SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue15Conceptual Notes for Identification of Normative Conflicts Between NormsAristotle’s Ethics in the Evolution of the Legal Negligence: a Review About Foreseeability author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Problema anuario de filosofía y teoría del derecho

On-line version ISSN 2448-7937Print version ISSN 2007-4387

Abstract

PARMIGIANI, Matías. Consent and the Fallacy of Necessity: a Replay to Beyleveld and Brownsword. Probl. anu. filos. teor. derecho [online]. 2021, n.15, pp.373-420.  Epub May 31, 2022. ISSN 2448-7937.  https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2021.15.16127.

In their influential work Consent in the Law, Beyleveld and Brownsword have raised a word of caution against the “fallacy of necessity”, which is the claim made on the assumption that seeking consent is always necessary to justify an act, arrangement or measure that may have an impact on another person. The aim of this paper is to critically analyze the alleged fallacy, in order to determine whether the need to seek other people’s consent is greater or lesser than the one envisioned by these authors.

Keywords : Consent; Fallacy of Necessity; Justification; Autonomy; Self-Respect; Personal Reasons.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish