SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue31Political rights of indigenous women in MexicoThe Inter-American Democratic Charter and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Cuestiones constitucionales

Print version ISSN 1405-9193

Abstract

RODRIGUEZ SANTIBANEZ, Iliana. Analysis from the perspective of international Human Rights non conformity trial for disability of the 2012 presidential elections in Mexico. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2014, n.31, pp.139-184. ISSN 1405-9193.

The July 12, 2012, the Progressive Movement coalition that took the citizen Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador as a presidential candidate for Mexico, filed a lawsuit of disagreement, arguing that it violated Article 41 Constitutional requiring elections in Mexico are free and genuine, so that the presidential election be declared invalid. The Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation in Mexico, which is the maximum resolution mechanism electoral disputes in this regard, was the authority responsible for validating the election and publish the final results of the presidential election. The Judgment of disagreement was asked literally: "the nullification of the election [...], requesting a declaration of non-validity [...] for violation of the constitutional principles of free suffrage and genuine elections and the cancellation of the registration of candidate c. Enrique Peña Nieto's campaign stops overshoot". In this judgment are relevant issues that are analyzed from the perspective of international law of human rights.

Keywords : human rights; international standards; democracy; elections.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License