SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.56 issue67Joke as a Hermeneutic ParadigmVirtues, Legal Argumentation, and Judicial Ethics author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Diánoia

Print version ISSN 0185-2450

Abstract

ATIENZA, Manuel. How to Evaluate Judicial Reasoning. Diánoia [online]. 2011, vol.56, n.67, pp.113-134. ISSN 0185-2450.

This article deals with the question of how to evaluate justificatory judicial reasoning. To this end, the author clarifies the meaning of the one-right-answer thesis, identifies a variety of criteria of correctness, and gives special attention to the ideas of universality, coherence, (good) consequences, social and critical morality, and reasonability.

Keywords : one right answer; coherence; social and critical morality; reasonability.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License