SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue30El neo-republicanismo y sus implicancias para las instituciones legales y políticasCuando el consentimiento no importa: Un deber parcial de obediencia al derecho author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Isonomía

Print version ISSN 1405-0218

Abstract

MONTERO, Julio C.. Por qué una concepción restrictiva de la razón pública viola la neutralidad estatal: una crítica interna al liberalismo político. Isonomía [online]. 2009, n.30, pp.101-116. ISSN 1405-0218.

The central thesis of this article is that the conception of the public reason defended by Rawls, even in its "inclusive" version, is excessively restrictive and infringes the liberal principle of legitimacy and the idea that the state must remain neutral among the several comprehensive doctrines endorsed by its citizens. Finally, an alternative conception of the liberal public reason, which I call the "open conception", is proposed. This conception is grounded only on a basic duty of civility, namely the duty of reciprocity.

Keywords : Duty of civility; deliberative democracy; legitimacy; neutrality; public reason.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License