SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue2Automatic Segmentation of the Cerebellum in Ultrasound Volumes of the Fetal Brain author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ingeniería biomédica

On-line version ISSN 2395-9126Print version ISSN 0188-9532

Abstract

CASTANEDA-VILLA, N.; CALDERON-RIOS, E. R.  and  JIMENEZ-GONZALEZ, A.. On the Identification of an ICA Algorithm for Auditory Evoked Potentials Extraction: A Study on Synthetic Data. Rev. mex. ing. bioméd [online]. 2015, vol.36, n.2, pp.107-119. ISSN 2395-9126.  https://doi.org/10.17488/RMIB.36.2.2pdf.

Extracting characteristics and information from Auditory Evoked Potentials recordings (AEPs) involves difficulties due to their very low amplitude, which makes the AEPs easily hidden by artifacts from physiological or external sources like the EEG/EMG, blinking, and line-noise. To tackle this problem, some authors have used Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to successfully de-noise brain signals. However, since interest has been mainly focused on removing artifacts like blinking, not much attention has been paid to the quality of the recovered evoked potential. This is the AEP case, where literature reports interesting results on the de-noising matter, but without an objective evaluation of the AEP finally extracted (and the influence of different implementations or configurations of ICA). Here, to study the performance of three popular ICA algorithms (FastICA, Ext-Infomax, and SOBI) at separating AEPs from a mixture, a synthetic dataset composed of one Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (LLAEP) signal and the most frequent artifacts was generated. Next, the quality of the independent components (ICs) estimated by such algorithms was measured by using the AMARI performance index (Am), the signal interference ratio index (SIR), and the time required to achieve separation. Results indicated that the FastICA implementation, with the symmetric approach and the power cubic contrast function, is more likely to provide the best and faster separation of the LLAEP, which makes it suitable for this purpose.

Keywords : synthetic auditory evoked potentials; independent component analysis; Amari performance index; signal interference ratio index.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License