SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue13Reconstructing Principles of Criminal Law in Constitutional ReviewContestability of the legal concept of person and analogical hermeneutics author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

HAACK, Susan.Scientific Inference” vs. “Legal Reasoning”? -Not So Fast!. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2019, n.13, pp.193-213.  Epub May 19, 2020. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2019.13.13720.

To understand why the interactions of science with the legal system can be so problematic, it’s not enough to gesture vaguely towards a supposed contrast between scientific and legal “modes of thinking”; we need to look, instead, to the consequences of the different purposes of science and the law, the differ-ent constraints under which they pursue those purposes, and the different cultures of the two enterprises. From this perspective we can see why the law sometimes asks more of science than science can give, and sometimes gets less from science than science could give; and also why a simple dichotomy of “scientific inference” vs. “legal reasoning” is more misleading than helpful.

Keywords : Law; Legal Reasoning; Science; Scientific Inference.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English