SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 issue5Etiology and management of tar spot (Phyllachora maydis Maubl.) of maize in Guerrero State, MéxicoStructural differences between caldenal patches of the rangeland and its influence on the seed bank, in the province of La Pampa, Argentina author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Agrociencia

On-line version ISSN 2521-9766Print version ISSN 1405-3195

Abstract

PAZ-PELLAT, Fernando. Myths and fallacies about the curve number hydrological method of the SCS/NRCS. Agrociencia [online]. 2009, vol.43, n.5, pp.521-528. ISSN 2521-9766.

The modeling of the rainfall-direct runoff relationship is a basic requirement in the dynamics of watersheds, especially when information is scarce. A simple model of this relationship is very attractive in hydrological applications. In this paper an analysis is made of the hypotheses intrinsic to the simple method of the curve number (NC) of the USDA Soil Conservation Service / Natural Resources Conservation Service. The basic formulation of the rainfall-direct runoff relationship of the NC method is revised with a focus on its implications, coming to the conclusion that it has no hydrological support.

Keywords : Intrinsic hypotheses; curve number method; rainfall-runoff relationship.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License