SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.81 issue2Is the Visual Prostate Symptom Score (VPSS) as useful as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in evaluating patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)? A prospective comparison of the two questionnaireConcordance of the Gleason score in transrectal prostate biopsy vs radical prostatectomy author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista mexicana de urología

On-line version ISSN 2007-4085Print version ISSN 0185-4542

Abstract

POLANCO-PUJOL, Lucia. Differences in the complications according to the approach and type of nephrectomy in renal cancer ct1 treated with surgery. Rev. mex. urol. [online]. 2021, vol.81, n.2, e04.  Epub Apr 14, 2023. ISSN 2007-4085.  https://doi.org/10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v81i2.695.

Objective:

Comparative analysis of postoperative complications according to approach (open and laparoscopic) and surgical technique (radical and partial nephrectomy) in patients with renal cancer c T1.

Material and methods:

A retrospective analysis of 480 patients with renal cancer c T1 treated by surgery between 1990-2010. Complications in the first 60 days after surgery were evaluated (Clavien-Dindo classification). Complications Clavien ≥III were severe. Patients was clasificated in four cohort: 1) Open radical nephrectomy (ORN);2) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) ;3) open partial nephrectomy (OPN); 4) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine variables with relate to the complications.

Results:

In 198(41,3%) patients was performed ORN and in 155(32,3%) LRN. In the group of partial nephrectomies, 51 cases (10.6%) were open and 76 (15.8%) laparoscopic. Complications occurred in 20.2% of patients. The most frequent was Clavien II (13%). 25.8% undergoing ORN developed complications, in the LRN group 16,8% experienced complications (p=0.09). No significant difference in distribution of complications between laparoscopic and open approach in partial nephrectomy (OPN-15.7%, LPN-15.8%). The group of ORN had more complications than the other groups (of type Clavien-II), but there were not differences between severe complications. In the multivariable analysis laparoscopic radical nephrectomy behaved as independent predictive variable of complications (OR=0.41, p=0.007). In the multivariable analysis of Clavien≥III complication, no predictor or protective factor was identified.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy decreased the total postoperative complications to more than half. In severe complications (Clavien ≥III) no predictors of complications were identified.

Keywords : Nephrectomy; Laparoscopic; Renal cancer; Complications.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish