SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue13Agency and Legal Responsibility: Epistemic and Moral ConsiderationsReconstructing Principles of Criminal Law in Constitutional Review author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

CHAVEZ-FERNANDEZ POSTIGO, José. Manuel Atienza’s Argumentative Approach and the Standard Theory: Two Problems and a Solution. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2019, n.13, pp.129-160.  Epub May 19, 2020. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2019.13.13718.

In contemporary debates in legal reasoning Professor Manuel Atienza has coined a term which has gained certain notoriety amongst theorists of legal argumentation: “the standard theory of legal argumentation”. Despite the relative success of the term, there is some controversy about two connected questions: its allegedly usefulness, on one hand; and the kind of argumentative models that could be included in it, on the other. This paper purposes to answer both questions by claiming that Atienza’s argumentative model might be an instance of a “standard theory”, but only if it is understood in a way that is “external” to the model of Kantian rationality. At the same time, this argument will show that the term is useful for improving legal reasoning theories.

Keywords : Atienza; Standard Theory; Legal Argumentation; Kantian Rationality; Aristotelic Rationality.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )