SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue2Development and Simulation of an Automated Control Algorithm for Insulin Therapy of Hyperglycemic Emergencies in DiabetesA Socio-technical Approach to Evaluating an Electronic Medical Record System implemented in the Public Health Services of Aguascalientes author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ingeniería biomédica

On-line version ISSN 2395-9126Print version ISSN 0188-9532

Abstract

DALMAU-CEDENO, Oscar S.; ALVARADO-CARRILLO, Dora E.  and  MARROQUIN, José Luis. Regularized Hypothesis Testing in Random Fields with Applications to Neuroimaging. Rev. mex. ing. bioméd [online]. 2020, vol.41, n.2, pp.22-39.  Epub Nov 09, 2020. ISSN 2395-9126.  https://doi.org/10.17488/rmib.41.2.2.

The task of determining for which elements of a random field (e.g., pixels in an image) a certain null hypothesis may be rejected is a relevant problem in several scientific areas. In the current contribution, we introduce a new method for performing this task, the regularized hypothesis testing (RHT) method, focusing on its use in neuroimaging research. RHT is based on the formulation of the hypothesis testing task as a Bayesian estimation problem, with the previous application of a Markovian random field. The latter allows for the incorporation of local spatial information and considers different noise models, including spatially correlated noise. In tests on synthetic data showing regular activation levels on uncorrelated noise fields, RHT furnished a true positive rate (TPR) of 0.97, overcoming the state-of-the-art morphology-based hypothesis testing (MBHT) method and the traditional family-wise error rate (FWER) method, which afforded 0.93 and 0.58, respectively. For fields with highly correlated noise, the TPR provided by RHT was 0.65, and by MBHT and FWER was 0.35 and 0.29, respectively. For tests utilizing real functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, RHT managed to locate the activation regions when 60% of the original signal were removed, while MBHT located only one region and FWER located none.

Keywords : Regularized hypothesis test; Markovian random fields; Bayesian estimation; functional Magnetic resonance imaging.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English