SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue53Technical and Rational Elements for the Assessment of Scientific Evidence Reliability: Reference on Three Forensic Science Areas author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Isonomía

Print version ISSN 1405-0218

Abstract

PARMIGIANI, Matías. “Permissive” Interests and the (Moral) Power of Consent. A Critique of David Owens. Isonomía [online]. 2020, n.53, pp.1-30.  Epub June 09, 2021. ISSN 1405-0218.

The aim of this paper is to criticize David Owens’ theory on the (moral) power of consent. According to this theory, the power of consent must be analyzed in terms of a distinctive normative interest, which would consist in permitting certain obligations to be breached, no matter what materially follows from that, like the transgression of some of our non-normative interests. Here I will argue that Owens’ theory would unfairly conflate two sets of considerations: a first set, relative to our general power to consent; and a second set, relative to the exercise of that power in certain particular occasions. In order to understand the first set, the theory can still be useful. Nonetheless, in order to understand the second one, the most reasonable step would be to appeal to the idea of personal reasons for action, an idea that does not seem to have received much attention in the established literature on consent.

Keywords : permissive interests; justification; consent; Owens; personal reasons.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish