SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue1Ethnic Vote in Bolivia: Cohesion, Disintegration and Ethnic CleavagesA Fourth Estate? Markets, Audiences and Contents of Mexico’s Local Press author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Política y gobierno

Print version ISSN 1665-2037

Abstract

DONOSO, Alfonso. Immigration and Punishment. Against the Laws of Penal Inadmissibility. Polít. gob [online]. 2018, vol.25, n.1, pp.101-123. ISSN 1665-2037.

Are laws that forbid the entrance of foreigners in a state on grounds of their criminal record morally justifiable? Taking as a starting point Cecile Fabre’s arguments (2016) against Joseph Caren’s use of these laws or criteria of inadmissibility (2013), I consider a series of plausible arguments against these criteria to ultimately reject each of them. Instead, I offer a different and substantive normative critique against this criterion of penal inadmissibility based on the principle of equality, pivotal to any plausible political theory and, thus, central to an adequate conception of punishment within the political community. Ultimately, I deem penal inadmissibility unjustifiable within a political community that aspires to respect each individual’s equal moral status.

Keywords : punishment; ethics of immigration; laws of inadmissibility.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish