SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.38 issue114Seguridad humana: La responsabilidad de protegerLas infracciones tributarias en el sistema tributario mexicano author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado

On-line version ISSN 2448-4873Print version ISSN 0041-8633

Abstract

PAULSON, Stanley L.. Normativismo continental y su contraparte británico: ¿Qué tan diferentes son?. Bol. Mex. Der. Comp. [online]. 2005, vol.38, n.114, pp.1139-1163. ISSN 2448-4873.

The question ¿What is law? has found an enormous variety of answers. However, they can be grouped around the two most important philosophical traditions: legal positivism and natural law. The first establishes a specific connection between law and facts (reductive thesis), while the second can be distinguished by the relation between law and morality (normative thesis). In this context, the author examines these relations, studying the specific characteristics of the normative continental thesis, in particular regarding the thesis of Hans Kelsen, who developed normativism based on the theoretical work of Kant; in opt position to British normativism, that derived from Hume's empirism and finds its contemporary expression in Hart's legal theory.

Keywords : law; legal theory; ius-postivism; natural.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License