SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue40Freedom of Conscience and Conscientious Objection of Private Health Clinics: Conceptual Grounds for its Constitutional Interpretation author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Cuestiones constitucionales

Print version ISSN 1405-9193

Abstract

MAYER-SERRA, Carlos Elizondo  and  NUNEZ GONZALEZ, Leonardo. More Rights for Everyone? Human Rights, Public Policy and the Case of Orphan Drugs. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2019, n.40, pp.353-384.  Epub Mar 20, 2020. ISSN 1405-9193.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2019.40.13237.

When the constitutional reform on human rights was approved in 2011, there seemed to be a consensus on its benefits. There was optimism and it was not foreseen the possible risks and costs of its implementation. This article analyzes a series of amparos based on the right to health that forced public health services to pay for the so-called “orphan drugs”, used to treat rare diseases. Promoted by pharmaceutical companies, these amparos sought to force the State into buying expensive and not properly tested drugs. This legal dispute serves to further the discussion on the unintended implications of this human rights reform, its impact on public policies, and the judicialization of social rights.

Keywords : Amparo; Human Rights; Social Rights; Public Policy; Inequality; Orphan Drugs; Judiacialization.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )