SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue54A Discussion on the Systematic Position of Kant's Metaphysik der Sitten and Fichte's SittenlehreSublime and Painting in Fichte's First Outline of System in Comparison with Kant author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tópicos (México)

Print version ISSN 0188-6649

Abstract

PLACENCIA GARCIA, Luis. Kant and Hegel on the Nature of Intentional Action. Continuity or Rupture?. Tópicos (México) [online]. 2018, n.54, pp.171-200. ISSN 0188-6649.  https://doi.org/10.21555/top.v0i54.863.

This paper aims to present some shared aspects of Kant's and Hegel's conception of intentional action. Such aspects, I claim, form the basis of other well known divergences between them. Since Kant's and Hegel's conception of intentional action have been studied by many scholars in the last years, I will focus just on one point: The differences between kantian and hegelian approches and contemporary causal-reductive framework. Finnaly, I will suggest that the most important difference between Kant and Flegel in practical philosophy can be better understood in this context.

Keywords : intentional action; causal theories of action; Kant; Hegel.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish