SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 issue8Personality, learning and academic performance in medicineAn approach to mixed methods research in medical education author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Investigación en educación médica

On-line version ISSN 2007-5057

Abstract

JURADO-NUNEZ, Alma et al. Distractors in multiple-choice questions for medical students: a descriptive analysis in a high-stakes summative exam. Investigación educ. médica [online]. 2013, vol.2, n.8, pp.202-210. ISSN 2007-5057.

Introduction: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) exams are the most frequently used tool for knowledge assessment of medical students. It has been shown that three options in each item are enough; however, many tests in our country still use questions with five options. The study of non-functional distractors (NFD) is needed in order to improve the quality of our assessment instruments. Objective: To identify NFD and their behavior in a high-stakes summative exam in medical students. Method: A psychometric analysis was performed of the Theoretical Professional Exam at UNAM Faculty of Medicine, the 2008 version. Difficulty, discrimination and point-biserial correlation were calculated for each item and its four distractors. The frequency of items with zero to four NFD was obtained, and the differences of NFD per item and their psychometric characteristics were assessed. The psychometric behavior of the whole exam was compared to a version where items with four NFD were removed. Results: The test had 420 MCQ items with five options, and was answered by 882 students. The instrument had a Cronbach's alpha of 0.93. Of the 1 680 distractors evaluated, only 788 (46.9%) were functional. More than two-thirds of the total of items had two or more NFD. There was an average of 2.12 ± 0.99 NFD per item, the majority of which were chosen by less than 5% of the test takers. With higher quantity of NFD, the items' difficulty index was higher and the discrimination index was lower. Conclusions: Items with two functional distractors were the majority in the exam. Two plausible distractors are a reasonable alternative for item development, maintaining or improving the reliability and psychometric profile of these types of tests.

Keywords : Learning assessment; written tests; multiple choice questions; undergraduate medical education; Mexico.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License