SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue9Recognition of binding precedent as a source of law in Cuban lawHuman rights as political trumps in constitutional states: The dilemma between liberal and communitarian democracy in Ronald Dworkin author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

HIMMA, Kenneth Einar. Understanding the relationship between the U.S. constitution and the conventional rule of recognition. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2015, n.9, pp.327-375. ISSN 2448-7937.

Legal theorists specializing in constitutional theory have tended to regard positivism and other conceptual theories as irrelevant; the idea is that a theory of the concept of law cannot tell us anything that helps to solve difficult normative and descriptive substantive issues of constitutional theory. While there is something to this complaint, there is at least one substantive non-normative issue worth pursuing and I attempt to pursue it here. In particular, I attempt to determine how the Constitution and rule of recognition are related by examining the practices of officials. This may not solve any interesting issues of constitutional theory, but it entails that judicial supremacy extends further than is commonly assumed, making the morally normative issues associated with this practice in a democratic system of governance even more difficult.

Keywords : Positivism; Constitution; Constitutionalism; Constitutional Interpretation; Judicial Supremacy; Rule of Recognition.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License