SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.60 issue74A Superimposed Economical Consensus in the Distributive Justice DebateNon Intentional Meanings: From Exclusion to Inclusion author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Diánoia

Print version ISSN 0185-2450

Abstract

DELGADO, Carolina. Plato on False Discourse and Literature: A Discussion from R. II 376d-379a. Diánoia [online]. 2015, vol.60, n.74, pp.27-51. ISSN 0185-2450.

This paper attempts to elucidate the meaning of the controversial Platonic statement in relation to the peculiarity in the literary accounts which, in spite of being false, contain at the same time certain truths (R. II 377a6). Furthermore, there seems to be contradiction in the fact that Plato critiques those writings and still proposes using others equally false. I analyze three possibilities to disambiguate the meaning of pseûdos in these contexts -"false" would point to fiction or to a verbal lie or the character of one of the two levels (factual or normative) which would comprise a literary account; and I support the fact that, for Plato, the undesirable falsity is only the one related to the typological core comprised in those accounts.

Keywords : pseûdos; fiction; noble lie; literature.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License