SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue3Postharvest quality in fruit of hydroponic tomato cultivated with wastewater and well waterProductivity of 'Tahiti' lime grafted onto four roostocks in a commercial orchard in Veracruz, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Chapingo. Serie horticultura

On-line version ISSN 2007-4034Print version ISSN 1027-152X

Abstract

SAHAGUN-CASTELLANOS, Jaime  and  VILLANUEVA-VERDUZCO, Clemente. Synthetic varieties derived from single or double crosses?. Rev. Chapingo Ser.Hortic [online]. 2012, vol.18, n.3, pp.279-289. ISSN 2007-4034.  https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2012.06.31.

The use of synthetic varieties (SVs) derived from single (SynSC) or double (SynDC) crosses is a way of avoiding the high seed cost of hybrid maize (Zea mays L) and onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties, among others. In addition, these SVs could be used to more economically predict the genotypic means (GMs) of the SVs derived from the hybrid parental lines (SynL). It is known, however, that the inbreeding coefficients (ICs) of the SynL, SynSC, and SynDC derived from the same lines can differ, but the reason why is unknown. This lack of knowledge makes it difficult for the breeder to improve the representation of the SynL through the SynDC and SynSC and thereby to improve the estimation of the SynL GM. The objective of this study was to determine the reason why the SynL, SynSC, and SynDC can differ. From unrelated L lines whose IC is FL, L/2 single (SCs) and L/4 double crosses (DCs) were derived; and each line, SC, and Dc were represented by m individuals. By randomly mating each set of parents, the SynL, SynSC, and SynCD were formed. It was found that the genotypic arrays of the three SVs differ because with the same 4 initial lines the number of non-identical by descent genes contributed to the genotypic array is larger as fewer lines are involved in a parent [lines (1), single crosses (2), and double crosses (4)]. Thus, the ICs of SynL and SynDC are the smallest and largest, respectively; and it is expected that the GMs show the opposite ordering. In addition, as m and FL are smaller the differences among the genotypic arrays of the SVs are larger. On the contrary, when the L lines are pure, the genotypic arrays of SynL and SynSC are equal, and their IC must be equal as well. To be equal to SinL, SynDC requires, in addition, a large m. However, even with FL < 1, as m is larger the genotypic arrays of SynSC and SynDC tend to the genotypic array of SynL, although slowly, particularly for SynDC.

Keywords : Allium cepa L.; Zea mays L.; inbreeding; synthetic varieties; hybrids; genotypic array.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License