SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue54Thinking about the Exceptions. Violence, Equality and Dignity from KantKant and Hegel on the Nature of Intentional Action. Continuity or Rupture? author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tópicos (México)

Print version ISSN 0188-6649

Abstract

HARO ROMO, Vicente de. A Discussion on the Systematic Position of Kant's Metaphysik der Sitten and Fichte's Sittenlehre. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2018, n.54, pp.147-169. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i54.862.

The systematic position of Kant's Metaphysics of Morals and in particular of its second part, the Doctrine of Virtue, is analogue to the one of Fichte's System of Ethics according to the Principles of the Doctrine of Science. However, in this book, Fichte criticizes Kant's ethics as "formalist" and suggests that his own is more real and applicable, because of his theory on the conciliation between natural impulse and moral impulse. This article explains and discusses such thesis, and shows that this evaluation on Kant is unfair, because precisely on the Doctrine of Virtue, in a different methodic way -but soundly and coherently with the ethics of autonomy-, Kant develops his "material ethics".

Keywords : Kant's ethics; Fichte s ethics; formalism; material ethics; natural impulse; moral impulse; kantian theory on virtue and on character.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish