SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue1How Can I Say No? Female Empowerment and Unwanted Sex in MexicoInduced Traffic in Mexico: Contributions to the Debate and Public Policy Implications author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Estudios demográficos y urbanos

On-line version ISSN 2448-6515Print version ISSN 0186-7210

Abstract

VILALTA Y PERDOMO, Carlos J.. On the Spatial Distribution of Urban Electoral Processes and a Comparison between ols and sam Regression Techniques. Estud. demogr. urbanos [online]. 2006, vol.21, n.1, pp.83-122.  Epub Oct 30, 2019. ISSN 2448-6515.  https://doi.org/10.24201/edu.v21i1.1262.

The aim of this work is to demonstrate two things: 1) That due to the fact that some social phenomena presents spatial variation, its modeling also presents important methodological implications, and therefore 2) it is advisable to use a regression technique that incorporates data spatiality in its design. A two-step process is followed: First, the Moran autocorrelation coefficient is calculated to demonstrate the spatial concentration of electoral behavior in urban Mexico between 1994 and 2000. Secondly, two regression techniques are compared, OLS and SAM. From the comparison it is concluded that the SAM technique is a more robust technique than the OLS, based on that the former is able to compute more accurate regression coefficients and detects significant regional effects even in the presence of models dealing with the heteroskedasticity problem.

Keywords : electoral geography; electoral behavior; urban electorate; spatial statistics; spatial self-correlation; regression analysis; heterodasticity.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish