Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
-
Cited by SciELO
-
Access statistics
Related links
-
Similars in SciELO
Share
Revista mexicana de física
Print version ISSN 0035-001X
Rev. mex. fis. vol.52 n.5 México Oct. 2006
Investigación
On the morse potential in liquid phase and at liquidvapor interface
U.F. GaliciaPimentel, D. OsorioGonzález, and J. LópezLemusa
Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Av. Instituto Literario 100, Toluca 50000, México, aemail: jllemus@uaemex.mx
Recibido el 11 de mayo de 2006
Aceptado el 27 de septiembre de 2006
Abstract
Canonical Molecular Dynamics simulations have been performed to calculate thermodynamic properties in the liquid phase and at the liquidvapor interface for fluids interacting by Morse potential. Transport properties such as self diffusion and shear viscosity have been calculated in one phase. Self diffusion shows an important dependence on particle number whereas shear viscosity does not show such dependence. At the liquidvapor interface, properties such as orthobaric densities, vapor pressure, and surface tension were calculated. Equilibrium densities were compared with results obtained by NpT plus test particle method, and an excellent agreement was found. The surface tension and the vapor pressure are computed for the first time in this work. We also analyzed the cutoff distance dependence in both bulk and interfacial properties. No significant difference was found in the data obtained when two different cutoff distances were used, Rc = 2.5σ y Rc = 4.0σ. This is a consequence of the shortrange nature of the potential.
Keywords: Surface tension; Morse potential; molecular dynamics.
Resumen
Se realizaron simulaciones canónicas de Dinámica Molecular para obtener propiedades termodinámicas en la fase líquida y en la interfase líquidovapor para fluidos que interactuan mediante el potencial de Morse. Se calcularon en una fase las propiedades de transporte tales como la autodifusión y la viscosidad de corte. La autodifusión muestra una dependencia en el número de partículas mientras que la viscosidad de corte no mostró tal comportamiento. Las propiedades que se calcularon en la interfase líquidovapor fueron las densidades ortobaricas, la presión de vapor, y la tensión superficial. Las densidades de equilibrio fueron comparadas con aquellas densidades que se obtuvieron mediante la metodología NpT mas partícula de prueba, y de esto se halló un acuerdo excelente. La tensión superficial y la presión de vapor se calculan aquí por primera vez. También hemos analizado la dependencia en el radio de corte por parte de las propiedades de bulto e interfaciales. Los datos obtenidos con dos distintos radios de corte, Rc = 2.5σ y Rc = 4.0σ, fueron comparados entre sí, y como resultado de ello, no hallamos diferencias significativas. Esto es una consecuencia de la naturaleza de corto alcance del potencial.
Descriptores: tensión superficial; potencial de Morse; dinámica molecular.
PACS:31.15.Qg
DESCARGAR ARTÍCULO EN FORMATO PDF
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge CONACyTMéxico for partial support Grand P/49607. JLL wishes to thank UAEMMéxico Grands 2152/2005 and 2263/2006, for partial support. JLL would also like to thank Jorge OrozcoVelazco for his useful comments.
References
1. Y. Zhou, M. Karplus, K.D. Ball, and R.S. Berry, J. Chem. Phys. 116 (2002) 2323. And references therein. [ Links ]
2. X. Xu, C. Cheng, and I.H. Chowdhury, J. Heat Transfer 126 727. [ Links ]
3. I. Last, Y. Levy, and J. Jortner, PNAS 99 (2002) 9107 [ Links ]
4. L.A. Girifalco and V.G. Weizer, Phys. Rev. 114 (1959) 687. [ Links ]
5. S. J. Chen and H.L. Huang, Chinese J. Phys. 19 (1981) 106. [ Links ]
6. J.P.K. Doye and D.J. Wales, Science 271 (1996) 484. [ Links ]
7. J.P.K. Doye, R.H. Leary, M. Locatelli, and F. Schoen, J. Compt. 16 (2004) 371. [ Links ]
8. A. Tekin and M. Yurtsever, TurkJ. Chem. 26 (2002) 627. [ Links ]
9. C.I. Chou, C.L. Ho, B. Hu, and H. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 57 (1998) 2747. [ Links ]
10. A. Strachan, T. Cagin, and W.A. Goddard III, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 15084. [ Links ]
11. T.C. Lim, Acta Chim. Slov. 52 (2005) 149. [ Links ]
12. A. Del Sol Mesa C. Quesne and Y.F. Smirnov, J. Phys. A 31 (1998) 321. [ Links ]
13. P.M. Morse and E.C.G. Stueckelberg, Phys. Rev. 33 (1929) 932. [ Links ]
14. A.S. Leal, C. Gouvea dos Santos, C.M. Quintella, and H.H.R. Schor, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 10 (1999) 359. [ Links ]
15. V. Constantoudis and C.A. Nicolaides, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005) 084118. [ Links ]
16. A.I. Milchev and A.A. Milchev, Europhyics Lett. 56 (2001) 695. [ Links ]
17. D. OsorioGonzález, M. Mayorga, J. Orozco, and L. RomeroSalazar, J. Chem. Phys. 118 (2003) 6989. [ Links ]
18. P. Shah and C. Chakravarty, J. Chem Phys. 116 (2002) 10825. [ Links ]
19. H. Okumura and F. Yonezawa, J. Chem. Phys. 113 (2000) 9162. [ Links ]
20. T.C. Lim, Z. Naturforsch 58a (2003) 615. [ Links ]
21. M.P. Allen and D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987). [ Links ]
22. D.M. Heyes, Mol. Phys. 71 (1990) 781. [ Links ]
23. M. Schoen and C. Hoheisel, Mol. Phy. 56 (1985) 653. [ Links ]
24. J. LópezLemus and J. Alejandre, Mol. Phys. 100 (2002) 2983. [ Links ]
25. A. Trokhymchuk and J. Alejandre, J. Chem. Phys. 111 (1999) 8510. [ Links ]
26. J. Janecek, J. Phys. Chem. B 110 (2006) 6264. [ Links ]
27. A.Z. Panagiotopoulos, N. Quirke, M. Stapleton and D.J. Tildesley, Mol. Phys. 63 (1988) 527. [ Links ]
28. F. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 5 (1972) 4529. [ Links ]
29. J.V. Sebgers and J.M. LeveltSengers, Progress in Liquid Physics (C.A. Croxton. Wiley, Chichester, 1978). [ Links ]
30. L.J. Van Poolen, C.D. Holcomb and V.G. Nielsen, Fluid Phase Equilib. 129 (1997) 105. [ Links ]
31. J.K. Singh, D.A. Kofke and J.R. Errington, J. Chem. Phys. 119 (2003) 3405. [ Links ]
32. M. GonzálezMelchor, F. Bresme and J. Alejandre, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005) 104710. [ Links ]
33. M.E. VelázquezSánchez, A. GamaGoicochea, M. GonzálezMelchor, M. Neria and J. Alejandre, J. Chem. Phys. 124 (2006) 084104. [ Links ]
34. P. Orea, J. LópezLemus and J. Alejandre, J. Chem. Phys. 123 (2005) 114702. [ Links ]
35. M. GonzálezMelchor, P. Orea, J. LópezLemus, F. Bresme and J. Alejandre, J. Chem. Phys. 122 (2005) 94503. [ Links ]
36. J. LópezLemus, M. RomeroBastida, T.A. Darden, and J. Alejandre, Mol. Phys. 104 (2006) 2413. [ Links ]