SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.8Influence of climate change on thermal requirements of cactus pear (Opuntia spp.) in Central-Northern of Mexico author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista bio ciencias

On-line version ISSN 2007-3380

Revista bio ciencias vol.8  Tepic  2021  Epub Oct 04, 2021

https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.08.e982 

Original articles

Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) response to the inoculation of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the parasitism of root-knot Meloidogyne incognita

E. Herrera-Parra1 

J. Ramos-Zapata2 

C. Basto-Pool1 

J. Cristóbal-Alejo3  * 

1 Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Km. 25 Carretera Antigua a Mérida-Motul, Mocochá, CP. 97450, Yucatán, México.

2 Departamento de Ecología Tropical. Campus de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. Km. 15.5 Carretera Mérida-Xmatkuil, CP. 97315 Mérida, Yucatán, México.

3 Tecnológico Nacional de México/Campus Conkal, Km. 16.3 Antigua carretera Mérida-Motul, Conkal. CP. 97345 Yucatán, México.


Abstract

Under greenhouse conditions, two experiments were established with the main goal of estimating the effect of three native species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), in the initial growth, 47 days after the sowing of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), and in the biocontrol at 50 days after inoculation of M. incognita. In both experiments, five treatments were included: three consisting for each species of AMF: T1 = Funneliformis geosporum, T2 = Claroideoglomus claroideum, and T3 = Glomus ambisporum, with the incorporation of 50 % chemical fertilization, T4 = 100 % chemical fertilization, and T5 = a control (only water, without AMF and fertilization). In the second experiment, in addition to the three treatments with AMF, one with a chemical nematicide and the other without chemical nematicide and AMF were included. The treatments were established in a completely randomized experimental design. At 47 days after planting, G. ambisporum promoted significant growth (p ≤ 0.01) of the seedlings at height (20.50 %), dry aerial biomass (30.43 %), and fresh root weight (24.7 %) concerning 100 % chemical fertilization. The mycorrhizal colonization was high (96.97-100 %). At 50 days after the inoculation of the nematode F. geosporum and G. ambisporum significantly reduced (p ≤ 0.01) the index of galling to 79.65 %. The effect of the nematicide to reduce the reproduction of the nematode was tantamount (p ≤ 0.01) to that achieved with F. geosporum and G. ambisporum, with reductions in egg production of 89 % and females formation of 69.73 %. The fungal species favored plant growth; these species are a potential microbial resource for the biocontrol of M. incognita.

Keywords: Capsicum annuum; M. incognita; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus

Resumen

En condiciones de invernadero se establecieron dos experimentos con el objetivo de estimar el efecto de especies nativas de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares (AMF), en el crecimiento inicial, a los 47 días posteriores a la siembra de chile dulce (Capsicum annuum) y en el biocontrol a los 50 días posteriores a la inoculación de M. incognita. En ambos experimentos se incluyeron cinco tratamientos: tres constituidos por cada especie de AMF: T1 = Funneliformis geosporum, T2 = Claroideoglomus claroideum y T3 = Glomus ambisporum, con la incorporación de un 50 % de fertilización química, T4 = fertilización química 100 % y T5 = un control (solo agua, sin AMF y sin fertilización). En el segundo experimento además de los tres tratamientos con AMF se incluyó uno con nematicida químico y otro sin nematicida químico y sin AMF. Los tratamientos se establecieron en un diseño experimental completamente al azar. A los 47 días posteriores a la siembra, G. ambisporum promovió un crecimiento significativo (p ≤ 0.01) de la altura de plántulas (20.50 %), biomasa aérea seca (30.43 %) y peso fresco de raíz (24.7 %) en relación a la fertilización química al 100 %. La colonización micorrízica fue alta (96.97-100 %). A los 50 días posteriores a la inoculación del nematodo F. geosporum y G. ambisporum redujeron significativamente (p ≤ 0.01) el índice de agallamiento en 79.65 %. El efecto del nematicida químico para reducir la reproducción del nematodo fue igual (p ≤ 0.01) al obtenido con F. geosporum y G. ambisporum con reducciones de producción de huevos en 89 % y de formación de hembras de 69.73 %. Las especies de hongos favorecieron el crecimiento de las plantas y son un recurso potencial microbiano para el biocontrol de M. incognita.

Palabras clave: Capsicum annuum; M. incognita; hongo micorrízico arbuscular

Introduction

In Mexico, approximately 161, 285 hectares are dedicated to the cultivation of Capsicum annuum L. where at least 3, 296, 874 t of fruits are produced, which positions the country as the second largest producer in the world (SIAP, 2017). For its cultivation it is required healthy, vigorous seedlings, with developed roots, of excellent quality and that survive the conditions that prevail in the definitive sites for its cultivation (Estrada-Luna & Davies, 2003). Agrochemicals are applied to nourish the seedlings and keep them free of pests and diseases. However, these products are not used rationally and consequently cause high production costs and soil and groundwater contamination (Pérez et al., 2011). Likewise, in greenhouses and fields, plants with dwarfism, chlorosis, wilt, nodules or galls in the root system and reduction in the number and size of fruits are frequently observed, which reduces their yield. These symptoms have been associated with the presence of the root-knot nematodes Meloidogyne incognita (Herrera-Parra et al., 2011). Globally, it causes production losses of at least 100 billion dollars (Bartlem et al., 2014). The toxicity of chemical nematicides applied for their control persists in the environment and causes damage to human health, making it necessary to seek control alternatives compatible with the environment and the fauna that inhabits the ecosystems (Xie et al., 2015).

An ecological alternative is the use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which participate in the diversification, restoration, conservation of ecosystems and productivity of agricultural crops (Lara-Pérez, et al., 2014; Bona et al., 2016). They favor nutrient translocation, improve photosynthetic rate, and regulate stomatal conductance (Bárzana et al., 2014; Zayed et al., 2017). Reports indicate that in C. annuum, they reduce abiotic stress, increase height, leaf area (Castillo et al., 2009), biomass, and fruit yield (Ortas et al., 2011; López-Gómez et al., 2015).

On the other hand, in nematode-parasitized crops, AMF act as direct competition for penetration sites, spaces and nutrients, alter the composition of radical exudates, modify root morphology or activate defense mechanisms (Schouteden et al., 2015) which reduces the penetration of the infective phase of the nematode (J2), reproduction and root damage. The interactions of AMF-Capsicum-nematode can vary, with reported increases, decreases or no effect on plant growth (Erdinç et al., 2017; Bazghaleh et al., 2018), or on the nematode’s ability to reproduce (Herrera-Parra et al., 2014). These responses are modulated by the origin of the AMF, the conditions where they are incorporated, and by functional symbiosis with the host (Ju-Kyeong et al., 2009). The best benefit of the AMF-plant association has been recorded with the use of native AMF; this condition makes them adapted to abiotic conditions, which favors their establishment and the colonization of local hosts (Cofcewicz et al., 2001).

In southeastern Mexico, few studies consider the evaluation of native AMF as growth promoters of tropical horticultural species and biological control of phytoparasitic nematodes, and little is known about the effect of native AMF species on the initial growth of C. annuum and on the duck system C. annuum-M. incognita. In the present study, two experiments were designed: the first, to estimate the effect of three AMF species on the initial growth responses of sweet pepper (C. annuum) and the second, to evaluate the biocontrol of M. incognita with the inoculation of the same AMF in the same cultivar.

Material and Methods

Origin of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

The AMF were isolated from soil from the lowland deciduous forest of southeastern Mexico, in the Cuxtal ecological reserve, with locations of 20°52’ 07.44’’ N and 89°36’ 51.64’’ W. The soil type is Leptosol with depths varying from 0 to 25 cm (Díaz-Garrido et al., 2005). The climate is warm sub-humid with rain in summer and winter. The average annual precipitation is 900 mm with an average annual temperature of 27.5 °C (García, 1973). The dominant vegetation is tropical deciduous forest (Flores & Espejel, 1994).

Propagation, extraction and identification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

To identify the AMF, the collected soil was sifted and mixed with sterile sand (1:1 v/v) and placed in 10 kg pots for propagation. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) seeds were then planted as a trap crop (Sieverding, 1991). The pots were kept in greenhouses at an average of 36 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 64 %, and were irrigated at field capacity. After 12 weeks and with the purpose of stimulating the sporulation of the AMF, irrigation was suspended. In week 16, spore extraction was carried out, according to the method of wet sifting and decanting and centrifugation (Gerdermann & Nicholson, 1963), where 100 g of soil from each propagation pot were processed and homogenized with Tween 20 (0.05 %) in water, the solution was filtered through a series of sieves with 600, 425, 90 and 25 μm mesh opening, and from the retained fractions, spores were extracted and deposited in 1.5 mL vials provided with sterile distilled water.

The identification was made by comparing and contrasting the morphological characteristics of the spores, with genus- and species-specific descriptors, available on the website of the International Culture Collection of Arbuscular and Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (West Virginia University, 2020), the taxonomy of Glomeromycota (Schenck & Perez, 1990; Schüßler & Walker, 2010). Spores were separated by species and deposited in vials. According to morphological characteristics three species were identified: Funneliformis geosporum C. Walker & A. Schüßler, Claroideoglomus claroideum C. Walker A. and Glomus ambisporum C. Walker & A. Schüßler. For the conservation of the spores, they were disinfected by removing the sterile water from the vials and adding Tween 20 at 0.05 %, they were centrifuged at 500 rpm for one minute, then the supernatant was removed and 2 % Chloramine T was added. The water was centrifuged at 500 rpm for 15 minutes, both procedures were repeated twice. Finally, the supernatant was removed and a mixture of gentamicin (100 ppm) and streptomycin (200 ppm) was added to each vial and kept at 4 °C until inoculation.

Evaluation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fires in the initial growth of sweet pepper (C. annuum).

Five treatments were evaluated, three constituted by each species of AMF: T1 = F. geosporum, T2 = C. claroideum and T3 = G. ambisporum, with the incorporation of 50 % of chemical fertilization, two control treatments: T4 = 100 % chemical fertilization (Polyfeed®, 17-17-17, Haifa, Mexico, 2 g L-1 of water) without AMF, applied twice a week, from 10 days after sowing (das) and T5 = one control (only water, without AMF and without fertilization).

Before the establishment of the experiment, soil was sterilized by means of steam dragging for three days for 1 hour at 90 °C, and ten germination trays of 72 cavities were filled. In six of these, 30 spores of each AMF were deposited in each cavity, the remaining four served as controls, without AMF inoculation. In the trays were planted sweet pepper seeds (C. annuum) type Criollo previously disinfected with sodium hypochlorite 1 % followed by two washings with sterile distilled water. The trays were covered until the germination of the seeds and were kept in the greenhouse at an average of 28 ± 2 °C, with an average relative humidity of 64 % and an average light intensity of 400 lux with the application of irrigation at field capacity.

After 47 das the growth variables were estimated at 30 seedlings: seedling height, dry air biomass, fresh and dry root weight. The percentage of mycorrhizal colonization was estimated in five plants per treatment. The roots were washed with running water and deposited in cassettes for tissue, then they were passed through KOH at 10 %, H202 at 30 %, HCL at 30 %, with heating and rinsing with running water. Finally, trypan blue was added and they were left to rest for 24 hours. After this time, trypan blue was removed and the roots were rinsed with running water (Phillips & Hayman, 1970).

Later, permanent preparations were made, 10 sections of roots were taken and mounted on an object holder, with the help of brown paper they were pressed to soften them, then two drops of polyvinyl alcohol and an object cover were added. The samples were labeled and placed in the drying oven at 47 °C for 72 hours. Finally, the structures of the AMF (mycelium, spores, vesicles and coils) were observed in an optical microscope and the percentage of colonization was quantified (McGonigle et al., 1990).

Nematode control experiment

Obtaining J2 from M. incognita

Commercial plantations in production of sweet pepper (C. annuum) parasitized by M. incognita were sampled in the municipality of Tixpehual, Yucatan, located 20°58’40”N and 89°26’30”W at an altitude of 8 meters above sea level. The gilled roots were deposited in paper bags and kept at 6 °C in refrigeration for 24 hours. They were washed with running water and egg masses were extracted with syringes under the stereoscopic microscope (Leica M80, USA). They were disinfected with 1 % sodium hypochlorite for one minute and washed with sterile distilled water until the disinfectant was removed. The eggs were incubated in a microbiological culture oven at 25 ± 1 °C for three days until the J2 hatched. Then, they were concentrated in a 500 mL flask, 1 mL was taken and counted to calibrate the inoculum. Adult females were extracted from the gilled roots to identify the species by morpho-taxonomic characters (Ayuob, 1980).

Control bioassay of M. incognita in greenhouse

In order to estimate the biocontrol of M. incognita with AMF, plastic pots of 2 kg capacity were filled with sterile soil. Before transplanting, a hole of 3 cm in diameter and 5 cm deep was made and 1 mL of water was inoculated containing 1,000 larvated eggs and 300 J2 of M. incognita, then a 47-day-old sweet chili bell pepper (C. annuum) seedling inoculated with the AMF was transplanted, as indicated in the first experiment and coming from this one.

In this experiment there was an adjustment of the nutrition of the plants from the inoculation of the nematode. This consisted in a fertilization with chemical balance 2:1:1, with the sources: urea (Magro®, 46-0000, Fertinova, Mexico), potassium nitrate (Ultrasol®, 1200-46, SQM, Mexico) and monoammonium phosphate (MAP®, 12-61-00, Greenhow S. A. de C. V. Mexico), applied twice a week.

Five treatments were also evaluated in this experiment: three constituted the AMF species: T1 = F. geosporum, T2 = C. claroideum and T3 = G. ambisporum, two control treatments: T4 = a 24 % oxamyl nematicide in a dose of 1 mL L-1 of water (Vydate®, Dupont, Mexico), applied to the soil at the time of transplant, with nematodes and without AMF and T5 = a control, with nematodes and without AMF. Each treatment was constituted by 15 plants that constituted the repetitions, distributed in greenhouse conditions, indicated in the first experiment.

The treatments were evaluated 50 days after inoculation with M. incognita, and the following variables were considered as biocontrol variables of the nematode: the galling index estimated with a scale of radical damage for root-knot nematodes (Taylor & Sasser, 1983), the number of eggs and females per gram of root (Herrera-Parra et al., 2014). As growth variables were measured: plant height, number of flower buds per plant, dry aerial biomass per plant, fresh root weight, root length and finally by volumetric displacement, root volume. As variables associated with AMF, the percentage of colonization in the roots of five plants per treatment was estimated according to the techniques of Phillips and Hayman (1970) and McGonigle et al. (1990) indicated in the first experiment.

Experimental design and data analysis

A completely randomized experimental design was used in the experiments. With the obtained data, analysis of variance was made and for the case of data related to total mycorrhizal colonization and the galling index, which did not comply with the assumptions of normal distribution, they were transformed to homogenize variances by means of the sine arc function [y=arcsin (x/100)]. Tukey’s method (p ≤ 0.05) was applied as a mean comparator, using the statistical package InfoStat 2018.

Results and Discussion

Response of sweet pepper (C. annuum) seedlings to inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

AMF promoted significant growth (p ≤ 0.01) of C. annuum seedlings at 47 das compared to control seedlings. Treatments involving C. claroideum and G. ambisporum increased the height of the seedlings by up to 20.50 % relative to those inoculated with F. geosporum and 100 % chemical fertilization, and by up to 73 % relative to those of the control (Table 1).

Table 1 Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on sweet pepper seedlings (C. annuum) at 47 days after planting. 

Treatment Seedling heigth (cm) Dry aerial biomass (g) Fresh root biomass (g) Dry root biomass (g) Colonization (%)
*F. geosporum 10.40 ± 0.42b 0.26 ± 0.03c 0.81 ± 0.11b 0.09 ± 0.02c 98.66 ± 0.95b
*C. claroideum 13.90 ± 1.09a 0.42 ± 0.08ab 1.09 ± 0.20ab 0.16 ± 0.04a 96.97± 1.73c
*G. ambisporum 13.76 ± 0.93a 0.46 ± 0.11a 1.21 ± 0.24a 0.16 ± 0.03ab 100 ± 0.00a
** 100 % Chemical Fertilization 11.05 ± 0.51b 0.32 ± 0.03bc 0.91 ± 0.01b 0.11 ± 0.07bc 6.18 ± 0.73e
Control 3.75 ± 0.14c 0.01 ± 0.05d 0.12 ± 0.13c 0.003 ± 0.02d 9.51 ± 0.44d
LSD 1.24 0.12 0.28 0.48 0.06

The table shows averages ± standard deviation. Growth variables: n = 30. Colonization = 5. LSD = Least significant difference. Equal letters within the same column are statistically equal (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).

* Treatments that included 50 % chemical fertilization.

** Treatment that included 100 % chemical fertilization.

A significant effect (p ≤ 0.01) of dry aerial biomass production was obtained with G. ambisporum with gains of 97 % in relation to the control seedlings, in addition it surpassed the 100 % chemical fertilization and F. geosporum with which up to 0.32 ± 0.03 g of dry aerial biomass was registered. Also, C. claroideum improved this response variable as did G. ambisporum and 100 % chemical fertilization (Table 1).

Root growth was significantly increased (p ≤ 0.01) with C. claroideum and G. ambisporum and significantly increased fresh (90 %) and dry (98 %) root biomass, relative to the control. The averages of fresh and dry root biomass with 100 % chemical fertilization were equal to those caused by F. geosporum and lower than those of C. claroideum and G. ambisporum (Table 1). In the cultivation of C. annuum, a preliminary growth phase under protected conditions is required to obtain seedlings with desirable characteristics for establishment in production systems (Macías-Rodríguez et al., 2013). At this stage, inoculation with C. claroideum and G. ambisporum is an alternative to improve seedling growth (height, aerial and root biomass), even with better characteristics than those obtained with 100 % chemical fertilization. These effects have been observed in cultivars of C. annuum Ancho with Glomus spp + Gigaspora sp. and the incorporation of medium-dose fertilization (P 22 µg mL-1) where higher dry biomass was estimated (Alonso-Contreras, 2013). In cultivars such as Jalapeño, De árbol and Serrano with the inoculation Rhizophagus intraradices (formerly Glomus intraradices) and Glomus zac-19 improved the emission of leaves, stem diameters and aerial biomass (González-Mendoza et al., 2015). In C. frutescens they favored initial growth with F. mosseae and Racocetra fulgida (formerly Scutellospora fulgida) in combination with 50 % of bovine manure (Jiménez et al., 2017). Other reports indicate that AMF significantly increase photosynthetic activity, chlorophyll content, and assimilation of water and immobile nutrients from the soil (Alvarado-Carrillo et al., 2014; Lehman & Rilling, 2015), reduce biotic and abiotic stress (Khalid et al., 2016; Tchabi et al., 2019), which favors the growth of the initial phase of crops as observed in this study.

Of the three AMF species, F. geosporum was the least favorable to seedling growth. This response may have been modulated by compatibility between AMF and the host and no functional mutualistic symbiosis was established (Jin et al., 2017; Bazghaleh et al., 2018), which does not show a positive effect on plant biomass production (Rosheim, 2016; Avio et al., 2017). The results indicated that AMF with medium fertilization doses favored the growth of C. annuum seedlings and that the incorporation of these microorganisms can be a complementary alternative for seedling production, which reduces the use of chemical fertilizers and damage to the environment.

The AMF species: F. geosporum, C. claroideum and G. ambisporum colonized the roots of C. annuum seedlings, with significant difference (p ≤ 0.01). In particular, G. ambisporum had greater colonization (100 ± 0.00 %), followed by F. geosporum (98.66 ± 0.95 %) and C. claroideum (96.97 ± 1.73 %). Seedlings with 100 % chemical fertilization and those of the control had less than 10 % root colonization (Table 1). The estimated colonization percentages in the seedlings inoculated with these fungi suggest that in this growth stage they allow the colonization of their roots, which may be a strategy to increase growth success in early stages of the crop, where better P translocation, photosynthetic rate and dry biomass production have been reported (Alonso-Contreras et al., 2013; Nana et al., 2015).

Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on M. incognita

In the control plants inoculated with M. incognita, without arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and without the application of nematicide, the symptoms of the disease were observed: chlorosis, decrease in growth and galls formation. In these plants there were higher index of galls (51.60 ± 37.24), number of eggs (408.30 ± 282.54) and females (60.80 ± 41.97) (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 2).

Table 2 Reproduction variables of M. incognita estimated 50 days after inoculation with the nematode in sweet pepper (C. annuum). 

Treatments Galling index
(%)
Number of eggs per g of root Number of females per g of root
F. geosporum 15.50 ± 5.27b 155.20 ± 17.40b 24.00 ± 2.30b
C. claroideum 32.00 ± 9.66ab 344.20 ± 30.54a 37.40 ± 4.35ab
G. ambisporum 10.50 ± 6.45b 163.20 ± 20.50b 25.70 ± 4.00b
Nematicide 30.00 ± 10.32ab 44.40 ± 3.20b 18.40 ± 1.89b
Control 51.60 ± 37.24ª 408.30 ± 282.54a 60.80 ± 41.97a
LSD 23.12 162.24 24.15

The table shows averages ± standard deviation. n = 15. LSD = Least significant difference. Equal letters within the same column are statistically equal (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).

The galling index was significantly reduced (p ≤ 0.01) with the inoculation of F. geosporum and G. ambisporum, which reduced damages by 79.65 % in relation to the control plants (Table 2). This potential has been reported with R. intraradices (formerly G. intraradices) against Nacobbus aberrans (Lax et al., 2011), with Rhizophagus intraradices, Funneliformis mosseae against Rotylenchulus reniformis (Herrera-Parra et al., 2014), with G. bagyarajii, G. macrocarpum against M. incognita (Raghavendra et al., 2016), with Gigaspora albida, Claroideoglomus etunicatum and Acaulospora morrowiae (formerly Acaulospora longula) against M. arenaria (Da Silva et al., 2017), which evidences the effectiveness as microbial biocontrol agents.

C. claroideum and the nematicide treatment, although statistically not different from the control, showed a tendency to reduce the galling index by up to 38 %. The effect with C. claroideum was related to its ability to improve root length and branching, which allowed new spaces available for nematode feeding and new infections, which caused more damage and up to 87 % of egg production and 51 % of female formation, in relation to the plants treated with nematicide. This treatment did not prevent the penetration of J2, but significantly reduced the reproduction of the nematode with 44.40 ± 3.20 eggs and 18.40 ± 1.89 females, and its effect to reduce the damage was the same as with F. geosporum and G. ambisporum, which limited the production of eggs by 89 % and the formation of females by 69.73 %, in relation to the control plants (Table 2).

The ability of AMF to reduce damage and reproduction of endoparasitic nematodes (Lax et al., 2011; Herrera-Parra et al., 2014; Tchabi et al., 2019), is associated with competition among organisms for carbon sources, spaces and sites of infection, since these are organisms with the same physiological needs and struggle to establish themselves in the same place where they obtain resources for their feeding (Vos et al., 2014; Schouteden et al., 2015). It is also related to the production of radical exudates, such as phenols, flavonoids and organic acids (Hage-Ahmed et al., 2013); which disorient the J2 of the nematode and prevent its penetration and allow functional symbiosis between plants and AMF, allowing the activation of the host defense system (Cervantes-Gámez et al., 2015). This action prepares the plant and allows a defense response also against foliar pathogens (Pérez-Ortega et al., 2015, Reyes-Tena et al., 2016).

Effect of AMF on C. annuum growth

The decrease in root damage and reduction of nematode reproduction by AMF favored plant growth. In the control plants the growth was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.01) than in the plants treated with AMF and nematicide.

The plants with higher height were the ones inoculated with F. geosporum and C. claroideum, these treatments presented the same effect as nematicide and registered plants 75 % higher than control ones (Table 3). Similar reports showed height increases of C. annuum cv plants. Cacho de Cabra with the inoculation of C. claroideum (Castillo et al., 2009) and in the Jalapeño, Serrano and De árbol cultivars, with the inoculation of Glomus spp. and R. intraradices significantly favored the growth in height, in relation to the control plants (González-Mendoza et al., 2015). The functional interaction between AMF and plants increases the production of gibberellins and cytokines (Alonso-Contreras et al., 2013; Pereira et al., 2016), reduces abiotic stress and nematode damage (Baum et al., 2015). Factors that favor the growth of plants still parasitized by these phyto-parasites.

Table 3 Sweet pepper (C. annuum) growth mycorrhizae and its response to M. incognita 

Treatments Plant height
(cm)
Floral button
number
Dry aerial
biomass (g)
Root length
(cm)
Fresh root
weigth (g)
Root volume
(cm3)
F. geosporum 24.30 ± 2.45a 8.00 ± 0.78b 2.20 ± 0.30ab 19.35 ± 3.18b 5.03 ± 1.53ab 5.80 ± 2.14b
C. claroideum 21.00 ± 3.68ab 12.00 ± 0.87ª 1.76 ± 0.51b 25.25 ± 0.75a 3.74 ± 0.19bc 4.40 ± 1.50bc
G. ambisporum 19.40 ± 1.83b 11.00 ± 1.08a 1.82 ± 0.42b 23.55 ± 1.75a 3.37 ± 0.62c 2.80 ± 1.03c
Nematicide 22.40 ± 2.06ab 11.00 ± 0.87a 2.69 ± 0.45a 19.95 ± 1.72b 5.86 ± 1.80a 8.70 ± 1.56a
Control 5.90 ± 4.20c -- 0.09 ± 0.08c 6.20 ± 4.30c 0.44 ± 0.44d 0.25 ± 0.23d
LSD 3.80 1.03 0.49 3.37 1.42 1.83

The table shows averages ± standard deviation. n = 15. LSD = Least significant difference. Equal letters within the same column are statistically equal (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05).

The highest number of flower buds was presented in the plants inoculated with the AMF and the nematicide, on average they ranged from 8 ± 0.78 to 11 ± 0.87, the control plants did not emit flower buds (Table 3). This response was associated to the capacity that the AMF have to translocate nutrients such as N, P, K, Ca, Cu, Mg, Zn, Fe (Nana et al., 2015; He et al., 2017) which favors better nutrition, growth and emission of flower buds, e.g. studies with G. caledonium and R. intraradices in C. annuum promoted greater emission of flowers, associated with better contents of P and Zn (Ortas et al., 2011). In species such as Heliconia stricta, inoculation of Rhizophagus intraradices and Zac 29 strain increased the number of buds and flowers, improved nutritional status and photosynthetic activity (Uc-Ku et al., 2019).

A significant increase was registered (p ≤ 0.01) of dry aerial biomass with the nematicide (2.69 g±0.45) and F. geosporum (2.20 g ± 0.30), with the rest of the AMF, increases higher than the control were registered up to 95 % (Table 3). This response has been observed in crops inoculated with AMF (González-Mendoza et al., 2015; Zayed et al., 2017; Uc-Ku et al., 2019) in which changes in photosynthetic activity are reported to favor CO2 fixation, capture efficiency and P translocation, which is reflected in greater growth, foliar expansion and biomass production.

With C. claroideum and G. ambisporum the plants had 21 % longer roots than those treated with the nematicide and 75 % than those of the control. The roots with the highest fresh weight (p ≤ 0.01) were achieved with the nematicide (5.86 ± 1.80) and with F. geosporum (5.03 ± 1.53). With the rest of the AMF it increased up to 88 % in relation to the control plants. The largest volume of roots was estimated with the nematicide (8.70 ± 1.56 cm3) and a significant increase (95 %) in root size with the incorporation of the AMF in relation to those of the control (Table 3). The highest percentage of mycorrhizal colonization was estimated with G. ambisporum (68.83 %). With C. claroideum and F. geosporum the roots had 42.98 %. The plants treated with the nematicide and those of the control presented a 6.36 % of colonization, which could be due to spores introduced by air currents.

The results obtained in this study showed that with native species of AMF as a biological resource, it can be used to reduce the biotic stress induced by root pathogens such as M. incognita and to favor the growth of C. annuum in the study conditions evaluated.

Conclusion

The greatest growth in the initial stage was obtained with C. claroideum and G. ambisporum and their ability to promote growth was greater than that obtained with seedlings treated with 100 % chemical fertilization and control plants. AMF colonized the roots in the initial growth stage of C. annuum. The best biocontrol of the nematode was obtained with the inoculation of F. geosporum and G. ambisporum. The AMF show potential as microbial agents to favor the growth in the initial stage of C. annuum and as biocontrol agents of M. incognita in the study conditions evaluated.

REFERENCES

Avio, L., Sbrana, C., Giovannetti, M. and Frassineti, S. (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect total phenolics content and antioxidant activity in leaves of oak leaf lettuce varieties. Horticulturae, 224: 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.022 [ Links ]

Alvarado-Carrillo, M., Díaz-Franco, A. and Peña del Río, Ma. De los A. (2014). Productividad de tomate mediante micorriza arbuscular en agricultura protegida. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 15(3): 513-518. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342014000300014Links ]

Alonso-Contreras, R., Aguilera-Gómez, L. I., Rubí-Arreaga, M., González-Huerta, A., Olalde-Portugal, V. and RivasManzano, V. (2013). Influencia de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en el crecimiento y desarrollo de Capsicum annuum L. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 4 (1): 77-88. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/remexca/v4n1/v4n1a6.pdfLinks ]

Ayoub, M.S. (1980). Plant nematology an agricultural training aid. Department of food and agriculture division of plant industry laboratory services nematology. California. Sacramento, USA, p. 157. [ Links ]

Bartlem, D. G., Jones, M. G. K. and Hammes, U. Z. (2014). Vascularization and nutrient delivery at root-knot nematodes feeding sites in host roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65 (7): 1789-1798. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert415 [ Links ]

Baum, C., El-Tohamy, W. and Gruda, N. (2015). Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a review. Scienta Horticulturae, 187:131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.002 [ Links ]

Bárzana, G., Aroca, R., Bienert, G. P., Chaumont, F. and Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. (2014). New insights into the regulation of aquaporins by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in maize plants under drought stress and possible implications for plant performance. Molecular Plant Microbe Interactions, 27(4): 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1094/ MPMI-09-13-0268-R [ Links ]

Bazghaleh, N., Hamel, C., Gan, Y., Taran, B. and Knight, J. D. (2018). Genotypic variations in the responses of chickpea to arbuscular mycorrhizal and non mycorrhizal fungal endophytes. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 64 (4): 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0521 [ Links ]

Bona, E., Sacarafoni, A., Marsano, F., Boatti, L., Copetta, A., Massa, N., Gamalero, E., D´Agostino, G., Cavaletto, M. and Berta, G. (2016). Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis affects the grain proteome of Zea mays: a field study. Scientific Reports, 6: 26439. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26439 [ Links ]

Castillo, R. C., Sotomayor, S. L., Ortíz, O. C., Leonelli, C. G., Borie, B. F. and Rubio, H. R. (2009). Efect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on an ecological crop or chili peppers (Capsicum annuum L.). Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 69 (1): 79-87. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392009000100010 [ Links ]

Cervantes-Gámez, R. G., Bueno-Ibarra, M. A., Cruz-Mendívil, A., Calderón-Vázquez, C. L., Ramírez-Douriet, C. M., Maldonado-Mendoza, I. E., Villalobos-López, M. A., Valdez-Ortíz, A. and López-Meyer, M. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal simbiosis-induced expression changes in Solanum lycopersicum leaves revealed by RNA-seq analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep, 34, 89-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-015-0903-9 [ Links ]

Cofcewicz, E. T., Medeiros, C. A. B., Carneiro, R. M. D. G. and Pierobom, C. R. (2001). Interação dos fungos micorrízicos arbusculares Glomus etunicatum e Gigaspora margarita e o nematóide das galhas Meloidogyne javanica em tomateiro. Fitopatología Brasileira, 26 (1): 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-41582001000100011 [ Links ]

Díaz-Garrido, S., Bautista, F., Delgado, C. and Castillo-González, M. (2005). Mapas parcelarios de suelos en Mérida, Yucatán, México. In: Bautista F, Palacio G (eds.) Caracterización y manejo de los suelos de la península de Yucatán. Implicaciones agropecuarias, forestales y ambientales. Universidad Autónoma de Campeche, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mérida, 145-158. [ Links ]

Da Silva Campos, M. A., Da Silva, S. F. B., Yano- Melo, A. M., De Melo, N. F. and Maia, L. C. (2017). Application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi during the acclimatization of Alpinia pupurta to induce tolerance to Meloidogyne arenaria. The Plant Pathology Journal, 33(3): 329-336. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2016.0094 [ Links ]

Erdinç, Ç., Demirer, D. M., Ekincialp, A., Sensoy, S. and Demir, S. (2017). Variations in response of determinate common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation, Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 4:1-9 https://doi:10.3906/tar-1609-68 [ Links ]

Estrada-Luna, A. A. & Davies, Jr. F. T. (2003). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence water relations, gas exchange abscisic acid and growth of micropropaged chile ancho pepper (Capsicum annuum) plantlets during aclimatization and post-acclimatization. Journal of Plant Physiology. 160 (9): 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00989 [ Links ]

Flores Guido, J. S. & Espejel Carbajal, M. I. (1994). Tipos de vegetación de la península de Yucatán. Fascículo 3. Etnoflora Yucatanense. Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán. Mérida. [ Links ]

García Amaro, E. (1973). Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México. [ Links ]

González-Mendoza, D., García-López, A., Ceceña-Duran, C., Grimaldo-Juárez, O., Avilés-Marín, M., Pérez-Luna, Y. and Álvarez-Gutiérrez, P. (2015). Hongos micorrízicos arbusculares y sus efectos en el crecimiento de diferentes cultivares de Capsicum annuum L. Phyton, 84:345-350. http://www.revistaphyton.fund-romuloraggio.org.ar/vol84-2/Gonzalez_Mendoza.pdfLinks ]

Gerdemann, J. & Nicholson, T. (1963). Spores of mycorrhizal endogene species extracted from soil gy wet sieving and decanting. Transactions of the British Mycologycal Society, 46: 235-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00071536(63)80079-0. [ Links ]

He, L., Li, C. & Liu, R. (2017). Indirect interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Spodoptera exigua alter photosynthesis and plant endogenous hormones. Mycorrhiza, 27:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-017-0771-2 [ Links ]

Hage-Ahmed, K., Moyses, A., Voglgruber, A., Hadacek, F. and Steinkellner, S. (2013). Alterations in root exudation of intercropped tomato mediated by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and the soilborne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici. J. Phytopathol, 161, 763-773. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12130 [ Links ]

Herrera-Parra, E., Lozano-Contreras, M. G., Santamaría-Basulto, F., Cristóbal-Alejo, J., Cabrera-H, A. J. and Marbán-Mendoza, N. (2014). Inoculantes micorrícicos para el control de Rotylenchulus reniformis (Tylenchida: Hoplolaimidae) en Carica papaya cv. Maradol. Nematropica, 44: 218-227. [ Links ]

Herrera-Parra, E., Cristóbal-Alejo, J., Tun-Suárez, J. M., Góngora-Jiménez, J. A. and Lomas-Barrié, T. C. (2011). Nematofauna nociva (Meloidogyne spp.) en cultivos hortícolas tropicales: distribución y perspectivas de manejo en Yucatán. En: Recursos genéticos microbianos de la zona golfo sur-sureste de México. SUBNARGEN. Edit. Morevalladolid S de R. L. de C. V. 125-136. [ Links ]

Jiménez, J. J., Ramírez, M., Petit, B., Colmenares, C. and Parra, I. (2017). Efecto de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares y estiércol de bovinos en el crecimiento inicial y pigmentación en Capsicum frutescens L. Bioagro, 29(2):137-144. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/857/85751092008.pdfLinks ]

Jin, L., Wang, Q., Wang, Q., Wang, X. and Gange, C. A. (2017). Mycorrhizal-induced growth depression in plants. Symbiosis, 72:81-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-016-0444-5 [ Links ]

Ju-Kyeong, E. & Ahn-Heum, E. 2009. Differential growth response of various crop species arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation. Mycobiology, 31(1):72-76. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3749461/pdf/mb-37-72.pdfLinks ]

Khalid, M. E., Ahmed, S. El-Din. and Abdallah, M. E. (2016). The impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in mitigating saltinduced adverse effect in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 24 (1):170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.010 [ Links ]

Lehman, A. & Rilling, C. M. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal contribution to copper, manganese and iron nutrient concentrations in crops-A meta-analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 81: 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.013 [ Links ]

Lara-Pérez, L., Noa-Carrazana, J. C., Landa-López, A. de J., Hernández-González, S., Oros-Ortega, I. and Andrade-Torres, A. (2014). Colonización y estructura de la comunidad de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en Alsophila firma (Cyatheaceae) en bosque mesófilo de montaña en Veracruz, México. Revista de Biología Tropical, 62(2):1609-1632. https://doi:10.15517/rbt.v622i4.13324 [ Links ]

Lax, P., Becerra, G. A., Soteras, F., Cabello, M. and Doucet, M. E. (2011). Effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intrarradices on the false root-knot nematode Naccobbus aberrans in tomato plants. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 47: 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0514-4 [ Links ]

López-Gómez, B. F., Alarcón, A., Quintero-Lizaola, R. and Lara-Herrera, A. (2015). Selección de cepas de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en dos sistemas de producción de chile. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6(6): 1203-1214. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342015000600005Links ]

McGonigle, T. P., Miller, M. H., Evans, D. G., Fairchild, G. L. and Swan, J. A. (1990). A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal. New Phytol, 115:495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x [ Links ]

Macías-Rodríguez, H., Muñoz-Villalobos, J. A., Velásquez-Valle, M. A., Potisek-Talavera, M. C. and Villa-Castorena, M. M. (2013). Chile Habanero: Descripción de su cultivo en la península de Yucatán. Revista Chapingo Serie Zonas Áridas. 12 (2): 37-43. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=455545057001Links ]

Nana, W. L., Pokaa, N. A., Fokom, R., Nguemezi, T. S., Mangaptche, L. E., Eke, P., Kuate, J. and Etoa, F. X. (2015). Effect of nitrogen levels and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on biomass production, mineral nutrition, sugar and total phenolic content of two Zea mays cultivars. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 9 (1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEA/2015/18088 [ Links ]

Ortas, I., Sari, N., Akpinar, C. and Yetisir, H. (2011). Screening mycorrhiza species for plant growth, P and Zn uptake in pepper seedling grown under greenhouse conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 128 (2): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.12.014 [ Links ]

Pérez-Castañeda, L., Castañón-Nájera, G., Ramírez-Meraz, M. and Mayek-Pérez, N. (2015). Avances y perspectivas sobre el estudio del origen y la diversidad genética de Capsicum spp. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios, 2 (4): 117-128. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-90282015000100009Links ]

Pérez-Ortega, E., de la Noval, B., Martínez-Coca, B., Torres-de la Noval., Medina-Carmona, A., Hernández, A. and León, O. (2015). Inducción de mecanismos de defensa en plantas de tomate (Solanum lycopersicon L.) micorrizadas frente al ataque de Oidiopsis taurica (Lev.) Salm. Cultivos Tropicales, 36 (1):98-106. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0258-59362015000100013Links ]

Phillips, G. M. & Hayman, D. S. (1970). Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions British Mycological Society, 55 (1):158-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3 [ Links ]

Pereira, J. A. P., Vieira, C., Freitas, M. S. M., Prins, C. L., Martins, M. A. and Rodrigues, R. (2016). Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on Capsicum spp. Journal of Agricultral Science, 154 (5), 828-894. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615000714 [ Links ]

Raghavendra, K. M., Ashwin, R. and Bagyaraj, D. J. (2016). Screning arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi in order to select the best for alleviating wilt disease complexo of Capsicum. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Science, 88 (2):679-684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-016-0804-1 [ Links ]

Rosheim, M. L. (2016). Plant genotype influences mycorrhiza benefits and susceotibility to a soil pathogen. The American Minland Naturalist, 175 (1): 103-102. https://doi.org/10.1674/amid-175-01-103-112.1 [ Links ]

Reyes-Tena, A., Quiñone-Aguilar, E. E., Rincón-Enríquez, G. and López-Pérez, L. (2016). Mycorrhizae in Capsicum annuum L. To promote growth and biosecurity against Phytophtora capsici L. Revista Mexicana de Ciencia Agrícolas, 4(16):857-870. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/remexca/v7n4/2007-0934-remexca-7-04-00857-en.pdfLinks ]

Schouteden, N., De Waele, D., Panis, B. and Vos, C. M. (2015). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for the biocontrol of plantparasitic nematodes: A review of the mechanisms involved. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6: 1280. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffmicb.2015.01280 [ Links ]

Sieverding, E. (1991). Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal management in tropical agrosystems. Technical Cooperation, Federal Republic of Germany. [ Links ]

Schenck, N. C. & Pérez, Y. (1990). Manual for the identification of VA mycorrhizal fungi, 3rd ed. Synergistic, Gainesville. [ Links ]

Schüβler, A. & Walker, C. (2010). The Glomeromycota. A species list with new families and new genera. The Royal Botanic Garden Kew, Kew. http://www.amf-phlogeny.comLinks ]

Servicio de información agroalimentaria y pesca [SIAP]. (2015). Secretaría de Agricultura Ganadería Desarrollo Rural Pesca y Alimentación. México. http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/Links ]

Taylor, A. & Sasser, J. N.. (1983). Biología, Identificación y control de los nematodos de nódulo de la raíz (especies de Meloidogyne). p. 89-95. Proyecto Internacional de Meloidogyne. Departamento de Fitopatología. Universidad del Estado de Carolina del Norte, Raleigh, EEUU. [ Links ]

Tchabi, A., Mawuko, S. B., Agboka, K., Kodjo, T. A. and Penouskou, E. (2019). Screening for native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to promote Solanum macrocarpum l. yield and Meloidogyne spp. suppression in the field conditions. Journal of Pharmaceutical, Chemical and Biological Sciences, 6(4). 282-291. https://www.jpcbs.infoLinks ]

Uc-Ku, A. G., Arreola-Enríquez, J., Carrillo-Ávila, E., Osnaya-González, Ma. M., Alarcón, A., Fererra-Cerrato, R. and Landeros-Sánchez, C. (2019). Inoculación de hongos micorrízicos arbusculares en el cultivo de Heliconia. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 10 (5): 1057-1069. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i5.1608 [ Links ]

Vos, C. M., Yang, Y., de Coninck, B. and Cammune, B. P. A. (2014). Fungal (-like) biocontrol organisms in tomato disease control. Biological Control, 74: 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.04.004 [ Links ]

West Virginia University. (2020). International culture collection of (vesicular) arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Recuperado 21 de enero 2021, Recuperado 21 de enero 2021, https://invam.wvu.edu/Links ]

Xie, H., Yan, D., Mao, L., Wang, Q., Li, Y., Ouyang, C., Guo, M. and Cao, A. (2015). Evaluation of methyl bromide alternatives efficacy against soil-borne pathogens, nematodes and soil microbial community. Plos One, 10 (2): e0117980. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117980 [ Links ]

Zayed, M. S., El-Moneim, H. G. A., Mohammed, S. H. and Ali, A. W. M. I. (2017). Role of endomycorrhizae and Pseudomonas fluorescens on the acclimation of micropropagated Stevia rebaudiana Bert. plantlets. African Journal of Plant Science, 11(3): 38-47. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2016.1494 [ Links ]

Cite this paper: Herrera-Parra, E., Ramos-Zapata, J., Basto-Pool, C., Cristóbal-Alejo, J. (2021). Sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum) response to the inoculation of native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the parasitism of root-knot Meloidogyne incognita. Revista Bio Ciencias 8, 982. doi: https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.08.e982

Received: June 16, 2020; Accepted: December 10, 2020

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons