SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.5 issue5Mathematical Modeling of Recessive Flows in the Andean Mediterranean Region of Maule: Case Study of Estero Upeo, ChileExtreme 24Hour Rainfall Predictions in the State of Zacatecas, Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Tecnología y ciencias del agua

On-line version ISSN 2007-2422

Abstract

FLOWERS-CANO, Roberto S.; FLOWERS, Robert Jeffrey  and  RIVERA-TREJO, Fabián. Evaluation of Probabilistic Model Selection Criteria: Validation with Series of Simulated Maxima. Tecnol. cienc. agua [online]. 2014, vol.5, n.5, pp.189-197. ISSN 2007-2422.

In this paper, a Monte Carlo study is performed to determine the validity of using the root mean square error as a selection criterion for the frequency analysis. This statistic is compared to those from the Kolmogorov- Smirnov, the Cramer-Von Mises and the Anderson-Darling tests. The distributions chosen to compare these statistics are gamma, Weibull, Gumbel, log-normal and log-logistic. The results obtained by this study indicate that at least 50 random observations are needed to obtain good results using either the Anderson-Darling or root mean square error statistics. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramer-Von Mises tests are not recommended since they require sample sizes larger than those usually found in hydrology.

Keywords : Root mean square error; Kolmogorov- Smirnov; Cramer-Von Mises; Anderson-Darling.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License