SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.52 issue5Cobalt nitride films produced by reactive pulsed laser depositionOn the morse potential in liquid phase and at liquid-vapor interface author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de física

Print version ISSN 0035-001X

Abstract

LOAIZA CALDERON, S.P.  and  ALVAREZ ROMERO, J.T.. Calibración de polvo TLD-100 para energías de 60Co, 137Cs, 192Ir y RX de 250, 50 k Vp en dosis absorbida en agua con fines de control de calidad dosimétrico para braquiterapia de alta tasa de dosis. Rev. mex. fis. [online]. 2006, vol.52, n.5, pp.413-421. ISSN 0035-001X.

To help solve the traceability and quality control dosimetric problems for the users of 192Ir sources in the Mexican Republic, the Secondary Standard Dosimetric Laboratory at ININ to calibrated a batch of powder TLD-100 (LiF:Mg,Ti) in terms of absorbed dose to water Dw for the following radiation sources: 60Co, 137Cs and RX 250 and 50 kVp. Later on, the calibration is interpolated to obtain the 192Ir. The calibration radiation field is carried out with the following protocols: For the 60Co, OIEA TRS 398 protocol employing a secondary standard Farmer chamber PTW N30013, calibrated on Dw at the NRC (Canada). For 137Cs the AAPM TG 43 protocol is used, in terms of air kerma strength Sk determined by the air kerma Ka measured with a secondary standard chamber type thimble NE2611 traceable to the NIST (USA). For Rays X 250 and 50 kVp, the protocol AAPM TG 61 using a tertiary standard Farmer chamber PTW 30001, with traceability to the LCIE (France) on air kerma Ka. The calibration curves are built for the TLD response RTLD vs Dw, they are fitted by means of a least squares fit technique with a second degree polynomial that corrects the supralinearity response. The curves are validated by the lack of fit test, and the Anderson Darling normality test. Later on, the sensibility factors are interpolated for the sources of 192Ir: MicroSelectron and VariSource. Two capsules are sent to two hospitals to verify a nominal Dw = 2 Gy, in the first one an underestimate of the Dw is obtained, and in other one an overestimation is presented. Finally, the expanded uncertainty associated to Dwand the Fs are calculated.

Keywords : TL Dosimetry; TLD-100; Brachytherapy; HDR; absorbed dose to water; 192Ir.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License