SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue39Early course on “Research in Medicine”. Development of critical reading, projects, and medical draftsChanges and strategies of medical education in response to the COVID-19 pandemic author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Investigación en educación médica

On-line version ISSN 2007-5057

Abstract

MARTINEZ-FRANCO, Adrián Israel; VIVES-VARELA, Tania; MARTINEZ-GONZALEZ, Adrián  and  SANCHEZ-MENDIOLA, Melchor. Use of a Clinical Decision Support System (DXplain) by Medical Students. Investigación educ. médica [online]. 2021, vol.10, n.39, pp.71-78.  Epub Jan 31, 2022. ISSN 2007-5057.  https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.39.20223.

Introduction:

Diagnosis is the main challenge in physicians’ duties, and it is fundamental to obtain optimal clinical results in patients. Physician professional activities require varying degrees of skills, but few are as difficult to cultivate as the ability to achieve a correct diagnosis. Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) can be used for this processes during medical training.

Objective:

To explore medical students’ opinions on using a CDSS (DXplain) as learning material to analyze clinical cases.

Method:

Observational study with a mixed sequential method. Second-year medical students of three generations (n = 3132) of the National Autonomous University of Mexico Faculty of Medicine, participated using SADC (DXplain) in the Biomedical Informatics course. Students answered an online questionnaire of 12 statements with four response options: very inadequate, inadequate, adequate, and very adequate. The qualitative portion of the study used focus groups. For statistical analysis, the X2 test was used.

Results:

The majority of users (84.9%) found DXplain system’s inclusion in the Biomedical Informatics course adequate or very adequate, and 92.3% would recommend DXplain to other students for their learning. By triangulating the quantitative and qualitative results, three categories related to the use of DXplain were found: 1) teachers who support its use, 2) motivation for clinical reasoning, and 3) usefulness for learning.

Conclusions:

The students’ opinions were favorable regarding the use of DXplain as teaching material, at the initial stage of their career. DXplain must be efficiently implemented and used as supplement for developing clinical reasoning.

Keywords : Clinical decision support systems; Clinical reasoning; Undergraduate medical education; DXplain.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish