SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.99 issue3A population genetics study of three native Mexican woody bamboo species of Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Guaduinae) using nuclear microsatellite markersPhysiological screening of ruderal weed biomonitors of atmospheric nitrogen deposition author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Botanical Sciences

On-line version ISSN 2007-4476Print version ISSN 2007-4298

Abstract

GUZMAN-VAZQUEZ, Itzel; CASTILLO-ARGUERO, Silvia; OROZCO-SEGOVIA, Alma  and  COLLAZO-ORTEGA, Margarita. Spatial and temporal dynamics of two cacti seed banks in a xerophytic shrubland in Mexico City. Bot. sci [online]. 2021, vol.99, n.3, pp.560-572.  Epub June 25, 2021. ISSN 2007-4476.  https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2745.

Background:

Soil and aerial seed banks directly affect recruitment in plant populations. Soil banks result as the balance between seed inputs and outputs. Seed bank dynamics vary by species and environmental conditions. Few records on cacti seed banks are available.

Questions:

What types of seed banks do two cacti genera form in a lava-field reserve? Does seasonality influence the seed bank dynamics? Are inputs and outputs associated to the microenvironment?

Studied species:

Opuntia tomentosa, O. lassiacantha, Mammillaria haageana subsp. san-angelensis, M. magnimamma.

Study site and dates:

Xerophytic shrubland in the “Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel” in Mexico City. 2016 to 2018.

Methods:

We collected soil samples from four microenvironments during the rainy and the dry seasons, searched for seeds and tested their viability. We compared the number of inputs, outputs and viable seed by microenvironment and season. For M. magnimamma, each month we registered fruit maturation and searched for seeds remaining between tubercles.

Results:

Opuntia seed bank inputs occurred in all microenvironments and in both seasons. Rain favored inputs in hollows by secondary seed dispersal. We registered a large number of outputs caused by germination, granivory and loss of viability. Opuntia seed bank was developed in headland, plain and slope. No Mammillaria seed inputs were found, neither an aerial bank in M. magnimamma.

Conclusion:

Opuntia seed banks were restricted to microenvironments that provided “safe sites” which stored viable seeds. Mammillaria seed dynamics may hinders recruitment for their populations.

Keywords : microenvironments; recruitment; “safe site”; seasonality; viability.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )