SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue45The thesis of the foundational political decisions and its link with the human-social realityConstitutional substitution in Colombia: Reform limits to the Derivative Constituent Power (Legislative Function) author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Cuestiones constitucionales

Print version ISSN 1405-9193

Abstract

ZOMETA, Manuel. Normative Antinomy: Weighting of fundamental rights in the salvadoran context. Cuest. Const. [online]. 2021, n.45, pp.421-433.  Epub May 09, 2022. ISSN 1405-9193.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2021.45.16669.

The conflict among fundamental rights, or “normative antinomy” is a legal form that deals on the interference of a right over another, either by protection means, obstacles on its achievement or in the exercise of a right. This study analyzes the normative antinomy derived from the collision between the right to freedom, through the scope on freedom to transit and not to be detained against the will, in the context of the measures decreed by the Salvadoran Executive on the protection of the right to public health during the pandemic caused by COVID-19; making use of the weight formula, proposed by Robert Alexy in the method of weighting and balancing of fundamental rights.

Keywords : Fundamental Rights; Balancing; Freedom; Health; Constitution; Normative Antinomy.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )