SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.36 issue4Evaluation of bleeding, pain and operative time of the midvasto versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty for grade IV osteoarthrosisBone revascularization: structural allograft intramedullary vs extramedullary. Experimental work author indexsubject indexsearch form
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Acta ortopédica mexicana

Print version ISSN 2306-4102

Abstract

GARCIA-GONZALEZ, N et al. Reliability of radiographic parameters to determine the surgical success in distal radius fractures. Acta ortop. mex [online]. 2022, vol.36, n.4, pp.216-222.  Epub Sep 29, 2023. ISSN 2306-4102.  https://doi.org/10.35366/109806.

Introduction:

distal radius fractures are the most common in upper extremities. Therefore, it is important to standardize radiographic measures for their surgical approach. This study assessed the intra/interobserver reproducibility of radiographic parameters associated with surgical success of distal radius fractures.

Material and methods:

retrospective cross-sectional design of secondary data extracted from clinical records. Posteroanterior and lateral X-rays of 112 distal radius fractures were assessed by two trauma specialists standardized in the measurements required to compute five parameters indicative of postoperative success: radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt, ulnar variance, and articular stepoff. The reproducibility of distances and angles was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method, calculating the mean of the difference between measurements, the range at ± 2 SD, and the proportion of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Postoperative success was also compared between patients with and without obesity according to the mean of the two measures made by each evaluator.

Results:

evaluator 1 had the largest intra-observer difference in radial height (0.16 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD in ulnar variance (8.1%); evaluator 2 had the largest difference in volar tilt (1.92o) and the highest proportion in radial inclination (10.7%). The largest inter-observer difference was for ulnar variance (1.02 mm) and the largest proportion outside ± 2 SD. for radial height (5.4%). Radial tilt had the largest difference (1.41o) with 4.5% of measurements outside ± 2 SD. Ulnar variance and volar tilt had the largest difference in postoperative success between evaluators, especially in patients with obesity.

Conclusion:

improving the radiographic quality and standardizing the measurements results in more reproducible indicators.

Keywords : Bland-Altman; surgical success; fracture; distal radius; reproducibility.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish