deficient since, at best, they do not demonstrate anything and, at worst, they either commit an ambiguity fallacy or a petitio principii.

Keywords : models; scientific representation; Contessa; inferential conception; truth.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )