SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue4Effect of supplementation with vitamin E and chelated or inorganic minerals on beef quality and oxidative stabilityProductive and ingestive behavior in growing hair sheep in silvopastoral and stabled weight-gain systems author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias

On-line version ISSN 2448-6698Print version ISSN 2007-1124

Abstract

ALBARRAN-PORTILLO, Benito; LOPEZ-GONZALEZ, Felipe; RUIZ-ALBARRAN, Miguel  and  ARRIAGA-JORDAN, Carlos Manuel. Productive and economic response to concentrate supplementation by grazing dairy cows at high stocking. Rev. mex. de cienc. pecuarias [online]. 2019, vol.10, n.4, pp.855-869.  Epub Apr 30, 2020. ISSN 2448-6698.  https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v10i4.4787.

Small-scale dairy systems contribute to ameliorate rural poverty and to local milk supply. Their sustainability is limited by high feeding costs, mainly from purchased concentrates (CC); whereas a higher reliance on quality forage may improve profitability; but high stocking rates may left high CC use. The objective of this work was to assess the productive and economic response by grazing dairy cows to levels of CC under grazing of ryegrass-white clover pastures under high stocking rate (4 cows/ha). Six Holstein milking cows were replicated assigned 3 X 3 Latin Square arrangements. Daily milk yield and composition were recorded, and feed intake estimated from utilised metabolizable energy. Treatments were: T1= 1.0 kg T6= 3.0 kg and T6= 6.0 kg concentrate/cow/d. There were significant differences (P<0.05) for milk yield, with T6 having higher yields than T1 and T3. There were no significant differences in milk protein or fat content among treatments (P>0.05). Herbage intake was significantly (P<0.05) lower in T6, with no differences (P>0.05) between T1 and T3. There were no differences in margins over feeding costs, but feeding cost per kg of milk was 2.2 times higher in T6 compared to T1, and margin per kilo of milk was 26 % higher in T1 than T6. Although milk yields are higher with T6, T1 and T3 require less expenditures and margins are similar. Supplementation may alleviate high grazing pressure that deteriorates pastures, ensuring the long-term sustainability of small-scale dairy farming systems.

Keywords : Milk; Supplements; Concentrate; Intake; Stoking rate; Cost.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish     · English ( pdf ) | Spanish ( pdf )