SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue52Reflections on reciprocal action and the necessary unity. On the interpretation of E. Watkins regarding Kant's causal model author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tópicos (México)

Print version ISSN 0188-6649

Abstract

CAMACHO, Enrique. Nationalism and Crisis. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2017, n.52, pp.427-454. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i52.836.

Nationalism seems a persistent ideology in academia as much as in politics; despite the fact that it has been shown that nationalism is deeply unjust for minorities. A case for national identity is often invoked to supplement liberalism regarding the inner difficulties that liberal theories have to explain their membership, assure stability and produce endorsement. So, it seems that national identity may also be required for justice. While this controversy continues, I argue that a different approach is available. We can define a conception of legitimacy independently from a conception of justice, and then ask what legitimacy requires from our national allegiances. If everything goes well, much of the controversy from justice disappears as we find that the case for cultural nationalism may be illegitimate for liberal democracies.

Keywords : nationalism; distributive justice; legitimacy; political self-determination; minority rights; majority rights.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English