SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 issue3Pathogen intrusion events in drinking water distribution systemsMorphodynamic comparison of the Northeast shoreline of Quintana Roo, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

On-line version ISSN 2007-2422

Abstract

DEVORA-ISIORDIA, Germán Eduardo; GONZALEZ-ENRIQUEZ, Rodrigo  and  RUIZ-CRUZ, Saúl. Evaluation of desalination processes and their development in Mexico. Tecnol. cienc. agua [online]. 2013, vol.4, n.3, pp.27-46. ISSN 2007-2422.

Different desalination processes exist, which are differentiate by their cost, environmental impact, the quality of the product and energy consumption. A comparison of thermal and membrane processes identified the existing technologies to desalinate seawater, the number of installed plants, the technology used, the supply source and the use of desalinated water. The technical feasibility and main objective of this work was the study and comparison of thermal and membrane desalination systems with respect to production costs in USD/m3 and energy consumption in kWh/m3. Desalination systems have been in practice since 1970 with the use of membrane systems (reverse osmosis (RO), electrodialysis (ED) and nanofiltration (NF)) and thermal systems (multiple stage distillation (MED), multiple stage flash distillation (MSF), and solar distillation (SD)). Of the 13,000 plants installed, 50% use RO, 33% use NF, 1% MSD and 4% MSF. The most common supply sources are seawater (60%) and brackish water (22%). The beneficiaries of this desalinated water are the municipal (66%) and the industrial (23%) sectors. The type of technology that requires less energy consumption is RO, from 2 to 2.8 kWh/m3 at a cost of 0.6 USD/m3, whereas MSD and MSF technologies consume 3.4 to 4 kWh/m3 and 5 to 8 kWh/m3 at a production cost of 1.5 USD/m3 and 1.10 USD/m3, respectively. The comparison of technologies determined that energy consumption and production costs are less and production is greater with RO. Moreover, RO has significant advantages over other systems, such as not requiring phase changes, unlike MED and MSF. Reverse osmosis is the most feasible process with regard to production, energy consumption and cost.

Keywords : reverse osmosis; electrodialysis; distillation; desalination; water quality; cations; anions.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License