SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue46A Normative Evaluation of the Use of Drones in Asymmetric Armed ConflictsContemporary Judicial Virtue Ethics before the Case of the Colombian Armed Conflict author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Isonomía

Print version ISSN 1405-0218

Abstract

ABAL, Federico. Three Legislative Proposals on Torture. Isonomía [online]. 2017, n.46, pp.63-106. ISSN 1405-0218.

The debate about torture can be divided, following McMahan’s classification, into two levels: theoretical and practical. In the first, there is a discussion about the moral permissibility of torture in exceptional circumstances and the characteristics that make torture a practice, prima facie, immoral. In the second, the possible consequences of different models of legislation intending to address the situations that obtain in the real world (absolutism, institutionalism and legalism) are evaluated. In this second level, this paper aims to critically analyze the legislative proposals of Jeff McMahan and Alan Dershowitz. It also seeks to offer a preliminary exploration of the advantages of the legalistic model.

Keywords : torture; absolutism; institutionalism; legalism; McMahan; Dershowitz.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )