SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.9 issue18El psicoanálisis como saber-poder. Sobre el funcionalismo de Foucault y su crítica al Complejo de EdipoHume y el escepticismo antiguo author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Signos filosóficos

Print version ISSN 1665-1324

Abstract

MANSILLA, H. C. F.. Crítica a las filosofías de la historia de Hegel y Marx a partir de sus consecuencias práctico-políticas. Sig. Fil [online]. 2007, vol.9, n.18, pp.81-103. ISSN 1665-1324.

This essay deals with the probable origin of the conception of linear, ascending development, whose most prominent representatives in the modern era were Hegel and Marx. In opposition to the circular concept of historical evolution, which was prevailing in many cultures, the theories of linear ascending development have their roots in theological elements of the Judean-Christian tradition. But when applied to practice, these doctrines exhibit authoritarian and technocratic consequences, which are not congruent with the idea of a development open to several options.

Keywords : anthropomorphism; authoritarianism; Condorcet; obligatory development; historicism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish