Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
Cited by SciELO
Access statistics
Related links
Similars in SciELO
Share
Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado
On-line version ISSN 2448-4873Print version ISSN 0041-8633
Abstract
SOTO PINEDA, Jesús Alfonso and JARAMILLO DE LOS RIOS, Luis Felipe. Common aspects of the Chicago and Harvard Schools of antitrust analysis: the neo-institutional contribution. Bol. Mex. Der. Comp. [online]. 2019, vol.52, n.154, pp.77-106. Epub May 12, 2020. ISSN 2448-4873. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2019.154.14138.
On the understanding that Harvard and Chicago Schools postulates, this paper conducts a comparative analysis between those and the conceptual pillars of the Neoinstitutional School. Within the framework of traditional disputes between Chicago and Harvard Schools, the advances of neoinstitutionalism, might explain how both Schools support different purposes for competition law, but rely on the same origins, since the two of them were created to fight harmful excess of market power and corporate mergers. It is in that context, the neoinstitutionalism explains how processes of market power and concentration can emerge, going beyond what traditional perspectives have considered about them.
Keywords : Antitrust; Harvard; Chicago; Neoinstitutional School.