SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue108De la crítica a la cárcel a la crítica de las alternativasLa utilidad del iuscomparatismo en la armonización de los sistemas jurídicos author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado

On-line version ISSN 2448-4873Print version ISSN 0041-8633

Abstract

CIANCIARDO, Juan. Principios y reglas: una aproximación desde los criterios de distinción. Bol. Mex. Der. Comp. [online]. 2003, vol.36, n.108, pp.891-906. ISSN 2448-4873.

The author examines the criteria to distinguish between principles and rules, taking as a point of departure the theory of Robert Alexy. The author explains the critique developed by Aulis Aarnio and Luis Prieto Sanchís to said theory. The former denies the existence of a distinction between principles and rules; while the latter argues that, even if the distinction is admitted, it is irrelevant, because it adds little in support of the critique to legal positivism. Finally, the author contradicts the two critical arguments mentioned, and develops a proposal that distinguishes between "strong" principles and other kind of principles, stressing the reasonableness of the former.

Keywords : principles; rules; legal theory; legal positivism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License