SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.57 issue69Internal and External, Theoretical Rationality and Practical Rationality: Comments to Jesús Vega Encabo's PaperQuaestiones Heracliteae: New essays on Heraclitus (Nuevos ensayos sobre Heráclito): Analysis and Commentary author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Diánoia

Print version ISSN 0185-2450

Abstract

LLORENTE, Renzo. Fernando Savater's Tauroética: A Critical Analysis. Diánoia [online]. 2012, vol.57, n.69, pp.171-184. ISSN 0185-2450.

In Tauroética Fernando Savater aims to offer a refutation of both the arguments used to condemn bullfighting on moral grounds and the reasons that are commonly cited to justify greater moral consideration for animals. Savater's attempted refutation rests on a number of distinct claims: human beings have no moral obligations toward animals; animals do not have interests; anti-bullfighting arguments illegitimately equate animals with human beings; those who condemn bullfighting maintain a contradictory moral position; and the prohibition of bullfighting would constitute an unjust curtailment of personal freedom. This essay provides a critical analysis of these claims and demonstrates that all of them are in fact untenable.

Keywords : bullfighting; animal rights; interests; liberties; moral obligations.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License